06.06.2014 Views

Ankle and Foot 47 - Department of Radiology - University of ...

Ankle and Foot 47 - Department of Radiology - University of ...

Ankle and Foot 47 - Department of Radiology - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ken L. Schreibman<br />

Richard Bruce<br />

<strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> <strong>47</strong><br />

This chapter is intended to serve as a practical approach to<br />

imaging the ankle <strong>and</strong> foot using computed tomography<br />

(CT) <strong>and</strong> magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Rather than<br />

providing an exhaustive review <strong>of</strong> the literature, we illustrate<br />

the anatomic structures <strong>and</strong> common pathologic<br />

processes seen with CT <strong>and</strong> MRI scans. In addition, we have<br />

included discussions regarding the techniques for obtaining<br />

these scans, including the CT <strong>and</strong> MR protocol sheets<br />

we use daily in the <strong>Radiology</strong> <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>University</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> Wisconsin in Madison (UW). The most up-to-date versions<br />

<strong>of</strong> these protocol sheets are available for free download<br />

at www.schreibman.info. Throughout this chapter, we<br />

have endeavored to include references to review articles for<br />

readers who wish to explore topics in more detail. The<br />

images <strong>and</strong> content <strong>of</strong> this chapter are based on Dr.<br />

Schreibman’s lecture series.<br />

Anatomy<br />

• Tarsal Bones<br />

• Gross Anatomy <strong>of</strong> the Tarsal Bones 15<br />

Talus<br />

Figures <strong>47</strong>-1 through <strong>47</strong>-4 are photographs <strong>of</strong> cadaveric<br />

bones arranged to illustrate the relationships <strong>of</strong> the major<br />

tarsal bones <strong>and</strong> joints. Figure <strong>47</strong>-1 represents the bones<br />

we typically cover when scanning the distal tibia/ankle/<br />

foot. Central to all this is the talus, labeled Ta. (The label<br />

abbreviations in Fig. <strong>47</strong>-1 will be consistent throughout all<br />

figures.) Indeed, the word talus is Latin for “ankle,” indicating<br />

that early anatomists considered the talus the center <strong>of</strong><br />

the ankle. Underst<strong>and</strong>ing the articulations between the<br />

talus <strong>and</strong> the surrounding bones is the key to underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

the anatomy <strong>of</strong> the ankle <strong>and</strong> foot.<br />

Two views <strong>of</strong> the talus are shown in Figure <strong>47</strong>-2. The<br />

dome is the broad, curved articular surface on the top <strong>of</strong><br />

the talus. (The specimen in Fig. <strong>47</strong>-2 has an osteochondral<br />

lesion centrally in the medial edge <strong>of</strong> the talar dome.<br />

Osteochondral lesions are discussed later in the chapter.)<br />

The head is the rounded process at the anterior aspect <strong>of</strong><br />

the talus, <strong>and</strong> it articulates with the navicular bone. The<br />

body <strong>of</strong> the talus comprises everything between the dome<br />

<strong>and</strong> head. The dome <strong>of</strong> the talus along with the distal ends<br />

<strong>of</strong> the tibia <strong>and</strong> fibula make up the ankle joint (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-3).<br />

(<strong>Ankle</strong> joint is the preferred name <strong>of</strong> this joint in the radiology<br />

<strong>and</strong> orthopedic surgery literature, rather than “tibiotalar<br />

joint” or “crural joint.”)<br />

Mortise<br />

The flat talar dome articulates with the flat surface at the<br />

distal end <strong>of</strong> the tibia known as the plafond. Plafond is an<br />

architectural term meaning “a ceiling formed by the underside<br />

<strong>of</strong> a floor.” In essence, the plafond is the ceiling <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ankle joint, formed by the floor <strong>of</strong> the tibia. The ankle joint<br />

is bounded on the sides by the inner articular surfaces <strong>of</strong><br />

the medial <strong>and</strong> lateral malleoli. The plafond <strong>and</strong> malleoli<br />

together form a rectangular opening called the mortise into<br />

which the talar domes fit, analogous to a mortise-<strong>and</strong>tenon<br />

joint in woodworking. The ankle mortise is a remarkably<br />

sturdy joint. Like the hip <strong>and</strong> knee joints, the ankle<br />

must bear our entire body weight with every step. But<br />

although it is common for primary osteoarthritis to affect<br />

the hips <strong>and</strong> knees <strong>of</strong> many <strong>of</strong> us as we age, it is uncommon<br />

to have primary osteoarthritis <strong>of</strong> the ankle.<br />

The joint between the distal tibia <strong>and</strong> fibula is called<br />

the syndesmosis. Syndesmosis is a Greek term meaning “to<br />

bind together,” <strong>and</strong> in general a syndesmosis joint is held<br />

together by thick connective ligaments. (Most joints in the<br />

body, including the ankle <strong>and</strong> subtalar joints, are synovial<br />

joints in that they are enclosed by a synovium-lined capsule<br />

that creates synovial fluid.) The distal fibula, just above the<br />

lateral malleolus, fits into a shallow groove in the adjacent<br />

tibia, <strong>and</strong> this relationship is best visualized in the axial<br />

plane <strong>of</strong> a CT scan.<br />

Subtalar Joint<br />

The talus articulates with the tibia from above <strong>and</strong> with the<br />

navicular in front. It is at the undersurface <strong>of</strong> the talus<br />

where it articulates with the calcaneus that things get complicated.<br />

This joint below the talus is called the subtalar<br />

joint, which is preferred over “talocalcaneal joint.” Figure<br />

<strong>47</strong>-4 illustrates the three facets that make up the subtalar<br />

joint. In Figure <strong>47</strong>-4A to D, the talus <strong>and</strong> calcaneus were<br />

attached using colored modeling clay. In Figure <strong>47</strong>-4E, the<br />

two bones have been disarticulated <strong>and</strong> the talus flipped<br />

2207<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2207<br />

9/9/2008 5:33:07 PM


2208 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

over, displaying the talar <strong>and</strong> calcaneal articular surfaces <strong>of</strong><br />

the posterior, middle, <strong>and</strong> anterior facets <strong>of</strong> the subtalar<br />

joint in red, blue, <strong>and</strong> green, respectively.<br />

The posterior facet is the largest <strong>and</strong> is the primary<br />

weight-bearing portion <strong>of</strong> the subtalar joint. At the anterolateral<br />

corner <strong>of</strong> the posterior facet, the talus comes to an<br />

acutely angled corner, the lateral process <strong>of</strong> the talus. When<br />

the subtalar joint experiences an extreme axial load, such<br />

as when a person falls from a height or undergoes a deceleration<br />

injury in a motor vehicle collision, the pointy<br />

lateral process <strong>of</strong> the talus acts like a wedge, splitting<br />

<strong>and</strong> fracturing the calcaneus. 13 Calcaneal fractures tend to<br />

extend into the posterior facet, <strong>and</strong> when imaging calcaneal<br />

fractures we obliquely angle our coronally reformatted<br />

CT slices to be perpendicular to the posterior facet.<br />

The middle facet is defined by the sustentaculum tali,<br />

a shelflike projection from the anteromedial portion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

calcaneus that supports the middle <strong>of</strong> the talus. Sustentaculum<br />

in Latin means “a supporting structure.” The flexor<br />

hallucis longus tendon passes under the sustentaculum<br />

tali. The middle facet <strong>of</strong> the subtalar joint is a completely<br />

separate articulation from the posterior facet. When injecting<br />

contrast (<strong>of</strong>ten mixed with anesthetic) into the posterior<br />

facet <strong>of</strong> the subtalar joint, we do not expect it to<br />

communicate with the middle facet. Across the middle<br />

facet <strong>of</strong> the subtalar joint is one <strong>of</strong> the two most common<br />

locations for tarsal coalitions to occur, the other being<br />

between the anterior process <strong>of</strong> the calcaneus <strong>and</strong> the<br />

lateral pole <strong>of</strong> the navicular.<br />

Unlike the posterior <strong>and</strong> middle facets, the anterior<br />

facet is not well defined <strong>and</strong> may even be absent. When<br />

present, the anterior facet is a smooth continuation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

middle facet, extending under the head <strong>of</strong> the talus. Directly<br />

lateral to the anterior <strong>and</strong> middle facet is the sinus tarsi, an<br />

area devoid <strong>of</strong> bone <strong>and</strong> filled primarily with fat.<br />

• Anatomic Divisions<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-5 is a three-dimensionally reformatted CT image<br />

showing the anatomic divisions between the tarsals <strong>and</strong><br />

metatarsals. The hindfoot consists <strong>of</strong> the talus <strong>and</strong> the calcaneus<br />

<strong>and</strong> is separated from the midfoot by the Chopart*<br />

joint, a smooth continuation between the talonavicular<br />

<strong>and</strong> calcaneocuboid joints. The midfoot consists <strong>of</strong> the<br />

other five tarsal bones, the navicular, the cuboid, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

three cuneiforms. The forefoot consists <strong>of</strong> the metatarsals<br />

<strong>and</strong> phalanges <strong>and</strong> is separated from the midfoot by the<br />

tarsometatarsal joint, also known as the Lisfranc † joint. Along<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-1. Gross anatomy <strong>of</strong> the tarsals <strong>and</strong> surrounding bones.<br />

Ti, tibia; Fi; fibula; Ta, talus; Ca, calcaneus; ST, sustentaculum tali;<br />

N, navicular; Cu, cuboid; 1, 2, <strong>and</strong> 3, refer respectively to the first,<br />

second, <strong>and</strong> third cuneiforms (sometimes referred to as the medial,<br />

intermediate, <strong>and</strong> lateral cuneiforms, respectively); I, II, III, IV, <strong>and</strong> V<br />

refer to the first through fifth metatarsals, respectively.<br />

*François Chopart (1743-1795), a pioneer in urology, was known for the particular<br />

attention he gave to recording his numerous clinical observations. Thus, it<br />

is somewhat surprising that he never wrote about the midtarsal amputation that<br />

bears his name almost three centuries later. He performed this surgery only once,<br />

on August 21, 1791, to resect a presumed liposarcoma <strong>of</strong> the foot. The approach<br />

was based on Chopart’s knowledge <strong>of</strong> the anatomy <strong>of</strong> the midfoot <strong>and</strong> was published<br />

by his student, Laffiteau, in 1792.<br />

† Jacques Lisfranc (1790-18<strong>47</strong>) was a very aggressive surgeon who wrote<br />

extensively <strong>and</strong> described many new procedures, including disarticulation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

shoulder, excision <strong>of</strong> the rectum, <strong>and</strong> amputation <strong>of</strong> the cervix. At age 23 he joined<br />

Napoleon’s army as a battlefront surgeon, a setting where amputations were the<br />

norm. Military surgeons (<strong>of</strong> the period) were not given the calm <strong>and</strong> unhurried<br />

atmosphere necessary for the task <strong>of</strong> laboriously picking out bone splinters <strong>and</strong><br />

bits <strong>of</strong> clothing from gaping wounds. Locating the open ends <strong>of</strong> severed arteries<br />

<strong>and</strong> tying them <strong>of</strong>f in the smoke <strong>of</strong> battle or by flickering c<strong>and</strong>lelight was an enormous<br />

problem. Although some wounds did not themselves dictate amputation, it<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten had to be done because the patient could not otherwise survive the rigors<br />

<strong>of</strong> transport to the rear. The mind did not have time to reason. Experience <strong>and</strong><br />

cold-bloodedness counted for more than talent. Everything had to be done with<br />

prompt <strong>and</strong> decisive action. In 1815, the final year <strong>of</strong> the war, Lisfranc wrote a 50-<br />

page paper describing his technique for performing a partial amputation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

foot at the tarsometatarsal joint, with the sole being preserved to make the flap.<br />

The technique was used to treat forefoot gangrene from frostbite. Lisfranc was<br />

widely known for his ability to amputate a foot in less than a minute, an important<br />

skill in that preanesthesia era.<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2208<br />

9/9/2008 5:33:08 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2209 <strong>47</strong><br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-2. Gross anatomy <strong>of</strong> the talus as viewed<br />

from the top <strong>and</strong> medial sides. The green arrows show<br />

an osteochondral lesion <strong>of</strong> the talus (OLT) in the<br />

medial edge <strong>of</strong> the dome.<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-3. Gross anatomy <strong>of</strong> the ankle joint.<br />

A, The plafond (dotted line) is the transverse cortical<br />

articular surface at the distal end <strong>of</strong> the tibia. The<br />

mortise is the rectangular opening consisting <strong>of</strong> the<br />

plafond as well as the inner cortical articular surfaces<br />

(solid lines) <strong>of</strong> the medial malleolus (MM) <strong>and</strong> lateral<br />

malleolus (LM). B, The talar dome fits into the ankle<br />

mortise. The joint between the distal tibia <strong>and</strong> fibula is<br />

the syndesmosis (black bracket).<br />

A<br />

B<br />

the Lisfranc joint is a common site for fracture-dislocations<br />

to occur, particularly in diabetic patients with peripheral<br />

neuropathy. Figure <strong>47</strong>-5 illustrates how the base <strong>of</strong> the<br />

second metatarsal (II) sticks down like a keystone, disrupting<br />

the otherwise relatively smooth tarsometatarsal joint.<br />

For this reason dislocations along the Lisfranc joint are<br />

typically accompanied by fractures across the base <strong>of</strong> the<br />

second metatarsal.<br />

• Cross-sectional Anatomy <strong>of</strong> the Tarsal Bones<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-6 is a series <strong>of</strong> straight axial images through the<br />

ankle <strong>and</strong> hindfoot, from proximal (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-6A) to<br />

distal (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-6F). The straight axial plane is well suited<br />

to examine the syndesmosis (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-6B, arrow). The<br />

two joints that make up the Chopart joint, the talonavicular<br />

joint (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-6D) <strong>and</strong> the calcaneocuboid joint<br />

(see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-6F), are also well pr<strong>of</strong>iled in the axial plane.<br />

However, the ankle <strong>and</strong> subtalar joints are not well pr<strong>of</strong>iled<br />

in the axial plane, <strong>and</strong> because examination <strong>of</strong> these two<br />

joints is usually the primary indication for requesting a CT<br />

<strong>of</strong> the ankle or hindfoot, other reformatted planes are<br />

required.<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-7 is a series <strong>of</strong> straight sagittal images through<br />

the hindfoot, from lateral (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-7A) to medial (see<br />

Fig. <strong>47</strong>-7C). Nearly all <strong>of</strong> the joints are pr<strong>of</strong>iled in the sagittal<br />

plane, including the ankle joint, the calcaneocuboid<br />

<strong>and</strong> talonavicular joints, <strong>and</strong> the posterior <strong>and</strong> middle<br />

facets <strong>of</strong> the subtalar joint. The only joint not well seen in<br />

the sagittal plane is the syndesmosis, but this is easily seen<br />

in the axial plane. The lateral sagittal images are also useful<br />

for visualizing the lateral process <strong>of</strong> the talus <strong>and</strong> the anterior<br />

process <strong>of</strong> the calcaneus (compare Fig. <strong>47</strong>-7A with<br />

Fig. <strong>47</strong>-4C).<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-8 is a series <strong>of</strong> oblique coronal images<br />

through the hindfoot, from posterior (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-8A) to<br />

anterior (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-8D). This plane best pr<strong>of</strong>iles the subtalar<br />

joint, <strong>and</strong> the broad posterior facet can be followed<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2209<br />

9/9/2008 5:33:12 PM


2210 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

A<br />

C<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-4. Various views <strong>of</strong> the gross anatomy <strong>of</strong><br />

the subtalar joint. A, Medial view. ST, sustentaculum<br />

tali. B, Inferior medial view. ST, sustentaculum tali.<br />

C, Lateral view. LPT, lateral process <strong>of</strong> talus; APC,<br />

anterior process <strong>of</strong> calcaneus. D, Anterior lateral view<br />

looking into the sinus tarsi (asterisk). E, The subtalar<br />

joint has been disarticulated: left, talus (flipped over);<br />

right, calcaneus. The articular surfaces <strong>of</strong> the three<br />

facets <strong>of</strong> the subtalar joint are coated with colored<br />

modeling clay: posterior (red), middle (blue), anterior<br />

(yellow).<br />

B<br />

D<br />

E<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-5. Three-dimensional CT scan illustrating anatomic<br />

divisions <strong>of</strong> the foot. The Chopart joint separates the hindfoot (talus [Ta]<br />

<strong>and</strong> calcaneus [Ca]) from the midfoot (navicular [N], cuboid [Cu], <strong>and</strong><br />

the three cuneiforms [1, 2, 3]). The Lisfranc joint separates the midfoot<br />

from the forefoot (metatarsals <strong>and</strong> phalanges).<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2210<br />

9/9/2008 5:33:19 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2211 <strong>47</strong><br />

A B C<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-6. Straight axial images through the ankle<br />

<strong>and</strong> hindfoot, proximal (A) to distal (F). A, Proximal to<br />

syndesmosis. Fi, fibula; Ti, tibia. B, Through the<br />

syndesmosis (arrow). Fi, fibula; Ti, tibia. C, Through the<br />

top <strong>of</strong> the mortise. LM, lateral malleolus; MM, medial<br />

malleolus; Ta, talus. D, Through the sustentaculum tali<br />

(ST). Ca, calcaneus; N, navicular; Ta, talus; TNJ,<br />

talonavicular joint. E, Through the level where the<br />

calcaneus gets close to the navicular (arrowhead) but<br />

does not normally form a joint. If there were an<br />

articulation here, or osseous bridging, that would be<br />

tarsal coalition. Ca, calcaneus; Cu, cuboid. Numerals<br />

indicate cuneiforms. F, Through the calcaneocuboid<br />

joint (CCJ). Ca, calcaneus; Cu, cuboid. Roman numerals<br />

indicate metatarsals.<br />

D E F<br />

over several 3-mm slices (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-8A). As the posterior<br />

facet ends the middle facet begins, as defined by the sustentaculum<br />

tali (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-8B). When the oblique coronal<br />

slices are properly angled, the middle facet appears horizontally<br />

oriented (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-8C). The sinus tarsi is the<br />

cone <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t tissues directly lateral to the middle facet.<br />

Anterior to the subtalar joint, the round head <strong>of</strong> the talus<br />

is seen as a circle forming the talonavicular joint (see Fig.<br />

<strong>47</strong>-8D). This demarcates the Chopart joint, the division<br />

between the hindfoot <strong>and</strong> midfoot.<br />

• <strong>Ankle</strong> Tendons<br />

There are 10 tendons that cross the ankle joint. For imaging<br />

purposes, these tendons can be clustered into four groups<br />

based on their anatomic locations, as illustrated by the<br />

colored curved lines drawn atop three-dimensional CT<br />

images in Figure <strong>47</strong>-9. The anterior tendons are the anterior<br />

tibial, the extensor hallucis longus, <strong>and</strong> the extensor<br />

digitorum longus (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-9A). Posteriorly, there are the<br />

Achilles <strong>and</strong> plantaris tendons (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-9B). Laterally,<br />

the peroneus longus <strong>and</strong> peroneus brevis tendons pass<br />

under the lateral malleolus (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-9C). Medially, the<br />

posterior tibial <strong>and</strong> flexor digitorum longus tendons pass<br />

under the medial malleolus, whereas the flexor hallucis<br />

longus passes under the sustentaculum tali (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-9D<br />

<strong>and</strong> E).<br />

On MRI, ankle tendons are best appreciated in cross<br />

section in the direct axial plane (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-10). The oblique<br />

coronal plane (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-11) is a good secondary plane to<br />

observe the medial <strong>and</strong> lateral tendons as they course<br />

under the malleoli. Normal tendons should appear uniformly<br />

black on all imaging sequences <strong>and</strong> have a sharply<br />

defined interface with adjacent fatty s<strong>of</strong>t tissues. Any<br />

increased signal in a tendon on a T2-weighted image indicates<br />

the presence <strong>of</strong> pathology, typically an intrasubstance<br />

tear. In addition, more than a trace amount <strong>of</strong> fluid around<br />

an ankle tendon is abnormal, indicating inflammation or<br />

some other pathologic process. The exception to this is the<br />

flexor hallucis longus, which can normally contain some<br />

fluid in its tendon sheath.<br />

• Anterior Tendons<br />

Normal Anatomy<br />

The normal anterior tibial tendon serves as a useful internal<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard with which to compare the size <strong>of</strong> the other<br />

ankle tendons. The anterior tibial is normally the largest<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2211<br />

9/9/2008 5:33:23 PM


2212 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-7. Straight sagittal images. Ca, calcaneus; Cu, cuboid;<br />

N, navicular; Ta, talus; Ti, tibia. A, Through the lateral hindfoot,<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>iling the calcaneocuboid joint (CCJ), the ankle joint (AJ), <strong>and</strong> the<br />

posterior facet <strong>of</strong> the subtalar joint (P-STJ). The brown arrow points<br />

to the lateral process <strong>of</strong> the talus (LPT), <strong>and</strong> the red arrow points to<br />

the anterior process <strong>of</strong> the calcaneus (APC). Fractures through these<br />

pointed bony projections are <strong>of</strong>ten difficult to see on radiographs<br />

<strong>and</strong> are typically worked up with CT. B, Through the middle <strong>of</strong> the<br />

hindfoot, pr<strong>of</strong>iling the talonavicular joint (TNJ), the ankle joint (AJ),<br />

<strong>and</strong> the posterior facet <strong>of</strong> the subtalar joint (P-STJ). The middle facet<br />

<strong>of</strong> the subtalar joint (M-STJ) can now be seen. C, Through the medial<br />

hindfoot, now pr<strong>of</strong>iling the middle facet, above the sustentaculum<br />

tali (ST). Straight alignment should normally be present between the<br />

talus, navicular, medial cuneiform (1), <strong>and</strong> first metatarsal (I).<br />

A B C D<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-8. Oblique coronal images through the hindfoot, posterior (A) to anterior (D). Ca, calcaneus; Fi, fibula; ST, sustentaculum tali; Ta, talus;<br />

Ti, tibia. A, This plane best pr<strong>of</strong>iles the posterior facet <strong>of</strong> the subtalar joint (red arrow). The ankle mortise (yellow line) can be appreciated in the<br />

oblique coronal plane but would be better pr<strong>of</strong>iled in the mortise coronal plane. B, This oblique slice is just anterior to the ankle joint, where the<br />

posterior facet <strong>of</strong> the subtalar joint is ending (red arrow) <strong>and</strong> the middle facet is beginning (blue arrow). C, The oblique coronal slices are angled<br />

correctly if the middle facet <strong>of</strong> the subtalar joint (blue arrow) has a horizontal orientation. The cone <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t tissues lateral to the middle facet is the<br />

sinus tarsi (asterisk). D, The junction <strong>of</strong> the hindfoot <strong>and</strong> midfoot is at the round head <strong>of</strong> the talus at the talonavicular joint (circle).<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2212<br />

9/9/2008 5:33:28 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2213 <strong>47</strong><br />

A B C<br />

D<br />

E<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-9. The 10 ankle tendons are illustrated as colored lines drawn over three-dimensional CT images. A, Anterior view <strong>of</strong> the anterior<br />

tendons: anterior tibial (AT; red), extensor hallucis longus (EHL; green), <strong>and</strong> extensor digitorum longus (EDL; blue). B, Posterior view <strong>of</strong> the<br />

posterior tendons: Achilles (Ach; light blue) <strong>and</strong> plantaris (yellow). Also labeled are the medial pole <strong>of</strong> the navicular (N) <strong>and</strong> the sustentaculum tali<br />

(ST). C, Posterolateral view <strong>of</strong> the lateral tendons: peroneus brevis (PB; dark purple) inserting into the base <strong>of</strong> the fifth metatarsal, <strong>and</strong> peroneus<br />

longus (PL; light purple) wrapping under the cuboid. Medial (D) <strong>and</strong> posterior (E) views <strong>of</strong> the medial tendons, illustrating the “Tom, Dick, <strong>and</strong><br />

Harry” mnemonic: the posterior tibial (PT; red) wraps under the medial malleolus <strong>and</strong> inserts on the medial pole <strong>of</strong> the navicular (N); the flexor<br />

digitorum longus (FDL; blue) runs behind the PT, under N, <strong>and</strong> out to the second to fifth toes; <strong>and</strong> the flexor hallucis longus (FHL; green) runs<br />

behind the talus, wraps under the sustentaculum tali (ST), crosses under the FDL at the master knot <strong>of</strong> Henry, <strong>and</strong> passes between the two great<br />

toe sesamoids (white arrows), inserting on the distal phalanx.<br />

tendon in axial cross section, except the Achilles<br />

tendon. 42<br />

The anterior tendons extend, uncrossed, over the ankle<br />

joint <strong>and</strong> foot (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-9A). The anterior tibial is the<br />

most medial <strong>of</strong> the three anterior tendons. It extends along<br />

the medial aspect <strong>of</strong> the great toe tarsometatarsal joint to<br />

insert on the plantar aspect <strong>of</strong> the base <strong>of</strong> the first metatarsal<br />

<strong>and</strong> the adjacent medial cuneiform bone. The extensor<br />

hallucis longus is the middle <strong>of</strong> the three anterior tendons,<br />

proceeding straight to its insertion at the dorsal base <strong>of</strong> the<br />

great toe distal phalanx. The most lateral <strong>of</strong> the three anterior<br />

ankle tendons is the extensor digitorum longus. At the<br />

level <strong>of</strong> the midfoot, the extensor digitorum longus fans<br />

out into four separate tendon slips, which, in turn, proceed<br />

along the forefoot to insert at the dorsal bases <strong>of</strong> the second<br />

through fifth middle <strong>and</strong> distal phalanges. 21,31<br />

Whereas the anterior tibial <strong>and</strong> extensor digitorum<br />

longus tendons can be followed over a series <strong>of</strong> axial<br />

images (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-10), it is common to lose visualization<br />

<strong>of</strong> the extensor hallucis longus tendon as it curves anterior<br />

to the midfoot (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-10C). This is in part due to<br />

“magic-angle” effects. 7 It is important not to misinterpret<br />

this lack <strong>of</strong> visualization as a rupture <strong>of</strong> the extensor hallucis<br />

longus tendon, a condition that is exceedingly rare.<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2213<br />

9/9/2008 5:33:31 PM


2214 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-10. MRI <strong>of</strong> normal ankle tendons in the straight axial plane. Ach, Achilles tendon; AT, anterior tibial tendon; EDL, extensor digitorum<br />

longus tendon; EHL, extensor hallucis longus tendon; FDL, flexor digitorum longus tendon; FHL, flexor hallucis longus tendon. PB, peroneus brevis<br />

tendon; PL, peroneus longus tendon; PT, posterior tibial tendon; A&N (artery <strong>and</strong> nerve) points to the dotted circle surrounding the neurovascular<br />

bundle that includes the posterior tibial artery <strong>and</strong> nerve. A, Just above the syndesmosis. B, Through the tip <strong>of</strong> the medial malleolus. C, One slice<br />

distal to B there is loss <strong>of</strong> the dark signal from the EHL tendon. D, Image through the talonavicular joint demonstrates the PT tendon inserting on<br />

the navicular (N), <strong>and</strong> the FHL tendon passing under the sustentaculum tali (ST). At this level, the EDL is dividing into separate tendon slips.<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2214<br />

9/9/2008 5:33:33 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2215 <strong>47</strong><br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-11. MRI <strong>of</strong> normal ankle tendons in the oblique<br />

coronal plane. FDL, flexor digitorum longus tendon; FHL,<br />

flexor hallucis longus tendon; PB, peroneus brevis tendon;<br />

PL, peroneus longus tendon; PT, posterior tibial tendon.<br />

A, Through the posterior facet <strong>of</strong> the subtalar joint.<br />

B, Through the middle facet <strong>of</strong> the subtalar joint. ST,<br />

sustentaculum tali. A&N (artery <strong>and</strong> nerve) points to<br />

the dotted circle surrounding the neurovascular bundle that<br />

includes the posterior tibial artery <strong>and</strong> nerve. C, Through the<br />

talonavicular joint. At this level, the PT tendon has divided<br />

into separate slips. The white line with the round end points<br />

to the portion <strong>of</strong> the PT that inserts onto the medial pole <strong>of</strong><br />

the navicular (N). The white line with the square end points<br />

to the portion <strong>of</strong> the PT that passes under the navicular. This<br />

patient has an os peroneum, which is why the PL tendon<br />

appears enlarged <strong>and</strong> gray at this level (dark gray arrow).<br />

The lack <strong>of</strong> edematous signal along the course <strong>of</strong> the extensor<br />

hallucis longus on T2-weighted images should reassure<br />

the radiologist there is no pathologic process.<br />

Injury<br />

Tears <strong>of</strong> the anterior ankle tendons are rare, <strong>and</strong> if the<br />

patient indicates that the point <strong>of</strong> maximal tenderness is<br />

directly over the anterior tendons, it is prudent to search<br />

for other causes for pain, such as an unsuspected stress<br />

fracture (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-12).<br />

Ganglion cysts can arise from any synovium-lined<br />

structure, including the anterior ankle tendons. Figure<br />

<strong>47</strong>-13 shows a synovial cyst arising from <strong>and</strong> partially<br />

enveloping the anterior tibial tendon.<br />

• Posterior Tendons<br />

Normal Anatomy<br />

For anatomic purposes, the Achilles <strong>and</strong> plantaris tendons<br />

together make up the posterior group. The Achilles tendon<br />

is the largest tendon in the body, originating in the midcalf<br />

at the junction <strong>of</strong> the two heads <strong>of</strong> the gastrocnemius<br />

muscle <strong>and</strong> the soleus muscle, <strong>and</strong> inserts onto the back<br />

<strong>of</strong> the calcaneal tuberosity. Unlike the anterior, medial,<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2215<br />

9/9/2008 5:33:35 PM


2216 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-12. The patient is a 45-year-old with pain over the dorsum <strong>of</strong> the midfoot, indicated by the marker (m). Axial proton-density–<br />

weighted (A) <strong>and</strong> T2-weighted (B) images well demonstrate normal anterior tibial (AT) <strong>and</strong> extensor digitorum longus (EDL) tendons. The extensor<br />

hallucis longus (EHL) tendon, which was well seen <strong>and</strong> normal on more proximal slices, is not seen on this slice, although it should be just below<br />

the marker. Could this be a rare EHL tear? The lack <strong>of</strong> edema in (B) argues against this diagnosis. The answer is revealed on the sagittal T1-<br />

weighted (C) <strong>and</strong> T2-weighted fat-suppressed (D) images: there is a navicular stress fracture (black arrow). The normal Achilles tendon (Ach) is<br />

uniform in thickness <strong>and</strong> dark signal in both sagittal sequences <strong>and</strong> has a sharp interface with the adjacent Kager’s fat pad. A portion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

normal AT tendon is seen, as well as a normal amount <strong>of</strong> fluid in the retrocalcaneal bursa (white arrowhead in D).<br />

<strong>and</strong> lateral ankle tendons, all <strong>of</strong> which are surrounded by<br />

synovial sheaths, the Achilles is surrounded by thin layers<br />

<strong>of</strong> filmy fibrous tissue with fine internal blood vessels,<br />

called the paratenon or paratendon. This paratenon is analogous<br />

to synovium in that it provides nutrients for the<br />

tendon, but because the Achilles tendon does not change<br />

its axis <strong>of</strong> motion, there is no need for the lubrication function<br />

<strong>of</strong> synovium. Thus, there should never be any fluid<br />

seen around a normal Achilles tendon.<br />

Directly anterior to the Achilles tendon is a triangular<br />

fat pad described radiographically by Kager in 1939. 26<br />

Kager’s fat pad is located in the retromalleolar region <strong>and</strong><br />

is defined anteriorly by the posterior aspect <strong>of</strong> the tibia <strong>and</strong><br />

posteriorly by the Achilles tendon, with the base being the<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2216<br />

9/9/2008 5:33:37 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2217 <strong>47</strong><br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-13. Synovial cyst <strong>of</strong><br />

the anterior tibial tendon in a 23-<br />

year-old. Axial (A) <strong>and</strong> sagittal (B)<br />

T2-weighted images demonstrate<br />

the cystic outpouching (white<br />

arrow) <strong>of</strong> the synovial sheath<br />

surrounding the anterior tibial<br />

tendon (black arrow). The tendon<br />

itself is normal.<br />

A<br />

B<br />

proximal aspect <strong>of</strong> the calcaneus. The space contained<br />

within this triangle is filled with fatty tissue, producing a<br />

well-defined lucent triangle that can be seen on lateral<br />

radiographs <strong>of</strong> the ankle (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-14A). On rupture <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Achilles tendon, this space becomes poorly demarcated,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the normally lucent fatty tissue space becomes obscured<br />

(see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-21A).<br />

The Achilles tendon is easily evaluated by physical<br />

examination as well as by MRI or ultrasonography. 23 In the<br />

sagittal plane, the Achilles tendon should appear uniformly<br />

straight <strong>and</strong> black on T1-weighted images (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-14B)<br />

as well as on fluid-sensitive images (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-14C). There<br />

should be a sharp interface between the Achilles tendon<br />

<strong>and</strong> Kager’s fat pad directly ventral to it. A normal retrocalcaneal<br />

bursa may be present just in front <strong>of</strong> the Achilles<br />

tendon (white arrowhead, Figs. <strong>47</strong>-12D <strong>and</strong> <strong>47</strong>-14C). The<br />

normal retrocalcaneal bursa should measure less than<br />

6 mm superior to inferior, 3 mm medial to lateral, <strong>and</strong><br />

2 mm anterior to posterior. 41 Any fluid behind the Achilles<br />

tendon, in a retro-Achilles bursa, is abnormal. In the axial<br />

plane, the Achilles tendon should appear flattened in the<br />

anteroposterior direction. Distally, the ventral margin <strong>of</strong><br />

the tendon becomes concave, with upturned corners resembling<br />

a smile (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-10D).<br />

Injury<br />

For practical purposes, the plantaris tendon is seldom clinically<br />

relevant in the ankle. Tears <strong>of</strong> the plantaris tendon<br />

tend to occur high in the calf, at the plantaris musculotendinous<br />

junction, <strong>and</strong> have been called “tennis leg.” By<br />

MRI, plantaris tears present as fluid tracking along the<br />

length <strong>of</strong> the calf, between the underlying soleus <strong>and</strong> more<br />

superficial gastrocnemius muscles (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-15). Figure<br />

<strong>47</strong>-16 illustrates a chronically swollen <strong>and</strong> scarred posterior<br />

tibial tendon, with its cross-sectional area greater than<br />

that <strong>of</strong> the normal anterior tibial tendon.<br />

Ruptures <strong>of</strong> the Achilles tendon are usually diagnosed<br />

clinically, <strong>of</strong>ten by the patients themselves. Patients can<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten recall the exact instant the Achilles ruptured, describing<br />

the sensation “as if someone kicked me.” The classic<br />

Achilles tendon rupture occurs with forced dorsiflexion <strong>of</strong><br />

the planted foot, such as occurs in basketball or other<br />

jumping sports. The classic patient is a middle-age<br />

“weekend warrior” who leads a sedentary life <strong>and</strong> attempts<br />

to participate in sports, perhaps with younger players,<br />

without an adequate warm-up. Of all the tendons <strong>of</strong> the<br />

foot <strong>and</strong> ankle, the Achilles is the only one for which disorders<br />

have a male predominance. Complete ruptures <strong>of</strong><br />

the Achilles tendon typically occur at one <strong>of</strong> two locations.<br />

