PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament

PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament

publications.parliament.uk
from publications.parliament.uk More from this publisher
04.06.2014 Views

89WS Written Ministerial Statements 26 MARCH 2013 Written Ministerial Statements 90WS UK throughout the continuing discussions on the legislation, and in the negotiations between the Council and the European Parliament. I made it clear that the Commission’s proposed “greening” of the CAP, which will involve part of the subsidy envelope being paid on the basis of compliance with environmental measures, should be delivered through a simple system, to achieve environmental benefits without imposing unnecessary costs on farmers, and to secure value for taxpayers. Council agreed to include an option for member states to design their own certification scheme to deliver the Commission’s “greening”outcomes, which has the potential to simplify implementation significantly, for both farm business and the paying agency. I was disappointed that the majority of member states were content to allow farmers to be paid twice under two different budgets for delivering the same environmental benefit; but compromises were necessary, and this now forms part of the position. I made it clear that I shared the European Parliament’s opposition to this approach. Although several member states wanted to extend sugar beet quotas to 2020, I worked with other member states to persuade the Council to agree that they will end in 2017. I am disappointed that they will continue beyond the date previously set for them to end but we have achieved a compromise and fought off calls for the end to be in 2020. The result is that sugar beet quotas will finally be scrapped benefiting consumers and our food processing industries. It is also important that we ensure availability of cane sugar supplies to allow cane refineries to compete on an equal footing; and I am determined to work with the Commission to persuade them to ensure fair treatment for cane sugar refiners. The Council concluded that the ceiling for coupled payments in each member State—effectively, the proportion of their CAP subsidy envelope which can be linked to production—should increase from that proposed by the Commission. Under the proposals, member states, including the UK, which have made the most progress in decoupling payments, will be allowed to pay up to 7% of their direct payment budget as coupled payments. The remaining member states will be allowed up to 12%. I was disappointed that the Council proposed that coupled payments continue, and that different levels of flexibility should be allowed to different member states, but the agreement is a clear improvement on the European Parliament’s proposal for 15% or even 18%. The presidency had mistakenly removed from its proposed compromise on the rural development regulation, wording which is relevant to the calculation of a portion of the UK’s rebate. I made it clear that it was essential for this mistake to be corrected, and the presidency ensured that it was corrected in the compromise further changes tabled on the second day. Following objections from a few member states, the presidency maintained the text with the necessary wording, but put the article in square brackets and referred it for resolution in the framework of the Council deliberation on the EU own resource decision. However, at my insistence they also made it clear that this issue needed to be resolved before the rural development regulation could be agreed. I and other Ministers successfully argued against pressure from some member states to extend the use of market intervention. Reducing market intervention has helped to keep Europe on the path towards a more competitive farming sector, with less of a distorting impact of subsidy. Under any other business, I raised the issue of the European Commission’s proposed action on neonicotinoids. A total of 11 member states supported my call for the Commission to use all the latest scientific evidence, before any final decisions were taken; in particular I asked the Commission to ensure that any decision was taken in the light of field studies into effects on bee populations. The protection of bees is vital; but action should be considered, proportionate and science-led. I promised to deliver the results of our field studies to the Commission and other member states by the week commencing 25 March 2013. Also under any other business, the Netherlands presented a paper on trade difficulties with Russia who planned to ban the import of plants from the EU from 1 June. They were supported by other member states and called on the Commission to provide the phytosanitary information Russia requested. I echoed this call, as seed potato exports to Russia are important for Scotland. The Commission acknowledged the situation and indicated that it would raise the issue with the Russians. ENVIRONMENT, FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS Veterinary Products Committee The Minister of State, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Mr David Heath): Today I am announcing the triennial review of the Veterinary Products Committee (VPC). The VPC is an advisory nondepartmental public body (NDPB) sponsored by DEFRA which advises the Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD), which acts on behalf of the Secretary of State on veterinary medicines. Triennial reviews of NDPBs are part of the Government’s commitment to ensuring accountability in public life. The work for this review will begin in April 2013 and will be conducted in accordance with Government guidance for reviewing NDPBs. I will announce the findings of the review later in the year. Further information on the review is available on DEFRA’s website http://www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/ about/with/ndpb-review/. Horsemeat Fraud The Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Mr Owen Paterson): I would like to update the House on developments since my written ministerial statement on 4 March 2013, Official Report, column 54WS, on the latest results from the testing of beef products for the presence of horsemeat. In addition to the results of 5,430 industry tests reported to the House on 4 March 2013, Official Report, column 54WS, the Food Standards Agency has received further results from the UK-wide authenticity survey of beef products. The survey is of beef products on sale at a range of retail and catering outlets, with samples

