PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament

PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament

publications.parliament.uk
from publications.parliament.uk More from this publisher
04.06.2014 Views

1111W Written Answers 26 MARCH 2013 Written Answers 1112W Probation Julie Elliott: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what assessment he has made of the effects of his proposed reform of probation services on re-offending rates for people serving fewer than 12 months. [149386] Jeremy Wright: On 22 February the Ministry of Justice’s consultation on plans for reforming the way in which offenders are rehabilitated in the community closed. Through our proposed reforms we want to address the fact that offenders released from custodial sentences of less than 12 months are among the most highly prolific offender groups. In 2010 57.6% of the short sentenced offenders released from prison reoffended within a year and there is currently no statutory support for those offenders sentenced to less than 12 months in custody. Our proposed reforms will help reduce reoffending by opening up rehabilitation services to a more diverse market, using payment by results to encourage providers to focus on outcomes, and by making the whole system more efficient, so that we can extend rehabilitative provision to this most prolific group of offenders. We will respond to the consultation and bring forward detailed plans in due course. Julie Elliott: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what assessment has been carried out to evaluate the effect of the removal of probation trusts. [149387] Jeremy Wright: The Ministry of Justice’s consultation on plans for reforming the way in which offenders are rehabilitated in the community closed on 22 February. We want the public sector probation service to be organised in the most efficient manner for delivery of its new responsibilities. The options being considered range from fewer Trusts to a different structure altogether or direct delivery on behalf of the Secretary of State. We have sought consultees’ views on this important issue and will bring forward detailed plans in due course. Andy Sawford: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) with reference to his Department’s consultation, Transforming Rehabilitation, whether probation trusts, as public bodies, will be permitted to bid, either on their own, or with partners, for commercial contracts for the delivery of probation services in the community under the competition plans set out; [149607] (2) whether probation trusts will be able to set up special purpose vehicles, either on their own, or with partners, to bid for commercial contracts for the delivery of probation services in the community under the competition plans set out; [149608] (3) whether probation trusts will be able to set up mutual delivery organisations to bid for commercial contracts for the delivery of probation services in the community under the competition plans set out; [149609] (4) whether probation staff who set up their own mutual delivery organisation to bid for commercial contracts for the delivery of probation services in the community would have to resign from their employment with their probation trust to take part in the competition; [149610] (5) where a probation trust has developed a relationship with a partner provider, or providers, to bid for commercial contracts for the delivery of probation services in the community, whether those partners will remain eligible to take part in the proposed competitions; [149611] (6) what advice the National Offender Management Service has received on the legal implications of excluding probation trusts from any competition to deliver probation services in the community. [149612] Jeremy Wright: We remain committed to facilitating an open competition which allows a range of bidders to take part in the new probation services market. As set out in our consultation document ‘Transforming Rehabilitation—a revolution in the way we manage offenders’, it remains open for probation staff to put together proposals for potential mutuals and other alternative delivery vehicles to bid to deliver probation services as part of future competitions. Under our proposals we will only contract with entities capable of bearing the financial and operational risks associated with Payment by Results and delivering offender services in the community. Therefore, public sector entities will not be able to bid, as they will not be able to carry the financial risk. Instead staff groups within trusts can work on proposals for alternative delivery vehicles and mutuals. The Cabinet Office’s Mutual Support Programme is available to support probation staff to explore their options. Trust staff do not have to resign, as these employee-led entities or partnerships will only be formally set up following the conclusion of the competition, if they have won a bid or are part of a winning bid. This is to guarantee continuity of service in probation during the transition to new arrangements, and also to ensure that those public sector probation professionals who do come together to enter the bidding process are not disadvantaged if they are not successful. Where a group of staff are designing and setting up a mutual or alternative delivery vehicle with a partner provider, clear ethical walls will need to be put in place between the probation trust on the one hand and the group of staff and commercial organisation on the other, to ensure fair competition. Any partner also looking to compete in its own right would have to satisfy us of similar ethical walls between bids too. The Department has taken appropriate legal advice on the proposals in the consultation paper and will of course comply with any obligations imposed on it by procurement law. The Ministry of Justice’s consultation on plans for reforming the way in which offenders are rehabilitated in the community closed on 22 February. We will respond to the consultation and bring forward detailed plans in due course. INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT Central America Mr Stewart Jackson: To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what projects her Department has funded in (a) Costa Rica, (b) Honduras, (c) Nicaragua, (d) El Salvador, (e) Guatemala, (f) Belize and (g) Panama since May 2010; and if she will make a statement. [149455]

