PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament
PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament
PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1529 Flood Insurance<br />
26 MARCH 2013<br />
Flood Insurance<br />
1530<br />
affordable insurance and sometimes to get any insurance<br />
at all. Does my hon. Friend agree that, in that case, the<br />
30 June deadline is perhaps not the highest priority?<br />
The highest priority should be getting the right deal for<br />
constituents so that they can go forward into the future.<br />
Sir Robert Smith: Both are important. The right deal<br />
for those not getting a good enough service out of the<br />
statement of principles is extremely important, as is<br />
knowing what it is going to happen after the deadline.<br />
That is important for everyone affected, as they are<br />
going to have to renew their insurance and will have to<br />
find an affordable way of doing that. I commend the<br />
motion as a way of keeping up the pressure and highlighting<br />
our constituents’ perspective that there has to be a<br />
serious solution to this problem.<br />
3.44 pm<br />
Ian Lavery (Wansbeck) (Lab): I congratulate the hon.<br />
Member for Esher and Walton (Mr Raab) on initiating<br />
this timely debate on the Floor of the House. By way of<br />
background, I remind Members that on 5 and 6 September<br />
2008 Morpeth—a market town in my constituency—found<br />
itself at the centre of the most intensive rainfall in living<br />
memory. Some 950 properties in the town, including<br />
dozens of businesses, were directly affected. Surrounding<br />
villages were hit very hard, too, including Hepscott, which<br />
was affected by flash flooding. A number of other<br />
properties were badly flooded. The devastation suffered<br />
by individuals, families, businesses and the community<br />
at large cannot be overstated in any way, shape or form.<br />
It was an experience that will haunt their memories for<br />
many years.<br />
As we debate the issue today, I am delighted that<br />
progress is finally being made in Morpeth. I thank and<br />
congratulate Northumberland county council, which<br />
has allocated £12 million towards the cost of new flood<br />
defences. That money is being delivered with the support<br />
and agreement of the three main political parties. It is<br />
important to recognise the role that the emergency<br />
services have played across the UK, but particularly in<br />
Morpeth in my constituency, and the way that they<br />
operated to help others during those difficult times. The<br />
local community in my constituency, the Morpeth Flood<br />
Action Group and many others pulled together, as has<br />
happened in the constituencies of many other hon.<br />
Members on both sides of the House, in the most<br />
difficult of circumstances. It would be remiss of me not<br />
to mention the Environment Agency and Ian Hodge,<br />
who works at the agency in Newcastle, who has played a<br />
huge role in Morpeth.<br />
The problem has been described as immense, but the<br />
pooling system—an important component of insurance—<br />
will be an integral part of any agreement and, I hope,<br />
positive resolution that is reached. The pooling system<br />
has been proposed under the “Flood Re” model and the<br />
Morpeth model. That system formalises the existing<br />
cross-subsidy. It redistributes the risk to keep affordability<br />
in place for high-risk properties. It represents the only<br />
fair way forward in a changing situation where climate<br />
change is giving rise to an increasing number of extreme<br />
weather events. The ABI model, the “Flood Re” system<br />
and the Morpeth system combine availability with<br />
affordability. The “Flood Mu”, or Noah model, does<br />
not guarantee that because it does not put a cap on<br />
flood premiums.<br />
Damian Collins (Folkestone and Hythe) (Con): Does<br />
the hon. Gentleman agree that it is important that the<br />
insurance industry take into account investment in new<br />
flood defence schemes, including the one that he has<br />
talked about and the new sea wall at Dymchurch in my<br />
constituency? Often insurers base their quotes on generic<br />
information that does not take into account investment<br />
in new defences.<br />
Ian Lavery: That is a powerful comment, with which I<br />
totally agree.<br />
As has been discussed, the ABI has been in discussion<br />
with the Government for several months, perhaps years,<br />
on the ending of the statement of principles in June<br />
2013. The clock is ticking. The deadline is fast approaching.<br />
People want answers. People in Morpeth have been<br />
flooded time and again; hon. Members on both sides of<br />
the House have described the experiences of people in<br />
their constituencies who have suffered greatly time and<br />
again. They cannot get affordable insurance. The excesses<br />
are higher than what the properties are worth, so it is<br />
meaningless.<br />
Time and again, Members on both sides of the<br />
House have mentioned the importance of ensuring that<br />
we have a statement that will ensure something affordable<br />
and accessible is in place when the statement of principles<br />
runs out. We have been told time and again that the<br />
discussions with the ABI are at a critical point, that the<br />
statement is nearly ready and that things are in place.<br />
However, The Times this morning said something<br />
completely different. It suggested that there are huge<br />
difficulties between the ABI and the Government. Perhaps<br />
the Minister, for whom I have a lot of time and who has<br />
been very helpful, can explain from the Dispatch Box<br />
this afternoon where we are with the ABI and what is<br />
likely to happen in the next three months. It is absolutely<br />
imperative that we get something in place for the people<br />
who have been suffering for some time.<br />
I am sure that the Minister will have much more to<br />
say, and it is important that we deal with this issue and<br />
that measures are put in place. I hope that we will not<br />
hear, “We are still in discussions and we cannot really<br />
give any more details, because the matter is confidential<br />
and that wouldn’t be right.” We want an answer today<br />
for everyone who lives in a property on a flood plain.<br />
We do not want to hear, “Something will happen.” Give<br />
us the answers, so we can tell our constituents what the<br />
situation is and they can feel safe.<br />
3.50 pm<br />
Julian Sturdy (York Outer) (Con): I am grateful for<br />
the opportunity to make a short contribution to this<br />
very important debate on flood insurance, which I<br />
congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Esher and<br />
Walton (Mr Raab) on securing.<br />
As the Member of <strong>Parliament</strong> for a constituency that<br />
contains two major river courses and surrounds one of<br />
the most historic, flood-hit cities in the country, I<br />
naturally have constituents who express a great deal of<br />
concern about flooding, its impact on the local community<br />
and on the availability and affordability of flood insurance.<br />
Flood insurance is an issue not only for those who have<br />
sadly been flooded, but for those who have not and may<br />
never be but are deemed to be in a flood-risk area.