One site is low, 3 to 5 cm just proximal to the calcaneal<br />

insertion (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-17). This is a relatively hypovascular<br />

watershed region. The other site is relatively high, up at the<br />

musculotendinous junction (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-18). These more proximal<br />

tears may require that the imaging coil be repositioned<br />

around the lower calf rather than around the ankle<br />

to visualize the torn <strong>and</strong> retracted proximal end (Fig.<br />

<strong>47</strong>-19). When it is clinically apparent to all that the Achilles<br />

tendon is completely ruptured, confirmation with MRI<br />

is usually unnecessary. However, imaging with MRI or<br />

ultrasonography is used to measure the tendinous gap<br />

between the retracted ends <strong>of</strong> a complete tear.<br />

Partial tears <strong>of</strong> the Achilles tendon are usually intrasubstance<br />

tears, <strong>and</strong> edema-sensitive images reveal increased<br />

signal in a swollen, abnormally rounded tendon (Fig.<br />

<strong>47</strong>-20). Partial tears can also present as nearly complete<br />

ruptures, with only a few remaining fibers intact (Fig.<br />

<strong>47</strong>-21). In these cases, abnormal fluid can be seen surrounding<br />

the intact fibers, within the distended paratenon<br />

(see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-21E). Imaging with MRI or ultrasonography is<br />

used to assess the extent <strong>of</strong> partial tears.<br />

An Achilles tendon that has undergone internal healing<br />

<strong>and</strong> scar formation from a prior intrasubstance tear tends<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2217<br />

9/9/2008 5:33:38 PM


2218 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-14. Normal Achilles tendon in a 14-year-old with a calcaneal<br />

stress fracture. A, Lateral radiograph shows the normal sharp interface<br />

between the lucent Kager’s fat pad <strong>and</strong> the semiradiopaque Achilles<br />

tendon (white arrows). The sclerosis in the calcaneal tuberosity (black<br />

arrowheads) is more subtle radiographically. B, Midsagittal T1-weighted<br />

image shows the sharp interface between the normal, bright Kager’s fat<br />

pad <strong>and</strong> the normal, straight <strong>and</strong> uniformly dark Achilles tendon (Ach),<br />

which is uniform in thickness throughout its length. The dark line running<br />

perpendicular to the trabeculae in the calcaneal tuberosity is the stress<br />

fracture (black arrowheads). C, Midsagittal inversion recovery image<br />

reveals no abnormally increased signal in the uniformly dark Achilles<br />

tendon. A normal amount <strong>of</strong> fluid is present in the retrocalcaneal bursa<br />

(white arrowhead). There is bone marrow edema throughout the calcaneus<br />

as a response to the stress fracture in the tuberosity.<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2218<br />

9/9/2008 5:33:39 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2219 <strong>47</strong><br />

A<br />

B<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-15. Plantaris tear in a 71-year-old who, while playing tennis, heard a “snap” <strong>and</strong> experienced sudden onset <strong>of</strong> posterior calf pain.<br />

A, Coronal T2-weighted fat-suppressed images through both calves reveal a b<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> edema tracking between the left calf muscles (white<br />

arrowheads). B, Axial T2-weighted fat-suppressed images taken at the level <strong>of</strong> the dotted line in A show the edema tracking between the left<br />

soleus (S) <strong>and</strong> the gastrocnemius (G) muscles.<br />

A B C<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-16. Stenosing tenosynovitis <strong>of</strong> the posterior tibial tendon (PT) in a 57-year-old with chronic medial ankle pain. These are straight<br />

axial images, obtained at the same level, with different sequences. A, T1-weighted image shows loss <strong>of</strong> the normal sharp fat–tendon interface<br />

around the PT (arrowhead). B, Proton-density–weighted image shows that the chronically swollen <strong>and</strong> scarred PT is larger in axial cross section<br />

than the normal anterior tibial tendon (AT). C, T2-weighted image shows that the tissue surrounding the PT is not fluid but the chronic fibrotic<br />

scarring <strong>of</strong> stenosing tenosynovitis.<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2219<br />

9/9/2008 5:33:41 PM


2220 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-17. Complete Achilles tendon rupture in<br />

a 41-year-old with history <strong>of</strong> renal transplantation <strong>and</strong><br />

steroid use, who experienced acute posterior ankle<br />

pain 5 days earlier when bending over while<br />

gardening. Sagittal T1-weighted (A) <strong>and</strong> T2-weighted<br />

fat-suppressed (B) images reveal the complete<br />

Achilles tendon tear at the critical zone, 3 to 5 cm<br />

proximal to the calcaneal insertion. The arrows show<br />

the torn ends <strong>of</strong> the retracted fibers. C, Axial T1-<br />

weighted image through the tear reveals no intact<br />

Achilles tendon fibers (arrowhead). Incidentally noted<br />

is the intact plantaris tendon (arrow).<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-18. Complete Achilles tendon rupture in<br />

a 38-year-old who, while playing volleyball, felt a<br />

sudden “pop” <strong>and</strong> pain “like getting hit in the back <strong>of</strong><br />

the leg.” A, Midsagittal T1-weighted image shows that<br />

the tear occurred at the musculotendinous junction<br />

(white arrow). B, Midsagittal T2-weighted fatsuppressed<br />

image shows the torn ends <strong>of</strong> the<br />

retracted fibers (arrows). This Achilles tendon tear<br />

required surgical repair.<br />

A<br />

B<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2220<br />

9/9/2008 5:33:43 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2221 <strong>47</strong><br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-19. Complete Achilles tendon rupture at<br />

the musculotendinous junction in a 52-year-old. A, An<br />

initial set <strong>of</strong> sagittal images was obtained with the<br />

extremity coil centered on the heel, which was too low<br />

to include the proximal end <strong>of</strong> the tear. B, The coil was<br />

repositioned proximal to the ankle joint to include the<br />

musculotendinous junction. The marker (m) is at the<br />

palpable defect.<br />

A<br />

B<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-20. Intrasubstance tear <strong>of</strong> the Achilles<br />

tendon in a 54-year-old with a history <strong>of</strong> rheumatoid<br />

arthritis <strong>and</strong> several months <strong>of</strong> persistent heel pain.<br />

T2-weighted fat-suppressed images in the sagittal (A)<br />

<strong>and</strong> axial (B) planes reveal that the distal Achilles<br />

tendon is abnormally swollen with increased<br />

intrasubstance signal (black arrow). An incidental<br />

finding is an abnormal amount <strong>of</strong> fluid in the posterior<br />

tibial tendon sheath (white arrow in B).<br />

A<br />

B<br />

to retain its thickened fusiform shape. However, unlike the<br />

acute intrasubstance tear, a healed Achilles tendon does<br />

not contain internal signal (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-22).<br />

• Medial Tendons<br />

Normal Anatomy<br />

The classic mnemonic “Tom, Dick, <strong>and</strong> Harry” is useful for<br />

remembering the order <strong>of</strong> the medial ankle tendons; T<br />

represents the posterior tibial tendon, D the flexor digitorum<br />

longus tendon, <strong>and</strong> H the flexor hallucis longus<br />

tendon. By changing the emphasis to “Tom, Dick, ANd<br />

Harry,” with the AN st<strong>and</strong>ing for the posterior tibial artery<br />

<strong>and</strong> nerve, it is easier to remember the neurovascular<br />

bundle that runs between the flexor digitorum longus<br />

<strong>and</strong> flexor hallucis longus tendons (see Figs. <strong>47</strong>-10 <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>47</strong>-11).<br />

The posterior tibial tendon runs directly behind <strong>and</strong><br />

under the medial malleolus, proceeds medial to the talus,<br />

<strong>and</strong> inserts on the medial pole <strong>of</strong> the navicular (see Fig.<br />

<strong>47</strong>-10D). At this insertion site there is a focal osseous<br />

prominence, called the navicular tubercle. The bulk <strong>of</strong> the<br />

posterior tibial tendon inserts on the navicular tubercle,<br />

although smaller slips <strong>of</strong> tendon pass under the navicular<br />

(see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-11C) to insert on the plantar aspects <strong>of</strong> all three<br />

cuneiforms as well as the bases <strong>of</strong> the second through<br />

fourth metatarsals.<br />

The flexor digitorum longus tendon runs directly<br />

behind the posterior tibial tendon, although these two<br />

tendons maintain individual tendon sheaths. The flexor<br />

digitorum longus tendon extends plantar to the bones <strong>of</strong><br />

the midfoot, crossing superficially to the flexor hallucis<br />

longus tendon. This crossover point has been called the<br />

master knot <strong>of</strong> Henry, 24 <strong>and</strong> the sheaths <strong>of</strong> these two flexor<br />

tendons communicate at this point. Distally, the flexor<br />

digitorum longus divides into separate tendon slips that<br />

insert on the plantar bases <strong>of</strong> the second through fifth<br />

distal phalanges.<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2221<br />

9/9/2008 5:33:45 PM


2222 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

A<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-21. Near-complete<br />

Achilles tendon rupture in a<br />

54-year-old who, while playing<br />

racquetball, felt a pain “like being<br />

kicked in the back <strong>of</strong> the heel.”<br />

A, Lateral radiograph shows<br />

obscuration <strong>of</strong> the normally lucent<br />

Kager’s fat pad. B, Midsagittal T1-<br />

weighted image shows only a few<br />

remaining intact Achilles tendon<br />

fibers (arrow). C, Midsagittal T2-<br />

weighted fat-suppressed image<br />

shows the retracted ends <strong>of</strong> the<br />

torn fibers (black arrows). White<br />

arrow shows the few remaining<br />

fibers. D, Axial T1-weighted image<br />

through the level <strong>of</strong> the<br />

syndesmosis shows the markedly<br />

thinned intact Achilles tendon<br />

fibers (arrow). E, Axial T2-weighted<br />

fat-suppressed image at the same<br />

level shows bright abnormal fluid<br />

in the abnormally thickened <strong>and</strong><br />

distended paratenon (arrowheads).<br />

White arrow shows the thinned<br />

intact Achilles tendon fibers. This<br />

Achilles tear ultimately required<br />

surgical repair.<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

E<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2222<br />

9/9/2008 5:33:<strong>47</strong> PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2223 <strong>47</strong><br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-22. A 57-year-old with<br />

an Achilles tendon that has healed<br />

with chronic scarring. Axial T1-<br />

weighted (A), axial T2-weighted<br />

(B), <strong>and</strong> sagittal T2-weighted (C)<br />

images reveal that the distal<br />

Achilles tendon is too round <strong>and</strong><br />

thick but contains no increased<br />

signal.<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

The flexor hallucis longus muscle is a posterior structure<br />

originating from the lower two thirds <strong>of</strong> the back <strong>of</strong><br />

the fibula. The musculotendinous junction extends distally<br />

to the level <strong>of</strong> the ankle joint, <strong>and</strong> the proximal end <strong>of</strong> the<br />

tendon passes through a groove along the posterior talus.<br />

Whereas the posterior tibial <strong>and</strong> flexor digitorum longus<br />

tendons pass under the medial malleolus, the flexor hallucis<br />

longus tendon passes under the sustentaculum tali.<br />

The flexor hallucis longus then crosses deep to the flexor<br />

digitorum longus, extends under the first metatarsal, <strong>and</strong><br />

passes between the two great toe sesamoids, to insert on<br />

the plantar base <strong>of</strong> the distal phalanx (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-9D<br />

<strong>and</strong> E).<br />

A<br />

Medial<br />

malleolus<br />

B<br />

Injury<br />

Of the three medial ankle tendons, the posterior tibial is<br />

the most prone to tear, characteristically along the portion<br />

that curves around the medial malleolus. The posterior<br />

tibial tendon is relatively hypovascular in this region. 39<br />

This region <strong>of</strong> the tendon is also susceptible to mechanical<br />

wear as the tendon rubs against the medial malleolus (Fig.<br />

<strong>47</strong>-23). If the surrounding tendon sheath does not provide<br />

adequate lubrication, such as in stenosing tenosynovitis<br />

or rheumatoid pannus formation, this frictional wear<br />

increases. Perhaps because <strong>of</strong> these longitudinal frictional<br />

stresses, the posterior tibial tendon tends to tear with a<br />

longitudinal split, rather than the transverse rupture seen<br />

in Achilles tendon tears. When imaged in the axial plane,<br />

a longitudinal split in the posterior tibial tendon resembles<br />

two individual tendons. This longitudinally split posterior<br />

tibial tendon, when grouped with the flexor digitorum <strong>and</strong><br />

hallucis longus tendons, has been called the four-tendon<br />

sign (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-24).<br />

Tenosynovitis refers to inflammation between the<br />

tendon <strong>and</strong> the surrounding synovial sheath. This is <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

a chronic irritative process, more commonly affecting<br />

C D E<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-23. Illustration <strong>of</strong> posterior tibial tendon mechanical<br />

wear becoming a longitudinal tear. A, Medial view <strong>of</strong> the posterior<br />

tibial tendon (PT; red) as it wraps over the medial malleolus <strong>and</strong><br />

under the flexor digitorum longus tendon (FDL; blue). The PT is<br />

susceptible to mechanical wear as it rubs back <strong>and</strong> forth (as indicated<br />

by the double-headed black arrow) between the underlying medial<br />

malleolus (gray lightning bolts) <strong>and</strong> the overlying FDL (white lightning<br />

bolts). B, A more anterior view <strong>of</strong> a partially torn PT as it might appear<br />

if it were laid flat. The tendon is thickened <strong>and</strong> butterflied open, with<br />

the gray region representing abnormal internal signal. (The dashed<br />

line represents the location <strong>of</strong> cross sections C to E). C to E, MRI cross<br />

sections <strong>of</strong> the PT only (now shown as a black ellipse), taken in the<br />

axial or oblique coronal plane through the longitudinal tear as it<br />

develops. In C, there is a gray wedge <strong>of</strong> abnormally increased<br />

signal along the inner aspect <strong>of</strong> the flattened PT (black ellipse).<br />

In D, tendinopathy (gray wedges) now involves the outer <strong>and</strong> inner<br />

surfaces <strong>of</strong> the PT. In E, the wedges <strong>of</strong> tendinopathy have progressed<br />

to a longitudinal tear, giving the appearance in cross section that the<br />

PT is two tendons.<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2223<br />

9/9/2008 5:33:49 PM


2224 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

A B C<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-24. Longitudinal split in the posterior tibial tendon (PT) in a 39-year-old. Shown are the same straight axial images obtained through<br />

the tip <strong>of</strong> the medial malleolus (MM). A, T1-weighted image well demonstrates the anatomy <strong>of</strong> the tendons as well as the neurovascular bundle<br />

(dotted oval). B, Proton-density–weighted image shows what appears to be four medial tendons, the four-tendon sign, where 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 are the two<br />

halves <strong>of</strong> the split PT, <strong>and</strong> 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 are the normal flexor digitorum longus (FDL) <strong>and</strong> flexor hallucis longus (FHL) tendons. C, T2-weighted image<br />

demonstrates not bright fluid but gray scar (gray arrowhead) around the split PT, suggesting that this is chronic stenosing tenosynovitis. There is<br />

an abnormal amount <strong>of</strong> fluid in the FDL sheath (black arrowhead), suggesting active tenosynovitis here. The fluid in the FHL sheath (white<br />

arrowhead) is within normal limits for this tendon only.<br />

A<br />

B<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-25. Active posterior tibial tenosynovitis in a 46-year-old with chronic pain in the distribution <strong>of</strong> the posterior tibial tendon (PT).<br />

A, Straight axial proton-density–weighted image demonstrates that the PT is intact <strong>and</strong> contains no abnormal internal signal. The PT is slightly<br />

larger in cross section than the normal anterior tibial tendon, <strong>and</strong> there is loss <strong>of</strong> the normal fat signal around the tendon (gray arrowhead).<br />

B, Straight axial T2-weighted image at the same level reveals an abnormal amount <strong>of</strong> fluid in the posterior tibial tendon sheath (black arrowhead),<br />

indicating active tenosynovitis.<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2224<br />

9/9/2008 5:33:51 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2225 <strong>47</strong><br />

A B C<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-26. Chronic posterior<br />

tibial stenosing tenosynovitis in a<br />

57-year-old with chronic pain in<br />

the distribution <strong>of</strong> the posterior<br />

tibial tendon (PT). (This is the<br />

same patient as in Fig. <strong>47</strong>-16; these<br />

straight axial images are two slices<br />

distal to those.) T1-weighted (A),<br />

proton-density–weighted (B), <strong>and</strong><br />

T2-weighted (C) images all show<br />

abnormally dark signal (gray<br />

arrowhead) around the PT.<br />

women than men, particularly workers who are on their<br />

feet all day, such as waitresses <strong>and</strong> sales clerks. In the ankle,<br />

tenosynovitis most frequently occurs in the posterior tibial<br />

tendon <strong>and</strong> in the two peroneal tendons. Even when these<br />

tendons are intact, their tendon sheaths <strong>and</strong> surrounding<br />

s<strong>of</strong>t tissues should be carefully examined. An abnormal<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> fluid in the tendon sheath indicates active tenosynovitis<br />

(Fig. <strong>47</strong>-25). Dark, fibrous tissue around the<br />

tendon suggests chronic scarring or stenosing tenosynovitis<br />

(Fig. <strong>47</strong>-26). Rheumatoid pannus can also be demonstrated<br />

by MRI (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-55) <strong>and</strong> should enhance if<br />

intravenous contrast is administered. It has been suggested<br />

that these inflammatory conditions <strong>of</strong> the tendon sheath<br />

can be ameliorated by therapeutic tenography. 40<br />

• Lateral Tendons<br />

Laterally, the peroneus brevis <strong>and</strong> longus tendons share a<br />

common sheath as they pass under the lateral malleolus.<br />

Distal to the lateral malleolus, the tendons are enveloped<br />

with individual sheaths. The peroneus brevis tendon<br />

extends along the lateral aspect <strong>of</strong> the midfoot <strong>and</strong> inserts<br />

on the tuberosity at the lateral base <strong>of</strong> the fifth metatarsal.<br />

The peroneus longus tendon passes through a groove in<br />

the plantar surface <strong>of</strong> the cuboid, crosses under the midfoot<br />

deep to the master knot <strong>of</strong> Henry, <strong>and</strong> extends medially to<br />

insert on the plantar aspect <strong>of</strong> the medial cuneiform <strong>and</strong><br />

the base <strong>of</strong> the first metatarsal, just lateral to the anterior<br />

tibial tendon insertion site.<br />

A trick for identifying the peroneal tendons is to think<br />

<strong>of</strong> the lateral malleolus as a race track (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-27). The<br />

peroneus brevis, being the shortest, hugs the inside curve<br />

<strong>and</strong> is thus closest to the fibula. The peroneus longus<br />

follows the outside <strong>of</strong> the curve, running posterior <strong>and</strong><br />

inferior to the peroneus brevis.<br />

Unlike the medial ankle tendons, which are normally<br />

round or oval in axial cross section, the peroneus brevis<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-27. Coronal MRI (left) <strong>and</strong> graphic representation in the<br />

sagittal plane (right) demonstrate the relationship <strong>of</strong> the peroneal<br />

tendons to the lateral malleolus (LM); the peroneus brevis (PB) is<br />

closer to the distal fibula than is the peroneus longus (PL).<br />

can normally appear flattened as it passes around the<br />

lateral malleolus. The presence <strong>of</strong> increased signal in<br />

the substance <strong>of</strong> the tendon, or the presence <strong>of</strong> fluid in the<br />

surrounding sheath, aids in the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> pathology <strong>of</strong><br />

the peroneal tendons. It is <strong>of</strong>ten helpful to examine the<br />

peroneal tendons over multiple slices, using several imaging<br />

planes <strong>and</strong> sequences (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-28).<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2225<br />

9/9/2008 5:33:52 PM


2226 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

A B C<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-28. Longitudinal split<br />

<strong>of</strong> the peroneus brevis tendon (PB)<br />

in a 62-year-old. Straight axial T1-<br />

weighted (A), proton-density (PD)–<br />

weighted (B), <strong>and</strong> T2-weighted<br />

images through the syndesmosis.<br />

The PB (black arrow) is well seen<br />

on T1 <strong>and</strong> PD weighting, located<br />

between the lateral malleolus (LM)<br />

<strong>and</strong> the peroneus longus tendon<br />

(PL). At this level, the PB has a<br />

normal flattened appearance.<br />

However, the T2-weighted image<br />

shows an abnormal amount <strong>of</strong><br />

fluid in the common peroneal<br />

tendon sheath (white arrowhead).<br />

Straight axial T1-weighted (D), PDweighted<br />

(E), <strong>and</strong> T2-weighted (F)<br />

images through the LM. At this<br />

level, the PB is abnormally<br />

flattened to such an extent that it is<br />

draped over the PL, best seen on<br />

the PD image (E). Straight axial T1-<br />

weighted (G), PD-weighted (H), <strong>and</strong><br />

T2-weighted (I) images distal to<br />

the LM.<br />

D E F<br />

G H I<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2226<br />

9/9/2008 5:33:54 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2227 <strong>47</strong><br />

J K L<br />

M<br />

N<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-28, cont’d The marker (m) indicates the site <strong>of</strong> maximal tenderness. At this level, the PB is split into two pieces (black arrows),<br />

separated by the intact PL (white arrow). Oblique coronal T1-weighted (J), PD-weighted (K), <strong>and</strong> T2-weighted (L) images anterior to the LM,<br />

through the pain marker (m). All three sequences show increased signal in the PB (black arrow) as opposed to the normal black signal in the PL<br />

(white arrow). Although the “magic angle” can artifactually increase the intratendinous signal on the short TE sequences (T1 <strong>and</strong> PD), magic angle<br />

does not affect the long TE T2-weighted sequence. Thus, the bright signal in the PB on the T2-weighted image represents a true intrasubstance<br />

tear. The abnormal fluid in the common peroneal tendon sheath (white arrowhead) indicates active tenosynovitis. M <strong>and</strong> N, Far lateral sagittal<br />

inversion recovery images demonstrate the abnormal fluid in the common peroneal tendon sheath (white dotted rectangle) as well as the edema<br />

in the swollen PB (black dotted rectangle).<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2227<br />

9/9/2008 5:33:56 PM


2228 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

• <strong>Ankle</strong> Ligaments 14<br />

There are three sets <strong>of</strong> ligaments around the ankle joint.<br />

Laterally there are the syndesmotic ligaments <strong>and</strong> the<br />

lateral capsular ligaments. The syndesmotic ligaments<br />

consist <strong>of</strong> the thin anterior tibi<strong>of</strong>ibular ligament <strong>and</strong> the<br />

broader posterior tibi<strong>of</strong>ibular ligament. These ligaments<br />

are typically best seen in the straight axial plane (Fig.<br />

<strong>47</strong>-29A), although they may be seen in the coronal<br />

plane if a single image serendipitously cuts though one<br />

(Fig. <strong>47</strong>-29C). It is these syndesmotic ligaments that are<br />

disrupted in a Weber type C ankle fracture (see Fig.<br />

<strong>47</strong>-60C).<br />

The lateral capsular ligaments consist <strong>of</strong> the thin anterior<br />

tal<strong>of</strong>ibular ligament <strong>and</strong> the broader posterior tal<strong>of</strong>ibular<br />

ligament, both <strong>of</strong> which are transversely oriented <strong>and</strong><br />

thus best seen in the straight axial plane (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-29B), <strong>and</strong><br />

the longitudinally oriented calcane<strong>of</strong>ibular ligament, best<br />

seen in the coronal plane (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-29D).<br />

Of the lateral ankle ligaments, the anterior ones are<br />

more subject than the posterior ones to tearing from twisting<br />

injuries (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-30).<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-29. The normal lateral ankle ligaments. These are all T1-weighted images obtained using a high-resolution 512 acquisition matrix, in<br />

the same normal volunteer as in Figure <strong>47</strong>-10. A, Axial image through the bottom <strong>of</strong> the syndesmosis shows the two syndesmotic ligaments: the<br />

anterior tibi<strong>of</strong>ibular ligament (ATiFL; white arrow) <strong>and</strong> the posterior tibi<strong>of</strong>ibular ligament (PTiFL; black arrow). B, Axial image two slices distal to A,<br />

through the top <strong>of</strong> the talar dome, shows two <strong>of</strong> the three lateral capsular ligaments: the anterior tal<strong>of</strong>ibular ligament (ATaFL; white arrowhead)<br />

<strong>and</strong> the posterior tal<strong>of</strong>ibular ligament (PTaFL; black arrowhead). C, Coronal image through the back <strong>of</strong> the ankle joint shows the PTiFL (black<br />

arrow) running between the posterior malleolus <strong>of</strong> the talus <strong>and</strong> the fibula. D, Coronal image two slices anterior to C shows the PTaFL (black<br />

arrowhead) running between the back <strong>of</strong> the talus <strong>and</strong> the fibula. Also seen is a portion <strong>of</strong> the third <strong>of</strong> the three lateral capsular ligaments, the<br />

calcane<strong>of</strong>ibular ligament (CFL; gray arrowhead).<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2228<br />

9/9/2008 5:33:57 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2229 <strong>47</strong><br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-30. Tears <strong>of</strong> the anterior lateral ankle<br />

ligaments in a <strong>47</strong>-year-old. Straight axial protondensity<br />

(PD)–weighted (A) <strong>and</strong> T2-weighted fatsuppressed<br />

(B) images through the syndesmosis show<br />

disruption <strong>of</strong> the anterior tibi<strong>of</strong>ibular ligament (arrow).<br />

Straight axial PD-weighted (C) <strong>and</strong> T2-weighted fatsuppressed<br />

(D) images through the top <strong>of</strong> the ankle<br />

mortise show an interruption (arrowhead) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

anterior tal<strong>of</strong>ibular ligament.<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

Medially, the ankle joint is stabilized by a group <strong>of</strong><br />

ligaments that fan out from the distal tip <strong>of</strong> the medial<br />

malleolus in a triangular configuration <strong>and</strong> collectively are<br />

called the deltoid ligament. When viewed in the coronal<br />

plane (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-31), the deltoid ligament can be seen to<br />

consist <strong>of</strong> deep fibers that insert on the medial process <strong>of</strong><br />

the talus <strong>and</strong> superficial fibers that insert on the calcaneus<br />

at the sustentaculum tali. Injuries <strong>of</strong> the deltoid ligament<br />

tend to be sprains* rather than complete ruptures, although<br />

they may be accompanied by bone marrow edema (Fig.<br />

<strong>47</strong>-32) or even avulsion fractures.<br />

Unlike the ankle tendons, which when visualized by<br />

MRI can be followed over a series <strong>of</strong> sequential slices in<br />

several planes, the ankle ligaments are usually seen on only<br />

*”Sprains” are defined as stretching or tearing <strong>of</strong> ligaments <strong>and</strong> are due to<br />

twisting injuries. “Strains” are defined as stretching or tearing <strong>of</strong> muscles, <strong>of</strong>ten at<br />

the musculotendinous junction, <strong>and</strong> are caused by sudden <strong>and</strong> powerful contractions<br />

or from overuse.<br />

one or two slices in a single imaging plane. And when they<br />

are seen in a piecemeal fashion on two images, it can be<br />

difficult to determine whether the two halves <strong>of</strong> the ligament<br />

are continuous. Certainly, seeing fluid extending<br />

through or around the ankle ligament helps confirm the<br />

diagnosis <strong>of</strong> a tear, but at the UW our sports medicine clinicians<br />

<strong>and</strong> orthopedic surgeons do not use MRI to evaluate<br />

the ankle ligaments. They rely on physical examination,<br />

<strong>and</strong> sometimes stress radiographs, to assess the functional<br />

integrity <strong>of</strong> the ankle ligaments, ordering MRI primarily for<br />

the bones <strong>and</strong> tendons.<br />

There are many accessory ossicles that can be present<br />

throughout the skeleton, <strong>and</strong> these are well documented<br />

in the encyclopedic text by Keats. 27 Many <strong>of</strong> these normal<br />

variants can be found in the feet. Three <strong>of</strong> the most commonly<br />

found accessory ossicles in the feet are the os trigonum<br />

posterior to the talus, the accessory navicular medial<br />

to the navicular bone, <strong>and</strong> the os peroneum plantar to the<br />

calcaneocuboid joint. Although in the vast majority <strong>of</strong><br />

people these are nothing more than asymptomatic inci-<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2229<br />

9/9/2008 5:34:00 PM


2230 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

dental findings, in rare circumstances they are painful<br />

normal variants, conditions that can be difficult to diagnose<br />

<strong>and</strong> difficult to treat.<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-31. The normal medial ankle ligaments on a T1-weighted<br />

image obtained using a high-resolution 512 acquisition matrix. This<br />

coronal image is located just behind the middle facet <strong>of</strong> the subtalar<br />

joint. (This image is seven slices anterior to Fig. <strong>47</strong>-29D). The<br />

magnified dashed box to the right shows the superficial <strong>and</strong> deep<br />

components <strong>of</strong> the deltoid ligament. The broader deep fibers (black<br />

arrow) run from the medial malleolus (MM) to the medial process <strong>of</strong><br />

the talus. The more slender superficial fibers (white arrow) run from<br />

the MM to the calcaneus at the sustentaculum tali (ST). Also shown is<br />

the flexor retinaculum (open arrowheads), forming the ro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

tarsal tunnel atop the three medial tendons (T, posterior tibial; D,<br />

flexor digitorum longus; H, flexor hallucis longus) <strong>and</strong> the posterior<br />

tibial neurovascular bundle (dotted oval).<br />

• Os Trigonum Syndrome<br />

The os trigonum is a common accessory ossicle located<br />

directly behind the talus, at the posterior end <strong>of</strong> the<br />

subtalar joint, adjacent to where the flexor hallucis longus<br />

wraps around the back <strong>of</strong> the talus. The os trigonum develops<br />

as a separate ossification center. During growth this<br />

fuses to the talus in most people, but in 5% to 15% <strong>of</strong><br />

normal feet it remains nonunited <strong>and</strong> is variable in size<br />

<strong>and</strong> shape. There are no radiographic findings in a patient<br />

with symptomatic os trigonum syndrome, 44 although the<br />

diagnosis can be made with MRI by demonstrating marrow<br />

edema in the os trigonum <strong>and</strong> the adjacent talus<br />

(Fig. <strong>47</strong>-33).<br />

• Accessory Navicular Syndrome<br />

The accessory navicular bone (os tibiale externum) is a<br />

common normal variant found adjacent to the medial pole<br />

<strong>of</strong> the navicular in approximately 10% <strong>of</strong> the population.<br />

As previously mentioned under “Medial Tendons,” the<br />

medial pole <strong>of</strong> the navicular is the primary insertion site<br />

<strong>of</strong> the posterior tibial tendon (see Figs. <strong>47</strong>-10D <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>47</strong>-11C). Small accessory navicular bones are called type 1<br />

<strong>and</strong> are simply sesamoid bones in the substance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

posterior tibial tendon (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-34). The posterior tibial<br />

tendon still inserts normally on the navicular, <strong>and</strong> the type<br />

1 accessory navicular bones are <strong>of</strong> no clinical significance.<br />

Larger accessory navicular bones are called type 2 (Fig.<br />

<strong>47</strong>-35), <strong>and</strong> with these the posterior tibial tendon inserts<br />

onto the accessory navicular, rather than on the navicular<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-32. Deltoid ligament sprain in an 18-yearold.<br />

Mortise coronal T1-weighted (A) <strong>and</strong> T2-weighted<br />

fat-suppressed (B) images show abnormally increased<br />

signal in the deep deltoid (black arrow). There is bone<br />

marrow edema at its insertion site on the medial talus<br />

(arrowhead). The superficial deltoid (white arrow) is<br />

intact.<br />

A<br />

B<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2230<br />

9/9/2008 5:34:01 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2231 <strong>47</strong><br />

A<br />

B<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-33. Os trigonum syndrome in an 11-yearold<br />

competitive Irish dancer. Lateral view <strong>of</strong> the<br />

symptomatic left ankle (A) shows a small os trigonum,<br />

a common normal variant. The asymptomatic right<br />

side (B) is shown for comparison. C, Midsagittal T1-<br />

weighted image shows the small os trigonum (arrow).<br />

D, Corresponding sagittal inversion recovery image<br />

shows bone marrow edema in the os trigonum (arrow)<br />

as well as in the adjacent talus (arrowhead). E, Straight<br />

axial proton-density–weighted image shows the<br />

irregular cleft (arrowhead) between the os trigonum<br />

<strong>and</strong> the talus. Well seen are the normal structures<br />

in the tarsal tunnel: the posterior tibial tendon (T),<br />

flexor digitorum longus tendon (D), neurovascular<br />

bundle (&), <strong>and</strong> flexor hallucis longus tendon (H).<br />

F, Corresponding axial T2-weighted fat-suppressed<br />

image shows bone marrow edema in the os trigonum<br />

(arrow) <strong>and</strong> in the adjacent talus (arrowhead).<br />

C<br />

D<br />

E<br />

F<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2231<br />

9/9/2008 5:34:03 PM


2232 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-34. Normal type 1 (small) accessory<br />

navicular (arrow in dashed magnified box).<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-35. Normal type 2 (large) accessory<br />

navicular (white arrow in dashed magnified box).<br />

Incidentally seen is a normal os peroneum (black<br />

arrow).<br />

bone itself. Patients with this normal variation are typically<br />

asymptomatic unless they have a fracture through the<br />

normal fibrous union between the navicular <strong>and</strong> accessory<br />

navicular. A painful accessory navicular syndrome can be<br />

diagnosed by MRI by the presence <strong>of</strong> marrow edema in the<br />

accessory navicular <strong>and</strong> the adjacent navicular bone, especially<br />

if this corresponds to the point <strong>of</strong> maximum pain<br />

(Fig. <strong>47</strong>-36). Normally, there should be a solid fibrous<br />

union between the type 2 accessory navicular <strong>and</strong> the<br />

navicular. The presence <strong>of</strong> a line <strong>of</strong> fluid between<br />

these bones is abnormal <strong>and</strong> indicates a pseudarthrosis,<br />

another MRI finding in accessory navicular syndrome<br />

(Fig. <strong>47</strong>-37).<br />

• Os Peroneum Syndrome<br />

The os peroneum is a common sesamoid bone located in<br />

the peroneus longus tendon as it passes under the cuboid.<br />

In rare cases, this normal ossicle can become inflamed <strong>and</strong><br />

painful. Chronic inflammation can be suspected radiographically<br />

if the os peroneum is abnormally sclerotic,<br />

although this finding is subjective. A more objective finding<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2232<br />

9/9/2008 5:34:04 PM


A<br />

C<br />

E<br />

B<br />

D<br />

F<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-36. Accessory navicular syndrome in<br />

a 20-year-old with focal pain directly over the left<br />

medial navicular. A, St<strong>and</strong>ing anteroposterior<br />

radiograph <strong>of</strong> the asymptomatic right foot shows<br />

an elongated medial pole <strong>of</strong> an otherwise normal<br />

navicular (arrow). This has been referred to as a<br />

cornuate navicular <strong>and</strong> as a type 3 accessory navicular.<br />

B, St<strong>and</strong>ing anteroposterior radiograph <strong>of</strong> the<br />

symptomatic left foot barely reveals the type 2<br />

accessory navicular (arrow in the magnified dashed<br />

box). C, Far-medial sagittal T1-weighted image well<br />

shows the posterior tibial tendon (T) inserting onto<br />

the type 2 accessory navicular (A), as well as the<br />

fibrous union (arrowhead) between it <strong>and</strong> the<br />

navicular bone (N). D, Corresponding sagittal<br />

inversion recovery image shows subcortical edema<br />

(arrows) on both sides <strong>of</strong> this fibrous union.<br />

E, Oblique coronal T1-weighted image through the<br />

round head <strong>of</strong> the talus (Ta) shows the marker (m)<br />

indicating that the site <strong>of</strong> focal tenderness is directly<br />

over the abnormal articulation between the type 2<br />

accessory navicular (A) <strong>and</strong> the navicular bone (N).<br />

F, Corresponding coronal T2-weighted fat-suppressed<br />

image shows subcortical edema (arrows) on both<br />

sides <strong>of</strong> this abnormal articulation. G, Oblique axial<br />

T1-weighted image shows that the marker (m)<br />

indicating the site <strong>of</strong> focal tenderness is directly over<br />

the abnormal articulation between the type 2<br />

accessory navicular (A) <strong>and</strong> the navicular bone (N).<br />

H, Corresponding axial T2-weighted fat-suppressed<br />

image shows subcortical edema (arrows) on both<br />

sides <strong>of</strong> this abnormal articulation.<br />

G<br />

H<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2233<br />

9/9/2008 5:34:06 PM


2234 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

B<br />

A<br />

C<br />

D<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-37. Accessory navicular syndrome in a 38-year-old. A, Anteroposterior radiograph shows a type 2 accessory navicular (white arrow<br />

in magnified gray dashed box). B, On the lateral radiograph, the accessory navicular can faintly be seen through the anterior calcaneus (open<br />

arrow in magnified white dashed box). Axial (C) <strong>and</strong> far-medial sagittal (D) T2-weighted fat-suppressed images reveal a line <strong>of</strong> fluid (white<br />

arrowhead) indicating an abnormal joint where there should be a solid fibrous union between the navicular (N) <strong>and</strong> accessory navicular (A).<br />

