04.06.2014 Views

PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament

PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament

PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1093W<br />

Written Answers<br />

26 MARCH 2013<br />

Written Answers<br />

1094W<br />

(5) whether the banning of confidentiality clauses<br />

from severance agreements in the NHS will apply in<br />

cases in which the £20,000 threshold for referral to his<br />

Department is not met. [150235]<br />

Dr Poulter: The coalition Government has been<br />

consistently clear that nothing within a contract of<br />

employment or compromise agreement should prevent<br />

an individual from speaking out about issues such as<br />

patient care and safety, or anything else that could be in<br />

the wider public interest in accordance with the Public<br />

Interest Disclosure Act 1998.<br />

The Department has not banned confidentiality clauses<br />

per se. Compromise agreements, which include appropriately<br />

drafted confidentiality clauses, can be a legitimate<br />

mechanism for protecting the interests of both employer<br />

and employee as long as nothing in the agreement seeks<br />

to prevent, or has the effect of preventing, individuals<br />

from speaking out in the public interest.<br />

Although the use and specific content of a compromise<br />

agreement is a matter for the relevant employer and is<br />

confidential to the parties concerned, some NHS employers<br />

have used such agreements that have not been as clear<br />

on the issue of speaking out in the public interest as<br />

they should be. This has resulted in some staff who have<br />

felt ’gagged’ and therefore worried that they would not<br />

be allowed to speak out about their concerns after they<br />

have signed the agreement and left their employment.<br />

HM Treasury do not sign off ’compromise agreements’<br />

neither does the Department of Health. The Department<br />

and Treasury do not see the content of compromise<br />

agreements or the confidentiality clauses they may contain.<br />

The Department and the Treasury review the business<br />

cases that are put forward by employers in support of<br />

making a special severance payment. The Department<br />

will not support settlements, regardless of the amount<br />

concerned, where making such a payment is not in the<br />

public interest. This includes any case which may involve<br />

a potential whistleblowing issue.<br />

In future, the Government will require that where<br />

confidentiality clauses are used in compromise agreements<br />

that they include an explicit clause that makes it clear<br />

beyond doubt to the individual concerned that nothing<br />

in the agreement will prevent them from speaking out<br />

on issues in the public interest as covered by the Public<br />

Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (PIDA).<br />

Former NHS employees who feel they may be subject<br />

to a confidentiality ″gagging″ clause are protected under<br />

PIDA. Any clause that is in contravention of the PIDA<br />

regulations are void. Former employees are encouraged<br />

to initially seek professional support and advice on<br />

their particular case from the whistleblowing helpline.<br />

In parallel, the Department is considering how it may<br />

further communicate with employers on the issue of<br />

former employees.<br />

NHS: Interpreters<br />

Andrew Percy: To ask the Secretary of State for<br />

Health on how many occasions interpreters have been<br />

required for the purposes of treating (a) NHS patients,<br />

(b) emergency admissions, (c) maternity cases, (d)<br />

in-patient admissions and (e) out-patients in (i) Brigg<br />

and Goole constituency and (ii) Yorkshire and the<br />

Humber in each of the last five years. [150160]<br />

Norman Lamb: This information is not collected<br />

centrally. The provision of interpretation and translation<br />

services by national health service bodies is a matter for<br />

local determination.<br />

NHS: Managers<br />

Priti Patel: To ask the Secretary of State for Health<br />

(1) what measures are in place to remove from post<br />

NHS managers (a) that fail to meet performance<br />

targets, (b) have overseen healthcare services which put<br />

patients’ lives at risk and (c) have overseen financial<br />

mismanagement of a NHS organisation. [149567]<br />

(2) what measures are in place to prevent NHS<br />

managers (a) that fail to meet performance targets, (b)<br />

have overseen healthcare services which put patients’<br />

lives at risk and (c) have overseen financial<br />

mismanagement of a NHS organisation from gaining<br />

further employment in the NHS; and if he will consider<br />

introducing a baring scheme to prohibit such<br />

individuals from working in NHS management;<br />

[149568]<br />

(3) what steps he is taking to introduce new measures<br />

to (a) remove failing NHS managers, (b) monitor the<br />

performance of NHS managers, (c) monitor the<br />

financial management of NHS managers and (d) issue<br />

sanctions against failing NHS managers. [149569]<br />

Dr Poulter: All those working for the national health<br />

service have personal responsibility for the quality of<br />

care they provide, with good leadership critical to ensuring<br />

that patients receive excellent care. The vast majority of<br />

NHS leaders and managers work tirelessly to get the<br />

best possible care for the people they serve.<br />

However, the NHS does have systems in place to deal<br />

with the small number of managers who fail to meet the<br />

appropriate safety, quality, performance or financial<br />

standards.<br />

Employers are required to incorporate the Code of<br />

Conduct for NHS Managers in the employment contracts<br />

of chief executives and other directors. NHS managers<br />

are personally responsible for meeting the requirements<br />

of their employment contracts. Local governance systems<br />

are in place to hold NHS managers to account for the<br />

terms of their job role. If there are failures to meet the<br />

standards set, it is for the employer to decide what<br />

actions to take, including the possibility of additional<br />

training and support, or termination of contract.<br />

In support of this, Monitor, the NHS Trust Development<br />

Authority and Care Quality Commission work together<br />

to provide independent regulatory oversight of the safety,<br />

quality, performance and financial management of NHS<br />

providers in England.<br />

Monitor has and will continue to have intervention<br />

powers in relation to NHS foundation trusts and can<br />

remove directors from the board in cases of significant<br />

financial or service underperformance.<br />

The Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation<br />

Trust Public Inquiry provides graphic illustrations of<br />

lessons that can be learned from failure of individuals,<br />

the employing trust and system regulators to put patients<br />

first. It recommends a number of actions relating to<br />

NHS managers, including a mechanism for barring<br />

failing managers. These are being considered as part of<br />

the Government’s response, which will be published shortly.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!