1113W Written Answers 26 MARCH 2013 Written Answers 1114W Mr Duncan: DFID does not give aid directly to Costa Rica, Honduras, El Salvador, Belize or Panama. In 2010-11 and 2011-12, DFID did not provide any bilateral development aid to these countries. DFID does not give aid directly to Guatemala. However, in 2010-11 DFID provided £100,000 in the form of humanitarian assistance in response to the Guatemalan floods. In 2010-11 DFID provided bilateral development aid to two programmes in Nicaragua. The Caribbean Coast Development Programme was delivered through a Trust Fund arrangement with the World Bank Nicaragua office and focused on improving water, sanitation, energy infrastructure and nutrition for children on the Caribbean Coast where poverty in Nicaragua is highest. The second programme, Enhancing Small Enterprise Growth of Nicaragua through the Development of Existing Value Chains, was delivered through a delegated management arrangement with the embassy of Finland in Nicaragua and aimed to enhance micro, small and medium enterprise (MSME) growth with a particular focus on the provision of opportunities for women and excluded populations. DFID’s regional programme assists criminal asset recovery in Belize. Developing Countries: Armed Conflict Mr Jim Murphy: To ask the Secretary of State for International Development which countries are considered to be fragile and conflict-affected by the Government. [150187] Lynne Featherstone: DFID identifies 21 of its 28 focus states as being fragile or conflict-affected. These are Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Burma, DRC, Ethiopia, Kenya, Liberia, Malawi, Nepal, Nigeria, Occupied Palestinian Territories, Pakistan, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sudan, South Sudan, Tajikistan, Uganda, Yemen and Zimbabwe. This list was last updated in May 2011 and is updated every two years. Developing Countries: Religion John Glen: To ask the Secretary of State for International Development with reference to her Department’s report, Faith Partnership Principles, published in 2012, what work her Department is (a) funding and (b) undertaking to develop dialogue with national and local faith-based actors at her Department’s country office level to promote common understandings and collaborative platforms for action. [150239] Lynne Featherstone: There are no specific funding commitments attached to DFID’s work on the “Faith Partnership Principles Paper”. The Paper aims to strengthen and guide DFID’s future relationship and collaboration with faith groups. DFID is already supporting the work of a variety of faith groups through the Programme Partnership Arrangements, the Global Poverty Action Fund and the UK Aid match. DFID and the Faith Working Group agreed to identify priority countries where it would be possible to collaborate and build a common understanding. The first pilot country identified is Tanzania. The Faith Working Group and DFID will meet in mid-April 2013 with DFID Tanzania to discuss how best to progress this work which should be initiated in June 2013. Additional countries where further work can be undertaken will be identified after the summer. Public Expenditure Stephen Doughty: To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what payments to multilateral organisations expected to be made by her Department by the end of the 2012-13 financial year have been (a) delayed, (b) suspended or (c) cancelled; and what the total value of arrears is. [150210] Lynne Featherstone: DFID is not in arrears on any core multilateral contributions. The first £15 million payment to the Green Africa Power programme was rescheduled from 2012-13 to 2013-14. The Department also makes payments to multilateral organisations to deliver project specific bilateral support. The Department is not able to provide a consolidated report on any rescheduling of these payments. Stephen Doughty: To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what payments have been made to multilateral organisations by her Department in (a) November 2012, (b) December 2012, (c) January 2013, (d) February 2013 and (e) March 2013; and if she will make a statement. [150211] Lynne Featherstone: DFID does not gather these details on a monthly basis. DFID provides an annual breakdown of all spending through multilateral organisations in our Statistic on International Development (SID) publication. The SID for 2012-13 is due for publication in autumn. A copy of this publication for 2011-12 can be found in the House Library and on DFID’s website. Stephen Doughty: To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what programme partnership agreements that were expected to be concluded and signed by the end of the 2012-13 financial year have been delayed or cancelled; and if she will make a statement. [150212] Lynne Featherstone: DFID has Programme Partnership Arrangements (PPAs) with 41 Civil Society Organisations. These arrangements began in 2011 and will continue until March 2014. No new PPAs were expected to be concluded or signed in 2012-13. Stephen Doughty: To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what programme partnership agreements were concluded and signed by her Department with external organisations in (a) November 2012, (b) December 2012, (c) January 2013, (d) February 2013 and (e) March 2013. [150213] Lynne Featherstone: No Programme Partnership Arrangements (PPAs) were signed by DFID between November 2012 and March 2013: DFID has PPAs with 41 Civil Society Organisations. These will continue until 31 March 2014.

