04.06.2014 Views

PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament

PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament

PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1529 Flood Insurance<br />

26 MARCH 2013<br />

Flood Insurance<br />

1530<br />

affordable insurance and sometimes to get any insurance<br />

at all. Does my hon. Friend agree that, in that case, the<br />

30 June deadline is perhaps not the highest priority?<br />

The highest priority should be getting the right deal for<br />

constituents so that they can go forward into the future.<br />

Sir Robert Smith: Both are important. The right deal<br />

for those not getting a good enough service out of the<br />

statement of principles is extremely important, as is<br />

knowing what it is going to happen after the deadline.<br />

That is important for everyone affected, as they are<br />

going to have to renew their insurance and will have to<br />

find an affordable way of doing that. I commend the<br />

motion as a way of keeping up the pressure and highlighting<br />

our constituents’ perspective that there has to be a<br />

serious solution to this problem.<br />

3.44 pm<br />

Ian Lavery (Wansbeck) (Lab): I congratulate the hon.<br />

Member for Esher and Walton (Mr Raab) on initiating<br />

this timely debate on the Floor of the House. By way of<br />

background, I remind Members that on 5 and 6 September<br />

2008 Morpeth—a market town in my constituency—found<br />

itself at the centre of the most intensive rainfall in living<br />

memory. Some 950 properties in the town, including<br />

dozens of businesses, were directly affected. Surrounding<br />

villages were hit very hard, too, including Hepscott, which<br />

was affected by flash flooding. A number of other<br />

properties were badly flooded. The devastation suffered<br />

by individuals, families, businesses and the community<br />

at large cannot be overstated in any way, shape or form.<br />

It was an experience that will haunt their memories for<br />

many years.<br />

As we debate the issue today, I am delighted that<br />

progress is finally being made in Morpeth. I thank and<br />

congratulate Northumberland county council, which<br />

has allocated £12 million towards the cost of new flood<br />

defences. That money is being delivered with the support<br />

and agreement of the three main political parties. It is<br />

important to recognise the role that the emergency<br />

services have played across the UK, but particularly in<br />

Morpeth in my constituency, and the way that they<br />

operated to help others during those difficult times. The<br />

local community in my constituency, the Morpeth Flood<br />

Action Group and many others pulled together, as has<br />

happened in the constituencies of many other hon.<br />

Members on both sides of the House, in the most<br />

difficult of circumstances. It would be remiss of me not<br />

to mention the Environment Agency and Ian Hodge,<br />

who works at the agency in Newcastle, who has played a<br />

huge role in Morpeth.<br />

The problem has been described as immense, but the<br />

pooling system—an important component of insurance—<br />

will be an integral part of any agreement and, I hope,<br />

positive resolution that is reached. The pooling system<br />

has been proposed under the “Flood Re” model and the<br />

Morpeth model. That system formalises the existing<br />

cross-subsidy. It redistributes the risk to keep affordability<br />

in place for high-risk properties. It represents the only<br />

fair way forward in a changing situation where climate<br />

change is giving rise to an increasing number of extreme<br />

weather events. The ABI model, the “Flood Re” system<br />

and the Morpeth system combine availability with<br />

affordability. The “Flood Mu”, or Noah model, does<br />

not guarantee that because it does not put a cap on<br />

flood premiums.<br />

Damian Collins (Folkestone and Hythe) (Con): Does<br />

the hon. Gentleman agree that it is important that the<br />

insurance industry take into account investment in new<br />

flood defence schemes, including the one that he has<br />

talked about and the new sea wall at Dymchurch in my<br />

constituency? Often insurers base their quotes on generic<br />

information that does not take into account investment<br />

in new defences.<br />

Ian Lavery: That is a powerful comment, with which I<br />

totally agree.<br />

As has been discussed, the ABI has been in discussion<br />

with the Government for several months, perhaps years,<br />

on the ending of the statement of principles in June<br />

2013. The clock is ticking. The deadline is fast approaching.<br />

People want answers. People in Morpeth have been<br />

flooded time and again; hon. Members on both sides of<br />

the House have described the experiences of people in<br />

their constituencies who have suffered greatly time and<br />

again. They cannot get affordable insurance. The excesses<br />

are higher than what the properties are worth, so it is<br />

meaningless.<br />

Time and again, Members on both sides of the<br />

House have mentioned the importance of ensuring that<br />

we have a statement that will ensure something affordable<br />

and accessible is in place when the statement of principles<br />

runs out. We have been told time and again that the<br />

discussions with the ABI are at a critical point, that the<br />

statement is nearly ready and that things are in place.<br />

However, The Times this morning said something<br />

completely different. It suggested that there are huge<br />

difficulties between the ABI and the Government. Perhaps<br />

the Minister, for whom I have a lot of time and who has<br />

been very helpful, can explain from the Dispatch Box<br />

this afternoon where we are with the ABI and what is<br />

likely to happen in the next three months. It is absolutely<br />

imperative that we get something in place for the people<br />

who have been suffering for some time.<br />

I am sure that the Minister will have much more to<br />

say, and it is important that we deal with this issue and<br />

that measures are put in place. I hope that we will not<br />

hear, “We are still in discussions and we cannot really<br />

give any more details, because the matter is confidential<br />

and that wouldn’t be right.” We want an answer today<br />

for everyone who lives in a property on a flood plain.<br />

We do not want to hear, “Something will happen.” Give<br />

us the answers, so we can tell our constituents what the<br />

situation is and they can feel safe.<br />

3.50 pm<br />

Julian Sturdy (York Outer) (Con): I am grateful for<br />

the opportunity to make a short contribution to this<br />

very important debate on flood insurance, which I<br />

congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Esher and<br />

Walton (Mr Raab) on securing.<br />

As the Member of <strong>Parliament</strong> for a constituency that<br />

contains two major river courses and surrounds one of<br />

the most historic, flood-hit cities in the country, I<br />

naturally have constituents who express a great deal of<br />

concern about flooding, its impact on the local community<br />

and on the availability and affordability of flood insurance.<br />

Flood insurance is an issue not only for those who have<br />

sadly been flooded, but for those who have not and may<br />

never be but are deemed to be in a flood-risk area.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!