The far-medial sagittal image shows the posterior tibial tendon (T) inserting on the type 2 accessory navicular.<br />

<strong>of</strong> os peroneum syndrome is edema in <strong>and</strong> around the<br />

small ossicle, best shown with an edema-sensitive MRI<br />

sequence targeted to the lesion (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-38).<br />

• Os Calcaneus Secondarius<br />

Os calcaneus secondarius is an occasionally seen normal<br />

variant that resides between the anterior process <strong>of</strong> the<br />

calcaneus (APC) <strong>and</strong> the lateral pole <strong>of</strong> the navicular (Fig.<br />

<strong>47</strong>-39). It is discussed in more detail later.<br />

Imaging Protocol<br />

All imaging <strong>of</strong> the ankle <strong>and</strong> foot must begin with radiographs.<br />

Traumatic fractures are the most common cause<br />

<strong>of</strong> ankle <strong>and</strong> foot pain, <strong>and</strong> radiographs are the quickest<br />

<strong>and</strong> least expensive imaging modality for the detection<br />

<strong>and</strong> follow-up <strong>of</strong> these fractures. However, the question<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten arises as to which imaging modality should be<br />

obtained next if radiographs do not sufficiently delineate<br />

the fracture or do not demonstrate the cause <strong>of</strong> symptoms.<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2234<br />

9/9/2008 5:34:07 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2235 <strong>47</strong><br />

A<br />

B<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-38. Os peroneum syndrome in a 58-yearold<br />

who developed chronic lateral foot pain after<br />

ballroom dancing. (Case courtesy <strong>of</strong> Edwin Rogers,<br />

MD.) Oblique (A) <strong>and</strong> lateral (B) radiographs reveal an<br />

os peroneum (white arrow) below the calcaneocuboid<br />

joint, a common normal variant. C, Far-lateral sagittal<br />

T1-weighted image shows the peroneus longus<br />

tendon (PB), wrapping around the lateral malleolus<br />

(LM), toward the base <strong>of</strong> the fifth metatarsal (5).<br />

Behind <strong>and</strong> below the PB is the peroneus longus<br />

tendon (PL). D, Sagittal T1-weighted image one slice<br />

medial to C. Here, the PL is passing under the<br />

calcaneus (Ca) <strong>and</strong> cuboid (Cu). Directly plantar to<br />

the calcaneocuboid joint is the os peroneum (black<br />

arrow), a sesamoid <strong>of</strong> the PL. (The os peroneum is<br />

difficult to see on this T1-weighted image because its<br />

edematous bone marrow is dark.) E, Corresponding<br />

inversion recovery image <strong>of</strong> slice at D demonstrates<br />

bone marrow edema throughout the os peroneum<br />

(arrow).<br />

Continued<br />

C<br />

D<br />

E<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2235<br />

9/9/2008 5:34:10 PM


2236 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

F G H<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-38, cont’d F, Coronal<br />

T1-weighted slice through the os<br />

peroneum (arrow) shows its<br />

marrow to be darker than that <strong>of</strong><br />

the other bones. G, T2-weighted<br />

image without fat suppression,<br />

corresponding coronal slice to (F).<br />

This sequence is not particularly<br />

edema sensitive, <strong>and</strong> the marrow<br />

signal <strong>of</strong> the os peroneum (arrow)<br />

is isointense to that <strong>of</strong> the other<br />

bones. H, Corresponding coronal<br />

inversion recovery image <strong>of</strong> slice<br />

at F <strong>and</strong> G. This sequence is so<br />

fluid sensitive it shows marrow<br />

edema not only in the os<br />

peroneum (arrow) but also in the<br />

adjacent cuboid (arrowhead).<br />

I, Axial T1-weighted image through<br />

the bottom <strong>of</strong> the foot shows the<br />

os peroneum (arrow). J, Axial<br />

inversion recovery image<br />

corresponding to slice at I shows<br />

the bone marrow edema in the os<br />

peroneum (arrow). K, Bone scan,<br />

both-feet-on-detector view, shows<br />

increased activity in the os<br />

peroneum (arrow) <strong>of</strong> the left foot.<br />

The normal right foot is included<br />

for comparison. To help with<br />

localization, also included is an<br />

axial scout MRI (L) showing the os<br />

peroneum (arrow).<br />

I<br />

J<br />

K<br />

L<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2236<br />

9/9/2008 5:34:12 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2237 <strong>47</strong><br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-39. The os calcaneus secondarius (OCS)<br />

is an occasionally seen normal variant that resides<br />

between the anterior process <strong>of</strong> the calcaneus (APC)<br />

<strong>and</strong> the lateral pole <strong>of</strong> the navicular (N).<br />

Radiographs<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-40.<br />

Flow chart for imaging ankle <strong>and</strong> foot (see text).<br />

CT<br />

MRI US NM<br />

Assess cortex<br />

• Fractures<br />

-Calcaneus<br />

-Distal tibia<br />

-Lateral<br />

process <strong>of</strong> talus<br />

• Arthritis<br />

• Fusions<br />

• Coalitions<br />

-Osseous<br />

-Nonosseous<br />

Everything else<br />

• Tendons<br />

-Tears<br />

-Tenosynovitis<br />

• Masses<br />

-S<strong>of</strong>t tissue<br />

-Osseous<br />

• Bone pathology<br />

-Occult fracture<br />

-Osteochondral<br />

lesions<br />

-Infection<br />

• Tendons<br />

-Achilles<br />

• Toes<br />

-Morton’s<br />

-Plantar plate<br />

• Masses<br />

-Vascularity<br />

-Cyst vs solid<br />

• Foreign bodies<br />

-Wood<br />

• Screening<br />

-Sesamoid<br />

• Charcot<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-40 is a flow chart outlining which modalities we<br />

use to image various pathologic processes.<br />

CT is used when we specifically need to assess<br />

bone cortex. The ability to reformat CT data into twodimensional<br />

cross-sectional images in any plane desired<br />

makes it the ideal modality to assess the intra-articular<br />

extent <strong>of</strong> fractures, especially complex fractures involving<br />

the distal tibia or calcaneus. This is particularly helpful to<br />

orthopedic surgeons as part <strong>of</strong> their presurgical planning.<br />

CT data can also be volume rendered into threedimensional<br />

projections to show the alignment <strong>of</strong> comminuted<br />

fractures. CT is also useful for showing fractures<br />

that are difficult to see radiographically, such as the lateral<br />

process <strong>of</strong> the talus or the anterior process <strong>of</strong> the calcaneus.<br />

CT can be used to show arthritic narrowing <strong>of</strong> joints that<br />

are difficult to visualize radiographically, such as the subtalar<br />

joint. In patients who have undergone a surgical<br />

arthrodesis in an attempt to fuse a painful arthritic joint<br />

who remain symptomatic, CT can show the degree <strong>of</strong> bone<br />

fusion at the cortical level. CT is also the best modality to<br />

show the abnormal bone cortex in cases <strong>of</strong> tarsal coalition,<br />

both solid osseous <strong>and</strong> nonosseous coalitions.<br />

MRI is essentially used for everything else. MRI is the<br />

best way to evaluate all <strong>of</strong> the ankle tendons at once for<br />

tears or tenosynovitis. It is the best way to evaluate masses<br />

arising from either the s<strong>of</strong>t tissues or bones <strong>of</strong> the extremities.<br />

MRI is extremely sensitive for the detection <strong>of</strong> bone<br />

marrow <strong>and</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t tissue edema/inflammation, <strong>and</strong> as such<br />

is it useful for the detection <strong>of</strong> conditions that may be<br />

radiographically occult, including stress fractures, osteochondral<br />

lesions, <strong>and</strong> infection.<br />

Ultrasonography (US) can be used to perform a<br />

focused examination <strong>of</strong> the s<strong>of</strong>t tissues <strong>of</strong> the ankle or foot.<br />

Unlike MRI, which images all <strong>of</strong> the ankle bones <strong>and</strong><br />

tendons at once, US is used when we wish to examine one<br />

specific tendon. US is particularly useful when we wish to<br />

examine a torn Achilles tendon in a dynamic fashion to<br />

see how much the tendinous gap opens between plantar<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2237<br />

9/9/2008 5:34:13 PM


2238 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

flexion <strong>and</strong> dorsiflexion. US is used to evaluate small<br />

superficial structures that are sometimes difficult to see on<br />

MRI, such as Morton’s neuromas or the plantar plate. US<br />

can also be used to characterize s<strong>of</strong>t tissue masses, particularly<br />

to assess the degree <strong>of</strong> vascularity or to determine if<br />

the mass is cystic or solid. US is also extremely sensitive<br />

for the detection <strong>of</strong> subcutaneous foreign bodies in the<br />

extremities, particularly wooden splinters, which can be<br />

difficult to detect with radiographs, CT, or MRI. (A discussion<br />

<strong>of</strong> US <strong>of</strong> the ankle <strong>and</strong> foot is beyond the scope <strong>of</strong><br />

this chapter.)<br />

Nuclear medicine (NM) plays a limited role when it<br />

comes to imaging the ankle <strong>and</strong> foot, although in certain<br />

circumstances a bone scan can be helpful. Fractures <strong>of</strong> the<br />

sesamoid bones <strong>of</strong> the great toe tend to be less conspicuous<br />

on MRI than on bone scans, especially when the both-feeton-detector<br />

view is used. In neuropathic feet in which<br />

radiographs show Charcot changes <strong>of</strong> collapse <strong>and</strong> bone<br />

fragmentation, a bone scan combined with a white blood<br />

cell scan can be as sensitive <strong>and</strong> more specific for the detection<br />

<strong>of</strong> osteomyelitis than MRI. (A discussion <strong>of</strong> nuclear<br />

medicine is beyond the scope <strong>of</strong> this chapter.)<br />

• Radiography<br />

Because radiographs are a necessary first step in the workup<br />

<strong>of</strong> the ankle or foot, let us now briefly review how these<br />

should be obtained.<br />

• <strong>Ankle</strong> Radiography<br />

<strong>Ankle</strong> radiographs can be either weight bearing or non–<br />

weight bearing, depending on the preference <strong>of</strong> the ordering<br />

clinician. A st<strong>and</strong>ard radiographic ankle series consists<br />

<strong>of</strong> three projectional views: anteroposterior (AP), mortise,<br />

<strong>and</strong> lateral (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-41). The mortise view is similar to the<br />

AP view, with the leg internally rotated 15 degrees to obtain<br />

a better pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the ankle mortise.<br />

When obtaining radiographs <strong>of</strong> the ankle, it is important<br />

that the technologist include the base <strong>of</strong> the fifth<br />

metatarsal on at least one view. Patients with fractures <strong>of</strong><br />

the base <strong>of</strong> the fifth metatarsal clinically present complaining<br />

<strong>of</strong> lateral ankle pain, <strong>and</strong> this can cause the clinician<br />

to request radiographs <strong>of</strong> the ankle rather than <strong>of</strong> the foot.<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-41 is such a case, where the Jones* fracture can<br />

be seen at the edge <strong>of</strong> the lateral view.<br />

*Sir Robert Jones (1857-1933) was the father <strong>of</strong> orthopedic surgery in Engl<strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> revolutionized the care <strong>of</strong> wounded soldiers during World War I. An early<br />

proponent <strong>of</strong> x-rays, Jones imaged the transverse extra-articular fracture across<br />

the proximal diaphysis <strong>of</strong> the fifth metatarsal just a few months after Röntgen published<br />

“On a New Kind <strong>of</strong> Rays” (December 28, 1895). Jones first described this<br />

fracture after having sustained such an injury himself “whilst dancing.” (This was<br />

not ballroom dancing; rather it was “dancing in a circle round the tent pole” with<br />

his military colleagues. There was no mention as to whether alcohol was involved.)<br />

He subsequently identified this fracture on radiographs <strong>of</strong> two other patients <strong>and</strong><br />

published his series <strong>of</strong> three in the Annals <strong>of</strong> Surgery in 1902, “Fracture <strong>of</strong> the Base<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Fifth Metatarsal Bone by Indirect Violence.”<br />

• <strong>Foot</strong> Radiography<br />

It is preferable to obtain radiographs <strong>of</strong> the foot with the<br />

patient st<strong>and</strong>ing to visualize the bones in their weightbearing<br />

alignment. 5 AP <strong>and</strong> oblique views (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-42A <strong>and</strong><br />

B) can be obtained by placing the x-ray cassette on the floor<br />

<strong>and</strong> having the patient st<strong>and</strong> on the cassette while the x-ray<br />

beam is pointed downward. It is important to closely scrutinize<br />

the alignment <strong>of</strong> the tarsometatarsal joints on both<br />

<strong>of</strong> these views when assessing for a Lisfranc fracturedislocation.<br />

Normally, the first metatarsal should line up<br />

perfectly with the first (medial) cuneiform, the second<br />

metatarsal with the middle cuneiform, the third metatarsal<br />

with the third cuneiform, <strong>and</strong> the fourth <strong>and</strong> fifth metatarsals<br />

with the cuboid.<br />

The st<strong>and</strong>ing lateral view <strong>of</strong> the foot (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-42C) is<br />

somewhat more difficult to obtain because it is usually not<br />

possible to lower the x-ray tube all the way down to the<br />

floor. Consequently, we use a set <strong>of</strong> wooden steps (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-<br />

43). This elevates the feet to a level where the x-ray beam<br />

can be oriented horizontally while the cassette is held<br />

between the feet. Figure <strong>47</strong>-44 is an example <strong>of</strong> differences<br />

that can be seen between st<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> non–weight-bearing<br />

views.<br />

• Computed Tomography<br />

• Overview<br />

Bone CT protocols have evolved as scanner technology has<br />

progressed. In the broadest terms, a CT gantry consists <strong>of</strong><br />

a spinning ring on which is mounted an x-ray tube. The<br />

tube emits a fan-shaped x-ray beam, aimed through the<br />

center <strong>of</strong> the ring to an array <strong>of</strong> x-ray detectors mounted<br />

on the other side. The patient lies on a padded table that<br />

moves through the spinning gantry. With early generations<br />

<strong>of</strong> single-slice CT scanners the gantry would spin clockwise<br />

one rotation, then stop <strong>and</strong> spin counter-clockwise one<br />

rotation to prevent tangling <strong>of</strong> the power cables supplying<br />

the x-ray tube. The patient table would be stationary during<br />

each <strong>of</strong> the scanning rotations while the gantry was spinning<br />

<strong>and</strong> the tube was emitting x-rays. The table would<br />

move between gantry rotations <strong>and</strong> stop at each slice position.<br />

These were the days <strong>of</strong> true CAT, in which “A” stood<br />

for “axial,” <strong>and</strong> scans consisted only <strong>of</strong> a series <strong>of</strong> axial<br />

slides. Scans were relatively slow because time was lost<br />

stopping the gantry’s clockwise momentum to reverse its<br />

rotation.<br />

With the innovation <strong>of</strong> slip-ring technology, tangled<br />

power cables were eliminated <strong>and</strong> the gantry could spin in<br />

one direction continuously while the table moved continuously<br />

through it. Thus, helical CT (also known as spiral CT,<br />

analogous to a spiral-sliced ham) was born. Now the data<br />

stream coming out <strong>of</strong> the x-ray detectors no longer represents<br />

individual axial slices, but rather a continuous volume<br />

<strong>of</strong> patient imaging information. The raw data are then<br />

reconstructed into a series <strong>of</strong> axial slices that we refer to as<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2238<br />

9/9/2008 5:34:14 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2239 <strong>47</strong><br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-41. Non–weight-bearing radiographic<br />

ankle series in a 37-year-old with lateral ankle pain<br />

after an acute inversion injury. Anteroposterior view<br />

(A) <strong>and</strong> mortise view (B) demonstrate a normal<br />

appearance <strong>of</strong> the ankle joint. C, The lateral ankle view<br />

reveals no abnormalities <strong>of</strong> the hindfoot. (The region<br />

outlined by the dashed rectangle is magnified <strong>and</strong><br />

displayed to the right). Close inspection <strong>of</strong> the base <strong>of</strong><br />

the fifth metatarsal on the lateral view <strong>of</strong> the ankle<br />

reveals a proximal diaphyseal fracture, a Jones<br />

fracture (arrow). Fractures <strong>of</strong> the base <strong>of</strong> the fifth<br />

metatarsal <strong>of</strong>ten present clinically as lateral ankle<br />

pain. The technologist must be careful always to<br />

include the base <strong>of</strong> the fifth metatarsal on at least one<br />

view <strong>of</strong> all ankle radiographic series.<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

the source images. Because <strong>of</strong> its volumetric nature, helical<br />

data can be reconstructed at any slice width, <strong>and</strong> with any<br />

interval spacing between slices. These axial source images<br />

can then be reformatted into two-dimensional slices in any<br />

desired plane <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> any desired width, or into threedimensional<br />

volume-rendered images. In the past decade,<br />

single-slice helical scanners have evolved into multislice<br />

scanners, able to acquire larger volumes <strong>of</strong> patient data<br />

with each gantry rotation. This technology has largely been<br />

driven by the desire to scan the entire chest within a single<br />

breath-hold <strong>and</strong> the coronary arteries in a single heartbeat.<br />

Although a multislice CT scanner is not absolutely required<br />

for bone CT, covering the desired volume faster minimizes<br />

artifacts related to patient motion as well as minimizing<br />

the amount <strong>of</strong> time the patient has to lie still on the<br />

scanner table.<br />

Thus, the modern bone CT scan consists <strong>of</strong> the acquisition<br />

<strong>of</strong> three sets <strong>of</strong> imaging data. The raw data tend not to<br />

be archived; they are temporarily stored on the scanner’s<br />

hard drive <strong>and</strong> are overwritten as the hard drive becomes<br />

full (<strong>of</strong>ten after 24 hours). The source images are reconstructed<br />

from the raw data using a variety <strong>of</strong> filtered backprojection<br />

algorithms. These images are oriented in a plane<br />

axial to the scanner gantry. Once the raw data are overwritten,<br />

no additional source images can be reconstructed;<br />

thus, it behooves the CT technologist to create whichever<br />

source image data sets are needed for future reformats.<br />

These source images can be viewed by the radiologist as<br />

desired <strong>and</strong> can be sent to the picture archiving <strong>and</strong> communications<br />

system (PACS) for short- or long-term storage.<br />

However, the multiplanar two- <strong>and</strong> three-dimensional images<br />

reformatted from the source images are the ones primarily<br />

used for diagnostic <strong>and</strong> planning purposes <strong>and</strong> ultimately<br />

sent to the PACS for archiving.<br />

Achieving the highest-resolution two-dimensional<br />

reformatted images requires the source images to be<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2239<br />

9/9/2008 5:34:15 PM


2240 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

A<br />

B<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-43. Method <strong>of</strong> obtaining weight-bearing lateral view. In<br />

most radiology departments the x-ray tube cannot be lowered to the<br />

floor. Weight-bearing lateral views can be obtained by having the<br />

patient st<strong>and</strong> on a wooden box. The central x-ray beam (dashed<br />

arrow) passes through the foot, from lateral to medial, striking the<br />

x-ray cassette held upright between the feet.<br />

C<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-42. Weight-bearing radiographic foot series in an<br />

asymptomatic 41-year-old male volunteer. A, Anteroposterior view;<br />

B, oblique view; C, lateral view. The upward-pointing white arrow was<br />

placed by the technologist to indicate the patient was st<strong>and</strong>ing. The<br />

heel spur (black arrow in C) at the origin <strong>of</strong> the plantar fascia is <strong>of</strong><br />

doubtful clinical significance in this normal volunteer who has never<br />

had heel pain. (This person is not st<strong>and</strong>ing on screws, but on the<br />

wooden box in Figure <strong>47</strong>-43, held together by screws.)<br />

reconstructed into relatively thin slices, <strong>of</strong>ten the width <strong>of</strong><br />

a detector element. To minimize the stair-step quantization<br />

artifact that can occur between axial slices, the source<br />

images should be reconstructed at intervals such that they<br />

overlap each other. We have found that a 50% overlap<br />

(interslice interval equals one-half slice width) works well.<br />

We use an edge-enhanced reconstruction algorithm (called<br />

a “bone” algorithm by some CT manufacturers) to yield<br />

two-dimensional reformatted images with sharp cortical<br />

detail.<br />

Thin <strong>and</strong> overlapping source images also yield good<br />

three-dimensional reformatted images. However, threedimensional<br />

images by their nature represent a smooth<br />

rendering <strong>of</strong> the volumetric data, <strong>and</strong> edge-enhanced<br />

source images can yield excessively noisy threedimensional<br />

images. We create a second set <strong>of</strong> source<br />

images, using a smoothing reconstruction algorithm (called<br />

a “st<strong>and</strong>ard” algorithm by some manufacturers) for threedimensional<br />

reformatting.<br />

Depending on the length <strong>of</strong> the body part being<br />

scanned, the thin overlapping source images may consist<br />

<strong>of</strong> hundreds, or sometimes thous<strong>and</strong>s, <strong>of</strong> images—twice<br />

that if both edge-enhanced <strong>and</strong> smoothed data sets are<br />

created. At our institution we choose to store these source<br />

images permanently on our PACS, although we save them<br />

in a separate imaging folder from the multiplanar reformatted<br />

images, which typically consist <strong>of</strong> merely dozens <strong>of</strong><br />

images per plane.<br />

• Protocol for <strong>Foot</strong>, <strong>Ankle</strong>, <strong>and</strong> Tibia (Distal)<br />

Scanning Technique<br />

At the UW we have developed our “F/A/T” protocol—a single<br />

scanning protocol that allows us to create multiplanar<br />

reformatted images optimized to visualize the foot,<br />

ankle, <strong>and</strong> distal tibia. (The latest versions <strong>of</strong> all the<br />

UW musculoskeletal protocol sheets can be viewed<br />

<strong>and</strong> downloaded for free at www.<strong>Radiology</strong>.Wisc.Edu/<br />

MSKprotocols.)<br />

The patient is positioned supine on the CT table, with<br />

legs straight, feet together in the center <strong>of</strong> the gantry, <strong>and</strong><br />

toes pointing up at the ceiling (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-45A). We typically<br />

scan through both ankles <strong>and</strong> feet simultaneously because<br />

this position is most comfortable for the patient <strong>and</strong> allows<br />

us to compare the injured side with the contralateral<br />

normal side when questions arise regarding subtle alignment<br />

abnormalities. Unless the contralateral foot contains<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2240<br />

9/9/2008 5:34:17 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2241 <strong>47</strong><br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-44. Importance <strong>of</strong> weight-bearing view.<br />

A, Non–weight-bearing lateral view, obtained<br />

portably. On this image, the long axis <strong>of</strong> the talus<br />

(dashed white line) is parallel to the long axis <strong>of</strong> the<br />

first metatarsal (dashed black line), suggesting normal<br />

alignment. B, Same patient as in A, obtained upright at<br />

a follow-up clinic visit 3 months later. On this weightbearing<br />

lateral view, the long axis <strong>of</strong> the talus (solid<br />

white line) is now angled downward relative to the<br />

first metatarsal (solid black line). This indicates that<br />

the patient has a nonrigid flat-foot deformity (pes<br />

planus), demonstrable only with weight bearing.<br />

A<br />

B<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-45. A, The patient is positioned supine on the CT table<br />

with her legs straight, feet together, toes pointing to the ceiling.<br />

B, Example <strong>of</strong> a foot holder we built to help keep patients’ feet<br />

centered in the CT scanner in neutral position. C, In lieu <strong>of</strong> a<br />

dedicated foot holder, we have used a box.<br />

metal, including it in the scanning field-<strong>of</strong>-view (FOV)<br />

does not cause excessive streak artifacts <strong>and</strong> does not<br />

increase the radiation exposure to organs in the torso.<br />

Securing the patient’s feet to a dedicated holder (Fig.<br />

<strong>47</strong>-45B) or to a box (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-45C) helps to hold the feet in<br />

neutral position <strong>and</strong> to prevent motion during the scan.<br />

Scout views are obtained in both the AP <strong>and</strong> lateral<br />

projections (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-46). The scanning FOV should be<br />

set wide enough to include both the right <strong>and</strong> left lateral<br />

malleoli; for most patients this is less than 25 cm. The<br />

coverage should begin superior to both syndesmoses<br />

<strong>and</strong> extend below the calcanei. In cases <strong>of</strong> pilon fractures,<br />

which are comminuted fractures involving the plafond,<br />

coverage is extended superiorly to include more <strong>of</strong> the<br />

distal tibia. We typically scan using 120 kVp at less than<br />

200 mA.<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2241<br />

9/9/2008 5:34:22 PM


2242 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-46. Anteroposterior (A) <strong>and</strong> lateral<br />

(B) scout CT views. The scanning field should cover<br />

both ankles <strong>and</strong> should extend from above the<br />

syndesmosis to below the calcaneus (white<br />

rectangles). In cases <strong>of</strong> pilon fractures, more <strong>of</strong> the<br />

distal tibia is covered (dashed rectangle).<br />

A<br />

B<br />

We can achieve the highest resolution on the reformatted<br />

images by reconstructing the source images at a width<br />

equal to the width <strong>of</strong> the narrowest detector. The reconstruction<br />

interval between source images is equal to onehalf<br />

the detector width, <strong>and</strong> this allows for a 50% overlap<br />

between slices. We reconstruct two sets <strong>of</strong> source images;<br />

one uses an edge-enhanced bone algorithm for the twodimensional<br />

multiplanar reformatted images, the other a<br />

smoothing st<strong>and</strong>ard algorithm for reformatting in threedimensions.<br />

Both sets <strong>of</strong> source images are sent to the<br />

PACS for archival storage <strong>and</strong> can be accessed any time in<br />

the future if additional two- or three-dimensional reformatted<br />

images are desired. Because these thin overlapping<br />

slices yield hundreds <strong>of</strong> source images, we store these<br />

source images on the PACS in their own folder—a folder<br />

separate from where we store the reformatted images,<br />

which are images most <strong>of</strong> us primarily view.<br />

Reformatting Technique<br />

At the UW we have identified at least 15 different ways that<br />

we are commonly asked to create two-dimensional reformatted<br />

images <strong>of</strong> the ankle <strong>and</strong> foot. These are delineated<br />

on our downloadable protocol sheets, portions <strong>of</strong> which<br />

are shown in Figure <strong>47</strong>-<strong>47</strong>. The reformatting protocols are<br />

centered on the anatomic divisions illustrated in Figures<br />

<strong>47</strong>-5 <strong>and</strong> <strong>47</strong>-48.<br />

<strong>Ankle</strong>/Distal Tibia Protocol. Our ankle/distal tibia protocol<br />

(see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-<strong>47</strong>A) is centered on the ankle joint. This<br />

protocol is used for scanning fractures <strong>of</strong> the distal tibia<br />

(e.g., pilon, malleoli, triplane, juvenile Tillaux) or <strong>of</strong> the<br />

talar dome (e.g., osteochondral lesions). Using a midsagittal<br />

reference image, straight axial images are created in a<br />

plane parallel to the bottom <strong>of</strong> the foot. Then, using an<br />

axial reference image through the top <strong>of</strong> the ankle mortise,<br />

mortise coronal <strong>and</strong> mortise sagittal images are created<br />

parallel <strong>and</strong> perpendicular to an imaginary line through<br />

the anterior cortex <strong>of</strong> the medial <strong>and</strong> lateral malleoli. For<br />

distal tibial fractures, we find that creating reformatted<br />

images that are 3 mm thick at 3-mm intervals (no gap or<br />

overlap between reformatted slices) yields crisp images<br />

that do not appear noisy. However, for osteochondral<br />

lesions <strong>of</strong> the talar dome, our surgeons prefer that the<br />

mortise coronal <strong>and</strong> mortise sagittal images be reformatted<br />

at 1 mm, yielding images <strong>of</strong> higher resolution but also with<br />

more noise.<br />

Hindfoot/Midfoot Protocol. Our hindfoot/midfoot protocol<br />

(see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-<strong>47</strong>B) is centered on the Chopart joint <strong>and</strong><br />

is used to evaluate hindfoot fractures (e.g., calcaneus, talar<br />

body) <strong>and</strong> the subtalar joint (e.g., tarsal coalitions). Using<br />

an axial reference image, straight sagittal images are reformatted<br />

along a plane parallel to the long axis <strong>of</strong> the foot.<br />

The other three planes are reformatted <strong>of</strong>f a midsagittal<br />

reference image. Straight axial images are reformatted in a<br />

plane parallel to the bottom <strong>of</strong> the foot. Oblique coronal<br />

<strong>and</strong> oblique axial images are reformatted in planes both<br />

perpendicular <strong>and</strong> parallel to the posterior facet <strong>of</strong> the<br />

subtalar joint.<br />

Forefoot/Midfoot Protocol. Our forefoot/midfoot protocol<br />

(see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-<strong>47</strong>C) is primarily used to assess the alignment<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Lisfranc joint <strong>and</strong> the integrity <strong>of</strong> the adjacent<br />

bones. We find that it works best to create reformatted<br />

images in three planes relative to the first metatarsal shaft.<br />

A sagittal reference image that best delineates the entire<br />

length <strong>of</strong> the first metatarsal is selected. Long-axis <strong>and</strong><br />

short-axis planes are reformatted both parallel <strong>and</strong> perpendicular<br />

to the sagittal length <strong>of</strong> the first metatarsal. The<br />

third plane, sagittal to the first metatarsal, is best obtained<br />

<strong>of</strong>f an axial reference image that has been obliqued to<br />

include the entire length <strong>of</strong> the first metatarsal.<br />

Navicular Protocol. Our dedicated navicular protocol<br />

(see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-<strong>47</strong>D) is used to assess the healing <strong>of</strong> a known<br />

navicular fatigue fracture that has perhaps been previously<br />

diagnosed by MRI. Because these navicular fatigue fractures<br />

tend to be incomplete hairline cracks, we increase the resolution<br />

by creating thin (1 mm) reformatted images in a<br />

small (6 cm) FOV. Oblique coronal <strong>and</strong> oblique axial<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2242<br />

9/9/2008 5:34:23 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2243 <strong>47</strong><br />

A <strong>Ankle</strong>/distal tibia (centered on ankle joint)<br />

1. Straight axial (<strong>of</strong>f a sagittal)<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard: 3 × 3 mm<br />

For OLT: 3 × 3 mm<br />

2. Mortise coronal (<strong>of</strong>f an axial)<br />

3 × 3 mm<br />

1 × 1 mm<br />

3. Mortise sagittal (<strong>of</strong>f an axial)<br />

3 × 3 mm<br />

1 × 1 mm<br />

B Hindfoot/midfoot (centered on Chopart joint)<br />

1. Straight sagittal (<strong>of</strong>f an axial)<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard: 3 × 3 mm<br />

2. Oblique coronal (<strong>of</strong>f a sagittal)<br />

3 × 3 mm<br />

3. Straight axial (<strong>of</strong>f a sagittal)<br />

3 × 3 mm<br />

4. Oblique axial (<strong>of</strong>f a sagittal)<br />

3 × 3 mm<br />

C Forefoot/midfoot (centered on Lisfranc joint)<br />

All planes are relative to 1st metatarsal<br />

1. Axial (long axis) (<strong>of</strong>f a sagittal)<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard: 3 × 3 mm<br />

2. Short axis<br />

(<strong>of</strong>f a sagittal)<br />

3 × 3 mm<br />

3. Sagittal<br />

(<strong>of</strong>f an axial; may<br />

have to oblique<br />

reference image<br />

to see 1st metatarsal)<br />

3 × 3 mm<br />

D Navicular (stress fracture)<br />

Reformat 6 cm FOV<br />

Reformat 1 × 1 mm<br />

1 <strong>and</strong> 2. Coronal <strong>and</strong> axial<br />

(<strong>of</strong>f a sagittal)<br />

3. Sagittal (<strong>of</strong>f<br />

an axial)<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-<strong>47</strong>. These are portions <strong>of</strong> our <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin foot/ankle/distal tibia (F/A/T) protocol sheet. A, <strong>Ankle</strong>/distal tibia protocol.<br />

This protocol is appropriate for distal tibial fractures (pilon, malleoli, triplane, <strong>and</strong> juvenile Tillaux) <strong>and</strong> for talar dome fractures (osteochondral<br />

lesions <strong>of</strong> the talus [OLT], osteochondritis dissecans). B, Hindfoot/midfoot protocol. This protocol is appropriate for hindfoot fractures (calcaneus,<br />

talar body, <strong>and</strong> subtalar joint) <strong>and</strong> for tarsal coalitions. C, Forefoot/midfoot protocol. This protocol is appropriate for forefoot fractures (Lisfranc<br />

dislocation, metatarsals). D, Navicular protocol.<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2243<br />

9/9/2008 5:34:25 PM


2244 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-48. Anatomic division <strong>and</strong> major joints shown on a<br />

sagittal CT. The joint between the tibia (Ti) <strong>and</strong> talus (Ta) is the ankle<br />

joint (AJ), shown with the yellow line. The joint between the talus <strong>and</strong><br />

calcaneus (Ca) is the subtalar joint; the posterior facet (P-STJ) is shown<br />

with the red line. The Chopart joint, shown with the curved blue line,<br />

separates the hindfoot from midfoot. The Lisfranc joint, shown with<br />

the angled green line, separates the midfoot from forefoot.<br />

images are reformatted <strong>of</strong>f a sagittal reference image, <strong>and</strong><br />

oblique sagittal images are reformatted <strong>of</strong>f an axial reference<br />

image.<br />

• Magnetic Resonance Imaging<br />

• Coils <strong>and</strong> Markers<br />

When imaging the ankle or foot with MR, it is vital to<br />

underst<strong>and</strong> the clinical question that the scan is being requested<br />

to address. No one st<strong>and</strong>ardized protocol can<br />

answer all possible questions. The imaging planes,<br />

sequences, <strong>and</strong> even the selection <strong>of</strong> which coil to use will<br />

vary depending on the clinical circumstances. Whenever<br />

possible, an extremity coil should be used. We use a dedicated<br />

foot <strong>and</strong> ankle coil (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-49) that incorporates a<br />

chimney-like extension so that the toes can be included in<br />

the FOV. This chimney design also helps to hold the<br />

patient’s foot <strong>and</strong> ankle in a neutral position, that is, with<br />

the bottom <strong>of</strong> the foot perpendicular to the tibia, as it<br />

would be if the patient were st<strong>and</strong>ing. Some designs <strong>of</strong><br />

knee coils have an open top that allows the toes to protrude<br />

(Fig. <strong>47</strong>-50A). Custom cushioned inserts (Fig.<br />

<strong>47</strong>-50B) help to keep the heel immobilized <strong>and</strong> centered<br />

in the coil. Although the neutral positioning shown in<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-50A is fine for imaging the ankle <strong>and</strong> hindfoot,<br />

it would not be appropriate for the phalanges. When it is<br />

necessary to image the toes, <strong>and</strong> a foot coil as in Figure<br />

<strong>47</strong>-49 is not available, the knee coil can be used with the<br />

patient’s foot held in plantar flexion. In these circumstances,<br />

the technologist should see if having the patient<br />

lie prone makes it more comfortable to maintain plantar<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-49. This dedicated foot <strong>and</strong> ankle coil incorporates a<br />

chimney-like extension (arrow) so that the phalanges can be included<br />

in the field <strong>of</strong> view.<br />

flexion. Also, patients tend to feel less claustrophobic when<br />

prone. Sometimes we have to be creative in our coil selection<br />

to accommodate the patient’s physical limitations<br />

(Fig. <strong>47</strong>-51).<br />

We encourage our technologists to place a marker over<br />

the sight <strong>of</strong> maximal tenderness or near a nonhealing ulcer.<br />

