04.06.2014 Views

PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament

PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament

PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1571 Easter Adjournment<br />

26 MARCH 2013 Easter Adjournment<br />

1572<br />

[Mr Gareth Thomas]<br />

that the Deputy Leader of the House will speak to the<br />

Department for Culture, Media and Sport and the<br />

Department for Business, Innovation and Skills and<br />

encourage them to use their influence to support such<br />

an investigation.<br />

There is, too, the fiasco of the five points deducted<br />

for messing up the registration paperwork of the London<br />

Welsh scrum half, Tyson Keats, even though no one<br />

disputes his entitlement to seek employment in the UK,<br />

his eligibility to seek work as a professional rugby<br />

player or indeed—should the call come—his eligibility<br />

to play for England. I very much regret today’s decision<br />

to turn down London Welsh’s appeal against this grim<br />

five-point deduction. Quite why the crime is so severe<br />

that it should merit such a huge penalty, when other<br />

clubs making similar mistakes have not been hit so<br />

hard, is frankly difficult to fathom. Exeter fielded an<br />

extra overseas player in one of its matches last season<br />

and was hit with only a two-point fine. Leicester fielded<br />

Manu Tuilagi some seasons ago, despite his effectively<br />

being an illegal immigrant. The club was not penalised<br />

any points at all. One would think there would be some<br />

expectation by the RFU that Leicester would have<br />

checked his status; instead, the RFU rallied round to<br />

help him to get his status resolved.<br />

The premiership should surely be a genuine competition<br />

in which clubs battle it out on a level playing field. At<br />

the moment, sadly, a newly promoted team first has to<br />

climb a mountain to get to the playing field and is then<br />

expected to play with one hand tied behind its back. It<br />

is time that the funding of premiership rugby clubs<br />

became much more transparent and that newly promoted<br />

teams received appropriate funding.<br />

6.10 pm<br />

Priti Patel (Witham) (Con): Following last week’s<br />

Budget debate, I welcome today’s opportunity to highlight<br />

some key business-related issues affecting my constituency<br />

and my constituents.<br />

The House will be well aware that Essex is a county of<br />

entrepreneurs, as there are many successful small businesses.<br />

That is why the first item on my list is Her Majesty’s<br />

Revenue and Customs, which continues to act as a barrier<br />

to businesses and many small firms in my constituency.<br />

To put this into some kind of context, HMRC has spent<br />

over 10 years relentlessly pursuing and seeking to punish<br />

my constituent, Mr Philip Wright. His case relates to a<br />

complex issue surrounding tax paid in the construction<br />

industry. Despite Mr Wright losing his business, being<br />

unwell and being of very limited means and having<br />

previously won an initial court hearing, HMRC continues<br />

to drag this case on, persecuting my constituent. HMRC<br />

has made many errors, yet it seems to be determined to<br />

secure a precedent-setting victory over Mr Wright at a<br />

further court hearing later this year.<br />

This case shows how HMRC has targeted its efforts<br />

on the defenceless and on easy targets, while letting<br />

larger firms off the hook. It also shows once again how<br />

inept HMRC has been. My constituent had built up his<br />

own business and spent years doing the right thing. It is<br />

about time that HMRC did the right thing. I urge the<br />

Government, and particularly the Treasury Minister<br />

responsible for HMRC, to leave Mr Wright in peace.<br />

Today is quite a significant day, as we have to ask<br />

ourselves whether the official who presided over so<br />

many failures at the UK Border Agency is the right<br />

person to fix HMRC, with all its backlog of cases and<br />

problems.<br />

The next business example from my constituency<br />

highlights problems with the Valuation Office Agency.<br />

The VOA, as it is fondly known, is an executive agency<br />

of HMRC, and it has spent the past three years sitting<br />

on a firm’s business rate re-evaluation appeal. In June<br />

2010, the business requested a reduction on the basis<br />

that the rateable value applied was<br />

“incorrect, excessive, contrary to law and a disproportionate<br />

reflection on the change in rental values in the locality”.<br />

The VOA has sat on its hands for three years and done<br />

nothing. This is yet another example of bureaucracy<br />

not understanding how businesses operate in the real<br />

world, as a result of which I understand about 250,000<br />

further appeals in similar instances are outstanding. I<br />

urge Ministers to take action to end this bureaucratic<br />

shambles and to press the VOA to get its act together.<br />

Last week’s Budget has been positively welcomed by<br />

business, which is why I urge Ministers and the Government<br />

to press local councils to unleash local businesses from<br />

business rates and to tell local authorities to use their<br />

new powers to reduce rates and take a more flexible<br />

approach to local business taxation. My constituent,<br />

Duncan Clark, is an outstanding local entrepreneur<br />

who converted a redundant out-house building into a<br />

cookery school, creating two full-time jobs. He has<br />

taken a risk to set up that business and has a great “can<br />

do” attitude—the type of attitude that this country<br />

needs to grow into a more prosperous future. He should<br />

be congratulated on what he is doing; instead, of course,<br />

he faces a £6,000 bill for his rates. I hope that the<br />

Government will urge local councils to use their powers<br />

over business rates to foster a competitive spirit of<br />

business enterprise in this environment. That would<br />

help start-ups and help business men such as Mr Clark.<br />

Many of the problems that I have highlighted<br />

demonstrate that the public sector needs to have a<br />

greater understanding and appreciation of the private<br />

sector. If those public bodies engaged more constructively<br />

with the private sector, they would enhance their own<br />

understanding. A great example of that happened in<br />

Witham town, when Essex county council listened to a<br />

body called Witham Industrial Watch, whose business<br />

members monitor criminal activity on our industrial<br />

sites. The county council was on the verge of taking<br />

away the street lighting on the industrial estate, but<br />

Witham Industrial Watch made a persuasive case to the<br />

council. I pay tribute to the council and to the cabinet<br />

member for highways for realising that it made business<br />

sense to work with Witham Industrial Watch to get the<br />

right outcome.<br />

I look forward to hearing the Government’s response.<br />

Let me take this opportunity to wish you, Mr Deputy<br />

Speaker, and all the staff of the House a very pleasant<br />

Easter recess.<br />

6.15 pm<br />

George Galloway (Bradford West) (Respect): The world<br />

is still divided, as we know. The plight of poor children<br />

in that divided world preoccupies tens of thousands of<br />

the finest of our citizens. The proximate cause of my

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!