04.06.2014 Views

PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament

PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament

PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1031W<br />

Written Answers<br />

26 MARCH 2013<br />

Written Answers<br />

1032W<br />

Mr Hoban: Once someone has been awarded universal<br />

credit, any changes of circumstances will be taken into<br />

account and the award adjusted accordingly, as long as<br />

they continue to meet the entitlement conditions.<br />

To be eligible to claim universal credit during the<br />

roll-out, a person must meet the eligibility criteria in<br />

place at the time. For example, during the Pathfinder, a<br />

person must satisfy the requirements set out in Part 2 of<br />

the Universal Credit (Transitional Provisions) Regulations<br />

2013/386, irrespective of whether they have previously<br />

been entitled to universal credit. Any person who does<br />

not satisfy those requirements would need to claim an<br />

existing benefit or tax credit.<br />

CULTURE, MEDIA AND SPORT<br />

Arts<br />

Dan Jarvis: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture,<br />

Media and Sport what information her Department<br />

holds on the average annual salary of (a) full-time and<br />

(b) part-time employee in the UK (i) film, (ii) music<br />

and (iii) design industry. [150220]<br />

Mr Vaizey: DCMS does not publish separate estimates<br />

on earnings within the film, music and design industries.<br />

We rely on data from the Annual Survey of Hours and<br />

Earnings, published by the ONS.<br />

http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/ashe/annual-survey-of-hoursand-earnings/2012-provisional-results/index.html<br />

Broadband<br />

Helen Goodman: To ask the Secretary of State for<br />

Culture, Media and Sport with reference to paragraph<br />

2.7 on page 68 of Budget 2013 Red Book, how funding<br />

for broadband programmes to support local delivery<br />

will be reprofiled. [149946]<br />

Mr Vaizey [holding answer 25 March 2013]: The<br />

reprofiling exercise referred to in the Budget is designed<br />

to unblock and accelerate delivery by aligning funding<br />

with delivery timetables. This is an ongoing process.<br />

Final expenditure profiles will be agreed later in the<br />

year once local delivery timetables have been finalised.<br />

Olympic Games 2012<br />

Mr Umunna: To ask the Secretary of State for<br />

Culture, Media and Sport for what reasons<br />

applications for Olympic marketing licences can be<br />

rejected; and how many firms have been rejected for<br />

each such reason in 2013 to date. [149510]<br />

Hugh Robertson [holding answer 22 March 2013]:<br />

Applications for licences can be refused for one of two<br />

reasons:<br />

because they do not meet the eligibility criteria for the scheme,<br />

for example because the company concerned is not registered in<br />

the UK, is not in the supply chain of the Olympic Delivery<br />

Authority (ODA) or the London Organising Committee for the<br />

2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games (LOCOG), or whose<br />

contribution to the Games is incidental;<br />

because the company provided goods or services which fall<br />

within an excluded category. The excluded categories exist to<br />

protect the rights of worldwide Olympic sponsors. These rights<br />

last beyond 2012 and give exclusive rights of association to the<br />

Games in the UK and worldwide. It is the support of these<br />

sponsors which ensures the Games can take place—without them<br />

there would be no Games and no opportunity for businesses to<br />

associate with them.<br />

Of those companies whose applications have been<br />

rejected, 25 fall in the first category and 70 in the<br />

second. The new scheme, launched in January 2013,<br />

allows greater freedom for approved 2012 suppliers to<br />

promote the goods and services they supplied to the<br />

Games, than was permitted under the previous protocol<br />

published by LOCOG in December 2007and updated<br />

in September 2010.<br />

Mr Sutcliffe: To ask the Secretary of State for<br />

Culture, Media and Sport what suppliers of<br />

entertainment lighting systems can do to publicise their<br />

involvement in the London 2012 Olympic Games; and<br />

if she will make a statement. [149905]<br />

Hugh Robertson [holding answer 25 March 2013]:<br />

The provision of lighting systems falls within one of the<br />

Scheme’s excluded categories. These exclusions exist to<br />

protect the rights of worldwide Olympic sponsors whose<br />

investment makes the Games possible. Companies whose<br />

supply includes lighting services, for example installation<br />

and design, may be eligible and I encourage them to<br />

refer to the Supplier Recognition Scheme website for<br />

further guidance.<br />

The new scheme, launched in January 2013, allows<br />

greater freedom for approved 2012 suppliers to promote<br />

the goods and services they supplied to the Games,<br />

than was permitted under the previous protocol published<br />

by LOCOG in December 2007 and updated in<br />

September 2010.<br />

Mr Sutcliffe: To ask the Secretary of State for<br />

Culture, Media and Sport what definition of industrial<br />

lighting is being used by the administrators of the<br />

Supplier Recognition Scheme; and if she will make a<br />

statement. [149909]<br />

Hugh Robertson [holding answer 25 March 2013]:<br />

The provision of lighting systems falls within one of the<br />

excluded categories which exist to protect the rights of<br />

worldwide Olympic sponsors whose investment makes<br />

the games possible. Businesses which supplied lighting<br />

equipment or systems are excluded from the scheme—this<br />

applies to lighting used in either industrial, commercial<br />

or residential settings. Companies whose supply<br />

includes lighting services, for example installation and<br />

design, may be eligible and they are encouraged to refer<br />

to the Supplier Recognition Scheme website for further<br />

guidance.<br />

The new scheme, launched in January 2013, allows<br />

greater freedom for approved 2012 suppliers to promote<br />

the goods and services they supplied to the games,<br />

than was permitted under the previous protocol published<br />

by LOCOG in December 2007 and updated in<br />

September 2010.<br />

Mr Sutcliffe: To ask the Secretary of State for<br />

Culture, Media and Sport how many companies have<br />

(a) applied for and (b) been accepted on the Supplier<br />

Recognition Scheme to date; and if she will make a<br />

statement. [149911]<br />

Hugh Robertson [holding answer 25 March 2013]: As<br />

at 20 March 2013, 620 companies had applied for<br />

licences under the Supplier Recognition Scheme run by

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!