Markers can be helpful to draw the attention <strong>of</strong> both the<br />

technologist acquiring the images <strong>and</strong> the radiologist interpreting<br />

the images. Do not be dissuaded when the patient<br />

initially points to a wide area, such as across the midfoot<br />

or around the malleoli. This is typical. Instead, ask the<br />

patient to point to one spot with one finger—which, when<br />

encouraged, they usually can do. The marker should be<br />

placed there. Such a marker needs to be conspicuous on<br />

all imaging sequences, including fat-suppressed sequences,<br />

<strong>and</strong> should be placed on the patient in such a way as<br />

not to deform the contour <strong>of</strong> the skin. Although markers<br />

are commercially available,* generic capsules containing<br />

vitamin E or docusate sodium (Colace) are <strong>of</strong>ten used.<br />

• Scanning Technique<br />

Imaging Planes<br />

We use at least nine st<strong>and</strong>ard imaging planes in our foot<br />

<strong>and</strong> ankle MRI protocols (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-52). The exact slice thickness,<br />

interslice gap, <strong>and</strong> FOV should be optimized to take<br />

advantage <strong>of</strong> the characteristics <strong>of</strong> the MRI scanner <strong>and</strong> coil<br />

being used. The parameters used at the UW for our GE<br />

1.5-T scanners are spelled out in detail on our MRI scanning<br />

parameters <strong>and</strong> protocols sheets, the most up to<br />

date <strong>of</strong> which can be found at our website (http://www.<br />

<strong>Radiology</strong>.Wisc.Edu/MSKprotocols).<br />

*IZI Multi-Modality Radiographic Markers, IZI Medical Products, 7020<br />

Tudsbury Road, Baltimore, MD 21244; (410) 594-9403; http://www.izimed.com.<br />

Beekley MR-Spots, Beekley Corporation, 150 Dolphin Road, Bristol, CT 06010;<br />

(860) 583-<strong>47</strong>00; http://www.beekley.com.<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2244<br />

9/9/2008 5:34:27 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2245 <strong>47</strong><br />

A<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-50. A knee coil can be used to scan the ankle. A, The open top on this knee coil allows the toes to extend through the coil while<br />

keeping the foot in neutral position. B, A customized foam pad (white arrow) helps immobilize the hindfoot being scanned. A second pad next to<br />

the coil (black arrow) give the contralateral foot a place to rest.<br />

B<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-51. Example <strong>of</strong> a patient who could not be positioned in the foot or knee coil. This is a 41-year-old with paraplegia from spina bifida<br />

who is essentially frozen in the fetal position. The clinical concern was for infection in <strong>and</strong> around the ankle joint. Because the patient was<br />

physically unable to straighten her legs, we could not use the foot coil. Instead, we used a torso coil <strong>and</strong> covered the leg <strong>and</strong> ankle. A, Lateral<br />

radiograph shows s<strong>of</strong>t tissue swelling. B, T1-weighted, large field-<strong>of</strong>-view image covering the entire leg as well as the ankle. Because <strong>of</strong> difficulty<br />

positioning the patient, a portion <strong>of</strong> the other leg is also within the coil. C, Inversion recovery image shows no bone marrow edema but diffuse<br />

edema <strong>of</strong> the subcutaneous fat. D, T1-weighted image with fat suppression after the administration <strong>of</strong> intravenous gadolinium shows diffuse<br />

enhancement <strong>of</strong> the subcutaneous fat, indicative <strong>of</strong> cellulitis. The lack <strong>of</strong> enhancement <strong>and</strong> edema in the bone marrow exclude osteomyelitis. The<br />

gray arrow points to inadequate fat suppression at the edge <strong>of</strong> the coil, a common occurrence with large fields <strong>of</strong> view.<br />

The straight sagittal plane (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-52A) is our survey<br />

plane, <strong>and</strong> it is usually the first plane acquired in all <strong>of</strong> our<br />

ankle <strong>and</strong> foot MRI protocols. Most <strong>of</strong> the other imaging<br />

planes are acquired relative to a straight sagittal reference<br />

image. The straight sagittal slices are set up <strong>of</strong>f an axial scout<br />

image <strong>and</strong> are oriented parallel to the long axis <strong>of</strong> the foot.<br />

At least two axial orientations are typically used.<br />

Straight axial slices (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-52B) are set up <strong>of</strong>f a straight<br />

sagittal reference image, either a sagittal scout image or<br />

one <strong>of</strong> the midsagittal slices from the preceding acquisition.<br />

The straight axial slices should be roughly perpendicular<br />

to the long axis <strong>of</strong> the tibia <strong>and</strong> if the ankle is<br />

held in the neutral position will be roughly parallel to<br />

the bottom <strong>of</strong> the foot. The slices should begin well proximal<br />

to the level <strong>of</strong> the malleoli <strong>and</strong> extend distal to<br />

the calcaneus. This is our primary plane for imaging the<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2245<br />

9/9/2008 5:34:31 PM


2246 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

E<br />

F<br />

G<br />

H<br />

I<br />

Legend on opposite page.<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2246<br />

9/9/2008 5:34:33 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 22<strong>47</strong> <strong>47</strong><br />

ankle tendons <strong>and</strong> is also useful for the ankle ligaments<br />

<strong>and</strong> syndesmosis.<br />

Oblique axial slices (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-52C) are set up <strong>of</strong>f the<br />

same straight sagittal reference image as previously but are<br />

oriented parallel to the long axis <strong>of</strong> the metatarsals. This is<br />

our primary plane for imaging the tarsal bones, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

slices should include all <strong>of</strong> the tarsals from the back <strong>of</strong> the<br />

calcaneus through the metatarsal bases.<br />

There are at least three ways to orient slices in the<br />

coronal plane. Least commonly used is the straight coronal<br />

plane (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-52D). These slices are set up <strong>of</strong>f a sagittal<br />

reference image, are oriented roughly perpendicular to the<br />

plantar aponeurosis, <strong>and</strong> are used primarily when evaluating<br />

the plantar fascia.<br />

Oblique coronal slices (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-52E) are used much<br />

more <strong>of</strong>ten then straight coronal slices <strong>and</strong> are set up <strong>of</strong>f<br />

the same sagittal reference slice as previously. The oblique<br />

coronal slices are oriented perpendicular to the posterior<br />

facet <strong>of</strong> the subtalar joint. (See Fig. <strong>47</strong>-7 to review the<br />

anatomy <strong>of</strong> the posterior facet <strong>of</strong> the subtalar joint.) This<br />

is a good secondary plane to evaluate the tendons <strong>and</strong><br />

tarsals, <strong>and</strong> the slices should include all <strong>of</strong> the hindfoot<br />

<strong>and</strong> midfoot.<br />

Mortise coronal slices (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-52F) are set up <strong>of</strong>f<br />

a straight axial reference image taken through the top <strong>of</strong><br />

the talar dome. This axial reference image can be either an<br />

axial scout image or one <strong>of</strong> the straight axial slices from a<br />

preceding acquisition. The slices are aligned parallel to a<br />

line drawn between the medial <strong>and</strong> lateral malleoli. This<br />

is one <strong>of</strong> the primary planes used for imaging osteochondral<br />

lesions <strong>of</strong> the talus (OLTs), <strong>and</strong> it is also good for<br />

looking at the malleoli <strong>and</strong> the ankle ligaments.<br />

Mortise sagittal slices (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-52G) are set up <strong>of</strong>f<br />

the same straight axial reference image as previously, <strong>and</strong><br />

the slices are oriented perpendicular to the mortise coronal<br />

slices. This, rather than the straight sagittal plane, is the<br />

survey plane we use for OLTs.<br />

With regard to the forefoot, we have found that there<br />

is come confusion among technologists as to the coronal<br />

<strong>and</strong> axial planes, <strong>and</strong> to avoid potential ambiguity we refer<br />

to the short-axis <strong>and</strong> long-axis planes relative to the metatarsals.<br />

Short-axis images are obtained <strong>of</strong>f a straight sagittal<br />

reference image <strong>and</strong> are oriented perpendicular to the long<br />

axis <strong>of</strong> the metatarsals (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-52H). This yields a series<br />

<strong>of</strong> short-axis slices that cut transversely through the metatarsals<br />

<strong>and</strong> phalanges, an example <strong>of</strong> which is shown in<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-52I. This is a good plane to evaluate for bone<br />

marrow edema in the forefoot.<br />

Long-axis images are obtained <strong>of</strong>f a short-axis reference<br />

image through the metatarsals <strong>and</strong> are oriented to<br />

include all five, or at least four, metatarsals on individual<br />

slices (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-52I). This is the best way to obtain a<br />

side-by-side comparison <strong>of</strong> the metatarsals <strong>and</strong> is used<br />

when evaluating for stress fractures or osteomyelitis.<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-52. The st<strong>and</strong>ard imaging planes we use for MRI <strong>of</strong> the foot <strong>and</strong> ankle. The white lines represent the orientation, but not the actual<br />

number or spacing, <strong>of</strong> the slices. A, Straight sagittal slices are set up <strong>of</strong>f an axial scout image <strong>and</strong> are oriented parallel to the long axis <strong>of</strong> the foot.<br />

(Using a cushioned foot holder, as in Figs. <strong>47</strong>-49 <strong>and</strong> <strong>47</strong>-50, helps keep the foot in place relative to the scanner.) This is our survey plane, <strong>and</strong> it is<br />

the first plane acquired in all <strong>of</strong> our ankle <strong>and</strong> foot MRI protocols. Most <strong>of</strong> the other imaging planes are acquired relative to a straight sagittal<br />

reference image. B, Straight axial slices are set up <strong>of</strong>f a straight sagittal reference image, either a sagittal scout image or one <strong>of</strong> the midsagittal<br />

slices acquired in A. The straight axial slices should be roughly perpendicular to the long axis <strong>of</strong> the tibia <strong>and</strong>, if the ankle is held in the neutral<br />

position, will be roughly parallel to the bottom <strong>of</strong> the foot. The slices should begin well proximal to the level <strong>of</strong> the malleoli <strong>and</strong> extend distal to<br />

the calcaneus. This is our primary plane for imaging the ankle tendons. C, Oblique axial slices are set up <strong>of</strong>f the same straight sagittal reference<br />

image as in B <strong>and</strong> are oriented parallel to the long axis <strong>of</strong> the metatarsals. This is our primary plane for imaging the tarsal bones, <strong>and</strong> the slices<br />

should include all <strong>of</strong> the tarsals from the back <strong>of</strong> the calcaneus through the metatarsal bases. (Although the field <strong>of</strong> view can be enlarged to<br />

include the metatarsals <strong>and</strong> phalanges in their entirety, we prefer to use the short-axis <strong>and</strong> long-axis planes delineated in H <strong>and</strong> I when the<br />

clinical question involves the forefoot.) D, Straight coronal slices, set up <strong>of</strong>f a sagittal reference image, are used primarily when evaluating the<br />

plantar fascia <strong>and</strong> should be oriented roughly perpendicular to the plantar aponeurosis. E, Oblique coronal slices are used much more <strong>of</strong>ten then<br />

straight coronal slices <strong>and</strong> are set up <strong>of</strong>f the same sagittal reference slice as in B. The oblique coronal slices are oriented perpendicular to the<br />

posterior facet <strong>of</strong> the subtalar joint. (Refer to Fig. <strong>47</strong>-7 to review the anatomy <strong>of</strong> the posterior facet <strong>of</strong> the subtalar joint.) This is a good secondary<br />

plane to evaluate the tendons <strong>and</strong> tarsals, <strong>and</strong> the slices should include all <strong>of</strong> the hindfoot <strong>and</strong> midfoot. F, Mortise coronal slices are set up <strong>of</strong>f a<br />

straight axial reference image taken through the top <strong>of</strong> the talar dome. This axial reference image can be either an axial scout image or one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

straight axial slices acquired in B. The slices are aligned parallel to a line drawn between the medial <strong>and</strong> lateral malleoli. This is one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

primary planes used for imaging osteochondral lesions <strong>of</strong> the talus (OLT), <strong>and</strong> it is also good for looking at the malleoli <strong>and</strong> the ankle ligaments.<br />

G, Mortise sagittal slices are set up <strong>of</strong>f the same straight axial reference image as in F, <strong>and</strong> the slices are oriented perpendicular to the mortise<br />

coronal slices. This is the survey plane for OLT. (The marker [m] indicates the site <strong>of</strong> maximal tenderness.) With regard to the forefoot, we prefer<br />

to refer to the short-axis <strong>and</strong> long-axis planes, rather than coronal or axial, to avoid ambiguity. H, Short-axis images are obtained <strong>of</strong>f a straight<br />

sagittal reference image <strong>and</strong> are oriented perpendicular to the long axis <strong>of</strong> the metatarsals. A short-axis image through the metatarsals is shown in<br />

I. I, Long-axis images are obtained <strong>of</strong>f a short-axis reference image through the metatarsals <strong>and</strong> are oriented to try to include all five, or at least<br />

four, metatarsals on individual slices. This is the best way to obtain a side-by-side comparison <strong>of</strong> the metatarsals <strong>and</strong> is used when evaluating for<br />

stress fractures or osteomyelitis.<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 22<strong>47</strong><br />

9/9/2008 5:34:33 PM


2248 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-53. Comparison <strong>of</strong> T2-weighted, fatsuppressed<br />

(A) <strong>and</strong> inversion recovery (B) MRIs in a<br />

35-year-old with plantar fasciitis. Both <strong>of</strong> these sagittal<br />

images <strong>of</strong> the calcaneus delineate the plantar<br />

aponeurosis (open arrowheads), as well as the edema<br />

in the adjacent heel fat pad (white arrowheads) <strong>and</strong> in<br />

the bone marrow at its origin (white arrow).<br />

A<br />

B<br />

Protocols<br />

Our ankle/foot MRI protocols call for acquiring images in<br />

three <strong>of</strong> the st<strong>and</strong>ard planes <strong>and</strong> typically take 45 to 60<br />

minutes. We start with straight sagittal images to survey the<br />

bones. For an ankle MRI, the FOV needs to include the<br />

distal tibia <strong>and</strong> fibula, all <strong>of</strong> the tarsal bones, <strong>and</strong> the bases<br />

<strong>of</strong> the metatarsals. For a foot MRI, the FOV needs to include<br />

all <strong>of</strong> the phalanges, all <strong>of</strong> the metatarsals, <strong>and</strong> the midfoot<br />

tarsal bones back to the Chopart joint. In cases in which<br />

the area <strong>of</strong> clinical concern is vague, the sagittal FOV can<br />

be enlarged to include the ankle <strong>and</strong> forefoot. When they<br />

are available, the radiologist should check these first sets<br />

<strong>of</strong> sagittal survey images, particularly the edema-sensitive<br />

sequence. If the radiologist observes edema in the talar<br />

dome, images can then be acquired in the mortise coronal<br />

<strong>and</strong> mortise sagittal planes (our OLT protocol). If there is<br />

edema elsewhere in the tarsal bones, oblique axial <strong>and</strong><br />

oblique coronal images are acquired (our tarsal stress fracture<br />

protocol). If the marrow edema is in a metatarsal, this<br />

is usually best demonstrated with short- <strong>and</strong> long-axis<br />

images (our metatarsal stress fracture protocol). If no bone<br />

marrow edema is found, we generally proceed with our<br />

tendon protocol (straight axial <strong>and</strong> oblique coronal) unless<br />

some other site is clinically requested.<br />

Sequences<br />

Because detecting abnormally edematous signal in the<br />

bones, tendons, <strong>and</strong> surrounding s<strong>of</strong>t tissues is the key to<br />

all musculoskeletal MRI, we run edema-sensitive sequences<br />

in all the planes we image. This can be either a fatsuppressed<br />

fast-spin echo T2-weighted sequence or an<br />

inversion recovery sequence. Although for the most part<br />

these two sequences are equivalent (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-53), we find<br />

that we get the best images when we use inversion recovery<br />

for the straight sagittal survey plane <strong>and</strong> T2-weighted<br />

sequences in all other planes.<br />

T1-weighted images, being inherently fat sensitive,<br />

well demonstrate the normal fat in yellow bone marrow<br />

as well as the subcutaneus fat <strong>and</strong> the deeper fat between<br />

muscles <strong>and</strong> tendons. We use T1 weighting in all imaging<br />

planes whenever the tendons are not the primary site <strong>of</strong><br />

interest.<br />

When the tendons are the site <strong>of</strong> clinical concern,<br />

we use proton-density–weighted images, along with T2-<br />

weighted sequences, in the straight axial <strong>and</strong> oblique<br />

coronal planes. The straight axial plane well images all 10<br />

<strong>of</strong> the ankle tendons in cross section at <strong>and</strong> above the level<br />

<strong>of</strong> the ankle joint. The oblique coronal plane well images<br />

the medial <strong>and</strong> lateral ankle tendons in cross section as<br />

they curve under the malleoli. Tears in the substance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ankle tendons are usually best seen with proton-density–<br />

weighted images (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-54). However, because protondensity–weighted<br />

images are relatively insensitive for fluid,<br />

they should always be read side-by-side with edemasensitive<br />

images to look for abnormal amounts <strong>of</strong> fluid in<br />

the tendon sheaths, indicative <strong>of</strong> active tenosynovitis.<br />

• Use <strong>of</strong> Contrast<br />

Although the intravenous administration <strong>of</strong> a gadoliniumbased<br />

contrast agent (IVGd) is not needed for most<br />

musculoskeletal MRI, there are particular circumstances in<br />

which its use is invaluable.*<br />

Whenever possible, we use IVGd when there is a clinical<br />

concern for an inflammatory arthropathy or synovitis,<br />

such as in rheumatoid arthritis (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-55). The IVGd<br />

causes T1 signal enhancement <strong>of</strong> the hypervascularized<br />

inflammatory synovium (pannus) but not <strong>of</strong> the adjacent<br />

synovial fluid, a distinction that may not otherwise be seen<br />

on noncontrast T1-weighted or T2-weighted images.<br />

Likewise, we prefer to use IVGd whenever possible in<br />

cases <strong>of</strong> infection. IVGd can help distinguish an enhancing<br />

phlegmon from a nonenhancing pus pocket. Also, IVGd<br />

can distinguish cellulitis, which demonstrates contrast<br />

enhancement <strong>of</strong> the edematous skin, from “nonspecific<br />

edema from other causes” that does not enhance.<br />

*During the year leading up to the publication <strong>of</strong> this chapter, the U.S. Food<br />

<strong>and</strong> Drug Administration (FDA) has issued warnings describing the risk for nephrogenic<br />

systemic fibrosis (NSF) after exposure to gadolinium-containing contrast<br />

agents in patients with acute or chronic severe renal insufficiency. Information<br />

can be found at http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/infopage/gcca. Before any contrast<br />

agent is administered to any patient, that patient should be screened in<br />

accordance to your institution’s policies.<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2248<br />

9/9/2008 5:34:34 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2249 <strong>47</strong><br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-54. Peroneus brevis<br />

tear in a 62-year-old. This is a sideby-side<br />

comparison <strong>of</strong> the same<br />

straight axial slice acquired using<br />

T1-weighted (A), proton-density<br />

(PD)–weighted (B), <strong>and</strong> T2-<br />

weighted (C) images. Although T1<br />

shows the fat best <strong>and</strong> T2 shows<br />

the fluid best, PD shows the<br />

tendons best, particularly the<br />

abnormally increased signal in the<br />

split/abnormally flattened<br />

peroneus brevis tendon (white<br />

arrowhead).<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

A<br />

B<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-55. Comparison <strong>of</strong> T2 weighting with<br />

fat suppression (A) <strong>and</strong> T1 weighting with fat<br />

suppression after intravenous gadolinium (B) in a 65-<br />

year-old with rheumatoid arthritis. The bright T2<br />

signal in A in the posterior tibial (white arrow) <strong>and</strong><br />

flexor digitorum longus (white arrowhead) tendon<br />

sheaths is shown to be enhancing pannus in B. In<br />

comparison, the bright T2 signal in A adjacent to the<br />

extensor digitorum longus (black arrow) <strong>and</strong> the<br />

anterolateral ankle joint (black arrowhead) is shown to<br />

be nonenhancing fluid surrounded by a thin rim <strong>of</strong><br />

enhancing synovium in B.<br />

We sometimes use IVGd when we detect a s<strong>of</strong>t tissue<br />

mass that is bright on T2-weighted sequences <strong>and</strong> we wish<br />

to confirm whether it is solid (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-56) or cystic (Fig.<br />

<strong>47</strong>-57). IVGd is also useful for the detection <strong>of</strong> Morton’s<br />

neuroma by MRI (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-58). At UW, we prefer to image<br />

Morton’s neuroma with ultrasonography rather than<br />

MRI. 36<br />

The contrast-enhanced tissue can be made all the more<br />

conspicuous on T1-weighted images by suppressing the<br />

signal from fat, <strong>and</strong> we use fat suppression on nearly all <strong>of</strong><br />

our postcontrast images. When there is a concern that the<br />

degree <strong>of</strong> fat suppression may not be uniform throughout<br />

the image, fat-suppressed T1-weighted images can be<br />

obtained before the administration <strong>of</strong> IVGd to be compared<br />

side-by-side with the postcontrast fat-suppressed T1-<br />

weighted images.<br />

<strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> Injuries<br />

• <strong>Ankle</strong> Mortise Fractures<br />

• Malleoli/Syndesmosis 12<br />

Fractures <strong>of</strong> the medial <strong>and</strong> lateral malleoli are commonly<br />

the result <strong>of</strong> twisting injury <strong>of</strong> the talus in ankle mortise.<br />

Radiographs are usually sufficient for the management <strong>of</strong><br />

what are typically simple fractures. CT axial images through<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2249<br />

9/9/2008 5:34:35 PM


2250 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

A<br />

B<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-56. Schwannoma in a 67-year-old.<br />

A, Lateral radiograph shows a round s<strong>of</strong>t tissue mass<br />

posterior to the talus. B, Sagittal T1-weighted image<br />

shows the mass to be homogeneously relatively dark,<br />

with no invasion into the overlying subcutaneus fat or<br />

the underlying talus. C, Sagittal inversion recovery<br />

image shows the mass to be heterogeneously bright.<br />

This is the classic appearance <strong>of</strong> a schwannoma.<br />

D, Sagittal T1-weighted fat-suppressed image after<br />

intravenous gadolinium administration shows<br />

heterogeneous enhancement, confirming that this is a<br />

vascularized mass <strong>and</strong> not a cyst.<br />

C<br />

D<br />

A<br />

C<br />

B<br />

D<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-57. Synovial cyst in a 51-year-old.<br />

A, Lateral radiograph shows a round s<strong>of</strong>t tissue mass<br />

dorsal to the metatarsals. B, Sagittal T1-weighted<br />

image shows the mass to be homogeneously relatively<br />

dark. C, Sagittal T2-weighted fat-suppressed image<br />

shows the mass to be homogeneously bright. This is<br />

the classic appearance <strong>of</strong> a simple cyst. There is a<br />

small lobule distal to the main cyst. D, Sagittal T1-<br />

weighted fat-suppressed image after intravenous<br />

gadolinium (IVGd) shows enhancement <strong>of</strong> only the<br />

thin synovial lining but not the cyst fluid. Short-axis<br />

T1-weighted (E), T2-weighted fat-suppressed (F), <strong>and</strong><br />

T1-weighted fat-suppressed post-IVGd (G) images<br />

through the cyst demonstrate the same signal<br />

characteristics as in the sagittal plane. The gray arrows<br />

in F <strong>and</strong> G indicate areas <strong>of</strong> inadequate fat<br />

suppression near the fifth toe.<br />

E<br />

F<br />

G<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2250<br />

9/9/2008 5:34:38 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2251 <strong>47</strong><br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-58. Morton’s neuroma in a 44-year-old: short-axis images<br />

through the second metatarsal head. The marker (m) indicates the site<br />

<strong>of</strong> maximum tenderness. A, T1-weighted image demonstrates a small<br />

lobule <strong>of</strong> decreased signal (black arrow) between <strong>and</strong> below the heads<br />

<strong>of</strong> the second <strong>and</strong> third metatarsals. Morton’s neuromas are seldom<br />

more conspicuous than this on T1-weighted images. B, T2-weighted<br />

fat-suppressed images <strong>of</strong> Morton’s neuromas usually show little (open<br />

arrowhead), if any, edema. C, The administration <strong>of</strong> intravenous<br />

gadolinium makes the vascularized Morton’s neuroma (arrow) much<br />

more conspicuous on this T1-weighted fat-suppressed image.<br />

both ankles are useful when the integrity <strong>of</strong> the syndesmosis<br />

is questioned. To underst<strong>and</strong> the mechanism <strong>of</strong> syndesmotic<br />

injury, we find it is helpful to review the Weber*<br />

staging system for ankle fractures.<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-59 shows two models <strong>of</strong> the ankle mortise.<br />

On the left is a skeleton model showing the relationship<br />

<strong>of</strong> the talus to the malleoli <strong>and</strong> syndesmosis. On the right<br />

is a schematic. The tibia is connected to the fibula by the<br />

intraosseous membrane (IOM), a sheet <strong>of</strong> connective tissue<br />

that runs along the length <strong>of</strong> the diaphyses. Where the<br />

distal fibula fits into a groove in the distal tibia is the syndesmosis.<br />

The syndesmotic ligaments, the anterior <strong>and</strong><br />

posterior tibi<strong>of</strong>ibular ligaments, maintain the integrity <strong>of</strong><br />

this syndesmotic joint. The integrity <strong>of</strong> the ankle joint is<br />

maintained laterally by the anterior <strong>and</strong> posterior tal<strong>of</strong>ibular<br />

ligaments, <strong>and</strong> medially by the deltoid ligament.<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-60 illustrates how either inversion or eversion<br />

rotational injuries to the talus cause both avulsive<br />

<strong>and</strong> compressive forces on the malleoli. Figure <strong>47</strong>-60A<br />

illustrates a Weber type A injury, radiographically on the<br />

left <strong>and</strong> schematically on the right. As the talus undergoes<br />

an inversion rotational injury, it applies avulsive pulling<br />

forces on the lateral side <strong>of</strong> the mortise <strong>and</strong> compressive<br />

pushing forces on the medial side. The lateral avulsive<br />

forces may cause strain or tearing <strong>of</strong> the tal<strong>of</strong>ibular ligaments,<br />

or they may cause an avulsion fracture through the<br />

lateral malleolus, pulling it <strong>of</strong>f the fibular shaft. Conversely,<br />

the compressive forces on the medial side can fracture<br />

through the medial malleolus, pushing it away from the<br />

*Bernhard Georg Weber (1927-2002), a Swiss orthopedist, nearly gave up<br />

medicine <strong>and</strong> surgery to pursue his dream <strong>of</strong> becoming an architect. During his<br />

surgical training in Zurich, though, he recognized that orthopedics would satisfy<br />

his interest in medicine <strong>and</strong> technology <strong>and</strong> his need for artistic expression.<br />

Besides fracture treatment, he designed a new hip prosthesis <strong>and</strong> developed a<br />

tibial realignment osteotomy procedure to treat prematurely degenerated knees.<br />

In fact, he underwent this realignment procedure himself bilaterally to enable him<br />

to continue with two <strong>of</strong> his passions, skiing <strong>and</strong> tennis. His skill at skiing was such<br />

that he was certified as a championship instructor.<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-59. Models <strong>of</strong> the ankle mortise. Left,<br />

Skeletal model. Right, Schematic. The intraosseous<br />

membrane (IOM) is shown in yellow. The syndesmotic<br />

ligaments, the anterior <strong>and</strong> posterior tibi<strong>of</strong>ibular<br />

ligaments (Tib-Fig Lig), are modeled in green. The<br />

anterior <strong>and</strong> posterior tal<strong>of</strong>ibular ligaments (Talo-Fib<br />

Lig) are modeled in purple. The deltoid ligament (Delt<br />

Lig) is shown in blue. LM, lateral malleolus; MM,<br />

medial malleolus.<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2251<br />

9/9/2008 5:34:40 PM


2252 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

A<br />

B<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-60. Weber injuries. Structures are as<br />

identified in Figure <strong>47</strong>-59. A, Weber type A. Left,<br />

Anteroposterior radiograph <strong>of</strong> the ankle showing<br />

medial displacement <strong>of</strong> the talus relative to the tibia, a<br />

horizontal avulsion fracture through the lateral<br />

malleolus, <strong>and</strong> a vertically oriented compression<br />

fracture through the medial malleolus. Right,<br />

Schematic showing the mechanism <strong>of</strong> a Weber type A<br />

ankle fracture. As the talus undergoes an inversion<br />

rotational injury, it applies avulsive pulling forces on<br />

the lateral side <strong>of</strong> the mortise <strong>and</strong> compressive<br />

pushing forces on the medial side. B, Weber type B.<br />

Left, Anteroposterior radiograph <strong>of</strong> the ankle showing<br />

lateral displacement <strong>of</strong> the talus relative to the tibia, a<br />

horizontal avulsion fracture through the medial<br />

malleolus, <strong>and</strong> an obliquely vertically oriented<br />

compression fracture through the distal fibular, below<br />

the level <strong>of</strong> the syndesmosis. Right, Schematic showing<br />

the mechanism <strong>of</strong> a Weber type B ankle fracture. As<br />

the talus undergoes an eversion rotational injury, it<br />

applies avulsive pulling forces on the medial<br />

malleolus <strong>and</strong> compressive pushing forces on the<br />

fibula. C, Weber type C. Left, Anteroposterior<br />

radiograph <strong>of</strong> the ankle showing a horizontal avulsion<br />

fracture through the medial malleolus <strong>and</strong> an<br />

obliquely vertically oriented compression fracture<br />

through the distal fibular, above the level <strong>of</strong> the<br />

syndesmosis. The syndesmosis is disrupted <strong>and</strong><br />

abnormally widened, with no overlap between the<br />

tibia <strong>and</strong> fibula. Right, Schematic showing the<br />

mechanism <strong>of</strong> a Weber type C ankle fracture. This is<br />

the same as a Weber type B, except now the<br />

compressive forces extend through the syndesmosis,<br />

tearing the tibi<strong>of</strong>ibular ligaments <strong>and</strong> the distal<br />

intraosseous membrane (IOM), with the oblique<br />

fracture higher up on the fibula. (If the compressive<br />

forces extend proximally up the length <strong>of</strong> the IOM,<br />

fracturing through the proximal fibula up near the<br />

knee, this is referred to as a Maisonneuve fracture<br />

[not illustrated].)<br />

C<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2252<br />

9/9/2008 5:34:45 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2253 <strong>47</strong><br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-61. CT <strong>of</strong> Weber type C injury. A, Axial<br />

images through both ankles show the abnormally<br />

widened left syndesmosis (black arrows) compared<br />

with the width <strong>of</strong> the contralateral normal right<br />

syndesmosis (white arrows). B, Mortise coronal<br />

image shows widened syndesmosis (black arrows)<br />

<strong>and</strong> the high fibula fracture (white arrow),<br />

characteristic <strong>of</strong> a Weber type C injury.<br />

A Right<br />

Left<br />

B<br />

tibial plafond. Radiographically, avulsion fractures can be<br />

distinguished from compression fractures by the orientation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the fracture margins. Avulsion fractures are horizontally<br />

oriented, in a direction roughly perpendicular to<br />

the lines <strong>of</strong> force. Compression fractures are more obliquely<br />

or vertically oriented, in the same direction as the force.<br />

This principle is the key to underst<strong>and</strong>ing the Weber<br />

fractures.<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-60B illustrates a Weber type B injury, radiographically<br />

on the left <strong>and</strong> schematically on the right. Here<br />

the talus is undergoing an eversion rotational injury, with<br />

the avulsive pulling forces on the medial malleolus <strong>and</strong> the<br />

compressive pushing forces on the lateral side. The medial<br />

avulsive forces may cause strain or tearing <strong>of</strong> the deltoid<br />

ligaments, or they may cause a horizontal avulsion fracture<br />

through the medial malleolus. The compressive forces on<br />

the lateral side cause a vertically oblique fracture through<br />

the fibula. If the fibular fracture is distal to the syndesmosis<br />

it is characterized as a Weber type B. The syndesmotic ligaments<br />

<strong>and</strong> IOM remain intact.<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-60C illustrates a Weber type C injury, radiographically<br />

on the left <strong>and</strong> schematically on the right. This<br />

is the same mechanism as a Weber type B injury, except<br />

now the compressive lateral forces extend through the syndesmosis,<br />

tearing the tibi<strong>of</strong>ibular ligament as well as the<br />

distal IOM. In this case the obliquely oriented fibula fracture<br />

will be higher up, above the level <strong>of</strong> the syndesmosis.<br />

Identifying this high fibula fracture is important to recognizing<br />

that the syndesmotic ligaments are disrupted,<br />

because radiographically the syndesmosis may not appear<br />

abnormally widened if not stressed.<br />

Indeed, sometimes the fibula fracture is so high that it<br />

occurs through the proximal fibula, near the knee joint,<br />

<strong>and</strong> is thus not imaged on ankle radiographs. This is<br />

referred to as a Maisonneuve* fracture <strong>and</strong> can be sus-<br />

*Jules Germain François Maisonneuve (1809-1897), a French surgeon <strong>and</strong> a<br />

student <strong>of</strong> Guillaume Dupuytren, was the first to describe external rotation as a<br />

contributing mechanism in the production <strong>of</strong> ankle fractures.<br />

pected when the ankle radiographs demonstrate an avulsion<br />

fracture through the medial malleolus without an<br />

accompanying fibula fracture. If you cannot tell from ankle<br />

radiographs whether you are looking at a Weber type B or<br />

C, this is a clue that you may be looking at a Maisonneuve,<br />

<strong>and</strong> radiographs that include the entire length <strong>of</strong> the fibula<br />

should be obtained.<br />

Determining the integrity <strong>of</strong> the syndesmosis is an<br />

important surgical consideration because syndesmotic<br />

injuries usually require screw fixation. When the integrity<br />

<strong>of</strong> the syndesmosis is unclear based on physical examination<br />

<strong>and</strong> radiographs, a CT scan can be helpful (Fig.<br />

<strong>47</strong>-61). Scanning in the axial plane through both ankles<br />

simultaneously allows for side-by-side comparison <strong>of</strong> the<br />

widths <strong>of</strong> the injured <strong>and</strong> uninjured syndesmoses.<br />

• Fracture through the Tibial Plafond<br />

Intra-articular fractures through the tibial plafond <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

require surgical open reduction with internal fixation<br />

(ORIF) to restore the anatomic alignment <strong>of</strong> the articular<br />

surfaces, <strong>and</strong> multiplanar reformatted CT scans are <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

instrumental in such surgical planning. Three fractures in<br />

particular that typically come to CT are the pilon 10 fracture<br />

in adults, <strong>and</strong> the juvenile Tillaux 35 <strong>and</strong> triplane 38 fractures<br />

in adolescents.<br />

Pilon Fracture<br />

Pilon fractures are any tibial fracture that involves the distal<br />

articular plafond <strong>and</strong> are typically the result <strong>of</strong> an axial<br />

loading force. Pilon is French for “pestle,” an instrument<br />

used for crushing or pounding, <strong>and</strong> was first used to describe<br />

this fracture in 1911 by Étienne Destot, the father <strong>of</strong><br />

radiology in France. When they are the result <strong>of</strong> a highenergy<br />

injury, such as a fall from height or a high-speed<br />

motor vehicle front-end collision, pilon fractures can<br />

produce significant comminution with multiple displaced<br />

fracture fragments. Although these comminuted fractures<br />

invariably require internal fixation, they are typically not<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2253<br />

