PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament
PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament
PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1075W<br />
Written Answers<br />
26 MARCH 2013<br />
Written Answers<br />
1076W<br />
for Sustainable Homes; how many such houses were<br />
built on greenfield land; what proportion of the<br />
completed units were affordable; and if he will make a<br />
statement. [150185]<br />
Mr Foster: The Government does not hold information<br />
in the form requested, distinguishing the types of sites<br />
on which Code homes are constructed. Statistical<br />
information about the Code for Sustainable Homes and<br />
the energy performance of buildings is however published<br />
quarterly on the Gov.uk website. In 2012 Code level 4<br />
completion certificates were issued for 9,468 homes, of<br />
which 7,640 were publicly funded. Similarly in 2012,<br />
Code level 5 and 6 completion certificates were issued<br />
for 234 homes, of which 211 were publicly funded.<br />
Olympic Games 2012<br />
Gordon Henderson: To ask the Secretary of State for<br />
Communities and Local Government whether any<br />
funds from the public purse will be spent refurbishing<br />
and modifying the Olympic Stadium in preparation for<br />
any sale. [149863]<br />
Brandon Lewis: <strong>Parliament</strong>, in passing the Localism<br />
Act, devolved a number of functions, including<br />
responsibility for the Olympic legacy in London to the<br />
Mayor of London. Therefore, the Mayor is now accountable<br />
to Londoners and the London Assembly for the delivery<br />
of these functions in London and the use of the resources<br />
provided to support them. The Mayor established the<br />
London Legacy Development Corporation to manage<br />
the long-term planning, development, management and<br />
maintenance of the Olympic Park and its facilities after<br />
the London 2012 Games. There are no current plans to<br />
sell the stadium.<br />
On 22 March the Corporation announced that West<br />
Ham <strong>United</strong> Football Club has been confirmed as the<br />
stadium’s long-term anchor tenant with a 99 year<br />
concession, paying approximately £2 million in rent per<br />
year. West Ham will also make a contribution of £15 million<br />
towards the cost of transforming the stadium into a<br />
multi-use venue with a roof to pitch side and retractable<br />
seating that is suitable for athletics, football and other<br />
events.<br />
The remaining funding for the transformation of the<br />
stadium will come from the London borough of Newham<br />
(£40 million), the Corporation/Mayor of London<br />
(£52.6 million), the Public Sector Funding Package<br />
(£38.7 million) and the Public Works Loan Board<br />
(£18.7 million).<br />
The Government is committed to ensuring that the<br />
Olympic Stadium provides a long-term and viable legacy<br />
for the Olympic Games and therefore agreed to make<br />
an exceptional contribution of £25 million towards the<br />
transformation costs, should it be required once the<br />
tenders are returned.<br />
The total public sector contribution towards the<br />
cost of transforming the stadium is £175 million. The<br />
stadium and its transformation will be managed by<br />
the Legacy Corporation and Newham council using<br />
a dedicated joint venture E20 Stadium LLP. The<br />
partnership, announced in July 2012, will help secure<br />
extensive community benefits including jobs and sport<br />
and education activity, with community access to both<br />
the stadium and the new 400m community track. The<br />
E20 Stadium partnership will now procure a stadium<br />
operator to manage the venue, coordinate community<br />
and sporting use, and to bring in various concerts and<br />
events.<br />
The stadium transformation will ensure that it has<br />
both the capacity and facilities to attract cultural and<br />
sporting events on a one-off basis and through long-term<br />
regular use.<br />
Planning Permission<br />
Tom Blenkinsop: To ask the Secretary of State for<br />
Communities and Local Government whether his<br />
Department has any plans to deregulate the<br />
publication of planning permission applications in<br />
local newspapers. [149335]<br />
Brandon Lewis [holding answer 21 March 2013]:<br />
Ministers have been clear that, in an internet age,<br />
commercial newspapers should expect over time less<br />
state advertising as more information is syndicated online<br />
by local authorities for free. The flipside is the free press<br />
should not face state unfair competition from town hall<br />
newspapers and municipal propaganda dressed up as<br />
local reporting.<br />
However, my Department does not have any current<br />
plans to remove the statutory requirement for certain<br />
planning applications to be advertised in newspapers.<br />
Such notices ensure that the public are informed of<br />
decisions by their local authority which may affect their<br />
quality of life, local amenity or their property. This is<br />
especially the case in relation to planning applications,<br />
where there is a limited period for local residents to<br />
make representations.<br />
The last Administration produced a consultation paper<br />
on this issue, proposing to<br />
remove the statutory requirements to publish notices in<br />
newspapers (Department for Communities and Local<br />
Government, ‘Publicity for planning applications’, July<br />
2009). This was not well-received. Following that<br />
consultation, the Administration concluded:<br />
“The Government has decided not to take forward this amendment.<br />
This means that the statutory requirement to publish certain<br />
applications in newspapers remains. It is clear from the responses<br />
that some members of the public and community groups rely on<br />
the statutory notices in newspapers to learn about planning<br />
applications in their area. The Government is not convinced that<br />
good alternative arrangements can be readily rolled out”.<br />
(Department for Communities and Local Government,<br />
‘Publicity for planning applications: Summary of responses<br />
to consultation’, December 2009, p. 14).<br />
More broadly, in response to his implicit suggestion<br />
that such notices should be abolished in newspapers, I<br />
would direct the hon. Member to a passage from The<br />
Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy:<br />
“People of Earth, your attention, please... This is Prostetnic<br />
Vogon Jeltz of the Galactic Hyperspace Planning Council. As<br />
you will no doubt be aware, the plans for development of the<br />
outlying regions of the Galaxy require the building of a hyperspatial<br />
express route through your star system, and regrettably, your<br />
planet is one of those scheduled for demolition. The process will<br />
take slightly less than two of your Earth minutes. Thank you...<br />
There’s no point in acting surprised about it. All the planning<br />
charts and demolition orders have been on display at your local<br />
planning department in Alpha Centauri for fifty of your Earth<br />
years, so you’ve had plenty of time to lodge any formal complaint<br />
and it’s far too late to start making a fuss about it now...