Chomsky on Anarchism.pdf - Zine Library
Chomsky on Anarchism.pdf - Zine Library
Chomsky on Anarchism.pdf - Zine Library
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
INTERVIEW WITH BRRRY PRTEMRN<br />
I was reading Isaac Puente the Spanish libertarian communist theorist who<br />
was arguing rather like that. He was arguing that "Well, if <strong>on</strong>e becomes a<br />
teacher <strong>on</strong>e learns by experience. and if <strong>on</strong>e becomes a doctor <strong>on</strong>e learns by<br />
experience. " It wasn't <strong>on</strong>e isn't a doctor when <strong>on</strong>e is 22 but you learn and<br />
maybe that is how anarchism ought to be seen.<br />
At a very general level I think we would all agree. People in the rough range<br />
of those who call themselves anarchists-which is preny broad-there would<br />
at least be a general agreement that, whatever social structures and arrangements<br />
are developed, they ought ro maximize the possibilities for people ro<br />
pursue their own creative potential and you can't make a formula for that.<br />
People are roo different and they ought ro be different and the differences<br />
ought to be encouraged. It's just like with raising children, you want them to<br />
find their own paths. Yo u d<strong>on</strong>'t say here's the rigid framework-lots of people<br />
do, but they shouldn't-here is the framework you are supposed to follow. My<br />
own view, and I differ with some of my close friends <strong>on</strong> this, is that we should<br />
be cautious in trying to sketch out the nature of the fu ture society in too much<br />
detail. It's not that it can't be d<strong>on</strong>e. Ir can be d<strong>on</strong>e in interesting and different<br />
ways-and it has been d<strong>on</strong>e-but I think the real questi<strong>on</strong> is to what is extent<br />
is it importam to do it and to what extent is it importam to just try and experiment<br />
and chip away at existing structures?<br />
222 Actually, another problem which I think must be faced is that at any particular<br />
point in human history people have not understood what oppressi<strong>on</strong> is.<br />
It's something you learn. Ifl go back to, say, my parents or grandmother, she<br />
didn't think she was oppressed by being in a super patriarchal family where the<br />
father would walk down the street and not recognize his daughter when she<br />
came because-not because he didn't know who she was, bur because you d<strong>on</strong>'t<br />
nod to your daughter. It didn't feel like oppressi<strong>on</strong>. It just felt like the way life<br />
works. r mean, what psychic effects it had internally-well, that's a complicated<br />
questi<strong>on</strong>. But, as any<strong>on</strong>e involved in any kind of activism knows-say the<br />
women's movement-<strong>on</strong>e of the first tasks is to get people to understand that<br />
they are living under c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s of oppressi<strong>on</strong> and dominati<strong>on</strong>. It isn't obvious,<br />
and who knows what forms of oppressi<strong>on</strong> and dominati<strong>on</strong> we are just<br />
accepting without even noticing them. At some further stage of self-enlightenment<br />
and communal understanding we will recognize that those are the things<br />
we have to deal with and we can't plan fo r them if we d<strong>on</strong>'t know about them.<br />
Linked to that then. Emma Goldman. as she grew older and feared the foct<br />
that there might not be an immediate revoluti<strong>on</strong>, became very influenced by<br />
Gustav Landauer who said the state isn't just out there. It's inside us and<br />
that we have to become ourselves-as fiee as we can be in capitalism, In foct<br />
she was always worried that there may be a chance that people w<strong>on</strong>'t be<br />
ready for revoluti<strong>on</strong> and that there is a way of developing the politics of the