PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament
PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament
PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1555 Easter Adjournment<br />
26 MARCH 2013 Easter Adjournment<br />
1556<br />
5.10 pm<br />
Jeremy Corbyn (Islington North) (Lab): Like my<br />
hon. Friend the Member for Ealing North (Stephen<br />
Pound), I wish to discuss the housing crisis in London,<br />
although five minutes is a very short time in which to<br />
try to describe a truly appalling situation. Some 360,000<br />
families are on the housing waiting list in London—that<br />
excludes the large number of single people who usually<br />
cannot even get on the waiting list—and 750,000 Londoners<br />
are living in grossly overcrowded accommodation. The<br />
housing solutions for them are non-existent, and will be<br />
unless there is an enormous change in Government<br />
policy and in the policy of the Mayor of London<br />
towards this crisis.<br />
Mr Gareth Thomas (Harrow West) (Lab/Co-op): My<br />
hon. Friend is an inner-London MP for an area that has<br />
a particularly severe overcrowding problem, but does he<br />
agree that this issue affects the outer-London suburbs<br />
as much as inner London? Does he acknowledge that a<br />
huge number of people in Harrow in my constituency<br />
are also waiting, without a great deal of hope, for a new<br />
home?<br />
Jeremy Corbyn: This is indeed a time for inner and<br />
outer London solidarity, and I am happy to declare that<br />
act of solidarity with my hon. Friends the Members for<br />
Ealing North, for Harrow West (Mr Thomas) and for<br />
Hayes and Harlington (John McDonnell), and with<br />
many other outer-London boroughs. To be homeless in<br />
London is to be homeless in London, to be overcrowded<br />
is to be overcrowded, and to be on the waiting list is<br />
clearly to be on the waiting list.<br />
The solutions to this situation have to be sought.<br />
Sadly, what was offered in the Budget is not a solution; I<br />
suspect that it will result in those with deep pockets<br />
being able to buy yet more properties, which they will<br />
then keep empty, as part of the disgrace of private<br />
sector land banking that is going on in London. I will<br />
discuss the other solutions concerning owner-occupation,<br />
social rented housing and private rented housing in a<br />
moment. First, I wish to deal with the issue of the large<br />
number of empty properties, often at the high end of<br />
the market, deliberately kept empty by people who have<br />
large amounts of money that comes from dubious<br />
sources. They have bought these properties in order to<br />
make a great deal of money out of them at a later date<br />
when their value increases. Given the current housing<br />
crisis, we should be giving powers to local authorities to<br />
take over properties that are deliberately kept empty, so<br />
that the people in desperate housing need can get somewhere<br />
to live in London.<br />
Alison Seabeck: Does my hon. Friend share my concern<br />
that the spare homes subsidy could be misused by<br />
exactly the people he is talking about, and that Government<br />
and taxpayers’ money could be misused?<br />
Jeremy Corbyn: My hon. Friend makes a strong<br />
point. There is no clear definition of how this subsidy<br />
being offered by the Chancellor will be used, so it seems<br />
to be an opportunity for those with deep pockets to<br />
make a great deal of money for themselves. The people<br />
in desperate housing need, such as those represented by<br />
me or by my hon. Friends the Members for Harrow<br />
West or for Ealing North, will not have that same<br />
opportunity.<br />
Mark Reckless (Rochester and Strood) (Con): Will<br />
the hon. Gentleman give way?<br />
Jeremy Corbyn: I will not give way any more, because<br />
I would lose my time.<br />
The second area I wish to discuss is the social rented<br />
sector in London—council housing. The problems of<br />
housing in London are not new; they were acute in the<br />
19th century and in the early 20th century. It was the<br />
inspiration and idealism of the Labour-controlled London<br />
county council in the inter-war years that did a great<br />
deal to build decent homes for people who were living in<br />
appalling slums. Indeed, in my constituency and others<br />
one can see the products of the inspirational work done<br />
by Herbert Morrison and others. The post-second world<br />
war council house building did an incredible amount to<br />
give people decent places to live.<br />
I had the great honour of being a member of Haringey<br />
borough council from 1974 to 1983 and I remember<br />
complaining in 1979 that we had built only 1,000 council<br />
houses that year. I was complaining that we could have<br />
done more, but 1,000 is more than have been built in the<br />
whole of London in most of the past few years. I am<br />
critical of my party in government and of the current<br />
Government for not doing enough to build new council<br />
housing.<br />
The Government’s solution is to suggest to local<br />
authorities that they should raise rents to 80% of the<br />
market rent to raise some funds to develop new housing.<br />
In my borough and those of most colleagues in London,<br />
council house rents would more than double. Islington<br />
borough council, to its credit, has refused to do that and<br />
has managed to develop a substantial building programme<br />
on its own land from its own resources. But obviously,<br />
there are limits to that programme, imaginative though<br />
it is.<br />
We need central Government involvement in the building<br />
of new council homes as a matter of enormous urgency.<br />
The Mayor of London does not seem fully to grasp all<br />
that. In fact, there are quite a lot of things the Mayor of<br />
London does not fully grasp, but one of them is the<br />
essential need for the building of new council houses.<br />
The number of social rented properties—that is, council<br />
or housing association properties—built under his watch<br />
and by his means has reduced from 11,000 in 2010-11 to<br />
only 983 in the current year. Goodness knows how<br />
much lower than that the numbers will go in future<br />
years. We must kindly ask central Government to get a<br />
grip of the situation and do their best to intervene with<br />
the Mayor and with borough councils to ensure that<br />
there is a rapid increase in the supply of council housing<br />
in London. That is the best and most efficient way of<br />
solving the housing crisis. It provides jobs, provides<br />
homes and helps people to have a secure place to live.<br />
The final area I want to mention was covered in a<br />
ten-minute rule Bill that I introduced and it is the<br />
private rented sector. In London, 800,000 families live<br />
in that sector—it is the fastest growing housing sector<br />
by a long way. In my constituency, a third of all households<br />
are in the private rented sector and that number is rising<br />
fast. Generally speaking, people who live in the private<br />
rented sector pay the most to live in the least efficient,