9/9/2008 5:34:46 PM


2254 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

surgical emergencies. The patients with significantly displaced<br />

fractures may go to the operating room the day <strong>of</strong><br />

the injury for traction reduction <strong>and</strong> external fixation to<br />

restore relative alignment to the mortise, <strong>and</strong> then wait<br />

several days for the swelling <strong>of</strong> the surrounding s<strong>of</strong>t tissues<br />

to reduce before returning to the operating room for the<br />

more anatomic ORIF <strong>of</strong> the pilon fracture. This means that<br />

these patients typically receive their CT scans during this<br />

interim period, after the external fixator is in place. However,<br />

as illustrated in Figure <strong>47</strong>-62, such external fixation hardware<br />

is no impediment to obtaining the CT images the<br />

surgeon requires. To maintain alignment between the hindfoot<br />

<strong>and</strong> leg, the surgeon will percutaneously drill thick<br />

metal pins through the calcaneus (white arrows in Fig. <strong>47</strong>-<br />

62A, B, <strong>and</strong> D) <strong>and</strong> through the tibia proximal to the fracture<br />

(this pin is not seen in Fig. <strong>47</strong>-62). These pins are<br />

rigidly attached by metal clamps (white arrowheads in Fig.<br />

<strong>47</strong>-62A <strong>and</strong> B) to nonmetallic connecting bars (gray arrows<br />

in Fig. <strong>47</strong>-62A to C). It is these nonmetallic bars that span<br />

the length <strong>of</strong> the fracture <strong>and</strong> maintain the tibia length.<br />

Because these nonmetallic bars are made <strong>of</strong> materials<br />

(usually carbon fiber) that block very few x-rays from reaching<br />

the detectors, they are nearly radiolucent <strong>and</strong> cause no<br />

CT streak artifacts (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-62C). The metal pin-bar<br />

clamps block many x-rays from reaching detectors <strong>and</strong> thus<br />

will cause some CT streak artifacts. However, because the<br />

clamps are always placed proximal <strong>and</strong> distal to the pilon<br />

fracture, they never cause any CT streak artifacts across the<br />

reformatted fracture margins (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-62B <strong>and</strong> D). Using<br />

our st<strong>and</strong>ard bone CT scanning protocol <strong>of</strong> thin/overlapping<br />

slices, metallic streak artifacts are <strong>of</strong>ten not appreciable.<br />

Notice the good visualization <strong>of</strong> the calcaneus cortex<br />

in Figure <strong>47</strong>-62B <strong>and</strong> D, which is only minimally affected<br />

by streaking caused by the metal pin-bar clamps.<br />

Juvenile Tillaux Fracture<br />

Juvenile Tillaux fractures are Salter-Harris type 3 fractures.*<br />

These fractures have a characteristic appearance, particularly<br />

on CT. The fracture is the result <strong>of</strong> an external rotation<br />

force pulling on the anterior tibi<strong>of</strong>ibular ligament, causing<br />

avulsion <strong>of</strong> the anterolateral corner <strong>of</strong> the distal tibial<br />

epiphysis (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-63A). These fractures always occur laterally<br />

because the distal tibial physis fuses from medial to<br />

lateral as a child matures (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-63B). As such, juvenile<br />

Tillaux fractures occur exclusively in adolescents in whom<br />

the lateral growth plates have not yet fused, usually between<br />

the ages <strong>of</strong> 12 <strong>and</strong> 15 years. Coronal <strong>and</strong> sagittal images<br />

are useful to demonstrate the degree <strong>of</strong> displacement particularly<br />

at the articular surface (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-63B <strong>and</strong> C, white<br />

arrow). While minimally displaced juvenile Tillaux fractures<br />

are usually treated nonoperatively, fractures displaced<br />

more than 2 mm should have orthopedic consultation <strong>and</strong><br />

surgery to restore the congruity <strong>of</strong> the joint surface.<br />

Triplane Fracture<br />

Triplane fractures are Salter-Harris type 4 fractures. Like the<br />

juvenile Tillaux fracture, triplane fractures occur in adolescents<br />

in whom the lateral growth plates have not yet fused.<br />

When minimally displaced, triplane fractures can be difficult<br />

to see radiographically, <strong>and</strong> frontal <strong>and</strong> lateral views are<br />

needed to appreciate their multiplanar nature (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-64A<br />

to C): the epiphysis fracture running vertically in a sagittal<br />

orientation (plane 1), the physeal fracture running horizontally<br />

in the axial plane (plane 2), <strong>and</strong> the metaphyseal fracture<br />

running obliquely vertically in a coronal orientation<br />

(plane 3). Multiplanar CT scans are ideally suited to visualize<br />

these fractures in all planes (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-64D to F) <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

reveal more deformity <strong>of</strong> the articular surface than would<br />

be anticipated from radiographs alone.<br />

• Talar Fractures 3,<strong>47</strong><br />

Talar fractures can be thought <strong>of</strong> as either traumatic or<br />

insidious. Traumatic fractures are considered surgical emergencies<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the high risk <strong>of</strong> avascular necrosis, <strong>and</strong><br />

patients usually go straight from the emergency department<br />

to the operating room without stopping at CT (although<br />

CT scans <strong>of</strong> displaced fractures <strong>of</strong> the body <strong>of</strong> the talus can<br />

be dramatic; Fig. <strong>47</strong>-65). Even with anatomic internal fixation,<br />

avascular necrosis sometimes occurs, <strong>and</strong> CT can be<br />

useful to confirm the presence <strong>of</strong> abnormal medullary sclerosis<br />

suspected radiographically (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-66).<br />

• Osteochondral Lesions <strong>of</strong> the Talus<br />

Fractures <strong>of</strong> the talar dome are insidious. They typically<br />

occur at the medial edge or posterolateral corners <strong>of</strong> the<br />

talar dome <strong>and</strong> are thought to be the result <strong>of</strong> an impaction<br />

<strong>of</strong> the talar dome on the tibial plafond during an inversion<br />

or eversion twisting injury. Refer to the illustrations <strong>of</strong><br />

Weber injuries (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-60). Because they involve the<br />

cortical bone <strong>and</strong> the overlying articular hyaline cartilage,<br />

they are referred to as osteochondral fractures. A gross example<br />

is indicated by the green arrow in Figure <strong>47</strong>-2. Osteochondral<br />

fractures notoriously occur on convex articular surfaces,<br />

including the femoral condyles <strong>of</strong> the knee <strong>and</strong><br />

capitellum <strong>of</strong> the elbow. Generically, these fractures have<br />

been referred to by many names, including osteochondral<br />

defect, osteochondral lesion, <strong>and</strong> osteochondritis dissecans. The<br />

last term is the oldest <strong>and</strong> perhaps the most misleading,<br />

for although the suffix “itis” by definition implies inflammation,<br />

histologically these lesions have not been shown<br />

to be inflammatory. We prefer the term osteochondral lesions<br />

<strong>of</strong> the talus, to distinguish them from osteochondral lesions<br />

at other sites.<br />

*The Salter-Harris system is applied to fractures that involve the growth plate<br />

(physis) at the ends <strong>of</strong> skeletally immature bones. Type 1 refers to simple transverse<br />

fractures that involve the physis only. Type 2, the most common, refers to<br />

fractures that involve the physis <strong>and</strong> the adjacent metaphysis. Type 3 fractures<br />

extend from the physis through the epiphysis at the end <strong>of</strong> the bone, typically disrupting<br />

the articular surface at a joint. Type 4 fractures involve the epiphysis, the<br />

physis, <strong>and</strong> the metaphysis. Type 5 fractures are rare <strong>and</strong> are crush injuries to the<br />

growth plate. Text continued on p. 2260<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2254<br />

9/9/2008 5:34:<strong>47</strong> PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2255 <strong>47</strong><br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-62. Pilon fracture. A, Anteroposterior radiograph showing an external fixation device. The radiopaque hardware that could<br />

potentially cause streak artifacts on CT—the thick metal pin through the calcaneus (white arrows), the distal pin-bar clamps (white arrowheads),<br />

<strong>and</strong> the proximal pin-bar clamps (black arrowheads)—are below <strong>and</strong> above the pilon fracture <strong>and</strong> thus will not be in the axial CT scanning plane<br />

through the fracture. The longitudinal carbon fiber connecting bars are barely radiopaque, <strong>and</strong> as such they are barely discernible on this<br />

radiograph (gray arrows). These will cause no CT streak artifacts. B, Coronal plane CT scan. The carbon fiber connecting bars (gray arrows) cause<br />

no CT streak artifacts across the fractures. The CT streak artifacts from the metal percutaneous pin (white arrows) <strong>and</strong> pin-bar clamps (white<br />

arrowheads) are all distal to the pilon fracture <strong>and</strong> only minimally effect visualization <strong>of</strong> the calcaneus cortex. C, Axial plane CT scan through the<br />

level <strong>of</strong> the fractured plafond. The carbon fiber connecting bars (gray arrows) cause no CT streak artifacts across the fractures. D, Sagittal plane<br />

showing the talar dome impacted into a large cortical gap in the plafond. This is the type <strong>of</strong> visual information the surgeon needs to plan the open<br />

reduction <strong>and</strong> internal fixation. The white arrow shows the percutaneous pin passing through the calcaneus.<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2255<br />

9/9/2008 5:34:49 PM


2256 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-63. Juvenile Tillaux fracture in a 13-year-old who reported hearing or feeling a snap when, during cheerleading, she l<strong>and</strong>ed very<br />

forcefully on the left foot with the ankle twisted. A Salter-Harris type 3 fracture was seen on outside radiographs (not shown). A CT series was<br />

requested to assess the degree <strong>of</strong> fracture displacement. A, Axial CT image through both distal tibial physes demonstrates the avulsion fracture <strong>of</strong><br />

the left anterolateral quadrant (sad face). B, Coronal CT image shows the Salter-Harris type 3 fracture with a longitudinal component through the<br />

epiphysis (arrow) <strong>and</strong> a transverse component through the unfused lateral physis (white arrowheads). The fused medial physis is indicated by the<br />

black arrowheads. C, Sagittal CT image shows the Salter-Harris type 3 fracture with a longitudinal component through the epiphysis (arrow) <strong>and</strong> a<br />

transverse component through the unfused physis (arrowheads). Because CT showed that the fracture fragments were displaced more than 2 mm,<br />

open reduction <strong>and</strong> internal fixation was performed electively 1 week after the injury. Postoperatively the patient did well after being non–weight<br />

bearing in a cast for 6 weeks <strong>and</strong> in a weight-bearing boot for 4 weeks.<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2256<br />

9/9/2008 5:34:50 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2257 <strong>47</strong><br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-64. Triplane fracture in a 13-year-old who twisted an ankle in a sledding accident. Non–weight-bearing anteroposterior (A) <strong>and</strong><br />

mortise (B) radiographs. When minimally displaced, the fracture margins can be difficult to see on radiographs. The black arrow points to the<br />

epiphysis fracture, running vertically in the sagittal plane (plane 1). The white arrow points to the physis fracture, running horizontally in the axial<br />

plane (plane 2). C, Lateral non–weight-bearing radiograph. The arrow points to the physis fracture, running horizontally in the axial plane. The<br />

arrowheads point to the metaphysis fracture, running obliquely vertically in the coronal plane (plane 3).<br />

Continued<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2257<br />

9/9/2008 5:34:51 PM


2258 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

E<br />

D<br />

F<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-64, cont’d D to F, CT scanning was performed after closed reduction <strong>and</strong> casting to assess the degree <strong>of</strong> fracture displacement.<br />

D, Axial CT scan. The avulsion fracture <strong>of</strong> the anterolateral quadrant (sad face) resembles the juvenile Tillaux fracture (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-63A). The<br />

surrounding plaster cast causes no streak artifacts <strong>and</strong> helps to immobilize the patient’s ankle during scanning. E, Coronal CT scan. The black<br />

arrow points to the epiphysis fracture, running vertically in the sagittal plane (plane 1). The white arrow points to the physis fracture, running<br />

horizontally in the axial plane (plane 2). F, Sagittal CT scan. The arrow points to the physis fracture, running horizontally in the axial plane (plane<br />

2). The arrowheads point to the metaphysis fracture, running obliquely vertically in the coronal plane (plane 3). These images clearly showed the<br />

surgeons that the closed reduction still had unacceptable displacement, <strong>and</strong> open reduction <strong>and</strong> internal fixation was performed the next day.<br />

After surgery, the patient was non–weight bearing in a cast for 4 weeks <strong>and</strong> was pain free after 1 week in a walking boot.<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2258<br />

9/9/2008 5:34:53 PM


A<br />

B<br />

<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2259 <strong>47</strong><br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-65. CT scan <strong>of</strong> a 69-year-old patient<br />

transferred to our emergency department after having<br />

undergone nonsurgical reduction <strong>and</strong> casting <strong>of</strong> an<br />

open ankle fracture-dislocation. The patient was sent<br />

for CT to better visualize the fracture. A, In the axial<br />

plane, we recognize the head <strong>of</strong> the talus (h-Ta) by its<br />

articulation with the navicular (N), but the body <strong>of</strong> the<br />

talus behind the head is missing. Small collections <strong>of</strong><br />

air, seen as black on CT, are scattered around the<br />

fracture fragments, indicating that this was an open<br />

fracture. B, The coronal plane shows no talus between<br />

the tibia (Ti) <strong>and</strong> calcaneus (Ca). C, The sagittal plane<br />

tells the whole story: the body <strong>of</strong> the talus (b-Ta) has<br />

been sheered <strong>of</strong>f the head <strong>and</strong> posteriorly displaced<br />

behind the ankle mortise.<br />

C<br />

A<br />

B<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-66. Development <strong>of</strong> avascular necrosis<br />

(AVN) <strong>of</strong> the talus after trauma in a 25-year-old who<br />

was transferred to our emergency department with<br />

the ankle already in a cast. A, Our initial casted lateral<br />

radiograph revealed a vertical fracture (arrowhead)<br />

through the body <strong>of</strong> the talus. Because <strong>of</strong> the risk <strong>of</strong><br />

AVN with talus fractures, the patient was immediately<br />

taken to the operating room. B, Intraoperative<br />

radiograph reveals anatomic reduction <strong>of</strong> the fracture<br />

with two screws. No sclerosis is present in the talus.<br />

C, On a lateral radiograph obtained 8 weeks later, the<br />

body <strong>of</strong> the talus appears more sclerotic than the<br />

surrounding bones. D, Midsagittal CT scan obtained 5<br />

days after the CT scan in part C revealed a broad b<strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> sclerosis in the talar dome <strong>and</strong> body, characteristic<br />

<strong>of</strong> AVN.<br />

C<br />

D<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2259<br />

9/9/2008 5:34:54 PM


2260 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

A<br />

B<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-67. Acute talar dome fracture in<br />

a 23-year-old who fell from a ladder. A <strong>and</strong> B,<br />

Anteroposterior <strong>and</strong> mortise radiographs in which the<br />

cortical fracture <strong>of</strong> the lateral corner <strong>of</strong> the talar dome<br />

is so nondisplaced it is barely discernible (arrow). C<br />

<strong>and</strong> D, Mortise coronal CT images obtained the same<br />

day well demonstrate the cortical fragment (arrow) as<br />

well as the full extent <strong>of</strong> the fracture (arrowheads).<br />

C<br />

D<br />

<strong>Radiology</strong> <strong>and</strong> Computed Tomography<br />

Although the development <strong>of</strong> a symptomatic OLT can<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten be traced to a specific injury, radiographs are usually<br />

read as normal early on. In part, this is because many <strong>of</strong><br />

these fractures are so nondisplaced that they can be difficult<br />

to see radiographically (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-67). But sometimes,<br />

even in retrospect, the initial radiographs truly are negative,<br />

<strong>and</strong> it may take months for the OLT to be radiographically<br />

apparent (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-68). At the UW we have a special<br />

reformatting protocol just for such talar dome fractures<br />

(see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-<strong>47</strong>A) that includes 1-mm-thin slices reformatted<br />

with no gaps in the mortise coronal <strong>and</strong> mortise sagittal<br />

planes.<br />

Magnetic Resonance Imaging <strong>and</strong> Staging<br />

Although CT is good at showing a displaced fragment <strong>and</strong><br />

the size <strong>of</strong> the talar dome defect, MRI is better at showing<br />

the integrity <strong>of</strong> the overlying articular hyaline cartilage<br />

<strong>and</strong> the underlying bone marrow. Edema-sensitive MRI is<br />

used to detect OLTs that are radiographically occult <strong>and</strong><br />

also is used to stage known OLTs to assess for healing<br />

potential or need for surgery.<br />

Several staging systems have been proposed. In 1959,<br />

Berndt, 8 an orthopedic surgeon from the Clevel<strong>and</strong> Clinic,<br />

working with Harty, an anatomist from the <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Pennsylvania, analyzed 24 cases <strong>of</strong> what they called “transchondral<br />

fractures <strong>of</strong> the talus.” In the process <strong>of</strong> tabulating<br />

their data, “an arbitrary classification was developed to<br />

aid underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> the mechanism <strong>of</strong> the fracture <strong>and</strong><br />

to help in determining the appropriate treatment.” This<br />

staging system was based solely on the radiographic appearance<br />

<strong>of</strong> the fracture:<br />

Stage I: A small compression fracture<br />

Stage II: Incomplete avulsion fragment<br />

Stage III: Complete avulsion without displacement<br />

Stage IV: Avulsed fragment displaced within the joint<br />

Thirty years later, Anderson <strong>and</strong> colleagues 2 from Australia<br />

modified this staging system based on the MRI<br />

appearance <strong>of</strong> the fracture. Anderson called stage I “subchondral<br />

trabecular compression” <strong>and</strong> defined it as radiographically<br />

negative, but with bone marrow edema on MRI<br />

(Fig. <strong>47</strong>-69). Anderson called stage II “incomplete separation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the fragment,” requiring demonstration <strong>of</strong> an intact<br />

attachment by either CT or MR (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-70). Anderson<br />

added a stage IIA, “formation <strong>of</strong> a subchondral cyst” (Fig.<br />

<strong>47</strong>-71). Stage IIA cysts are thought to develop from stage I<br />

injuries with post-traumatic necrosis <strong>of</strong> bone <strong>and</strong> subsequent<br />

resorption <strong>of</strong> the necrotic trabeculae, leaving behind<br />

a subchondral cyst. Anderson stage III, “unattached, undisplaced<br />

fragment,” is the same as Berndt <strong>and</strong> Harty stage III.<br />

Anderson noted, “In the T2 weighted image, the presence<br />

<strong>of</strong> synovial fluid around a large fragment can help to differentiate<br />

between stages II <strong>and</strong> III.” However, Anderson<br />

went on to question the utility <strong>of</strong> MRI over CT in making<br />

this determination (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-72). Anderson stage IV, “displaced<br />

fragment,” is the same as Berndt <strong>and</strong> Harty stage IV<br />

(Fig. <strong>47</strong>-73).<br />

Around the same time as Anderson but half a world<br />

away, De Smet <strong>and</strong> coworkers 19 from the <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Wisconsin, Madison, were correlating surgical <strong>and</strong> MRI<br />

findings <strong>and</strong> dividing OLTs into stable or unstable lesions.<br />

Stable fragments were defined as being fixed firmly<br />

with fibrous tissue or fibrocartilage, <strong>and</strong> these patients<br />

were thought not to need surgery. Unstable fractures are<br />

those that can be shown by MRI to be partially attached or<br />

unattached, <strong>and</strong> these fractures were thought to require<br />

more aggressive treatment with surgery or prolonged<br />

immobilization. De Smet showed that the key factor in<br />

distinguishing stability from instability by MRI is the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> bright signal on T2-weighted images at the<br />

interface between the fragment <strong>and</strong> the donor site. In unattached<br />

fragments this signal was as bright as fluid, <strong>and</strong><br />

surgery confirmed that these fragments were surrounded<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2260<br />

9/9/2008 5:34:57 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2261 <strong>47</strong><br />

A<br />

C<br />

B<br />

D<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-68. Osteochondral lesion (OLT) in a 9-<br />

year-old with right ankle pain, without any specific<br />

trauma. A, Mortise radiograph, even in retrospect, is<br />

negative for a lesion in the medial talar dome. B, Nine<br />

months later, the same mortise view reveals a subtle<br />

lesion in the medial talar dome (arrows). C <strong>and</strong> D, CT<br />

scans obtained 1 month after the radiograph in part B<br />

well demonstrate the medial osteochondral lesion <strong>of</strong><br />

the talus (open <strong>and</strong> black arrows). The difference<br />

between C <strong>and</strong> D is the way the images were<br />

reformatted: C was reformatted using our hindfoot<br />

protocol (3 × 3 mm in the oblique coronal plane),<br />

whereas D was reformatted using our specialized OLT<br />

protocol (1 × 1 mm in the mortise coronal plane). The<br />

thinner, 1-mm reformatted images yield edges with<br />

sharper margins. E, Mortise coronal reformatted CT<br />

well shows the extent <strong>of</strong> the OLT (black arrows).<br />

F, Axial source images through both ankles<br />

demonstrate not only the symptomatic OLT in the<br />

posterior medial corner <strong>of</strong> the right talar dome (black<br />

arrows), but an asymptomatic OLT in the posterior<br />

medial corner <strong>of</strong> the left talar dome (white arrows).<br />

The patient was treated conservatively <strong>and</strong> was<br />

asymptomatic bilaterally. LM, lateral malleolus; MM,<br />

medial malleolus; Ta, talus.<br />

E<br />

F<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2261<br />

9/9/2008 5:34:59 PM


2262 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-69. Anderson stage I osteochondral<br />

lesion <strong>of</strong> the talus—subchondral trabecular<br />

compression. Mortise coronal T1-weighted (A) <strong>and</strong><br />

T2-weighted fat-suppressed (B) images show bone<br />

marrow edema (arrows) emanating from the lateral<br />

corner <strong>of</strong> the talar dome. The overlying cortex <strong>and</strong><br />

cartilage are intact. (Courtesy <strong>of</strong> Richard Kijowski,<br />

MD.)<br />

A<br />

B<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-70. Anderson stage II osteochondral<br />

lesion <strong>of</strong> the talus—incomplete separation <strong>of</strong><br />

fragment. A, Mortise radiograph; B, mortise coronal CT<br />

scan; C, mortise coronal T1-weighted MRI; D, mortise<br />

coronal T2-weighted fat-suppressed MRI. The black<br />

arrow points to the fragment <strong>and</strong> the black<br />

arrowheads to the donor site. The white arrow in B<br />

<strong>and</strong> D shows where the fragment is still attached to<br />

the donor site. (Courtesy <strong>of</strong> Richard Kijowski, MD.)<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2262<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:01 PM


A<br />

B<br />

<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2263 <strong>47</strong><br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-71. Anderson stage IIA osteochondral<br />

lesion <strong>of</strong> the talus—formation <strong>of</strong> a subchondral cyst.<br />

A, Mortise radiograph; B, mortise coronal CT scan;<br />

C, mortise coronal T1-weighted MRI; D, mortise<br />

coronal T2-weighted fat-suppressed MRI. All images<br />

show the subcortical cyst <strong>of</strong> the medial talar dome<br />

with a thin sclerotic border (black arrows). The<br />

overlying cortex is intact except for a small focal<br />

irregularity (short white arrow). There is edema <strong>of</strong> the<br />

underlying bone marrow (long white arrow). (Courtesy<br />

<strong>of</strong> Richard Kijowski, MD.)<br />

C<br />

D<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-72. Anderson stage III osteochondral<br />

lesion <strong>of</strong> the talus—unattached, undisplaced<br />

fragment. A, Mortise radiograph; B, mortise coronal CT<br />

scan; C, mortise coronal T1-weighted MRI; D, mortise<br />

coronal T2-weighted fat-suppressed MRI. All images<br />

show the unattached nondisplaced fragment (short<br />

arrows). Arrowheads point to the donor site. Long<br />

arrow points to edema at the donor site. (Courtesy <strong>of</strong><br />

Richard Kijowski, MD.)<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2263<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:02 PM


2264 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-73. Anderson stage IV osteochondral<br />

lesion <strong>of</strong> the talus—displaced fragment. A, Mortise<br />

radiograph; B, mortise coronal CT scan; C, mortise<br />

coronal T1-weighted MRI; D, mortise coronal T2-<br />

weighted fat-suppressed MRI. All images show the<br />

displaced fragment (arrowheads) as well as the talar<br />

donor site (short arrows). Long arrows point to marrow<br />

edema at the donor site. (Courtesy <strong>of</strong> Richard<br />

Kijowski, MD.)<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

by joint fluid. In the partially attached fragments, the<br />

interface line was more irregular <strong>and</strong> not as bright as fluid,<br />

<strong>and</strong> at surgery this was found to represent loose granulation<br />

tissue. The stable lesions did not have increased T2<br />

signal at their interface (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-74). De Smet also found<br />

several patients with “focal oval or spherical lesions<br />

resembling cysts,” similar to the Anderson stage IIA lesions.<br />

These were all at the bases <strong>of</strong> unstable lesions, although<br />

at surgery these were found to be filled with loose granulation<br />

tissue rather than fluid. De Smet speculated that<br />

“these defects were traumatic cysts that were filled by the<br />

reactive tissue forming at the unstable interface.” De Smet<br />

also noted that the signal within the fragment, whether<br />

high, normal, or low on T2-weighted images, was not<br />

useful in distinguishing stable from unstable lesions (Fig.<br />

<strong>47</strong>-75).<br />

These seminal works by Anderson <strong>and</strong> De Smet <strong>and</strong><br />

colleagues point out the need for close communication<br />

between radiologists <strong>and</strong> orthopedic surgeons with regard<br />

to imaging <strong>and</strong> managing patients with OLT.<br />

Once the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> OLT has been established, the<br />

decision as to whether to treat the patient conservatively<br />

or surgically <strong>of</strong>ten comes down to determining whether the<br />

fracture is stable <strong>and</strong> has a potential for continued healing,<br />

or unstable <strong>and</strong> at risk <strong>of</strong> dislocating.<br />

• Lateral Process <strong>of</strong> Talus<br />

The lateral process <strong>of</strong> the talus (LPT) is the pointed anterolateral<br />

corner <strong>of</strong> the posterior facet <strong>of</strong> the subtalar joint,<br />

indicated by the brown arrow on gross Figure <strong>47</strong>-4C <strong>and</strong><br />

on sagittal CT Figure <strong>47</strong>-7A. LPT fractures are the result <strong>of</strong><br />

trauma, <strong>of</strong>ten athletic trauma. Snowboarding, in particular,<br />

is so <strong>of</strong>ten cited that fractures <strong>of</strong> the LPT are also referred<br />

to as snowboarder’s ankle. 48 The LPT fracture lines tend to be<br />

transversely oriented (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-76), although vertically oriented<br />

LPT fractures can occur (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-77). LPT fractures<br />

are <strong>of</strong>ten difficult to see radiographically (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-78A) <strong>and</strong><br />

are best imaged with CT. Because LPT fractures are typically<br />

transversely oriented in the axial plane, they are best visualized<br />

in the sagittal (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-78B) <strong>and</strong> oblique coronal<br />

planes (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-78C) to appreciate the size <strong>of</strong> the fracture<br />

fragment as well as the extension <strong>of</strong> the fracture line into<br />

the subtalar joint. Like OLT, LPT fractures are <strong>of</strong>ten diagnosed<br />

months after injury, <strong>and</strong> reports in the orthopedic<br />

literature state that “40% are missed at initial presentation.”<br />

It is incumbent on anyone who looks at radiographs<br />

<strong>of</strong> the ankle to scrutinize the LPT on all views because these<br />

fractures can be subtle <strong>and</strong> sometimes are seen only on<br />

frontal views (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-79).<br />

Text continued on p. 2269<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2264<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:03 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2265 <strong>47</strong><br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-74. Osteochondral lesion <strong>of</strong> the talus<br />

(OLT) in a 26-year-old with a remote history <strong>of</strong> an<br />

ankle strain, with diffuse ankle pain for the past year.<br />

Anteroposterior (A) <strong>and</strong> mortise (B) radiographs<br />

demonstrate the OLT <strong>of</strong> the medial talar dome (open<br />

arrow). MRI was obtained 1 week later. C, Mortise<br />

coronal T1-weighted image demonstrates the OLT <strong>of</strong><br />

the medial talar dome (open arrow). D, The<br />

corresponding mortise coronal T2-weighted fatsuppressed<br />

image shows no bright signal around the<br />

OLT, indicating that it is stable.<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2265<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:05 PM


2266 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System <strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2266 <strong>47</strong><br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-75. Osteochondral lesion <strong>of</strong> the talus<br />

(OLT) in a 14-year-old with ankle pain.<br />

Anteroposterior (A) <strong>and</strong> mortise (B) radiographs<br />

demonstrate a subtle OLT <strong>of</strong> the medial talar dome<br />

(open arrow). MRI was obtained 2 months later.<br />

C, Coronal T1-weighted image demonstrates the OLT<br />

<strong>of</strong> the medial talar dome (open arrow). D, The<br />

corresponding coronal T2-weighted fat-suppressed<br />

image shows a bright line <strong>of</strong> fluid (arrows) around the<br />

OLT, indicating it is unstable.<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

A<br />

B<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-76. Lateral process <strong>of</strong> the talus (LPT) fracture in a 17-year-old gymnast who l<strong>and</strong>ed awkwardly after a vault. A, Lateral radiograph<br />

demonstrates the slightly displaced, transversely oriented LPT fracture (arrowheads). B, Sagittal CT confirms the LPT fracture (arrowheads) seen in<br />

A. Given the relatively small size <strong>of</strong> this fracture, the patient was treated nonoperatively with casting <strong>and</strong> then with physical therapy. (This scan<br />

was performed using an older protocol, with source images 1 mm thick at 1-mm intervals. This lack <strong>of</strong> overlap yields reformatted images with<br />

some stair-step artifacts that can be seen in the metatarsal shaft. This artifact can be avoided by reconstructing source images with a 50% overlap.)<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2266<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:07 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2267 <strong>47</strong><br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-77. Subtle lateral process <strong>of</strong> the talus (LPT) fractures in a<br />

28-year-old who sustained multiple injuries from a motor vehicle<br />

collision. Lateral radiograph demonstrates a minimally displaced,<br />

vertically oriented LPT fracture (arrowhead).<br />

A<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-78. Fracture <strong>of</strong> lateral process <strong>of</strong> the talus<br />

(LPT) in a 22-year-old who walked away from a motor<br />

vehicle collision <strong>and</strong> presented 1 day later with ankle<br />

pain. A, Lateral radiograph does not clearly<br />

demonstrate the fracture. Incidentally noted is an os<br />

trigonum (white arrow) <strong>and</strong> a bone isl<strong>and</strong> (black<br />

arrow), both <strong>of</strong> no clinical significance. B <strong>and</strong> C, CT<br />

scans obtained the same day as A, reformatted in the<br />

direct sagittal (B) <strong>and</strong> oblique coronal (C) planes. Both<br />

planes well demonstrate the transverse LPT fracture,<br />

with extension into the posterior facet <strong>of</strong> the subtalar<br />

joint (arrowheads). The patient did well after 6 weeks<br />

<strong>of</strong> non–weight bearing, <strong>and</strong> no surgery was required.<br />

B<br />

C<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2267<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:09 PM


2268 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

A<br />

D<br />

B<br />

E<br />

C<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-79. Fracture <strong>of</strong> lateral<br />

process <strong>of</strong> the talus (LPT) in a 45-<br />

year-old who was the driver in a<br />

front-end automobile collision.<br />

A, Lateral radiograph does not<br />

clearly demonstrate the LPT<br />

fracture. There is a small ossicle<br />

(gray arrow) just behind the<br />

subtalar joint that could be<br />

mistaken for an os trigonum but is<br />

in fact a small fragment <strong>of</strong>f the<br />

posterior corner <strong>of</strong> the talus.<br />

B, Mortise radiograph shows a tiny<br />

ossicle (white arrow) between the<br />

LPT <strong>and</strong> lateral malleolus, too<br />

small to characterize. C,<br />

Anteroposterior radiograph<br />

reveals the large LPT fragment<br />

(white arrow) as well as a medial<br />

fragment (open arrow). D <strong>and</strong> E, CT<br />

scans obtained the same day as<br />

the radiographs, reformatted<br />

in the oblique coronal plane,<br />

perpendicular to the subtalar joint.<br />

D, Image through the middle facet<br />

<strong>of</strong> the subtalar joint (M-STJ) shows<br />

the large LPT fragment (arrow).<br />

E, A more posterior image<br />

demonstrates the LPT fracture<br />

extending into the posterior facet<br />

(arrowhead), as well as the<br />

separate fragment <strong>of</strong>f the medial<br />

talus (arrow). Surgery was<br />

performed 1 week later, after the<br />

s<strong>of</strong>t tissue swelling had<br />

diminished. Lateral (F) <strong>and</strong> mortise<br />

(G) radiographs were obtained<br />

after the LPT fracture was repaired<br />

with two screws. (There is also a<br />

Mitek suture anchor in the lateral<br />

malleolus.)<br />

F<br />

G<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2268<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:11 PM


• Calcaneal Fractures 6,18,33<br />

<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2269 <strong>47</strong><br />

The calcaneus is the most commonly fractured tarsal bone,<br />

with fractures typically occurring as the result <strong>of</strong> traumatic<br />

axial loading, such as can occur with a front-end automotive<br />

collision or falling from a height <strong>and</strong> striking the<br />

ground feet first. Here in Wisconsin, we have hunters falling<br />

from their tree-mounted deer st<strong>and</strong>s. As a clinical aside,<br />

patients who present to the emergency department with<br />

bilateral calcaneal fractures should also be evaluated for<br />

lumbar spine fractures at the time <strong>of</strong> the initial trauma<br />

workup. The same traumatic axial loading that drives the<br />

talus into the calcaneus also drives the lumbar vertebrae<br />

together, <strong>and</strong> the risk <strong>of</strong> a lumbar burst fracture with fragments<br />

retropulsed into the vertebral canal is high. An<br />

example <strong>of</strong> the workup <strong>of</strong> such a patient with nondisplaced<br />

lumbar fractures is outlined in Figure <strong>47</strong>-80.<br />

Calcaneal fractures can usually be recognized on the<br />

lateral radiograph by the presence <strong>of</strong> lucent fracture lines<br />

<strong>and</strong> displaced fragments (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-80A) or by a compression<br />

deformity <strong>of</strong> the calcaneus with flattening <strong>of</strong> “Böhler’s*<br />

angle” (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-80B). 9 When calcaneal fractures are<br />

identified, it is important to evaluate for related injuries.<br />

Lumbar compression fractures related to axial loading<br />

forces are particularly associated with calcaneal fractures.<br />

At the UW it is typical for severely traumatized patients to<br />

receive a contrast-enhanced CT scan <strong>of</strong> the abdomen <strong>and</strong><br />

pelvis as part <strong>of</strong> the initial trauma workup (see Fig.<br />

<strong>47</strong>-80C). Although this scan is designed to reconstruct the<br />

raw data into large FOV images that are relatively thick<br />

(5 mm) to assess for s<strong>of</strong>t tissue organ injury, the same raw<br />

data can also be reconstructed into images centered on the<br />

spine with a smaller FOV <strong>and</strong> thinner (1 mm), overlapping<br />

slices (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-80D). These thin, overlapping source<br />

images can then be reformatted into sagittal (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-<br />

