Benchmark Study on Green Buildings - Royal Architectural Institute ...

Benchmark Study on Green Buildings - Royal Architectural Institute ... Benchmark Study on Green Buildings - Royal Architectural Institute ...

07.06.2014 Views

• The Housing Corporation…………………………………. 109 • Chartered Institute of Housing (CIH)……………………… 109 • Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment (CABE)……………………………………………………. 109 • Home Builders Federation (HBF)………………………… 110 • Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA)……………… 110 • Chartered Institute of Architectural Technologists (CIAT).. 111 • Other organizations supporting green building……………. 111 • Energy Saving Trust (EST) information & programs……… 111 • Energy Star & Energy Saving Recommended Label……… 113 • Energy Service Companies (ESCOs)……………………… 114 • Construction Industry Research and Information Association (CIRIA)……………………………………………………. 114 • Beddington Zero Energy Development (BedZED)……….. 115 • English Partnerships & Millennium Communities………... 116 • Norwich and Peterborough Building Society (NPBS) & Ecology Building Society…………………………………………… 117 • Waterwise…………………………………………………. 117 • The “London Plan”………………………………………… 117 B-7 International Initiatives……………………………………………. 118 • Commission for Environmental Cooperation’s (CEC) green building advisory group…………………………………… 118 • Super E House Program…………………………………… 118 • United Nations Environment Program’s (UNEP) Sustainable Building & Construction Initiative (SBCI)………………... 118 Appendix C: Information Sources………………………………………………… 119 C-1 United States Sources……………………………………………… 119 C-2 Canada Sources……………………………………………………. 121 C-3 Germany Sources………………………………………………….. 124 C-4 Japan Sources……………………………………………………… 125 C-5 Australia Sources………………………………………………….. 127 C-6 United Kingdom Sources………………………………………….. 129 C-7 International Initiative Sources……………………………………. 131 C-8 Green Building Council, Environmental Labelling System and Green Building Rating System Sources………………………………….. 131 7

1.0 Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the literature regarding current green building practices, strategies, policies, and technologies in Canada, the United States, Japan, the United Kingdom, Germany, and Australia so that barriers to green building can be identified and recommendations made to increase the uptake of green building in Canada. More specifically, this report will conduct a comparison of the green building rating systems in place in each of the six aforementioned countries, review the state of their Green Building Councils (GBCs) and environmental labeling programs, and provide information on major green building initiatives of these countries. 2.0 Background: Since global warming has become an undeniable fact, attention in the developed world has focused on reducing resource consumption and the release of greenhouse gases, and on the increasing conservation efforts and environmental protection. The realization that the building industry was a huge consumer of energy and resources and a huge producer of pollution, waste, and greenhouse gases meant that improvements needed to be made in this area. In Canada, there are presently about 12.5 million residential units and 430,000 commercial and institutional buildings. These structures account for 33% of total energy use, 50% of natural resource consumption, create 30% of Canadian greenhouse gas emissions and are the cause of 25% of the nation’s landfill waste. The green building movement aims to reduce resource and energy consumption, increase the use of renewable energy, minimize environmental degradation and the production of waste, and maximize occupant health and comfort. These goals can be achieved through the use of sustainable building products and practices including modern building site environmental management techniques, utilization of recycled or locally-sourced building materials, efficient building designs to maximize daylighting, centrally controlled smart HVAC (heating, ventilation and air conditioning) systems, installation of green roofs and photovoltaic rooftop generators, application of non-toxic interior paints and finishes, use of water-conserving toilets, faucets and showerheads, improved insulation materials and techniques, building designs that maximize open space and promote air circulation, and numerous other techniques. Studies have shown that green buildings have longer lifecycles, lower maintenance and upkeep costs, reduced energy and water bills, and that they can attract higher rents, experience lower tenant turnover, and have higher rates of occupant satisfaction when compared to conventional buildings. The economic, social and environmental benefits of sustainable structures are numerous, and the increased construction and use of these buildings is a key component in maintaining the health of this planet. 3.0 Methodology: The green building rating systems of Canada, the United States, Japan, the United Kingdom, Germany, and Australia were reviewed to gain a deeper understanding of how 8

1.0 Purpose:<br />

The purpose of this paper is to examine the literature regarding current green building<br />

practices, strategies, policies, and technologies in Canada, the United States, Japan, the<br />

United Kingdom, Germany, and Australia so that barriers to green building can be<br />

identified and recommendati<strong>on</strong>s made to increase the uptake of green building in Canada.<br />

More specifically, this report will c<strong>on</strong>duct a comparis<strong>on</strong> of the green building rating<br />

systems in place in each of the six aforementi<strong>on</strong>ed countries, review the state of their<br />

<strong>Green</strong> Building Councils (GBCs) and envir<strong>on</strong>mental labeling programs, and provide<br />

informati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> major green building initiatives of these countries.<br />

2.0 Background:<br />

Since global warming has become an undeniable fact, attenti<strong>on</strong> in the developed world<br />

has focused <strong>on</strong> reducing resource c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong> and the release of greenhouse gases, and<br />

<strong>on</strong> the increasing c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> efforts and envir<strong>on</strong>mental protecti<strong>on</strong>. The realizati<strong>on</strong> that<br />

the building industry was a huge c<strong>on</strong>sumer of energy and resources and a huge producer<br />

of polluti<strong>on</strong>, waste, and greenhouse gases meant that improvements needed to be made in<br />

this area. In Canada, there are presently about 12.5 milli<strong>on</strong> residential units and 430,000<br />

commercial and instituti<strong>on</strong>al buildings. These structures account for 33% of total energy<br />

use, 50% of natural resource c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong>, create 30% of Canadian greenhouse gas<br />

emissi<strong>on</strong>s and are the cause of 25% of the nati<strong>on</strong>’s landfill waste.<br />

The green building movement aims to reduce resource and energy c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong>, increase<br />

the use of renewable energy, minimize envir<strong>on</strong>mental degradati<strong>on</strong> and the producti<strong>on</strong> of<br />

waste, and maximize occupant health and comfort. These goals can be achieved through<br />

the use of sustainable building products and practices including modern building site<br />

envir<strong>on</strong>mental management techniques, utilizati<strong>on</strong> of recycled or locally-sourced<br />

building materials, efficient building designs to maximize daylighting, centrally<br />

c<strong>on</strong>trolled smart HVAC (heating, ventilati<strong>on</strong> and air c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>ing) systems, installati<strong>on</strong> of<br />

green roofs and photovoltaic rooftop generators, applicati<strong>on</strong> of n<strong>on</strong>-toxic interior paints<br />

and finishes, use of water-c<strong>on</strong>serving toilets, faucets and showerheads, improved<br />

insulati<strong>on</strong> materials and techniques, building designs that maximize open space and<br />

promote air circulati<strong>on</strong>, and numerous other techniques. Studies have shown that green<br />

buildings have l<strong>on</strong>ger lifecycles, lower maintenance and upkeep costs, reduced energy<br />

and water bills, and that they can attract higher rents, experience lower tenant turnover,<br />

and have higher rates of occupant satisfacti<strong>on</strong> when compared to c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al buildings.<br />

The ec<strong>on</strong>omic, social and envir<strong>on</strong>mental benefits of sustainable structures are numerous,<br />

and the increased c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> and use of these buildings is a key comp<strong>on</strong>ent in<br />

maintaining the health of this planet.<br />

3.0 Methodology:<br />

The green building rating systems of Canada, the United States, Japan, the United<br />

Kingdom, Germany, and Australia were reviewed to gain a deeper understanding of how<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!