PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament
PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament
PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1031W<br />
Written Answers<br />
26 MARCH 2013<br />
Written Answers<br />
1032W<br />
Mr Hoban: Once someone has been awarded universal<br />
credit, any changes of circumstances will be taken into<br />
account and the award adjusted accordingly, as long as<br />
they continue to meet the entitlement conditions.<br />
To be eligible to claim universal credit during the<br />
roll-out, a person must meet the eligibility criteria in<br />
place at the time. For example, during the Pathfinder, a<br />
person must satisfy the requirements set out in Part 2 of<br />
the Universal Credit (Transitional Provisions) Regulations<br />
2013/386, irrespective of whether they have previously<br />
been entitled to universal credit. Any person who does<br />
not satisfy those requirements would need to claim an<br />
existing benefit or tax credit.<br />
CULTURE, MEDIA AND SPORT<br />
Arts<br />
Dan Jarvis: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture,<br />
Media and Sport what information her Department<br />
holds on the average annual salary of (a) full-time and<br />
(b) part-time employee in the UK (i) film, (ii) music<br />
and (iii) design industry. [150220]<br />
Mr Vaizey: DCMS does not publish separate estimates<br />
on earnings within the film, music and design industries.<br />
We rely on data from the Annual Survey of Hours and<br />
Earnings, published by the ONS.<br />
http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/ashe/annual-survey-of-hoursand-earnings/2012-provisional-results/index.html<br />
Broadband<br />
Helen Goodman: To ask the Secretary of State for<br />
Culture, Media and Sport with reference to paragraph<br />
2.7 on page 68 of Budget 2013 Red Book, how funding<br />
for broadband programmes to support local delivery<br />
will be reprofiled. [149946]<br />
Mr Vaizey [holding answer 25 March 2013]: The<br />
reprofiling exercise referred to in the Budget is designed<br />
to unblock and accelerate delivery by aligning funding<br />
with delivery timetables. This is an ongoing process.<br />
Final expenditure profiles will be agreed later in the<br />
year once local delivery timetables have been finalised.<br />
Olympic Games 2012<br />
Mr Umunna: To ask the Secretary of State for<br />
Culture, Media and Sport for what reasons<br />
applications for Olympic marketing licences can be<br />
rejected; and how many firms have been rejected for<br />
each such reason in 2013 to date. [149510]<br />
Hugh Robertson [holding answer 22 March 2013]:<br />
Applications for licences can be refused for one of two<br />
reasons:<br />
because they do not meet the eligibility criteria for the scheme,<br />
for example because the company concerned is not registered in<br />
the UK, is not in the supply chain of the Olympic Delivery<br />
Authority (ODA) or the London Organising Committee for the<br />
2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games (LOCOG), or whose<br />
contribution to the Games is incidental;<br />
because the company provided goods or services which fall<br />
within an excluded category. The excluded categories exist to<br />
protect the rights of worldwide Olympic sponsors. These rights<br />
last beyond 2012 and give exclusive rights of association to the<br />
Games in the UK and worldwide. It is the support of these<br />
sponsors which ensures the Games can take place—without them<br />
there would be no Games and no opportunity for businesses to<br />
associate with them.<br />
Of those companies whose applications have been<br />
rejected, 25 fall in the first category and 70 in the<br />
second. The new scheme, launched in January 2013,<br />
allows greater freedom for approved 2012 suppliers to<br />
promote the goods and services they supplied to the<br />
Games, than was permitted under the previous protocol<br />
published by LOCOG in December 2007and updated<br />
in September 2010.<br />
Mr Sutcliffe: To ask the Secretary of State for<br />
Culture, Media and Sport what suppliers of<br />
entertainment lighting systems can do to publicise their<br />
involvement in the London 2012 Olympic Games; and<br />
if she will make a statement. [149905]<br />
Hugh Robertson [holding answer 25 March 2013]:<br />
The provision of lighting systems falls within one of the<br />
Scheme’s excluded categories. These exclusions exist to<br />
protect the rights of worldwide Olympic sponsors whose<br />
investment makes the Games possible. Companies whose<br />
supply includes lighting services, for example installation<br />
and design, may be eligible and I encourage them to<br />
refer to the Supplier Recognition Scheme website for<br />
further guidance.<br />
The new scheme, launched in January 2013, allows<br />
greater freedom for approved 2012 suppliers to promote<br />
the goods and services they supplied to the Games,<br />
than was permitted under the previous protocol published<br />
by LOCOG in December 2007 and updated in<br />
September 2010.<br />
Mr Sutcliffe: To ask the Secretary of State for<br />
Culture, Media and Sport what definition of industrial<br />
lighting is being used by the administrators of the<br />
Supplier Recognition Scheme; and if she will make a<br />
statement. [149909]<br />
Hugh Robertson [holding answer 25 March 2013]:<br />
The provision of lighting systems falls within one of the<br />
excluded categories which exist to protect the rights of<br />
worldwide Olympic sponsors whose investment makes<br />
the games possible. Businesses which supplied lighting<br />
equipment or systems are excluded from the scheme—this<br />
applies to lighting used in either industrial, commercial<br />
or residential settings. Companies whose supply<br />
includes lighting services, for example installation and<br />
design, may be eligible and they are encouraged to refer<br />
to the Supplier Recognition Scheme website for further<br />
guidance.<br />
The new scheme, launched in January 2013, allows<br />
greater freedom for approved 2012 suppliers to promote<br />
the goods and services they supplied to the games,<br />
than was permitted under the previous protocol published<br />
by LOCOG in December 2007 and updated in<br />
September 2010.<br />
Mr Sutcliffe: To ask the Secretary of State for<br />
Culture, Media and Sport how many companies have<br />
(a) applied for and (b) been accepted on the Supplier<br />
Recognition Scheme to date; and if she will make a<br />
statement. [149911]<br />
Hugh Robertson [holding answer 25 March 2013]: As<br />
at 20 March 2013, 620 companies had applied for<br />
licences under the Supplier Recognition Scheme run by