80E) <strong>and</strong> other planes. Although CT images <strong>of</strong> the spine<br />

are well suited to demonstrate the presence or absence <strong>of</strong><br />

cortical fragments displaced into the vertebral canal as well<br />

as the overall alignment <strong>of</strong> the spine, MRI is used to visualize<br />

epidural hematomas <strong>and</strong> other possible s<strong>of</strong>t tissue<br />

causes for neural compromise. T1-weighted (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-<br />

80F) <strong>and</strong> proton-density–weighted (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-80G)<br />

images are less sensitive to bone marrow edema than are<br />

fat-suppressed T2-weighted (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-80H <strong>and</strong> I) or<br />

inversion recovery images.<br />

With traumatic axial loading, the wedge-shaped LPT is<br />

driven into the calcaneus at the angle <strong>of</strong> Gissane, fracturing<br />

<strong>and</strong> depressing the calcaneus (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-80J; Fig. <strong>47</strong>-81B).<br />

This fracture invariably involves the calcaneal articular<br />

surface <strong>of</strong> the posterior facet <strong>of</strong> the subtalar joint (see Figs.<br />

<strong>47</strong>-80K <strong>and</strong> <strong>47</strong>-81C). The fracture then propagates inferiorly<br />

<strong>and</strong> medially (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-81C), involving the sustentaculum<br />

tali <strong>and</strong> the middle facet to varying degrees (see<br />

Figs. <strong>47</strong>-80L <strong>and</strong> <strong>47</strong>-81D). Assessment <strong>of</strong> the integrity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

middle facet <strong>of</strong> the subtalar joint is an important part <strong>of</strong><br />

preoperative surgical planning. Surgeons prefer to operate<br />

on the calcaneus from the lateral side, meaning that they<br />

will not directly visualize the middle facet <strong>and</strong> sustentaculum<br />

tali. Thus, they require the preoperative CT scan to<br />

show them these structures. For this reason, the oblique<br />

coronal plane, angled perpendicular to the subtalar joint, is<br />

the primary imaging plane in the assessment <strong>of</strong> calcaneal<br />

fractures. Our CT hindfoot/midfoot reformatting protocol<br />

(see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-<strong>47</strong>B) also includes straight sagittal <strong>and</strong> straight<br />

<strong>and</strong> oblique axial images to assess for extension into the<br />

calcaneocuboid joint (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-81E).<br />

One additional clinical point regarding calcaneal fractures:<br />

they tend not to be surgical emergencies. Surgeons<br />

typically wait for several days after the initial trauma for<br />

the s<strong>of</strong>t tissue swelling to decrease before operating. Therefore,<br />

the preoperative CT scan <strong>of</strong> the calcaneus does not<br />

need to be performed emergently when there may be other,<br />

more serious injuries that need to be addressed.<br />

• Anterior Process <strong>of</strong> the Calcaneus<br />

The APC is the upper outer corner <strong>of</strong> the calcaneus where<br />

it articulates with the cuboid, indicated by the orange box<br />

on gross Figure <strong>47</strong>-4C <strong>and</strong> the red arrow on sagittal CT<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-7A. Like LPT fractures, APC fractures can be easily<br />

overlooked, <strong>and</strong> this structure should be carefully scrutinized<br />

on all lateral radiographs <strong>of</strong> the ankle <strong>and</strong> foot (Fig.<br />

<strong>47</strong>-82). APC fractures are more common in women <strong>and</strong><br />

are the result <strong>of</strong> an inversion injury while the foot is in<br />

plantar flexion, such as when wearing high-heeled shoes.<br />

Even when APC fractures are only minimally displaced<br />

they have a tendency for nonunion despite prolonged<br />

immobilization (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-83). CT is useful for both detecting<br />

these fractures <strong>and</strong> following their progress.<br />

One potential pitfall in the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> an APC fracture<br />

is the os calcaneus secondarius, an occasionally seen<br />

normal variant that resides between the APC <strong>and</strong> the lateral<br />

pole <strong>of</strong> the navicular (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-39). The os calcaneus<br />

secondarius can be thought <strong>of</strong> as a forme fruste <strong>of</strong> tarsal<br />

coalition, <strong>and</strong> it should not articulate with the cuboid as<br />

the APC does. CT can be used to distinguish an acute<br />

APC fracture from the normal-variant accessory ossicle<br />

(Fig. <strong>47</strong>-84).<br />

• Lisfranc Dislocation<br />

Dislocations along the tarsometatarsal joint are not uncommon.<br />

These can be the result <strong>of</strong> severe acute trauma, but<br />

the Lisfranc joint is also a common site for dislocation in<br />

diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy. As mentioned<br />

in a footnote earlier in this chapter, Jacques Lisfranc<br />

was a very aggressive surgeon in Napoleon’s army, <strong>and</strong><br />

although he did not describe the dislocation that now<br />

*Lorenz Böhler (1885-1973) is most notable as the creator <strong>of</strong> modern accident<br />

surgery. He was the head <strong>of</strong> the AUVA-Hospital in Vienna, Austria, that was later<br />

named for him. This hospital was an international model during his time as the<br />

leading surgeon there. Text continued on p. 2277<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2269<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:11 PM


2270 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

C<br />

A<br />

D<br />

B<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-80. Bilateral calcaneal<br />

fractures in a 25-year-old who<br />

fell from a three-story parking<br />

garage, l<strong>and</strong>ing feet first. Lateral<br />

radiographs <strong>of</strong> the left (A) <strong>and</strong><br />

right (B) ankles were obtained. In<br />

the left ankle, lucent fracture lines<br />

are clearly seen (arrowheads). In<br />

the right ankle, Böhler’s angle is<br />

flattened (compare with part N,<br />

after open reduction <strong>and</strong> internal<br />

fixation [ORIF]). As part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

trauma workup, a CT scan <strong>of</strong> the<br />

abdomen <strong>and</strong> pelvis was<br />

performed, hence the presence <strong>of</strong><br />

oral contrast in the colon on the<br />

anteroposterior scout image (C).<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> the mechanism causing<br />

bilateral calcaneal fractures, it was<br />

necessary to evaluate the lumbar<br />

spine for fractures. The same raw<br />

data from the large field-<strong>of</strong>-view<br />

(FOV) scan <strong>of</strong> the abdomen <strong>and</strong><br />

pelvis were reconstructed into<br />

thin, overlapping, small FOV<br />

images centered on the lumbar<br />

spine as source images (D). The<br />

arrowheads point to a fracture<br />

through the anterosuperior end<br />

plate <strong>of</strong> L1. E, Sagittal reformatted<br />

CT image <strong>of</strong> the lumbar spine<br />

shows the thin fracture through the<br />

anterosuperior corner <strong>of</strong> L1<br />

(arrowhead). F <strong>and</strong> G, MR sagittal<br />

T1- <strong>and</strong> proton-density–weighted<br />

images do not well demonstrate<br />

the L1 fracture.<br />

E F G<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2270<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:13 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2271 <strong>47</strong><br />

H<br />

J<br />

I<br />

LPT<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-80, cont’d H <strong>and</strong> I,<br />

MR sagittal <strong>and</strong> coronal fatsuppressed<br />

T2-weighted images<br />

show bone marrow edema<br />

throughout the superior halves <strong>of</strong><br />

the L1 <strong>and</strong> L2 vertebral bodies.<br />

The next day, a CT scan was<br />

performed through both ankles<br />

simultaneously <strong>and</strong> reformatted in<br />

multiple planes for each ankle<br />

individually using our hindfoot<br />

protocol. Displayed are images <strong>of</strong><br />

the right calcaneus. J, Sagittal<br />

image through the lateral process<br />

<strong>of</strong> the talus (LPT). The calcaneus is<br />

fractured just below the LPT,<br />

where the wedge-shaped LPT was<br />

driven into the calcaneus at the<br />

angle <strong>of</strong> Gissane. The small back<br />

spots with the fractured calcaneus<br />

are air, indicating that this was<br />

an open fracture that was<br />

subsequently reduced. Coronal<br />

oblique images through the<br />

posterior (K) <strong>and</strong> middle (L) facets<br />

<strong>of</strong> the subtalar joint were obtained.<br />

These calcaneal fractures typically<br />

begin with impaction from the LPT,<br />

<strong>and</strong> there is extension into the<br />

posterior facet (white arrowhead).<br />

In this patient, the fracture also<br />

extends through the sustentaculum<br />

tali (ST) into the middle facet<br />

(black arrowhead).<br />

Continued<br />

M-STJ<br />

LPT<br />

P-STJ<br />

ST<br />

K<br />

L<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2271<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:15 PM


2272 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

Böhler’s<br />

angle<br />

CCJ<br />

N<br />

M<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-80, cont’d M, Axial image through the<br />

calcaneocuboid joint (CCJ) shows that this joint is not<br />

involved in this patient. N, After ORIF <strong>of</strong> the calcaneal<br />

fracture, Böhler’s angle is restored (compare with B).<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2272<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:17 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2273 <strong>47</strong><br />

LPT<br />

N<br />

APC<br />

A<br />

B<br />

LM<br />

M-STJ<br />

ST<br />

C<br />

D<br />

E<br />

CCJ<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-81. Calcaneal fracture in a 40-year-old who fell<br />

from a 4-foot ladder, l<strong>and</strong>ing on the heel. A, Lateral<br />

radiograph shows a calcaneal fracture. B, CT scan in the<br />

sagittal plane shows where the lateral process <strong>of</strong> the talus<br />

(LPT; black arrow) drove into the calcaneus, causing wide<br />

separation <strong>of</strong> the posterior facet <strong>of</strong> the subtalar joint<br />

(bidirectional arrow). Incidentally seen is a nonosseous tarsal<br />

coalition (arrowheads) between the anterior process <strong>of</strong> the<br />

calcaneus (APC) <strong>and</strong> the navicular (N). C, CT scan in the<br />

coronal oblique plane through the posterior facet <strong>of</strong> the<br />

subtalar joint demonstrates the typical inferomedial direction<br />

<strong>of</strong> the fracture (dashed arrow). There are <strong>of</strong>ten laterally<br />

displaced fragments (black arrow). Normally, none <strong>of</strong> the<br />

calcaneus should be below the lateral malleolus (LM). D, CT<br />

scan in the coronal oblique plane through the middle facet<br />

(arrow) shows that in this patient the sustentaculum tali (ST)<br />

is in one large piece <strong>and</strong> that the fracture does not extend<br />

into the middle facet. E, Axial CT scan through the<br />

calcaneocuboid joint (CCJ) shows involvement <strong>of</strong> this joint<br />

(arrowhead).<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2273<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:19 PM


2274 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

APC<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-82. Anterior process <strong>of</strong> the calcaneus (APC) fracture in a<br />

48-year-old who fell while st<strong>and</strong>ing on a picnic table, sustained a<br />

twisting injury to the foot. This lateral radiograph was obtained in the<br />

emergency department the next day. The arrowheads in the magnified<br />

dashed box show the minimally displaced lucent fracture lines through<br />

the APC. The patient did well after nonoperative treatment with a non–<br />

weight-bearing cast for 12 weeks.<br />

A<br />

C<br />

B<br />

D<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-83. Anterior process <strong>of</strong> the calcaneus<br />

(APC) fracture in a 29-year-old who tripped down<br />

some steps. A, Oblique, non–weight-bearing foot<br />

radiograph shows a nondisplaced APC fracture (white<br />

arrowheads in magnified dashed box). B, Radiographs<br />

6 months later show that the APC fracture is still<br />

unhealed. CT scans were also obtained on the same<br />

day as the initial radiographs. C, Source axial images<br />

through both hindfeet reveal the minimally displaced<br />

transverse fracture (white arrowheads in dotted<br />

magnified box) <strong>of</strong> the left APC. The contralateral right<br />

foot serves as a useful normal comparison when both<br />

feet are included in the small scanning field <strong>of</strong> view.<br />

D, Sagittal reformatted image shows the ACP fracture<br />

disrupting the superior cortex (arrow). The acute<br />

fracture margins are not corticated. The patient was<br />

initially treated conservatively, including 4 months <strong>of</strong><br />

non–weight bearing <strong>and</strong> 4 months with a bone<br />

stimulator. When the patient remained symptomatic<br />

7 months later, a repeat CT scan was requested.<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2274<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:21 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2275 <strong>47</strong><br />

E<br />

F<br />

G<br />

H<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-83, cont’d E, The axial source images reveal that the transverse fracture remains nonunited (arrowheads in magnified dashed box).<br />

F, The sagittal image shows that the fracture margins are becoming sclerotic <strong>and</strong> corticated (arrow), a sign <strong>of</strong> nonunion. Because CT confirmed the<br />

clinical suspicion that the APC fracture was not healing, surgical intervention was warranted. G, Oblique radiograph obtained portably in the<br />

recovery room immediately after open reduction <strong>and</strong> internal fixation shows the lucent fracture line (arrowheads) bridged by a Whipple-type<br />

Herbert screw. H, Oblique radiograph obtained 9 months after surgery reveals that the fracture lines are essentially healed <strong>and</strong> barely discernible<br />

(arrowheads).<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2275<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:22 PM


2276 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-84. Anterior process <strong>of</strong> the calcaneus (APC) fracture in a 34-year-old who presented to the urgent care clinic 1 day after a minor<br />

motor vehicle collision, complaining <strong>of</strong> pain along the lateral midfoot. A, Lateral radiograph shows the small APC fracture resembling an os<br />

calcaneus secondarius (arrowheads in magnified dashed box). CT scans were obtained the next day. B, Sagittal scan through the APC<br />

demonstrating sharp, noncorticated, margins (arrowheads in dotted magnified box) on the vertically oriented fracture. C, The axial source scan<br />

confirms that this is an acute fracture with sharp but nonsclerotic margins (arrowheads in dashed magnified box).<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2276<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:23 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2277 <strong>47</strong><br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-85. Example <strong>of</strong> a Lisfranc amputation<br />

in a 53-year-old who has had chronic peripheral<br />

neuropathy <strong>of</strong> unknown cause since 16 years <strong>of</strong> age.<br />

Lateral (A), anteroposterior (B), <strong>and</strong> (C) oblique<br />

radiographs. Cu, cuboid; 1, 2, <strong>and</strong> 3 indicate the first,<br />

second, <strong>and</strong> third cuneiforms.<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

bears his name, he did describe an amputation along the<br />

tarsometatarsal joint, an example <strong>of</strong> which is shown in<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-85.<br />

In a Lisfranc dislocation, the second to fifth metatarsals<br />

are dislocated laterally, or dorsolaterally, relative to the<br />

tarsal bones. The Lisfranc dislocations are subdivided into<br />

two categories based on what happens to the first metatarsal<br />

relative to the other four. If the first metatarsal dislocates<br />

laterally along with the second to fifth metatarsals, it<br />

is called homolateral (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-86). If the first metatarsal<br />

diverges from the other four metatarsals, remaining aligned<br />

with the medial cuneiform (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-87), or if the first<br />

metatarsal dislocates medially (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-88), it is called<br />

divergent.<br />

When a Lisfranc fracture is grossly displaced, a CT scan<br />

is not needed to confirm the diagnosis. However, because<br />

the exact location <strong>of</strong> dislocated metatarsals may be difficult<br />

to discern based solely on radiographs, a threedimensionally<br />

reformatted CT scan may prove useful in<br />

presurgical planning (see Figs. <strong>47</strong>-86H <strong>and</strong> <strong>47</strong>-87F <strong>and</strong> G).<br />

The three-dimensional nature <strong>of</strong> these dislocations can<br />

best be appreciated by creating a series <strong>of</strong> three-dimensional<br />

images rotated along longitudinal <strong>and</strong> transverse<br />

axes <strong>and</strong> played as a movie loop on the PACS. We find that<br />

a series <strong>of</strong> 36 images, each 10 degrees apart, works well.<br />

When only minimally displaced, Lisfranc dislocations<br />

can be difficult to discern radiographically, <strong>and</strong> close attention<br />

should be paid to the Lisfranc joint on all views <strong>of</strong> the<br />

foot. Normally there is perfect alignment between the first<br />

metatarsal base <strong>and</strong> first (or medial) cuneiform, between<br />

the second metatarsal <strong>and</strong> the second (or middle) cuneiform,<br />

<strong>and</strong> between the third metatarsal <strong>and</strong> the third (or<br />

lateral) cuneiform. Also, the bases <strong>of</strong> the fourth <strong>and</strong> fifth<br />

metatarsals should be perfectly aligned with their individual<br />

facets on the cuboid (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-86A <strong>and</strong> B). One clue<br />

that a nondisplaced Lisfranc dislocation may be present is<br />

fracture fragments <strong>of</strong>f the base <strong>of</strong> the second metatarsal. As<br />

shown on the three-dimensional CT in Figure <strong>47</strong>-5, the<br />

base <strong>of</strong> the second metatarsal extends more proximally<br />

across the Lisfranc joint than do the other metatarsals.<br />

Thus, when dislocations occur along the Lisfranc joint, it<br />

Text continued on p. 2282<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2277<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:24 PM


2278 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

C<br />

A<br />

B<br />

D<br />

E<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-86. Example <strong>of</strong> progression from normal to neuropathic Lisfranc dislocation. The patient was 49 years <strong>of</strong> age at presentation <strong>and</strong> had<br />

diabetes mellitus. Anteroposterior (A) <strong>and</strong> oblique (B) radiographs reveals normal anatomic alignment between the first (1), second (2), <strong>and</strong> third<br />

(3) cuneiforms <strong>and</strong> the first (I), second (II), <strong>and</strong> third (III) metatarsals, as well as between the cuboid (Cu) <strong>and</strong> the fourth (IV) <strong>and</strong> fifth (V)<br />

metatarsals. C, Lateral radiograph shows normal alignment between the midfoot <strong>and</strong> forefoot. Arterial calcifications (arrow) are present, consistent<br />

with the patient’s history <strong>of</strong> diabetes. The patient returned 2.5 years later. He had been having episodes <strong>of</strong> passing out <strong>and</strong> falling, although he did<br />

not remember these episodes well. He did not remember injuring himself, <strong>and</strong> because <strong>of</strong> peripheral neuropathy he had no sensation in his foot.<br />

He first noticed swelling <strong>and</strong> blisters on his foot the morning the following radiographs were taken. He ambulated normally without the assistance<br />

<strong>of</strong> a walker or cane. Anteroposterior (D) <strong>and</strong> oblique (E) radiographs illustrate a homolateral Lisfranc dislocation, with lateral dislocations <strong>of</strong> all<br />

five metatarsals. The first metatarsal (I) is not articulating with the first cuneiform (1) but is instead articulating with the second cuneiform (2). The<br />

base <strong>of</strong> the second metatarsal (II; arrowhead) is not articulating with anything.<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2278<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:26 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2279 <strong>47</strong><br />

F<br />

G<br />

H<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-86, cont’d F, Lateral radiograph shows the dorsal dislocation <strong>of</strong> the second metatarsal (arrowhead). A CT scan was obtained to<br />

underst<strong>and</strong> better the extent <strong>of</strong> the dislocation. G, Axial oblique scan shows that none <strong>of</strong> the metatarsals are articulating with their appropriate<br />

tarsals. In cases <strong>of</strong> complex fracture-dislocations, three-dimensional (3D) reformatted images can help in underst<strong>and</strong>ing the relative locations <strong>of</strong><br />

the bones. H, This 3D image as viewed from above shows lateral displacement <strong>of</strong> all five metatarsals, <strong>and</strong> dorsal dislocation <strong>of</strong> the second through<br />

fourth metatarsals.<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2279<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:28 PM


2280 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

E<br />

D<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-87. Divergent Lisfranc dislocation in a 34-year-old who was the front passenger in a motor vehicle accident. Radiographs were<br />

obtained in the emergency department. Anteroposterior (A) <strong>and</strong> oblique (B) views <strong>of</strong> the foot reveal lateral dislocation <strong>of</strong> the second through fifth<br />

metatarsals. The white arrow points to a fragment fractured <strong>of</strong>f the base <strong>of</strong> the second metatarsal. The black arrowhead points to the base <strong>of</strong> the<br />

fourth metatarsal, which is not articulating with anything. C, The Lisfranc dislocation is less obvious on the lateral view, although the base <strong>of</strong> the<br />

fourth metatarsal (black arrowhead) is not articulating with anything. A closed reduction was attempted at the bedside but was unsuccessful.<br />

D <strong>and</strong> E, CT scans were obtained to aid in surgical planning. Straight axial (long-axis) (D) <strong>and</strong> coronal oblique (long-axis) (E) images through the<br />

Lisfranc joint show that none <strong>of</strong> the metatarsals (II to V) is articulating properly with its respective tarsal bone. Cu, cuboid; N, navicular.<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2280<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:29 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2281 <strong>47</strong><br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-87, cont’d F <strong>and</strong> G, Three-dimensional<br />

reformatted views help in underst<strong>and</strong>ing the<br />

multiplanar nature <strong>of</strong> the Lisfranc dislocation.<br />

F, Viewed from above, the second through fifth<br />

metatarsals can be seen to be dislocated dorsally <strong>and</strong><br />

laterally. G, The view from below the foot (“Star Wars”<br />

view) shows a large fragment <strong>of</strong>f the base <strong>of</strong> the<br />

second metatarsal (white arrow) <strong>and</strong> a smaller<br />

fragment <strong>of</strong>f the third metatarsal (black arrow).<br />

Postoperative anteroposterior (H), oblique (I), <strong>and</strong><br />

lateral (J) radiographs show that seven screws were<br />

required to restore the anatomic alignment <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Lisfranc joint.<br />

F<br />

G<br />

H<br />

I<br />

J<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2281<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:31 PM


2282 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

A<br />

B<br />

D<br />

C<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-88. Divergent Lisfranc dislocation in a 22-year-old who was driving on the highway when struck by another car going the wrong way.<br />

The patient also sustained a fracture <strong>of</strong> the contralateral femoral shaft. Anteroposterior (A) <strong>and</strong> oblique (B) radiographs demonstrate medial<br />

dislocation <strong>of</strong> the first metatarsal <strong>and</strong> lateral dislocation <strong>of</strong> the second through fourth metatarsals. The patient was taken to the operating room for<br />

open reduction <strong>and</strong> internal fixation <strong>of</strong> the femoral fracture with an intramedullary nail. Once the patient was fully anesthetized, the surgeon was<br />

able to apply longitudinal traction on the first ray <strong>and</strong> achieve closed anatomic reduction <strong>of</strong> the Lisfranc joint. C, Oblique port intra-operative<br />

radiograph. D, The patient returned to the operating room 1 week later, after the swelling had diminished, for elective fixation <strong>of</strong> the Lisfranc joint.<br />

is common for a base <strong>of</strong> the second metatarsal to be<br />

sheared <strong>of</strong>f or avulsed. In some cases, axial oblique CT<br />

images can help to demonstrate subtle <strong>of</strong>fsets at the<br />

tarsometatarsal joints, particularly when compared with<br />

the normal contralateral side (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-89). In other cases,<br />

the dislocations along the Lisfranc joint may be manifest<br />

only when a lateral stress is applied to the forefoot. In these<br />

patients, the nonstressed CT scan may fail to demonstrate<br />

the degree <strong>of</strong> potential displacement (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-90).<br />

• Arthritis 45<br />

The hallmarks <strong>of</strong> osteoarthritis—nonuniform joint space<br />

narrowing accompanied by the formation <strong>of</strong> osteophytes,<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2282<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:32 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2283 <strong>47</strong><br />

LEFT<br />

LEFT<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-89. Subtle Lisfranc dislocation in a 39-year-old who fell backward down a 3-foot wall <strong>and</strong> injured the left foot. The patient bicycled<br />

home <strong>and</strong> continued to walk on this foot for 3 days before coming to the emergency department, concerned because the pain was not<br />

diminishing. Anteroposterior (A) <strong>and</strong> oblique (B) non–weight-bearing radiographs were obtained. Close scrutiny <strong>of</strong> the Lisfranc joint on the<br />

oblique view (dashed box) reveals small fractures <strong>of</strong>f the bases <strong>of</strong> the second <strong>and</strong> first metatarsals (arrowheads). The Lisfranc joint appears<br />

anatomically aligned. The presence <strong>of</strong> the fragments along the Lisfranc joint raised the concern that this may represent a Lisfranc dislocation.<br />

C <strong>and</strong> D, CT scans were performed to assess the integrity <strong>of</strong> the tarsometatarsal joint. C, Axial oblique scan through both medial Lisfranc joints.<br />

In the normal right foot there is anatomic alignment across the first, second, <strong>and</strong> third cuneiform-metatarsal joints. In the injured left foot there<br />

is lateral subluxation <strong>of</strong> the first (white arrow) <strong>and</strong> third (black arrow) metatarsals as well as small fragments <strong>of</strong>f the second metatarsal (white<br />

arrowhead) <strong>and</strong> second cuneiform (black arrowhead). D, Axial oblique scan, slightly more plantar <strong>and</strong> more angled than C, through the lateral<br />

tarsometatarsal joint. On the normal right side the articular surfaces <strong>of</strong> the fifth metatarsal (V) <strong>and</strong> the cuboid (Cu) are aligned (white arrows).<br />

On the left, the lateral corner <strong>of</strong> the fifth metatarsal (black arrow) is laterally displaced relative to the cuboid’s impacted lateral corner (open<br />

arrowhead). These findings confirmed that the patient had sustained a disruption <strong>of</strong> the Lisfranc joint, which was treated with a boot <strong>and</strong> non–<br />

weight bearing.<br />

D<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2283<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:34 PM


2284 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-90. Subtle Lisfranc dislocation in a 56-<br />

year-old, nondiabetic patient who mis-stepped from<br />

a high curb <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>ed awkwardly, injuring the foot.<br />

A, Initial radiograph shows the fracture <strong>of</strong>f the base <strong>of</strong><br />

the second metatarsal (arrow). The alignment <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Lisfranc joint is relatively maintained. Because <strong>of</strong> the<br />

degree <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t tissue swelling, the patient was initially<br />

treated with a boot. B, Axial CT scan obtained 5 days<br />

later showed the second metatarsal fracture to be<br />

essentially nondisplaced <strong>and</strong> the first <strong>and</strong> second<br />

tarsometatarsal joints to be in anatomic alignment.<br />

When the s<strong>of</strong>t tissue swelling subsided 4 days later,<br />

the boot was exchanged for a cast. C, Postcasting<br />

anteroposterior radiograph reveals that there is lateral<br />

displacement <strong>of</strong> the first (white arrow) <strong>and</strong> second<br />

(black arrow) metatarsals. Because this demonstrated<br />

that the Lisfranc joint was not stable, 3 days later the<br />

patient was taken to the operating room for open<br />

reduction <strong>and</strong> internal fixation (D).<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

subcortical sclerosis, <strong>and</strong> subcortical round lucencies called<br />

geodes—are typically well seen radiographically. But some<br />

joints, such as the ankle <strong>and</strong> subtalar joints, can be difficult<br />

to pr<strong>of</strong>ile radiographically, <strong>and</strong> in such cases CT should be<br />

well able to demonstrate all these osteoarthritic changes<br />

(Fig. <strong>47</strong>-91).<br />

• Rheumatoid Arthritis<br />

For rheumatoid arthritis, we prefer MRI to CT when crosssectional<br />

imaging is required. MRI after the administration<br />

<strong>of</strong> intravenous contrast well demonstrates abnormally vas-<br />

cularized synovium <strong>and</strong> thickened pannus (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-55)<br />

as well as small cortical erosions before they become radiographically<br />

apparent.<br />

• Gout<br />

Gout is uric acid crystal deposition arthropathy with a<br />

predilection for the foot, particularly the first metatarsophalangeal<br />

joint. The cortical erosions caused by gout form<br />

slowly <strong>and</strong> can take as long as a decade to be manifest<br />

radiographically. These erosions are classically described as<br />

being well circumscribed with sharp overhanging edges.<br />

The diagnosis <strong>of</strong> gout is confirmed when an aspirate <strong>of</strong><br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2284<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:35 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2285 <strong>47</strong><br />

A<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-91. CT scan <strong>of</strong> osteoarthritis in a 71-yearold<br />

patient. A, Axial scan through the tops <strong>of</strong> both<br />

ankle joints demonstrates nonuniform narrowing <strong>of</strong><br />

the medial ankle mortise bilaterally (black arrows).<br />

Many small geodes with well-circumscribed,<br />

corticated margins (black arrowheads) are seen in<br />

both talar domes. B, Coronal scan demonstrates<br />

nonuniform narrowing medially in both mortises<br />

(black arrows), subcortical geodes (black arrowheads),<br />

<strong>and</strong> subcortical sclerosis (white arrowheads).<br />

C, Sagittal scan demonstrates nonuniform joint space<br />

narrowing (black arrows) as well as a small anterior<br />

osteophyte (white arrow).<br />

B<br />

C<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2285<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:37 PM


2286 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-92. A 34-year-old man came to the<br />

emergency department complaining <strong>of</strong> acute<br />

onset <strong>of</strong> nontraumatic pain <strong>of</strong> his left great toe.<br />

A, Anteroposterior radiograph <strong>of</strong> the left foot, with the<br />

area in the dashed box magnified to the right. A thin,<br />

white, curved line was observed just outside the<br />

lateral diaphyseal cortex <strong>of</strong> the first metatarsal<br />

(ellipse). Initially, this was mistakenly thought to<br />

present a periosteal reaction from the first metatarsal,<br />

rather than what it truly was: an eroded lateral<br />

sesamoid. There is also a marginal erosion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

medial first metatarsal head (white arrow). B, Axial CT<br />

scan through the sesamoids <strong>of</strong> the great toes<br />

bilaterally shows two normal sesamoids on the right,<br />

whereas on the left only a thin shell <strong>of</strong> the eroded<br />

lateral sesamoid remains (ellipse).<br />

A<br />

B<br />

joint fluid reveals strongly negative birefringent crystals<br />

under a polarizing microscope. CT is seldom used in the<br />

workup <strong>of</strong> gout. However, CT scans <strong>of</strong> the feet obtained<br />

for other reasons may unexpectedly reveal the finding <strong>of</strong><br />

gout (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-92).<br />

• Arthrodesis<br />

When the chronic pain from severe arthritis cannot be<br />

controlled medically, a surgical arthrodesis may be<br />

desirable. Once solid bony fusion across the joint has been<br />

achieved, that fused joint should be pain free. And even<br />

though the patient no longer has any motion at that joint<br />

after arthrodesis, before arthrodesis the joint may have<br />

been so limited by pain <strong>and</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> articular hyaline cartilage<br />

that the patient may have had very little functional<br />

range <strong>of</strong> motion to begin with.<br />

When patients remain symptomatic after an attempted<br />

arthrodesis, CT can be used to assess the degree <strong>of</strong> solid<br />

bony bridging, if any. Although there may be several metal<br />

plates <strong>and</strong> screws within the scanning FOV, these tend to<br />

cause relatively little CT streak artifact, especially when<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2286<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:38 PM


C<br />

D<br />

<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2287 <strong>47</strong><br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-92, cont’d C, Shortaxis<br />

(coronal) CT scan confirms the<br />

erosion <strong>of</strong> the left lateral sesamoid<br />

(ellipse) as well as an erosion in<br />

the adjacent metatarsal head<br />

(arrow). D, Axial CT scan proximal<br />

to B reveals the marginal erosion<br />

seen radiographically in the left<br />

medial first metatarsal head (white<br />

arrow) <strong>and</strong> an erosion in the right<br />

second cuneiform (black arrow).<br />

Both erosions have well-defined,<br />

slightly sclerotic margins with<br />

sharp overhanging edges,<br />

characteristic <strong>of</strong> gout. Aspiration<br />

<strong>of</strong> the patient’s left great toe<br />

metatarsophalangeal joint yielded<br />

uric acid crystals.<br />

the source images consist <strong>of</strong> thin, overlapping slices<br />

(Fig. <strong>47</strong>-93).<br />

• Tarsal Coalitions 17,32<br />

The term coalition comes from the verb “coalesce,” which<br />

means “to grow together <strong>and</strong> form a union.” These abnormal<br />

unions are either osseous, in which there is a solid cortical<br />

bridge between the bones, or nonosseous, in which there<br />

is a fibrous or cartilaginous union between the bones.<br />

Although abnormal bone coalitions have been reported<br />

throughout the body, certain locations predominate. In the<br />

wrist, for example, carpal coalitions usually occur between<br />

the lunate <strong>and</strong> triquetrum. In the hindfoot, tarsal coalitions<br />

most commonly occur across the middle facet <strong>of</strong> the<br />

subtalar joint, <strong>and</strong> between the APC <strong>and</strong> the lateral pole<br />

<strong>of</strong> the navicular. 46 An example <strong>of</strong> the latter was already seen<br />

as an incidental finding in Figure <strong>47</strong>-81B.<br />

The subtalar joint complex consists <strong>of</strong> the subtalar<br />

joint itself <strong>and</strong> the talonavicular <strong>and</strong> calcaneocuboid joints.<br />

These joints function in unison during the gait cycle, <strong>and</strong><br />

limitation <strong>of</strong> motion <strong>of</strong> any one <strong>of</strong> these joints limits the<br />

motion <strong>of</strong> the other joints. 37 The clinical syndrome <strong>of</strong> tarsal<br />

coalition consists <strong>of</strong> pain <strong>and</strong> reduced or absent subtalar<br />

motion, as well as pes planus (flat-foot) <strong>and</strong> peroneal<br />

muscle spasm (clonus on inversion stress). 4,43 The exact<br />

cause <strong>of</strong> the peroneal spasm is uncertain; however, peroneal<br />

muscle tightness is the result <strong>of</strong> tarsal coalition, not<br />

the cause. Symptoms usually manifest between 12 <strong>and</strong> 16<br />

years <strong>of</strong> age <strong>and</strong> worsen with increasing age. Conservative<br />

treatment options include anti-inflammatory medication<br />

<strong>and</strong> a trial <strong>of</strong> reduced activity, cast immobilization, <strong>and</strong><br />

molded orthoses. If conservative treatment fails, surgical<br />

options include resection <strong>of</strong> the coalition <strong>and</strong> arthrodesis<br />

if secondary osteoarthritis has developed.<br />

According to the literature, tarsal coalitions are bilateral<br />

in 50% to 60% <strong>of</strong> cases. However, in searching our<br />

database for examples for this chapter, we found that bilaterality<br />

was the rule. Perhaps because our CT protocol<br />

entails scanning both feet, we are apt to find asymptomatic<br />

coalitions <strong>and</strong> other incidental variants, such as the os<br />

calcaneus secondarius (a forme fruste <strong>of</strong> calcaneonavicular<br />

coalition), in the contralateral foot (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-94).<br />

A talar beak is an indirect sign <strong>of</strong> a tarsal coalition. Seen<br />

best radiographically on the lateral view (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-95A) or<br />

on a sagittal CT (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-95C), the talar beak is not part <strong>of</strong><br />

the coalition but a result <strong>of</strong> it. The altered biomechanics<br />

across the talonavicular joint can result in a traction spur<br />

(enthesophyte) arising from the dorsal head <strong>of</strong> the talus.<br />

Text continued on p. 2293<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2287<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:40 PM


