PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament
PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament
PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1093W<br />
Written Answers<br />
26 MARCH 2013<br />
Written Answers<br />
1094W<br />
(5) whether the banning of confidentiality clauses<br />
from severance agreements in the NHS will apply in<br />
cases in which the £20,000 threshold for referral to his<br />
Department is not met. [150235]<br />
Dr Poulter: The coalition Government has been<br />
consistently clear that nothing within a contract of<br />
employment or compromise agreement should prevent<br />
an individual from speaking out about issues such as<br />
patient care and safety, or anything else that could be in<br />
the wider public interest in accordance with the Public<br />
Interest Disclosure Act 1998.<br />
The Department has not banned confidentiality clauses<br />
per se. Compromise agreements, which include appropriately<br />
drafted confidentiality clauses, can be a legitimate<br />
mechanism for protecting the interests of both employer<br />
and employee as long as nothing in the agreement seeks<br />
to prevent, or has the effect of preventing, individuals<br />
from speaking out in the public interest.<br />
Although the use and specific content of a compromise<br />
agreement is a matter for the relevant employer and is<br />
confidential to the parties concerned, some NHS employers<br />
have used such agreements that have not been as clear<br />
on the issue of speaking out in the public interest as<br />
they should be. This has resulted in some staff who have<br />
felt ’gagged’ and therefore worried that they would not<br />
be allowed to speak out about their concerns after they<br />
have signed the agreement and left their employment.<br />
HM Treasury do not sign off ’compromise agreements’<br />
neither does the Department of Health. The Department<br />
and Treasury do not see the content of compromise<br />
agreements or the confidentiality clauses they may contain.<br />
The Department and the Treasury review the business<br />
cases that are put forward by employers in support of<br />
making a special severance payment. The Department<br />
will not support settlements, regardless of the amount<br />
concerned, where making such a payment is not in the<br />
public interest. This includes any case which may involve<br />
a potential whistleblowing issue.<br />
In future, the Government will require that where<br />
confidentiality clauses are used in compromise agreements<br />
that they include an explicit clause that makes it clear<br />
beyond doubt to the individual concerned that nothing<br />
in the agreement will prevent them from speaking out<br />
on issues in the public interest as covered by the Public<br />
Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (PIDA).<br />
Former NHS employees who feel they may be subject<br />
to a confidentiality ″gagging″ clause are protected under<br />
PIDA. Any clause that is in contravention of the PIDA<br />
regulations are void. Former employees are encouraged<br />
to initially seek professional support and advice on<br />
their particular case from the whistleblowing helpline.<br />
In parallel, the Department is considering how it may<br />
further communicate with employers on the issue of<br />
former employees.<br />
NHS: Interpreters<br />
Andrew Percy: To ask the Secretary of State for<br />
Health on how many occasions interpreters have been<br />
required for the purposes of treating (a) NHS patients,<br />
(b) emergency admissions, (c) maternity cases, (d)<br />
in-patient admissions and (e) out-patients in (i) Brigg<br />
and Goole constituency and (ii) Yorkshire and the<br />
Humber in each of the last five years. [150160]<br />
Norman Lamb: This information is not collected<br />
centrally. The provision of interpretation and translation<br />
services by national health service bodies is a matter for<br />
local determination.<br />
NHS: Managers<br />
Priti Patel: To ask the Secretary of State for Health<br />
(1) what measures are in place to remove from post<br />
NHS managers (a) that fail to meet performance<br />
targets, (b) have overseen healthcare services which put<br />
patients’ lives at risk and (c) have overseen financial<br />
mismanagement of a NHS organisation. [149567]<br />
(2) what measures are in place to prevent NHS<br />
managers (a) that fail to meet performance targets, (b)<br />
have overseen healthcare services which put patients’<br />
lives at risk and (c) have overseen financial<br />
mismanagement of a NHS organisation from gaining<br />
further employment in the NHS; and if he will consider<br />
introducing a baring scheme to prohibit such<br />
individuals from working in NHS management;<br />
[149568]<br />
(3) what steps he is taking to introduce new measures<br />
to (a) remove failing NHS managers, (b) monitor the<br />
performance of NHS managers, (c) monitor the<br />
financial management of NHS managers and (d) issue<br />
sanctions against failing NHS managers. [149569]<br />
Dr Poulter: All those working for the national health<br />
service have personal responsibility for the quality of<br />
care they provide, with good leadership critical to ensuring<br />
that patients receive excellent care. The vast majority of<br />
NHS leaders and managers work tirelessly to get the<br />
best possible care for the people they serve.<br />
However, the NHS does have systems in place to deal<br />
with the small number of managers who fail to meet the<br />
appropriate safety, quality, performance or financial<br />
standards.<br />
Employers are required to incorporate the Code of<br />
Conduct for NHS Managers in the employment contracts<br />
of chief executives and other directors. NHS managers<br />
are personally responsible for meeting the requirements<br />
of their employment contracts. Local governance systems<br />
are in place to hold NHS managers to account for the<br />
terms of their job role. If there are failures to meet the<br />
standards set, it is for the employer to decide what<br />
actions to take, including the possibility of additional<br />
training and support, or termination of contract.<br />
In support of this, Monitor, the NHS Trust Development<br />
Authority and Care Quality Commission work together<br />
to provide independent regulatory oversight of the safety,<br />
quality, performance and financial management of NHS<br />
providers in England.<br />
Monitor has and will continue to have intervention<br />
powers in relation to NHS foundation trusts and can<br />
remove directors from the board in cases of significant<br />
financial or service underperformance.<br />
The Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation<br />
Trust Public Inquiry provides graphic illustrations of<br />
lessons that can be learned from failure of individuals,<br />
the employing trust and system regulators to put patients<br />
first. It recommends a number of actions relating to<br />
NHS managers, including a mechanism for barring<br />
failing managers. These are being considered as part of<br />
the Government’s response, which will be published shortly.