04.06.2014 Views

PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament

PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament

PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1555 Easter Adjournment<br />

26 MARCH 2013 Easter Adjournment<br />

1556<br />

5.10 pm<br />

Jeremy Corbyn (Islington North) (Lab): Like my<br />

hon. Friend the Member for Ealing North (Stephen<br />

Pound), I wish to discuss the housing crisis in London,<br />

although five minutes is a very short time in which to<br />

try to describe a truly appalling situation. Some 360,000<br />

families are on the housing waiting list in London—that<br />

excludes the large number of single people who usually<br />

cannot even get on the waiting list—and 750,000 Londoners<br />

are living in grossly overcrowded accommodation. The<br />

housing solutions for them are non-existent, and will be<br />

unless there is an enormous change in Government<br />

policy and in the policy of the Mayor of London<br />

towards this crisis.<br />

Mr Gareth Thomas (Harrow West) (Lab/Co-op): My<br />

hon. Friend is an inner-London MP for an area that has<br />

a particularly severe overcrowding problem, but does he<br />

agree that this issue affects the outer-London suburbs<br />

as much as inner London? Does he acknowledge that a<br />

huge number of people in Harrow in my constituency<br />

are also waiting, without a great deal of hope, for a new<br />

home?<br />

Jeremy Corbyn: This is indeed a time for inner and<br />

outer London solidarity, and I am happy to declare that<br />

act of solidarity with my hon. Friends the Members for<br />

Ealing North, for Harrow West (Mr Thomas) and for<br />

Hayes and Harlington (John McDonnell), and with<br />

many other outer-London boroughs. To be homeless in<br />

London is to be homeless in London, to be overcrowded<br />

is to be overcrowded, and to be on the waiting list is<br />

clearly to be on the waiting list.<br />

The solutions to this situation have to be sought.<br />

Sadly, what was offered in the Budget is not a solution; I<br />

suspect that it will result in those with deep pockets<br />

being able to buy yet more properties, which they will<br />

then keep empty, as part of the disgrace of private<br />

sector land banking that is going on in London. I will<br />

discuss the other solutions concerning owner-occupation,<br />

social rented housing and private rented housing in a<br />

moment. First, I wish to deal with the issue of the large<br />

number of empty properties, often at the high end of<br />

the market, deliberately kept empty by people who have<br />

large amounts of money that comes from dubious<br />

sources. They have bought these properties in order to<br />

make a great deal of money out of them at a later date<br />

when their value increases. Given the current housing<br />

crisis, we should be giving powers to local authorities to<br />

take over properties that are deliberately kept empty, so<br />

that the people in desperate housing need can get somewhere<br />

to live in London.<br />

Alison Seabeck: Does my hon. Friend share my concern<br />

that the spare homes subsidy could be misused by<br />

exactly the people he is talking about, and that Government<br />

and taxpayers’ money could be misused?<br />

Jeremy Corbyn: My hon. Friend makes a strong<br />

point. There is no clear definition of how this subsidy<br />

being offered by the Chancellor will be used, so it seems<br />

to be an opportunity for those with deep pockets to<br />

make a great deal of money for themselves. The people<br />

in desperate housing need, such as those represented by<br />

me or by my hon. Friends the Members for Harrow<br />

West or for Ealing North, will not have that same<br />

opportunity.<br />

Mark Reckless (Rochester and Strood) (Con): Will<br />

the hon. Gentleman give way?<br />

Jeremy Corbyn: I will not give way any more, because<br />

I would lose my time.<br />

The second area I wish to discuss is the social rented<br />

sector in London—council housing. The problems of<br />

housing in London are not new; they were acute in the<br />

19th century and in the early 20th century. It was the<br />

inspiration and idealism of the Labour-controlled London<br />

county council in the inter-war years that did a great<br />

deal to build decent homes for people who were living in<br />

appalling slums. Indeed, in my constituency and others<br />

one can see the products of the inspirational work done<br />

by Herbert Morrison and others. The post-second world<br />

war council house building did an incredible amount to<br />

give people decent places to live.<br />

I had the great honour of being a member of Haringey<br />

borough council from 1974 to 1983 and I remember<br />

complaining in 1979 that we had built only 1,000 council<br />

houses that year. I was complaining that we could have<br />

done more, but 1,000 is more than have been built in the<br />

whole of London in most of the past few years. I am<br />

critical of my party in government and of the current<br />

Government for not doing enough to build new council<br />

housing.<br />

The Government’s solution is to suggest to local<br />

authorities that they should raise rents to 80% of the<br />

market rent to raise some funds to develop new housing.<br />

In my borough and those of most colleagues in London,<br />

council house rents would more than double. Islington<br />

borough council, to its credit, has refused to do that and<br />

has managed to develop a substantial building programme<br />

on its own land from its own resources. But obviously,<br />

there are limits to that programme, imaginative though<br />

it is.<br />

We need central Government involvement in the building<br />

of new council homes as a matter of enormous urgency.<br />

The Mayor of London does not seem fully to grasp all<br />

that. In fact, there are quite a lot of things the Mayor of<br />

London does not fully grasp, but one of them is the<br />

essential need for the building of new council houses.<br />

The number of social rented properties—that is, council<br />

or housing association properties—built under his watch<br />

and by his means has reduced from 11,000 in 2010-11 to<br />

only 983 in the current year. Goodness knows how<br />

much lower than that the numbers will go in future<br />

years. We must kindly ask central Government to get a<br />

grip of the situation and do their best to intervene with<br />

the Mayor and with borough councils to ensure that<br />

there is a rapid increase in the supply of council housing<br />

in London. That is the best and most efficient way of<br />

solving the housing crisis. It provides jobs, provides<br />

homes and helps people to have a secure place to live.<br />

The final area I want to mention was covered in a<br />

ten-minute rule Bill that I introduced and it is the<br />

private rented sector. In London, 800,000 families live<br />

in that sector—it is the fastest growing housing sector<br />

by a long way. In my constituency, a third of all households<br />

are in the private rented sector and that number is rising<br />

fast. Generally speaking, people who live in the private<br />

rented sector pay the most to live in the least efficient,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!