2288 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

A B C<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-93. Attempted<br />

arthrodesis. The patient is a 68-<br />

year-old farmer who injured his<br />

ankle 6 years earlier when he misstepped<br />

getting <strong>of</strong>f his tractor. He<br />

underwent arthrodesis surgery 3<br />

years ago, <strong>and</strong> this was revised 1<br />

year ago because <strong>of</strong> failure <strong>of</strong><br />

fusion. The patient is experiencing<br />

persistent pain. Anteroposterior<br />

(A), mortise (B), <strong>and</strong> lateral (C)<br />

radiographs reveal a plate <strong>and</strong><br />

several screws across the ankle<br />

mortise <strong>and</strong> syndesmosis.<br />

Although the metal obscures<br />

visualization <strong>of</strong> portions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

mortise, no bony fusion is seen<br />

medially (black arrowheads).<br />

D <strong>and</strong> E, CT scans were requested<br />

to see if any fusion was present.<br />

Mortise coronal (D) <strong>and</strong> mortise<br />

sagittal (E) images clearly show no<br />

bony bridging throughout the<br />

ankle mortise (black arrowheads).<br />

D<br />

E<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2288<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:41 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2289 <strong>47</strong><br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-93, cont’d Although<br />

there are some metallic streak<br />

artifacts, the resolution is high<br />

enough to visualize the widely<br />

spaced cancellous threads <strong>of</strong> the<br />

lag screw in the talus (white arrow)<br />

<strong>and</strong> the narrowly spaced cortical<br />

threads <strong>of</strong> the syndesmotic screw<br />

(white arrowhead). One operation<br />

<strong>and</strong> 16 months later,<br />

anteroposterior (F), mortise (G),<br />

<strong>and</strong> lateral (H) radiographs no<br />

longer demonstrate residual<br />

lucency along the mortise. Mortise<br />

coronal (I) <strong>and</strong> mortise sagittal (J)<br />

CT scans now reveal solid bony<br />

fusion between the tibia (Ti), talus<br />

(Ta), <strong>and</strong> fibula (Fi).<br />

F G H<br />

I<br />

J<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2289<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:43 PM


2290 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

A<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-94. Calcaneonavicular coalition in an 11-<br />

year-old with right foot pain. A, Oblique radiograph<br />

shows the abnormal joint in this nonosseous coalition<br />

(arrowheads in magnified dashed box). B, Axial<br />

oblique CT scan through the bottoms <strong>of</strong> the talar<br />

heads (H) shows the symptomatic coalition on the<br />

right foot (black arrowhead) between the elongated<br />

anterior process <strong>of</strong> the calcaneus (APC) <strong>and</strong> the<br />

navicular (N). Incidentally seen is an asymptomatic<br />

coalition on the left (white arrowhead) between the<br />

abnormally broad APC <strong>and</strong> the navicular. C, Axial<br />

oblique CT scan slightly plantar to B. On the right foot<br />

is the symptomatic abnormal joint (arrowhead)<br />

between the broad APC <strong>and</strong> the navicular. On the left<br />

is an extra bone, an os calcaneus secondarius (OCS),<br />

articulating with both the APC <strong>and</strong> navicular.<br />

B<br />

C<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2290<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:45 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2291 <strong>47</strong><br />

D<br />

E<br />

F<br />

G<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-94, cont’d D, Sagittal CT scan <strong>of</strong> the right foot shows the nonosseous coalition (arrowhead) between the navicular <strong>and</strong> APC. E, Sagittal<br />

CT scan <strong>of</strong> the left foot shows the OCS between the navicular <strong>and</strong> APC. Surgery was elected. F <strong>and</strong> G, Fluoroscopic spot views were obtained at the<br />

beginning (F) <strong>and</strong> end (G) <strong>of</strong> the resection. The pointer in F is a metal instrument that the surgeon uses to localize the coalition fluoroscopically.<br />

The white rectangle in G outlines the resection site. H, Postoperative radiograph shows the calcaneus <strong>and</strong> navicular no longer in contact with each<br />

other (white rectangle).<br />

H<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2291<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:<strong>47</strong> PM


2292 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

E<br />

F<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-95. Tarsal coalition in a 29-year-old radiology resident with a long history <strong>of</strong> bilateral foot pain. The pain is worse on the right, is<br />

aggravated by athletics, <strong>and</strong> was improved with custom orthoses. A, Lateral radiograph <strong>of</strong> the more symptomatic right ankle reveals a talar beak<br />

(arrow). B, Lateral radiograph <strong>of</strong> the less symptomatic left ankle shows no enthesophyte arising from the dorsal head <strong>of</strong> the talus. Oblique<br />

radiographs <strong>of</strong> the right (C) <strong>and</strong> left (D) feet reveal no coalition between the calcaneus <strong>and</strong> navicular (bidirectional arrows). E, Sagittal CT scan <strong>of</strong><br />

the right foot reveals the talar beak (arrow) as well as a portion <strong>of</strong> the solid osseous coalition across the subtalar joint (arrowhead). F, CT scan in<br />

the coronal oblique plane through the middle facets <strong>of</strong> both subtalar joints demonstrates solid osseous coalition across the right middle facet<br />

(white arrowheads). There is also a nonosseous coalition <strong>of</strong> the left middle facet (black arrowheads), as manifest by a joint that is abnormally<br />

broad with irregular, noncongruent articular surfaces.<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2292<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:49 PM


A<br />

C<br />

B<br />

D<br />

<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2293 <strong>47</strong><br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-96. Calcaneonavicular coalition seen<br />

radiographically in this 21-year-old who has been<br />

complaining <strong>of</strong> left ankle pain for at least 7 years. On<br />

physical examination, the subtalar range <strong>of</strong> motion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

left foot is half that <strong>of</strong> the asymptomatic right. A, Oblique<br />

radiograph <strong>of</strong> the asymptomatic right midfoot shows the<br />

normal relationship between the calcaneus (Ca) <strong>and</strong><br />

navicular (N), with no contact between them. B, Oblique<br />

radiograph <strong>of</strong> the symptomatic left foot shows the<br />

abnormal joint (arrowheads) between the calcaneus <strong>and</strong><br />

navicular. This is a nonosseous coalition. Lateral<br />

radiographs <strong>of</strong> the right (C) <strong>and</strong> left (D) ankles reveal<br />

elongated anterior processes <strong>of</strong> the calcaneus bilaterally<br />

(arrows). These bilateral “ant-eater” signs suggest that<br />

the patient has an asymptomatic calcaneonavicular<br />

coalition on the right that was not radiographically<br />

apparent on the oblique view (A).<br />

Talar beaks occur less frequently with nonosseous coalition<br />

because some subtalar motion remains.<br />

• Calcaneonavicular Coalition<br />

Of the two common locations for tarsal coalitions, calcaneonavicular<br />

coalitions can <strong>of</strong>ten be seen radiographically<br />

on the oblique view (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-96). Normally, the calcaneus<br />

<strong>and</strong> navicular do not touch (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-96A); it is abnormal<br />

any time they get close enough to each other to form<br />

a joint (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-96B), let alone a solid bony bridge.<br />

Another radiographic indication <strong>of</strong> a calcaneonavicular<br />

coalition is the presence <strong>of</strong> an elongated APC, sometimes<br />

called an ant-eater sign (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-96C <strong>and</strong> D). An elongated<br />

APC <strong>and</strong> an asymptomatic calcaneonavicular coalition<br />

may be seen as incidental findings on radiographs <strong>and</strong> CTs<br />

obtained for other reasons. And although an elongated<br />

APC may not cause a symptomatic coalition, it may be at<br />

increased risk <strong>of</strong> fracture (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-97).<br />

• Talocalcaneal Coalition<br />

Talocalcaneal coalitions, which occur across the middle<br />

facet <strong>of</strong> the subtalar joint, are difficult to demonstrate with<br />

conventional radiographs because these radiographs do not<br />

well pr<strong>of</strong>ile the middle facet. For this reason, coronal CT<br />

images obliqued to be perpendicular to the subtalar joint<br />

are the key imaging plane (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-95F). With osseous coalitions,<br />

solid bony ankylosis is present across the middle facet<br />

(see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-95F, white arrowheads). Nonosseous coalitions<br />

across the middle facet are not difficult to recognize by CT<br />

because they do not look like the flat, uniform middle facet<br />

we typically see on coronal oblique CT. In nonosseous<br />

coalitions, the articular surfaces are not smooth or congruous<br />

<strong>and</strong> tend to have an overgrown appearance (see Fig.<br />

<strong>47</strong>-95F, black arrowheads). An additional example <strong>of</strong> nonosseous<br />

middle facet coalition is shown in Figure <strong>47</strong>-98.<br />

• Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome<br />

The tarsal tunnel in the ankle is analogous to the carpal<br />

tunnel in the wrist. Both are spaces confined by the underlying<br />

bones <strong>and</strong> overlying fibrous ligaments through which<br />

pass tendons, blood vessels, <strong>and</strong> nerves. The ro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

tarsal tunnel is the flexor retinaculum, a broad, fibrous<br />

b<strong>and</strong> extending between the medial malleolus <strong>and</strong> the<br />

medial tubercle <strong>of</strong> the calcaneus (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-99A). These retinacular<br />

fibers help prevent the medial tendons from<br />

becoming dislocated <strong>and</strong> can be identified on highresolution<br />

images (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-99B; see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-31). Because the<br />

tarsal tunnel is a relatively tight space, otherwise innocuous<br />

volume-occupying lesions, such as synovial cysts (Fig.<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2293<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:50 PM


2294 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-97. Anterior process <strong>of</strong> the calcaneus (APC) fracture in a 51-year-old who was playing a jumping game. The patient, who was wearing<br />

s<strong>and</strong>als, l<strong>and</strong>ed awkwardly <strong>and</strong> felt a large “pop” after forcefully inverting the foot. A, Lateral radiograph obtained when the patient came into the<br />

emergency department the next day revealed the previously asymptomatic elongated APC (arrows). Careful scrutiny also reveals disruption <strong>of</strong><br />

the cortex (arrowhead), indicating a nondisplaced APC fracture. B <strong>and</strong> C, CT scans were obtained the same day. Sagittal (B) <strong>and</strong> axial (C) scans<br />

revealed the APC fracture (black arrowheads) as well as the incidental finding <strong>of</strong> a calcaneonavicular nonosseous coalition (white arrowhead;<br />

N, navicular). The patient was treated nonoperatively with a non–weight-bearing cast. When no healing was seen radiographically 9 weeks later,<br />

an ultrasonic bone stimulator was used. Five weeks after that, healing was evident radiographically. Twenty-three weeks later, the injury was<br />

essentially asymptomatic.<br />

<strong>47</strong>-100), small nerve sheath tumors, focal synovitis, or<br />

rarely even varicose veins, can potentially impinge on the<br />

posterior tibial nerve. 22,30<br />

• Stress Injuries<br />

When the foot is subjected to new or excessive forces, such<br />

as a change in physical activity or an increased level <strong>of</strong><br />

workout, certain bones may be subjected to a disproportionate<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> the increased stress <strong>and</strong> exhibit a stress<br />

response. The pattern <strong>of</strong> stress response depends on which<br />

bone is involved <strong>and</strong> how long it has been untreated.<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-98. Bilateral nonosseous coalitions <strong>of</strong> the middle facet <strong>of</strong><br />

the subtalar joint in an 8-year-old. Coronal CT scan reveals an<br />

abnormal vertical orientation <strong>of</strong> the right middle facet (white arrow).<br />

On the left, the talar-side middle facet has an abnormal rounded<br />

cortical surface (black arrow).<br />

• Navicular Stress Fractures 34<br />

Navicular stress fractures begin at the dorsal, central, proximal<br />

navicular where it articulates with the head <strong>of</strong> the talus<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2294<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:51 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2295 <strong>47</strong><br />

Tarsal<br />

tunnel<br />

Flexor<br />

retinaculum<br />

B<br />

A<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-99. Location <strong>of</strong> the tarsal tunnel. A, Illustration <strong>of</strong> the location <strong>of</strong> the tarsal tunnel (arrow), deep to the flexor retinaculum.<br />

(Artist, M. Schenk, MS, CMI.) B, Axial high-resolution T1-weighted image shows the medial neurovascular bundle (dotted ellipse) deep to the<br />

flexor retinaculum (arrows).<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-100. Tarsal tunnel containing a synovial<br />

cyst (arrow): axial (A) <strong>and</strong> sagittal (B) T2-weighted fatsuppressed<br />

images.<br />

A<br />

B<br />

(Fig. <strong>47</strong>-101A). These fractures tend to be the result <strong>of</strong><br />

repetitive injuries rather than a specific traumatic event. In<br />

our practice, such fatigue injuries are commonly seen in<br />

college athletes. Often the athlete’s prognosis <strong>and</strong> the<br />

length <strong>of</strong> time needed to rest the fatigue injury depend on<br />

whether the cortex is broken. When MRI demonstrates just<br />

bone marrow edema without a breach in the cortex, these<br />

will be radiographically occult, <strong>and</strong> our sports medicine<br />

physicians prefer we use the term stress reaction. We use<br />

stress fracture to refer to bones that exhibit a discrete line<br />

extending through the cortex by MRI, CT, or plain radiography<br />

(Figs. <strong>47</strong>-102 <strong>and</strong> <strong>47</strong>-103).<br />

Although navicular fatigue fractures may be suspected<br />

clinically, initial radiographs are <strong>of</strong>ten negative, <strong>and</strong> MRI<br />

is the next imaging study ordered to confirm the diagnosis.<br />

As with most stress fractures, MRI is more sensitive than<br />

CT for the detection <strong>of</strong> the bone marrow edema that develops<br />

before the cortex breaks (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-101). But MRI,<br />

owing to its exquisite sensitivity to marrow edema, may be<br />

too sensitive to assess fracture healing. At the UW we have<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2295<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:53 PM


2296 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

A<br />

C<br />

B<br />

D<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-101. Navicular stress reaction in a<br />

36-year-old avid runner who had recently begun<br />

marathon training. The markers (m) indicate the<br />

proximal <strong>and</strong> distal extents <strong>of</strong> the patient’s pain.<br />

A, Sagittal T1-weighted MRI shows abnormally dark<br />

bone marrow in the dorsal half <strong>of</strong> the navicular<br />

(arrow). B, Sagittal inversion recovery (IR) image,<br />

being more sensitive for edema, shows abnormally<br />

bright signal throughout the navicular (arrows).<br />

C, Long-axis, oblique axial T1-weighted image shows<br />

abnormally dark bone marrow in the central third <strong>of</strong><br />

the navicular, emanating from the proximal articular<br />

surface adjacent to the head <strong>of</strong> the talus (arrow).<br />

D, Fat-suppressed T2-weighted image in the same<br />

plane, being more sensitive for edema, shows<br />

abnormally bright signal throughout the navicular<br />

(arrows). E, Short-axis, oblique coronal T1-weighted<br />

image just distal to the talonavicular joint shows<br />

abnormally dark bone marrow in the dorsal central<br />

portion <strong>of</strong> the navicular (arrow). F, Fat-suppressed<br />

T2-weighted image at that same location, being more<br />

sensitive for edema, shows abnormally bright signal<br />

throughout the navicular (arrows). None <strong>of</strong> these MRIs<br />

demonstrates a discrete fracture line, <strong>and</strong> we call this<br />

a stress reaction rather than a stress fracture.<br />

E<br />

F<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2296<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:55 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2297 <strong>47</strong><br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-102. Navicular fatigue (stress) fracture<br />

in a 16-year-old who developed midfoot pain while<br />

cross-country skiing. A, Anteroposterior radiograph <strong>of</strong><br />

the foot reveals a subtle nondisplaced fracture in the<br />

middle third <strong>of</strong> the navicular (arrowhead in magnified<br />

dashed box). MRI was obtained 4 days later. Axial<br />

oblique T1- (B) <strong>and</strong> fat-suppressed T2-weighted (C)<br />

images reveal a discrete fracture in the middle third <strong>of</strong><br />

the navicular (arrowhead) as well as diffuse bone<br />

marrow edema.<br />

Continued<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

developed a specific CT protocol that reformats the images<br />

in thin, 1-mm slices using a small, 6-cm FOV centered on<br />

the navicular (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-<strong>47</strong>D).<br />

Whether seen by CT or MRI, navicular fatigue injuries<br />

begin at the dorsal, central, proximal navicular where it<br />

articulates with the head <strong>of</strong> the talus. This is illustrated by<br />

the black arrows pointing to the dark regions <strong>of</strong> bone<br />

marrow on the T1-weighted images in the stress reaction<br />

in Figure <strong>47</strong>-101. More fluid-sensitive fat-suppressed T2-<br />

weighted or inversion recovery images show bone marrow<br />

edema emanating from this dorsal/central/proximal site.<br />

This is illustrated by the white arrows in Figure <strong>47</strong>-101.<br />

When stress reactions progress to stress fractures, the cortical<br />

disruption starts at the dorsal/central/proximal site<br />

on the navicular <strong>and</strong> propagates in a plantar direction<br />

vertically in the sagittal plane (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-102) or in an<br />

oblique sagittal plane (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-103). Because <strong>of</strong> the<br />

primarily sagittal orientation <strong>of</strong> these fractures, they may<br />

be difficult to appreciate on sagittal CT images <strong>and</strong> are<br />

better seen on oblique coronal (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-102F) <strong>and</strong><br />

oblique axial (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-102G) images. Because they tend<br />

to be nondisplaced incomplete fractures, they are best seen<br />

on images that are reformatted into a small FOV with thin<br />

slices. Because these patients may undergo serial CT scans<br />

to follow the progress <strong>of</strong> fracture healing, it is useful to<br />

have a st<strong>and</strong>ard protocol (as in Fig. <strong>47</strong>-<strong>47</strong>D) to help retain<br />

uniform reformatting parameters from one scan to the next<br />

(see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-103C to F).<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2297<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:56 PM


2298 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

D<br />

E<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-102, cont’d Coronal oblique T1- (D) <strong>and</strong><br />

fat-suppressed T2-weighted (E) images show that this<br />

is an incomplete fracture, beginning from the dorsal<br />

cortex (arrowhead) <strong>and</strong> extending inferiorly in the<br />

sagittal plane, but not extending completely to the<br />

plantar cortex. A CT scan obtained 2 months later,<br />

reformatted using a 6-cm field <strong>of</strong> view in the oblique<br />

coronal (F) <strong>and</strong> oblique axial (G) planes, reveals that<br />

the fracture remains nonunited (arrowhead) <strong>and</strong> the<br />

bones are diffusely osteopenic from the patient’s<br />

being non–weight bearing.<br />

F<br />

G<br />

• Calcaneal Stress Fractures<br />

Calcaneal stress fractures occur in a characteristic location,<br />

arising from the posterior third <strong>of</strong> the calcaneal tuberosity<br />

beginning at the superior cortex a few centimeters anterior<br />

to the Achilles insertion, <strong>and</strong> extending inferiorly <strong>and</strong><br />

slightly anteriorly, running perpendicular to the trabeculae.<br />

When radiographically apparent, these fractures are seen as<br />

a white sclerotic line on the lateral view (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-104A). On<br />

MRI, calcaneal stress fractures are seen as a black line on<br />

sagittal T1-weighted images (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-104B) surrounded by<br />

bone marrow edema on fat-suppressed T2-weighted (Fig.<br />

<strong>47</strong>-104C) <strong>and</strong> inversion recovery (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-104D) images.<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-105 is a an example <strong>of</strong> a calcaneal stress fracture<br />

that was subtle on initial radiographs <strong>and</strong> was ultimately<br />

imaged using CT, a nuclear medicine bone scan, <strong>and</strong> MRI.<br />

• Plantar Fasciitis<br />

Plantar fasciitis is a stress reaction occurring at the origin<br />

<strong>of</strong> the plantar aponeurosis from the calcaneus, typically at<br />

the medial calcaneal tubercle. Degenerative changes from<br />

repetitive microtrauma in the origin <strong>of</strong> the plantar fascia<br />

cause traction periostitis <strong>and</strong> microtears, resulting in pain<br />

<strong>and</strong> inflammation. Plantar fasciitis is the most common<br />

cause <strong>of</strong> pain in the inferior aspect <strong>of</strong> the heel, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

diagnosis is typically made based on clinical symptoms<br />

<strong>and</strong> physical examination revealing tenderness along the<br />

medial calcaneal tuberosity. The relationship between<br />

plantar fasciitis <strong>and</strong> heel spurs has never been firmly established.<br />

Most patients with plantar fasciitis respond to conservative<br />

treatments that include calf stretching, orthoses,<br />

nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication, ultrasonic<br />

therapy, <strong>and</strong> occasionally casting. Patients with atypical<br />

clinical presentations or who fail conservative therapies<br />

may benefit from MRI to determine if their pain is indeed<br />

related to the plantar fascia or to some other etiology such<br />

as a tarsal stress fracture. An MRI <strong>of</strong> plantar fasciitis reveals<br />

edema around the origin <strong>of</strong> the aponeurosis. The plantar<br />

fascia itself may be abnormally thickened, <strong>and</strong> there may<br />

be edema in the underlying calcaneal bone marrow (Fig.<br />

<strong>47</strong>-106; see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-53).<br />

• Metatarsal Stress Fractures<br />

Metatarsal stress fractures occur at such characteristic locations<br />

that some carry eponyms.<br />

Jones Fracture. The Jones fracture occurs at the proximal<br />

metadiaphysis <strong>of</strong> the fifth metatarsal <strong>and</strong> is seen radiographically<br />

as a transverse lucency (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-41C).<br />

Although Jones fractures can be caused by a single traumatic<br />

injury, they are commonly seen as the result <strong>of</strong> repet-<br />

Text continued on p. 2304<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2298<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:57 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2299 <strong>47</strong><br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

E<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-103. Navicular stress fracture in a 20-year-old college decathlete complaining <strong>of</strong> lateral ankle pain not localized to the navicular. An<br />

MRI requested to evaluate the ankle joint found no abnormalities in or around the ankle but revealed abnormal bone marrow signal limited to the<br />

navicular. Coronal oblique T1- (A) <strong>and</strong> fat-suppressed T2-weighted (B) images, just distal to the talonavicular joint, reveal the dark fracture line<br />

extending from the dorsal cortex (arrowhead) in a plantar-lateral direction. Serial CT scans using our navicular protocol were ordered to follow the<br />

progress <strong>of</strong> healing. Shown here is the same coronal oblique slice, just distal to the talonavicular joint, from scans taken over a period longer than<br />

1 year. C, The first CT scan, obtained 2 months after the MRI, during which time the patient was non–weight bearing on this foot <strong>and</strong> using an<br />

ultrasonic bone stimulator. The fracture (white arrowhead) is very narrow, with indistinct, noncorticated margins, suggesting that it is healing.<br />

D, The second CT scan, obtained 1 month after C, during which time the patient was weight bearing in a boot <strong>and</strong> using the bone stimulator. The<br />

fracture line (gray arrowhead) is much less distinct, consistent with continued interval healing. E, The third CT scan, obtained 3 months after<br />

D, during which time the patient resumed his training regimen. The fracture line (dark gray arrowhead) is now barely discernible. F, The final CT<br />

scan was obtained 9 months after E, when the patient’s symptoms returned. The fracture (black arrowhead) has recurred along the original<br />

fracture lines, which are now wider <strong>and</strong> more distinct than on the first CT scan (C).<br />

F<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2299<br />

9/9/2008 5:35:59 PM


2300 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-104. Calcaneal stress fracture in a 62-year-old. A, Lateral radiograph shows a sclerotic b<strong>and</strong> (black arrowheads) in the characteristic<br />

position <strong>of</strong> a calcaneal stress fracture, perpendicular to the trabeculae (white arrowheads). Incidentally seen is an os peroneum (arrow), a<br />

common normal variant. B, Midsagittal T1-weighted image shows the characteristic well-defined black line (arrowheads) <strong>of</strong> a calcaneal stress<br />

fracture. C, The corresponding midsagittal T2-weighted fat-suppressed (T2FS) image also shows the dark fracture line (arrowheads) as well as<br />

surrounding bone marrow edema. D, Sagittal inversion recovery (IR) image shown for comparison with the T2FS image (C). On the IR image, the<br />

normal fatty bone marrow is very dark, making the bone marrow edema more conspicuous. Arrowheads show the calcaneal stress fracture.<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2300<br />

9/9/2008 5:36:00 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2301 <strong>47</strong><br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-105. Calcaneal stress fracture in a 14-year-old cross-country runner. A, Lateral radiograph shows a subtle sclerotic b<strong>and</strong> (arrowheads<br />

in the magnified dashed box). CT scans in the axial (B) <strong>and</strong> sagittal (C) planes show the sclerotic line in the right calcaneus (arrowheads). The<br />

normal left calcaneus is included for comparison.<br />

Continued<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2301<br />

9/9/2008 5:36:01 PM


2302 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

D<br />

E<br />

F<br />

G<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-105, cont’d Bone scan images, both-feet-on-detector (D) <strong>and</strong> lateral (E) views, show increased activity in the right calcaneal<br />

tuberosity. Incidentally noted is normal activity in the distal tibial physis (arrowheads) in this skeletally immature patient. Midsagittal T1-weighted<br />

(F) <strong>and</strong> T2-weighted fat-suppressed (G) images show the characteristic well-defined black line (arrowheads) <strong>of</strong> a calcaneal stress fracture, as well<br />

as edema in the surrounding bone marrow.<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2302<br />

9/9/2008 5:36:02 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2303 <strong>47</strong><br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

E<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-106. Plantar fasciitis in a 52-year-old with chronic bilateral heel pain. The left (A to C) <strong>and</strong> right (D to F) hindfeet were scanned<br />

individually. A, Sagittal T1-weighted image reveals thickening <strong>of</strong> the plantar fascia (white arrows). B, The corresponding sagittal inversion<br />

recovery (IR) image reveals edema (white arrowhead) deep to the plantar fascia (white arrow). Open arrow points to OS trigonum. C, Coronal T2-<br />

weighted fat-suppressed image demonstrates a line <strong>of</strong> fluid (white arrowhead) as well as some focal bone marrow edema (black arrowhead) deep<br />

to the origin <strong>of</strong> the plantar fascia (white arrow). (“med” <strong>and</strong> “lat” represent the medial <strong>and</strong> lateral sides <strong>of</strong> the image, respectively.) Incidentally<br />

seen is a normal os trigonum (open arrow in A to C) with bone marrow signal isointense to the normal bone marrow in the other bones. D, Sagittal<br />

T1-weighted image <strong>of</strong> the contralateral right foot also demonstrates a thickened plantar fascia (arrows). The calcaneal bone marrow edema is less<br />

conspicuous than on more fluid-sensitive sequences. E, The corresponding IR images reveal extensive bone marrow edema along the plantar<br />

portion <strong>of</strong> the calcaneus (arrowheads). F, Coronal T2-weighted fat-suppressed image shows the bone marrow edema (white arrowhead) radiating<br />

from the medial-plantar surface <strong>of</strong> the calcaneus, at the origin <strong>of</strong> the plantar fascia.<br />

F<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2303<br />

9/9/2008 5:36:03 PM


2304 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

B<br />

C<br />

A<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-107. Early Jones fracture in a 21-year-old college athlete. A, On the initial anteroposterior radiograph <strong>of</strong> the base <strong>of</strong> the fifth<br />

metatarsal there is a very subtle periosteal reaction (white arrow). There is a questionable lucency (open arrowheads) extending transversely<br />

through the lateral cortex. B, Far lateral sagittal inversion recovery (IR) image reveals bone marrow edema throughout the fifth metatarsal.<br />

C, Sagittal IR image through the asymptomatic fourth metatarsal for comparison revealed normal dark marrow signal. Because <strong>of</strong> the high<br />

propensity for Jones fractures to have delayed union or nonunion, elective internal fixation with a lag screw was performed the next day.<br />

D, Follow-up anteroposterior radiograph 2 weeks later reveals bone resorption (arrowheads) along the questionable lucency in A, part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

normal early healing response. Subsequent radiographs (not shown) demonstrated solid bony bridging 1 month later.<br />

D<br />

itive stress in athletes, or as in the case <strong>of</strong> Sir Robert Jones,<br />

“whilst dancing.” 25 The Jones fracture is well recognized to<br />

have a high rate <strong>of</strong> nonunion or delayed union because <strong>of</strong><br />

the relative hypovascularity <strong>of</strong> this portion <strong>of</strong> the fifth<br />

metatarsal, prompting orthopedic surgeons to recommend<br />

early screw fixation. MRI is useful in confirming the diagnosis<br />

when it is suspected in athletes with radiographically<br />

occult injuries (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-107).<br />

March Fracture. The march fracture is found most commonly<br />

in the mid- to distal diaphysis <strong>of</strong> the second metatarsal<br />

<strong>and</strong> less <strong>of</strong>ten in the third. Unlike the Jones fracture,<br />

which occurs in high-performance athletes, stress fractures<br />

in the second <strong>and</strong> third metatarsals occur in individuals<br />

who have previously led relatively sedentary lifestyles, then<br />

suddenly increase their level <strong>of</strong> activity. This fracture was<br />

first reported by Breithaupt in 1855, 11 when he described<br />

foot pain <strong>and</strong> swelling in military recruits in the Prussian<br />

army who were forced to go on long marches—hence the<br />

name “march fracture.” This was <strong>of</strong> course 40 years before<br />

Röntgen’s discovery <strong>of</strong> x-rays. The first radiographic reports<br />

<strong>of</strong> march fractures were in 1897.* Radiographically, the<br />

*In his 2006 academic dissertation for the <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Helsinki, Bone Stress<br />

Injuries <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Foot</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> (http://ethesis.helsinki.fi/julkaisut/laa/kliin/vk/<br />

sormaala/bonestre.pdf), Sormaala cites these two references:<br />

Schulte: Die sogenannte Fussgeschwulst. Arch Klin Chir 1897;55:872.<br />

Stechow: Fussödem und Röntgenstrahlen. Deutsche Militärärztliche Zeitschrift<br />

1897;26:465-<strong>47</strong>1.<br />

second <strong>and</strong> third metatarsals respond to stress by forming<br />

a periosteal reaction, although this may be imperceptible<br />

or subtle early on (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-108). Edema-sensitive MRI<br />

reveals abnormally bright marrow signal in the diaphysis<br />

as well as bright periosteal reaction outside the cortex.<br />

• Sesamoid Stress Fractures<br />

Sesamoid stress fractures are notoriously difficult to diagnosis<br />

radiographically. Perhaps because <strong>of</strong> their varying<br />

presence <strong>and</strong> appearance, radiologists tend to have a “blind<br />

spot” when it comes to the sesamoids. However, when<br />

looking at the sesamoids <strong>of</strong> the first metatarsophalangeal<br />

joint, there are some helpful statistics to keep in mind.<br />

Although the other sesamoid bones <strong>of</strong> the foot are present<br />

in less than 10% <strong>of</strong> people, the two sesamoids plantar to<br />

the head <strong>of</strong> the first metatarsal are present in 100% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

population. 16 Absence <strong>of</strong> either the medial (tibial) or lateral<br />

(fibular) sesamoids is always abnormal, <strong>and</strong> a destructive<br />

process should be considered (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-92). And<br />

although a multipartite medial sesamoid bone is a common<br />

normal variant found in 13% to 30% <strong>of</strong> the population, a<br />

multipartite lateral sesamoid bone is an uncommon variant,<br />

found in only 1% <strong>of</strong> normal feet.<br />

When symptoms are referable to the lateral sesamoid<br />

<strong>and</strong> radiographs reveal it to be multipartite, this should be<br />

diagnosed as a fracture (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-109). Additional diagnostic<br />

imaging should not be required, although MRI or a nuclear<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2304<br />

9/9/2008 5:36:04 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2305 <strong>47</strong><br />

A<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-108. Second metatarsal stress fracture in<br />

a 22-year-old who developed foot pain during a 1-<br />

week vacation in which the patient did a lot <strong>of</strong> walking<br />

in s<strong>and</strong>als. A, Oblique radiograph reveals a periosteal<br />

reaction along the medial cortex (white bracket in<br />

magnified dashed box). B, Long-axis T1-weighted<br />

image through the second metatarsal well illustrates<br />

the anatomy, but not the pathology. C, Corresponding<br />

long-axis T2-weighted fat-suppressed image reveals<br />

bone marrow edema throughout the second<br />

metatarsal diaphysis, the thickened medial cortex/<br />

periosteum, <strong>and</strong> edema <strong>of</strong> the adjacent medial s<strong>of</strong>t<br />

tissues. Short-axis T1-weighted (D) <strong>and</strong> T2-weighted<br />

fat-suppressed (E) images through the metatarsal<br />

shafts reveal edema in the second metatarsal bone<br />

marrow <strong>and</strong> in the adjacent medial s<strong>of</strong>t tissues<br />

overlying the periosteal reaction. Sagittal T1-weighted<br />

(F) <strong>and</strong> inversion recovery (G) images through the<br />

marker (m) indicating the site <strong>of</strong> maximal tenderness<br />

show edema in <strong>and</strong> around the second metatarsal.<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

E<br />

F<br />

G<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2305<br />

9/9/2008 5:36:06 PM


2306 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

A<br />

B<br />

D<br />

C<br />

E<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-109. Fracture <strong>of</strong> the lateral sesamoid in a 34-year-old who complained <strong>of</strong> localized pain plantar <strong>and</strong> lateral to the first metatarsal<br />

head, made worse with weight bearing <strong>and</strong> extension <strong>of</strong> the great toe, for 1.5 years before the diagnosis was made. Anteroposterior (A), oblique<br />

(B), <strong>and</strong> sesamoid (C) radiographs all clearly show the transverse split across the lateral sesamoid <strong>of</strong> the great toe. A bipartite lateral sesamoid is<br />

an uncommon variant, present in only 1% <strong>of</strong> the population, <strong>and</strong> when symptomatic should be interpreted as a fracture. Short-axis T1-weighted<br />

(D) <strong>and</strong> inversion recovery (E) images through the marker (m) indicating the site <strong>of</strong> maximum pain show normal bone marrow signal in the medial<br />

sesamoid (white arrow) <strong>and</strong> bone marrow edema in the lateral sesamoid (black arrow).<br />

medicine bone scan could be obtained if confirmation is<br />

necessary.<br />

Fractures <strong>of</strong> the medial sesamoid are more difficult to<br />

diagnose radiographically because this sesamoid is not<br />

infrequently multipartite in normal people. Here radiographs<br />

are <strong>of</strong> limited value, <strong>and</strong> more sensitive imaging<br />

modalities are <strong>of</strong>ten required. Although MRI can demonstrate<br />

abnormal marrow signal in the sesamoids, owing to<br />

the small size <strong>of</strong> these bones this may be present on only<br />

a single slice, <strong>and</strong> all imaging planes should be carefully<br />

scrutinized. Short-axis images are particularly helpful in<br />

comparing the marrow signal from the medial <strong>and</strong> lateral<br />

sesamoids side-by-side (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-110). The imaging <strong>of</strong> sesamoiditis<br />

is one <strong>of</strong> the few instances when we recommend a<br />

nuclear medicine bone scan over an MRI. In particular, the<br />

both-feet-on-the-detector view is extremely effective for<br />

localizing abnormal radiotracer uptake to one <strong>of</strong> the sesamoids<br />

(see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-110C).<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2306<br />

9/9/2008 5:36:08 PM


A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2307 <strong>47</strong><br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-110. Fracture <strong>of</strong> the medial sesamoid in a<br />