1113W<br />

Written Answers<br />

26 MARCH 2013<br />

Written Answers<br />

1114W<br />

Mr Duncan: DFID does not give aid directly to Costa<br />

Rica, Honduras, El Salvador, Belize or Panama. In<br />

2010-11 and 2011-12, DFID did not provide any bilateral<br />

development aid to these countries.<br />

DFID does not give aid directly to Guatemala. However,<br />

in 2010-11 DFID provided £100,000 in the form of<br />

humanitarian assistance in response to the Guatemalan<br />

floods.<br />

In 2010-11 DFID provided bilateral development aid<br />

to two programmes in Nicaragua. The Caribbean Coast<br />

Development Programme was delivered through a<br />

Trust Fund arrangement with the World Bank Nicaragua<br />

office and focused on improving water, sanitation,<br />

energy infrastructure and nutrition for children on the<br />

Caribbean Coast where poverty in Nicaragua is highest.<br />

The second programme, Enhancing Small Enterprise<br />

Growth of Nicaragua through the Development of<br />

Existing Value Chains, was delivered through a delegated<br />

management arrangement with the embassy of Finland<br />

in Nicaragua and aimed to enhance micro, small and<br />

medium enterprise (MSME) growth with a particular<br />

focus on the provision of opportunities for women and<br />

excluded populations.<br />

DFID’s regional programme assists criminal asset<br />

recovery in Belize.<br />

Developing Countries: Armed Conflict<br />

Mr Jim Murphy: To ask the Secretary of State for<br />

International Development which countries are<br />

considered to be fragile and conflict-affected by the<br />

Government. [150187]<br />

Lynne Featherstone: DFID identifies 21 of its 28<br />

focus states as being fragile or conflict-affected. These<br />

are Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Burma, DRC, Ethiopia,<br />

Kenya, Liberia, Malawi, Nepal, Nigeria, Occupied<br />

Palestinian Territories, Pakistan, Rwanda, Sierra Leone,<br />

Somalia, Sudan, South Sudan, Tajikistan, Uganda, Yemen<br />

and Zimbabwe. This list was last updated in May 2011<br />

and is updated every two years.<br />

Developing Countries: Religion<br />

John Glen: To ask the Secretary of State for<br />

International Development with reference to her<br />

Department’s report, Faith Partnership Principles,<br />

published in 2012, what work her Department is (a)<br />

funding and (b) undertaking to develop dialogue with<br />

national and local faith-based actors at her<br />

Department’s country office level to promote common<br />

understandings and collaborative platforms for action.<br />

[150239]<br />

Lynne Featherstone: There are no specific funding<br />

commitments attached to DFID’s work on the “Faith<br />

Partnership Principles Paper”. The Paper aims to<br />

strengthen and guide DFID’s future relationship and<br />

collaboration with faith groups. DFID is already supporting<br />

the work of a variety of faith groups through the<br />

Programme Partnership Arrangements, the Global<br />

Poverty Action Fund and the UK Aid match. DFID<br />

and the Faith Working Group agreed to identify priority<br />

countries where it would be possible to collaborate and<br />

build a common understanding. The first pilot country<br />

identified is Tanzania. The Faith Working Group and<br />

DFID will meet in mid-April 2013 with DFID Tanzania<br />

to discuss how best to progress this work which should<br />

be initiated in June 2013. Additional countries where<br />

further work can be undertaken will be identified after<br />

the summer.<br />

Public Expenditure<br />

Stephen Doughty: To ask the Secretary of State for<br />

International Development what payments to<br />

multilateral organisations expected to be made by her<br />

Department by the end of the 2012-13 financial year<br />

have been (a) delayed, (b) suspended or (c) cancelled;<br />

and what the total value of arrears is. [150210]<br />

Lynne Featherstone: DFID is not in arrears on any<br />

core multilateral contributions.<br />

The first £15 million payment to the Green Africa<br />

Power programme was rescheduled from 2012-13 to<br />

2013-14.<br />

The Department also makes payments to multilateral<br />

organisations to deliver project specific bilateral support.<br />

The Department is not able to provide a consolidated<br />

report on any rescheduling of these payments.<br />

Stephen Doughty: To ask the Secretary of State for<br />

International Development what payments have been<br />

made to multilateral organisations by her Department<br />

in (a) November 2012, (b) December 2012, (c)<br />

January 2013, (d) February 2013 and (e) March 2013;<br />

and if she will make a statement. [150211]<br />

Lynne Featherstone: DFID does not gather these<br />

details on a monthly basis.<br />

DFID provides an annual breakdown of all spending<br />

through multilateral organisations in our Statistic on<br />

International Development (SID) publication. The SID<br />

for 2012-13 is due for publication in autumn. A copy of<br />

this publication for 2011-12 can be found in the House<br />

Library and on DFID’s website.<br />

Stephen Doughty: To ask the Secretary of State for<br />

International Development what programme<br />

partnership agreements that were expected to be<br />

concluded and signed by the end of the 2012-13<br />

financial year have been delayed or cancelled; and if<br />

she will make a statement. [150212]<br />

Lynne Featherstone: DFID has Programme Partnership<br />

Arrangements (PPAs) with 41 Civil Society Organisations.<br />

These arrangements began in 2011 and will continue<br />

until March 2014. No new PPAs were expected to be<br />

concluded or signed in 2012-13.<br />

Stephen Doughty: To ask the Secretary of State for<br />

International Development what programme<br />

partnership agreements were concluded and signed by<br />

her Department with external organisations in (a)<br />

November 2012, (b) December 2012, (c) January<br />

2013, (d) February 2013 and (e) March 2013. [150213]<br />

Lynne Featherstone: No Programme Partnership<br />

Arrangements (PPAs) were signed by DFID between<br />

November 2012 and March 2013: DFID has PPAs with<br />

41 Civil Society Organisations. These will continue until<br />

31 March 2014.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!