27-year-old with a several-month history <strong>of</strong> pain<br />

localized to the head <strong>of</strong> the first metatarsal. Short-axis<br />

T1-weighted (A) <strong>and</strong> T2-weighted fat-suppressed (B)<br />

images show normal bone marrow signal in the lateral<br />

sesamoid (white arrow) <strong>and</strong> bone marrow edema in<br />

the medial sesamoid (black arrow). C, Bone scan, bothfeet-on-detector<br />

view, localizes the increased uptake<br />

to the medial sesamoid <strong>of</strong> the left foot. This patient<br />

failed to respond to conservative therapy <strong>and</strong><br />

ultimately had the medial sesamoid resected.<br />

Infection<br />

Osteomyelitis is always a diagnostic dilemma. The term<br />

osteomyelitis comes from the Greek roots osteon meaning<br />

“bone,” myelos meaning “marrow,” <strong>and</strong> itis meaning<br />

“inflammation.” Thus, osteomyelitis literally means “inflammation<br />

<strong>of</strong> bone marrow,” <strong>and</strong> this is perhaps symbolic <strong>of</strong><br />

the dilemma. MRI is extremely sensitive for the detection<br />

<strong>of</strong> marrow inflammation, but it is not specific for the<br />

inflammation caused by infection. By MRI, the bone<br />

marrow edema caused by infection looks just like the bone<br />

marrow edema caused by a stress response as well as the<br />

edema caused by a nonhealing fracture or even a healing<br />

fracture. For this reason, an MRI for osteomyelitis should<br />

not be read in isolation. It is difficult to arrive at the correct<br />

diagnosis without a thorough clinical workup <strong>and</strong><br />

complete underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> any prior surgical resections or<br />

debridements.<br />

• Imaging Techniques<br />

• Radiography<br />

Radiographs are essential in the workup <strong>of</strong> osteomyelitis,<br />

<strong>and</strong> at the UW we insist on having recent radiographs<br />

before we will perform an MRI for infection. Although it<br />

is true that radiographs are insensitive to the bone marrow<br />

<strong>and</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t tissue edema seen on MRI, they are not without<br />

value. First, radiographs are crucial to screen for the presence<br />

<strong>of</strong> metal, particularly in the feet <strong>of</strong> diabetic patients<br />

who may be insensate <strong>and</strong> thus unknowingly stepped<br />

on pins, not to mention the presence <strong>of</strong> orthopedic<br />

hardware.<br />

Second, in diabetic feet it is necessary to screen for the<br />

joint-centered collapse that is typically seen with peripheral<br />

neuropathy, the Charcot joint. These radiographic<br />

findings have been described as “the six Ds”: destruction,<br />

increased density, dislocation, debris, distension, <strong>and</strong> disorganization.<br />

The bone marrow <strong>and</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t tissue edema seen<br />

with MRI in patients with sterile neuropathic osseous<br />

changes may be indistinguishable from infection, <strong>and</strong> for<br />

this reason at the UW we recommend that patients who<br />

exhibit radiographic findings <strong>of</strong> a Charcot joint undergo a<br />

nuclear medicine bone scan <strong>and</strong> white blood cell scan,<br />

rather than MRI, for the workup <strong>of</strong> osteomyelitis. And<br />

because neuropathic collapse can occur relatively quickly<br />

<strong>and</strong> go unnoticed by a patient with an insensate foot (Fig.<br />

<strong>47</strong>-111), we require that the pre-MRI radiographs be recent,<br />

preferably within the last week.<br />

Third, radiographs may reveal findings that, in the<br />

proper clinical setting, are diagnostic for osteomyelitis.<br />

New cortical erosions (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-112) in a bone deep to a<br />

nonhealing ulcer or unresponsive cellulitis are as diagnostic<br />

as MRI for active osteomyelitis. Periosteal reactions,<br />

particularly the aggressive periosteal reaction <strong>of</strong> acute<br />

osteomyelitis or the thick involucrum <strong>of</strong> chronic osteomyelitis<br />

(Fig. <strong>47</strong>-113), can be diagnostic. Gas in the s<strong>of</strong>t<br />

tissues, such as from a gas-forming organism, is easily<br />

detected on radiographs yet may be hard to interpret on<br />

MRI because it can cause susceptibility artifacts similar to<br />

those caused by metal.<br />

• Magnetic Resonance Imaging<br />

Ultimately, it is easier to rule out osteomyelitis by MRI than<br />

it is to confirm its presence. The absence <strong>of</strong> increased bone<br />

marrow signal on a good edema-sensitive MRI effectively<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2307<br />

9/9/2008 5:36:09 PM


Figure <strong>47</strong>-111. Rapid onset <strong>of</strong> severe Charcot<br />

neuropathic collapse in a diabetic patient.<br />

Anteroposterior (A) <strong>and</strong> oblique (B) radiographs show<br />

anatomic alignment along the Lisfranc joint.<br />

Anteroposterior (C) <strong>and</strong> oblique (D) radiographs only<br />

3 months later reveal complete destruction <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Lisfranc joint.<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

A<br />

B<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-112. Radiographic evidence <strong>of</strong> active<br />

osteomyelitis in a 39-year-old. A, Oblique radiograph<br />

<strong>of</strong> the toes reveals subtle erosions in the lateral cortex<br />

<strong>of</strong> the fourth middle phalanx (arrow) <strong>and</strong> the lateral<br />

head <strong>of</strong> the fourth proximal phalanx (black<br />

arrowhead). Incidentally seen is a metallic foreign<br />

body (white arrowhead), not an uncommon finding in<br />

patients who are insensate because <strong>of</strong> peripheral<br />

neuropathy. B, Same oblique view just 2 months later<br />

reveals a new erosion in the medial cortex <strong>of</strong> the<br />

fourth middle phalanx (white arrow). The rapid onset<br />

<strong>of</strong> this erosion is highly suggestive <strong>of</strong> osteomyelitis.<br />

Marginal erosions from noninfectious inflammatory<br />

arthropathies such as rheumatoid arthritis, or<br />

crystalline arthropathies such as gout, could have a<br />

similar appearance but would not be expected to<br />

exhibit such rapid changes.<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2308<br />

9/9/2008 5:36:12 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2309 <strong>47</strong><br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-113. Evolution <strong>of</strong> involucrum in<br />

chronic osteomyelitis in a patient with diabetes.<br />

A, Anteroposterior radiograph reveals a somewhat<br />

lamellated periosteal reaction around the diaphysis <strong>of</strong><br />

the fifth metatarsal. B, Six weeks later, the periosteal<br />

reaction is thicker <strong>and</strong> more mature. C, Eleven weeks<br />

later, the periosteal reaction has developed the thick,<br />

irregular appearance <strong>of</strong> an involucrum. The<br />

underlying metatarsal has become a dead <strong>and</strong><br />

sclerotic sequestrum.<br />

A B C<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-114. Early neuropathic changes in a 66-<br />

year-old with a long history <strong>of</strong> diabetes. Oblique axial<br />

T1-weighted (A) <strong>and</strong> T2-weighted fat-suppressed (B)<br />

images show marrow edema throughout the midfoot<br />

bones.<br />

A<br />

B<br />

rules out the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> osteomyelitis. However, the<br />

converse is not true. Although the presence <strong>of</strong> bone<br />

marrow edema may be due to infection, the edema may<br />

represent a sterile stress response owing to the altered<br />

biomechanics <strong>of</strong> the patient walking on a neuropathic<br />

foot that has not yet collapsed. Indeed, marrow edema<br />

diffusely involving several <strong>of</strong> the tarsal bones can indicate<br />

neuropathic precollapse (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-114), <strong>and</strong> such patients<br />

need to be treated with a prolonged period <strong>of</strong> non–weight<br />

bearing.<br />

The diagnosis <strong>of</strong> osteomyelitis can be presumed when<br />

MRI shows not only marrow edema but also abscess in the<br />

adjacent s<strong>of</strong>t tissues (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-115) or a sinus tract communicating<br />

from the infected bone to the skin. 1 IVGd-based<br />

contrast is extremely helpful in diagnosing the abscess,<br />

which exhibits thick, irregular enhancement peripherally<br />

but not centrally (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-115H <strong>and</strong> K).<br />

• Brodie’s Abscess<br />

Brodie’s* abscess is a chronic intraosseous abscess resulting<br />

from incomplete resolution <strong>of</strong> acute osteomyelitis <strong>and</strong> isolation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the infection by surrounding bone. These abscess<br />

pockets are typically found in the metaphyses <strong>of</strong> skeletally<br />

immature children, <strong>and</strong> the usual pathogen is Staphylococcus<br />

aureus. However, the organisms tend to be <strong>of</strong> low virulence,<br />

*Sir Benjamin Collins Brodie (1783-1862) was an English physiologist <strong>and</strong><br />

surgeon who pioneered research into bone <strong>and</strong> joint disease. His most important<br />

work is widely acknowledged to be the 1818 treatise Pathological <strong>and</strong> Surgical<br />

Observations on the Diseases <strong>of</strong> the Joints, in which he attempts to trace the<br />

beginnings <strong>of</strong> disease in the different tissues that form a joint <strong>and</strong> to give an exact<br />

value to the symptom <strong>of</strong> pain as evidence <strong>of</strong> organic disease. This volume led to<br />

the adoption by surgeons <strong>of</strong> more conservative measures in the treatment <strong>of</strong> diseases<br />

<strong>of</strong> the joints, with consequent reduction in the number <strong>of</strong> amputations <strong>and</strong><br />

the saving <strong>of</strong> many limbs <strong>and</strong> lives.<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2309<br />

9/9/2008 5:36:14 PM


2310 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

A<br />

C<br />

E<br />

G<br />

B<br />

D<br />

F<br />

H<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-115. Developing calcaneal osteomyelitis<br />

in a 63-year-old diabetic patient. A, Lateral radiograph<br />

<strong>of</strong> the calcaneus shows intact cortex along the plantar<br />

surface (white arrowheads). Incidentally seen is mural<br />

calcification <strong>of</strong> the posterior tibial artery (gray<br />

arrowheads). Such arterial calcifications are common<br />

in diabetic patients. B, Midsagittal T1-weighted image<br />

shows no bone destruction. C, Corresponding sagittal<br />

inversion recovery (IR) image shows little, if any, bone<br />

marrow edema. D, Corresponding sagittal post–<br />

intravenous (IV) gadolinium contrast T1-weighted fatsuppressed<br />

image reveals diffuse enhancement <strong>of</strong> the<br />

plantar s<strong>of</strong>t tissues, indicative <strong>of</strong> cellulitis, but no<br />

nonenhancing abscess pockets. When the patient’s<br />

symptoms did not respond to antibiotics, repeat<br />

imaging was obtained 2 weeks later. E, Lateral<br />

radiograph now demonstrates loss <strong>of</strong> cortex along the<br />

plantar surface <strong>of</strong> the calcaneus (arrowheads).<br />

F, Midsagittal T1-weighted image reveals infiltration <strong>of</strong><br />

the fatty heel pad (arrows). G, Corresponding sagittal<br />

inversion recovery image reveals fluid bright signal<br />

(arrows) in the s<strong>of</strong>t tissues adjacent to the calcaneus,<br />

as well as bone marrow edema in calcaneus<br />

(arrowheads). H, Corresponding sagittal post-IV<br />

gadolinium contrast T1-weighted fat-suppressed<br />

image reveals a nonenhancing abscess pocket<br />

(arrows) as well as enhancing bone marrow<br />

(arrowheads). Coronal T1-weighted (I), inversion<br />

recovery (J), <strong>and</strong> post-IV gadolinium contrast T1-<br />

weighted fat-suppressed (K) images through the<br />

abscess pocket confirm the findings seen in the<br />

sagittal plane: an abscess pocket (gray, white, <strong>and</strong><br />

black arrows) adjacent to the osteomyelitis (white<br />

arrowhead) <strong>of</strong> the planter surface <strong>of</strong> the calcaneus.<br />

I J K<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2310<br />

9/9/2008 5:36:17 PM


A<br />

B<br />

C D E<br />

T1<br />

T2fs<br />

T1fs<br />

IVGd<br />

F G H<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-116. Brodie’s abscess in a young child. A, Anteroposterior radiograph <strong>of</strong> the asymptomatic right leg. B, Anteroposterior radiograph <strong>of</strong><br />

the swollen left leg reveals a lucency in the distal fibula metaphysis (arrow in the magnified dashed box). This lucency has a well-defined <strong>and</strong><br />

sclerotic margin, indicating chronicity. There are also thick, chronic periosteal reactions (arrowheads) extending up the diaphysis. C, Coronal<br />

T1-weighted image through the distal fibula confirms the radiographic findings <strong>of</strong> a thick chronic periosteal reaction (white arrowheads), as well as<br />

the well-circumscribed dark line (open arrowheads) around the lesion corresponding to the sclerotic margin. D, The corresponding coronal<br />

T2-weighted fat-suppressed image shows that the well-circumscribed lesion (arrow) is as bright as fluid <strong>and</strong> thus probably cystic. E, The<br />

corresponding coronal T1-weighted fat-suppressed post–intravenous (IV) gadolinium contrast image not only confirms that the lesion (arrow) is<br />

mostly nonenhancing <strong>and</strong> thus mostly cystic, but demonstrates peripheral enhancement, in some places thick (black arrowhead), characteristic <strong>of</strong><br />

an abscess, in this case an intraosseous or Brodie’s abscess. (There is inadequate fat suppression <strong>of</strong> the heel pad [large white arrowhead] on both<br />

<strong>of</strong> the fat-suppressed sequences, D <strong>and</strong> E.) F to H, Axial images through the fibular abscess reveal it to be isointense to muscle on T1-weighted<br />

image (F, arrow) <strong>and</strong> fluid bright on T2-weighted fat-suppressed image (G, arrow), with peripheral but not central enhancement on fat-suppressed<br />

T1-weighted image after IV gadolinium (H, arrow). There are edema <strong>and</strong> enhancement <strong>of</strong> the s<strong>of</strong>t tissues surrounding the fibula, indicating an<br />

active inflammatory component to this chronic Brodie’s abscess.<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2311<br />

9/9/2008 5:36:20 PM


2312 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

A B C<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-117. Plantar fibroma in a 44-year-old.<br />

Coronal T1-weighted (A), proton-density–weighted<br />

(B), <strong>and</strong> T2-weighted (C) images reveal that the lesion<br />

(arrows) is relatively dark on all sequences <strong>and</strong><br />

confined to the fat <strong>of</strong> the plantar heel pad.<br />

<strong>and</strong> it is not uncommon for cultures <strong>of</strong> such aspirates to<br />

yield no growth. Clinical symptoms are <strong>of</strong>ten mild, generally<br />

presenting with persistent local pain.<br />

Radiographs show an intramedullary lucency with surrounding<br />

sclerosis, the density <strong>of</strong> which depends on the<br />

chronicity <strong>of</strong> the abscess. A thick chronic periosteal reaction<br />

may also be present (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-116B). MRI after the<br />

administration <strong>of</strong> IV contrast reveals an intraosseous<br />

abscess with peripheral but not central enhancement<br />

(Fig. <strong>47</strong>-116E). 29<br />

Tumors<br />

• S<strong>of</strong>t Tissue Masses<br />

S<strong>of</strong>t tissue tumors <strong>of</strong> the feet <strong>and</strong> ankle are common, <strong>and</strong><br />

MRI is useful in determining the tissue type as well as<br />

demonstrating the relationship <strong>of</strong> the mass to the adjacent<br />

anatomic structures. Synovial cysts or ganglia are among<br />

the most common s<strong>of</strong>t tissue “masses” found around the<br />

foot <strong>and</strong> ankle. These are uniformly bright on fluidsensitive<br />

images <strong>and</strong> exhibit minimal if any peripheral<br />

enhancement after the administration <strong>of</strong> IVGd-based contrast<br />

(see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-57). In comparison, nerve sheath tumors<br />

such are schwannomas are heterogeneously bright on T2-<br />

weighted <strong>and</strong> inversion recovery images, <strong>and</strong> they demonstrate<br />

heterogeneous contrast enhancement (see Fig.<br />

<strong>47</strong>-56).<br />

Plantar fibromas can have variable signal characteristics<br />

but are typically dark on all sequences (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-117).<br />

These are usually found in the plantar fat adjacent to the<br />

aponeurosis, usually close to the calcaneus.<br />

Morton’s neuromas usually occur between the heads<br />

<strong>of</strong> the second <strong>and</strong> third or third <strong>and</strong> fourth metatarsals <strong>and</strong><br />

are also usually dark on noncontrast images, although they<br />

can exhibit postcontrast enhancement (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-58).<br />

Giant cell tumor <strong>of</strong> the tendon sheath is a localized<br />

form <strong>of</strong> pigmented villonodular synovitis, the latter being<br />

a joint-centered synovial proliferative condition. Both diseases<br />

show areas <strong>of</strong> decreased signal on T1-images, protondensity–images,<br />

<strong>and</strong> T2-weighted images, secondary to<br />

hemosiderin deposition (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-118A to C). The presence<br />

<strong>of</strong> hemosiderin can be detected on gradient echo <strong>and</strong> precontrast<br />

fat-suppressed T1-weighted images (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-118D),<br />

<strong>and</strong> the vascularized proliferative synovium should exhibit<br />

some contrast enhancement (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-118E).<br />

• Bone Tumors 28<br />

Osseous tumors are much less common than s<strong>of</strong>t tissue<br />

tumors <strong>of</strong> the foot <strong>and</strong> ankle. Like all bone lesions, these<br />

tumors should be initially evaluated radiographically. MRI,<br />

however, is useful in localizing tumors <strong>and</strong> staging their<br />

extent. Because most tumors have nonspecific signal characteristics,<br />

MRI is <strong>of</strong>ten unable to render a specific preoperative<br />

diagnosis.<br />

Primary bone tumors <strong>of</strong> the feet are rare, accounting<br />

for only 4% <strong>of</strong> all bone tumors. 20 Benign bone neoplasms<br />

are more common than malignant ones, although in the<br />

foot, most bone neoplasms are primary tumors because<br />

metastases to the foot are rare.<br />

• Benign Tumors<br />

The most common benign tumors <strong>of</strong> the foot are enchondromas<br />

<strong>and</strong> osteoid osteomas. An osteoid osteoma is a relatively<br />

common cause <strong>of</strong> bone pain in adolescents <strong>and</strong> young<br />

adults, accounting for approximately 10% <strong>of</strong> all benign<br />

bone tumors. The classic history is pain at night, relieved by<br />

aspirin. Osteoid osteomas are one <strong>of</strong> the few tumors that<br />

are better imaged by CT than MRI. Thin-slice CT well demonstrates<br />

the lucent nidus as well as the tiny sclerotic component<br />

that is characteristically associated with it (Fig.<br />

<strong>47</strong>-119A). CT is also used by radiologists for the purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

percutaneously ablating the nidus. On MRI, osteoid osteomas<br />

are seen as a nonspecific edema pattern emanating<br />

from a tiny, dark nidus (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-119B to D).<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2312<br />

9/9/2008 5:36:21 PM


<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2313 <strong>47</strong><br />

A B C<br />

D<br />

E<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-118. Giant cell tumor <strong>of</strong> the tendon sheath in a 19-year-old with a palpable medial mass. A, Straight axial T1-weighted image through<br />

the mass (arrow) demonstrates that it lies within the s<strong>of</strong>t tissues medial to the navicular (N), talus (Ta), <strong>and</strong> sustentaculum tali (ST) but does not<br />

invade the bones. B, The corresponding axial proton-density–weighted image shows that the mass has grown through a split tendon sheath<br />

(arrowheads). The tendons themselves—posterior tibial (T), flexor digitorum longus (D), <strong>and</strong> flexor hallucis longus (H)—are intact <strong>and</strong> normal<br />

in appearance with no evidence <strong>of</strong> tumor involvement. C, The corresponding axial T2-weighted image shows that the mass (arrow) has<br />

heterogeneous signal intensity, consistent with the presence <strong>of</strong> blood products <strong>of</strong> varying ages. D, Corresponding axial precontrast fat-suppressed<br />

T1-weighted image reveals that some signal in the mass is brighter than the surrounding suppressed fat, consistent with methemoglobin.<br />

E, Corresponding axial post–intravenous gadolinium fat-suppressed T1-weighted image demonstrates heterogeneous enhancement, indicative <strong>of</strong><br />

the vascularity <strong>of</strong> this synovial proliferation.<br />

Chondroblastomas are rare benign cartilaginous neoplasms,<br />

<strong>and</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the few tumors that arise from the<br />

epiphysis in a skeletally immature patient. Chondroblastomas<br />

can exp<strong>and</strong> the cortex but should not cross the unfused<br />

growth plate (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-120A). Radiographically, chondroblastomas<br />

can have either a lucent or chondroid matrix. By<br />

MRI, these lesions may exhibit considerable edema in the<br />

surrounding s<strong>of</strong>t tissues, but the tumor itself should have<br />

a sharp, non–aggressive-appearing interface with the<br />

normal bone (see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-120B to D).<br />

Intraosseous lipomas <strong>of</strong> the calcaneus are rare but have<br />

a characteristic radiographic appearance in that they are<br />

well circumscribed <strong>and</strong> nearly totally lucent except for a<br />

tiny central sclerotic focus (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-121A). By MRI, the<br />

intraosseous lipoma is uniformly isointense to fat on all<br />

sequences, except for a signal void corresponding to the<br />

sclerotic focus (Fig. <strong>47</strong>-121C <strong>and</strong> D).<br />

• Malignant Tumors<br />

The most common primary malignant tumor <strong>of</strong> the foot<br />

is chondrosarcoma, which has a propensity for the calcaneus<br />

(Fig. <strong>47</strong>-122). High-grade chondrosarcomas have a<br />

calcified matrix that appears radiographically sclerotic (see<br />

Fig. <strong>47</strong>-122A) <strong>and</strong> dark on T1- <strong>and</strong> T2-weighted sequences.<br />

Chondrosarcomas are not highly vascularized tumors <strong>and</strong><br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2313<br />

9/9/2008 5:36:23 PM


2314 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

A B C<br />

T1<br />

T2fs<br />

D<br />

IR<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-119. Osteoid osteoma in a 19-year-old with symptoms clinically thought to be due to a tibial stress fracture. A, Axial CT scan through the<br />

level <strong>of</strong> the syndesmosis. The nidus is the small lucent lesion (black circle). B, Axial T1-weighted image through same level as A. The low-intensity<br />

nidus (white circle) is masked by the surrounding marrow edema. C, Corresponding T2-weighted fat-suppressed image. The low-intensity nidus<br />

(white circle) is unmasked by the bright signal <strong>of</strong> the surrounding marrow edema. D, Sagittal inversion recovery (IR) image reveals bone marrow<br />

edema around the small nidus (white circle).<br />

A<br />

B<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-120. Chondroblastoma in a 16-year-old.<br />

A, Lateral radiograph demonstrates an expansile mass<br />

arising from the back <strong>of</strong> the tibia. B, Midsagittal T1-<br />

weighted image shows that the mass is purely<br />

epiphyseal, deforming but not crossing the distal<br />

physis in this patient who is not yet skeletally mature.<br />

C, Corresponding sagittal T2-weighted image shows<br />

heterogeneous bright signal in the mass. There is also<br />

edema in the adjacent s<strong>of</strong>t tissues (arrows), a common<br />

finding with chondroblastomas. D, Corresponding<br />

sagittal cartilage-sensitive sequence (fat-suppressed<br />

three-dimensional gradient echo) reveals signal<br />

intensity in this cartilaginous tumor that is nearly as<br />

bright as the nearby normal articular hyaline cartilage.<br />

C<br />

D<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2314<br />

9/9/2008 5:36:24 PM


A<br />

B<br />

<strong>47</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> 2315 <strong>47</strong><br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-121. Intraosseous lipoma discovered as<br />

an incidental finding in a 43-year-old. A, Lateral<br />

radiograph <strong>of</strong> the right calcaneus shows the lucent<br />

lesion in the anterior half with a well-circumscribed<br />

border (open arrowheads). Centrally, there is a small<br />

sclerotic focus (black arrowhead), characteristic <strong>of</strong> an<br />

intraosseous lipoma. B, Lateral radiograph <strong>of</strong> the<br />

contralateral left calcaneus is shown for comparison.<br />

A lipoma, intraosseous or otherwise, should<br />

be isointense to fat on all imaging sequences. C,<br />

Midsagittal T1-weighted image shows the signal<br />

intensity <strong>of</strong> the lipoma (open arrowheads) to be<br />

isointense to that <strong>of</strong> the surrounding fatty bone<br />

marrow. The central sclerotic focus (black arrowhead)<br />

is dark on all imaging sequences. D, On the<br />

corresponding T2-weighted fat-suppressed image, the<br />

fat in the lipoma suppresses to a degree similar to that<br />

<strong>of</strong> the surrounding fatty bone marrow so that it is<br />

nearly inconspicuous.<br />

C<br />

D<br />

A<br />

B<br />

Figure <strong>47</strong>-122. Chondrosarcoma arising from the<br />

calcaneal tuberosity 30-year-old. A, Lateral<br />

radiograph. This patient complained <strong>of</strong> heel pain for<br />

10 months until the sclerosis in her calcaneus was<br />

recognized. B, Sagittal T1-weighted image shows<br />

diffusely decreased signal in the calcaneus<br />

corresponding to the radiographic sclerosis. C, Sagittal<br />

fat-suppressed T2-weighted image reveals marrow<br />

edema only at the periphery <strong>of</strong> the sclerotic region.<br />

There is, however, extensive bright signal in the s<strong>of</strong>t<br />

tissues immediately plantar to the calcaneus,<br />

indicating that the tumor is extending out <strong>of</strong> the bone<br />

<strong>and</strong> into the s<strong>of</strong>t tissues. D, Sagittal post–gadolinium<br />

contrast fat-suppressed T1-weighted image<br />

demonstrates enhancement only at the periphery <strong>of</strong><br />

the osseous <strong>and</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t tissue masses. This enhancement<br />

pattern is due to the relative hypovascularity <strong>of</strong><br />

chondrosarcomas.<br />

C<br />

D<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2315<br />

9/9/2008 5:36:27 PM


2316 VII Imaging <strong>of</strong> the Musculoskeletal System<br />

hence demonstrate poor contrast enhancement as well as<br />

a poor response to chemotherapy. Contrast enhancement<br />

can be seen at the margins <strong>of</strong> the tumor where it is aggressively<br />

invading the bone <strong>and</strong> in the surrounding s<strong>of</strong>t tissues<br />

(see Fig. <strong>47</strong>-122D). Low-grade chondrosarcomas are difficult<br />

to distinguish from benign enchondromas for both<br />

radiologists <strong>and</strong> pathologists, <strong>and</strong> the clinical symptom<br />

<strong>of</strong> pain is <strong>of</strong>ten the deciding factor. Although many<br />

enchondromas are asymptomatic <strong>and</strong> may be discovered<br />

incidentally when imaging the foot for other reasons, all<br />

chondrosarcomas are painful.<br />

References<br />

1. Ahmadi ME, Morrison WB, Carrino JA, et al: Neuropathic<br />

arthropathy <strong>of</strong> the foot with <strong>and</strong> without superimposed<br />

osteomyelitis: MR imaging characteristics. <strong>Radiology</strong> 238:622-<br />

631, 2006.<br />

2. Anderson IF, Crichton KJ, Grattan-Smith T, et al: Osteochondral<br />

fractures <strong>of</strong> the dome <strong>of</strong> the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71:1143-<br />

1152, 1989.<br />

3. Archdeacon M, Wilber R: Fractures <strong>of</strong> the talar neck. Orthop Clin<br />

North Am 33:2<strong>47</strong>-262, x, 2002.<br />

4. Badgley CE: Coalition <strong>of</strong> the calcaneus <strong>and</strong> the navicular. Arch<br />

Surg 15:75-88, 1927.<br />

5. Ballinger PW, Frank ED: Merrill’s Atlas <strong>of</strong> Radiographic Positions<br />

<strong>and</strong> Radiologic Procedures, 9th ed. St. Louis, Mosby, 1999.<br />

6. Barei DP, Bellabarba C, Sangeorzan BJ, Benirschke SK: Fractures<br />

<strong>of</strong> the calcaneus. Orthop Clin North Am 33:263-285, x, 2002.<br />

7. Bencardino JT, Rosenberg ZS: Normal variants <strong>and</strong> pitfalls in MR<br />

imaging <strong>of</strong> the ankle <strong>and</strong> foot. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am<br />

9:4<strong>47</strong>-463, 2001.<br />

8. Berndt AL, Harty M: Transchondral fractures (osteochondritis<br />

dissecans) <strong>of</strong> the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 41:988-1020,<br />

1959.<br />

9. Böhler L: Diagnosis, pathology, <strong>and</strong> treatment <strong>of</strong> fractures <strong>of</strong> the<br />

os calcis. J Bone Joint Surg 13:75-89, 1931. Available at http://<br />

www.ejbjs.org/cgi/reprint/13/1/75.<br />

10. Borrelli J Jr, Ellis E: Pilon fractures: Assessment <strong>and</strong> treatment.<br />

Orthop Clin North Am 33:231-245, x, 2002.<br />

11. Breithaupt X: Zur pathologie des menschlichen fuses [The pathology<br />

<strong>of</strong> the human foot]. Medizinische Zeitung (Berlin) 24:169-<br />

175, 1855.<br />

12. Bucholz R, Heckman J, Court-Brown C, et al. (eds): Rockwood<br />

<strong>and</strong> Green’s Fractures in Adults, 6th ed. Philadelphia, Lippincott<br />

Williams & Wilkins, 2006.<br />

13. Cantrell MW, Tarquinio TA: Fractures <strong>of</strong> the lateral process <strong>of</strong> the<br />

talus. Orthopedics 23:55-58, 2000.<br />

14. Cheung Y, Rosenberg ZS: MR imaging <strong>of</strong> ligamentous abnormalities<br />

<strong>of</strong> the ankle <strong>and</strong> foot. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 9:<br />

507-531, 2001.<br />

15. Choplin RH, Buckwalter KA, Rydberg J, Farber JM: CT with 3D<br />

rendering <strong>of</strong> the tendons <strong>of</strong> the foot <strong>and</strong> ankle: Technique,<br />

normal anatomy, <strong>and</strong> disease. Radiographics 24:343-356, 2004.<br />

16. Coughlin MJ, Mann RA (eds): Surgery <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Foot</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong>, 7th<br />

ed. St. Louis, Mosby, 1999, Fig. 10-38.<br />

17. Crim JR, Kjeldsberg KM: Radiographic diagnosis <strong>of</strong> tarsal coalition.<br />

AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:323-328, 2004.<br />

18. Daftary A, Haims AH, Baumgaertner MR: Fractures <strong>of</strong> the calcaneus:<br />

A review with emphasis on CT. Radiographics 25:1215-<br />

1226, 2005.<br />

19. De Smet AA, Fisher DR, Burnstein MI, et al: Value <strong>of</strong> MR imaging<br />

in staging osteochondral lesions <strong>of</strong> the talus (osteochondritis<br />

dissecans): Results in 14 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 154:555-<br />

558, 1990.<br />

20. Enneking WF, Spanier SS, Goodman MA: A system for the surgical<br />

staging <strong>of</strong> musculoskeletal sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res<br />

153:106-120, 1980.<br />

21. Farooki S, Sokol<strong>of</strong>f RM, Theodorou DJ, et al: MR imaging <strong>of</strong> the<br />

midfoot: Normal anatomy with cadaveric correlation. Magn<br />

Reson Imaging Clin N Am 9:419-434, 2001.<br />

22. Finkel JE: Tarsal tunnel syndrome. MRI Clin North Am 2:67-78,<br />

1994.<br />

23. Finlay K, Friedman L: Ultrasonography <strong>of</strong> the lower extremity.<br />

Orthop Clin North Am 37:245-275, 2006.<br />

24. Henry AK: Extensile Exposure, 2nd ed. Edinburgh, E&S Livingstone,<br />

1957, p 304.<br />

25. Jones R: Fracture <strong>of</strong> the base <strong>of</strong> the fifth metatarsal bone by indirect<br />

violence. Ann Surg 35:697-700, 1902.<br />

26. Kager H: Zur Klinik und Diagnostik des Achillessehnenrisses.<br />

Chirurg 11:691-695, 1939.<br />

27. Keats TE, Anderson MW: Atlas <strong>of</strong> normal roentgen variants that<br />

may simulate disease, 8th ed. St. Louis, Mosby, 2006.<br />

28. Maldjian C, Rosenberg ZS: MR imaging features <strong>of</strong> tumors <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ankle <strong>and</strong> foot. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 9:639-657, xii,<br />

2001.<br />

29. Morrison WB, Ledermann HP, Schweitzer ME: MR imaging <strong>of</strong><br />

inflammatory conditions <strong>of</strong> the ankle <strong>and</strong> foot. Magn Reson<br />

Imaging Clin N Am 9:615-637, xi-xii, 2001.<br />

30. Narvaez JA, Narvaez J, Ortega R, et al: Painful heel: MR imaging<br />

findings. Radiographics 20:333-352, 2000.<br />

31. Netter FH: Bony attachments <strong>of</strong> muscles <strong>of</strong> leg. In Ciba Collection<br />

<strong>of</strong> Medical Illustration, vol 8, part 1. Summit, NJ, Ciba-Geigy,<br />

1991, p 107.<br />

32. Newman JS, Newberg AH: Congenital tarsal coalition: Multimodality<br />

evaluation with emphasis on CT <strong>and</strong> MR imaging. Radiographics<br />

20:321-332, 2000.<br />

33. Petrover D, Schweitzer ME, Laredo JD: Anterior process calcaneal<br />

fractures: A systematic evaluation <strong>of</strong> associated conditions. Skeletal<br />

Radiol 36:627-632, 2007.<br />

34. Pinney SJ, Sangeorzan BJ: Fractures <strong>of</strong> the tarsal bones. Orthop<br />

Clin North Am 32:21-33, 2001.<br />

35. Protas JM, Kornblatt BA: Fractures <strong>of</strong> the lateral margin <strong>of</strong> the<br />

distal tibia: The Tillaux fracture. <strong>Radiology</strong> 138:55, 1981.<br />

36. Quinn TJ, Jacobson JA, Craig JG, van Holsbeeck MT: Sonography <strong>of</strong><br />

Morton’s neuromas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1723-1728, 2000.<br />

37. Resnick D: Talar ridges, osteophytes, <strong>and</strong> beaks: A radiologic commentary.<br />

<strong>Radiology</strong> 151:329-332, 1984.<br />

38. Rogers LF, Poznanski AK: Imaging <strong>of</strong> epiphyseal injuries. <strong>Radiology</strong><br />

191:297, 1994.<br />

39. Rosenberg ZS: Chronic rupture <strong>of</strong> the posterior tibial tendon.<br />

MRI Clin North Am 2:79-87, 1994.<br />

40. Schreibman KL: <strong>Ankle</strong> tenography: What, how, <strong>and</strong> why. Semin<br />

Roentgenol 39:95-113, 2004.<br />

41. Schweitzer ME, Karasick D: MR imaging <strong>of</strong> disorders <strong>of</strong> the Achilles<br />

tendon. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:613-625, 2000.<br />

42. Schweitzer ME, Karasick D: MR imaging <strong>of</strong> disorders <strong>of</strong> the posterior<br />

tibialis tendon. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:627-635, 2000.<br />

43. Slomann HC: On coalition calcaneo-navicularis. J Orthop Surg<br />

3:586, 1921.<br />

44. Sobel M, Pavlov H, Geppert MJ, et al: Painful os peroneum syndrome:<br />

A spectrum <strong>of</strong> conditions responsible for plantar lateral<br />

foot pain. <strong>Foot</strong> <strong>Ankle</strong> 15:112-124, 1994.<br />

45. Sommer OJ, Kladosek A, Weiler V, et al: Rheumatoid arthritis: A<br />

practical guide to state-<strong>of</strong>-the-art imaging, image interpretation,<br />

<strong>and</strong> clinical implications. Radiographics 25:381-398, 2005.<br />

46. Stormont DM, Peterson HA: The relative incidence <strong>of</strong> tarsal coalition.<br />

Clin Orthop Relat Res 181:28-36, 1983.<br />

<strong>47</strong>. Thordarson DB: Talar body fractures. Orthop Clin North Am<br />

32:65-77, viii, 2001.<br />

48. von Knoch F, Reckord U, von Knoch M, Sommer C: Fracture <strong>of</strong><br />

the lateral process <strong>of</strong> the talus in snowboarders. J Bone Joint Surg<br />

Br 89:772-777, 2007.<br />

Ch0<strong>47</strong>-A05375.indd 2316<br />

9/9/2008 5:36:27 PM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!