91WS Written Ministerial Statements 26 MARCH 2013 Written Ministerial Statements 92WS being collected by local authority enforcement officers across the UK. Public analysts are testing these products for both horse and pig DNA. While the majority of testing has been completed, results of some analysis are still awaited. A total of 364 samples have been taken in the first two phases of this survey, including beef burgers, beef meatballs, minced beef, beef ready meals and tinned beef products. Two products have been identified which did not meet the sampling and analytical criteria, giving 362 samples on which the Food Standards Agency will be reporting. Results for five samples are in dispute. Where results are disputed, a retained portion of the food sample may be sent for further, independent analysis. Of the 357 samples for which analysis has been completed, all but five were clear of both horse and pig DNA at the 1% reporting limit. Two samples contained over 1% horse DNA and three samples contained over 1% pig DNA. All these products have been withdrawn from sale and named on the Food Standards Agency website. There have been no positive tests to date for the presence of bute in any of the UK food samples found to contain horse DNA. The Food Standards Agency met representatives of the food industry on 14 March to discuss future collaboration and reporting of test results. There was general agreement on four areas of future collaboration, for each of which the Food Standards Agency will now draw-up implementation plans. These areas are describing good practice for food businesses in assuring their food chains, with a particular focus on supporting small and medium-sized food businesses; an improved framework for securing and sharing intelligence; developing shared priorities for future food authenticity work; and creating a repository for sharing data and information. Food industry representatives also agreed to continue to provide data on their ongoing tests for horse DNA in processed beef products, with identification of individual products testing positive above the 1% reporting limit. The Food Standards Agency will next publish a summary of this information in early June, and will continue to report individual products testing positive above the 1% reporting limit as soon as they are confirmed by the food industry. Although in the short-term our priority has been to focus on the deliberate substitution of beef with horse, this does not mean that we have ignored the possibility of beef products containing undeclared pork or pig DNA. Consumers have a right to expect that all the food they are eating is correctly described. I recognise that even trace levels of pork contamination, below the 1% threshold, are unacceptable to some faith communities. Where a product is labelled as Halal and is found to contain traces of horse or pig DNA, the relevant local authority will investigate each case and take steps to ensure that consumers are informed. It remains the responsibility of all food businesses (including processors, catering suppliers and retailers) to ensure that the food they sell is what it says it is on the label, and Kosher and Halal certification bodies have a part to play in this. Any claims on a product certified by a certification body must be accurate. It is for the certification body to set out the standards which a certified product must meet, and for that body to work with food businesses to ensure those standards are adhered to. On 14 March senior officials from DEFRA, Food Standards Agency, DCLG and the Laboratory for the Government Chemist met with certifying organisations to discuss the Government’s testing programme. The main focus was the testing programme for detecting horse and pig DNA in beef products. They also discussed research being undertaken on detection levels and crosscontamination thresholds. Investigations continue at a number of sites across the UK. City of London police is the co-ordinating Police Authority for these investigations. At a European-level the Food Standards Agency continues to work closely with the Commission and other member states, sharing information via the rapid alert system for food and feed. We will be reporting the UK’s contribution to the Europe-wide programme of testing to the European Commission in advance of the deadline of 15 April. I will continue to keep the House informed. HEALTH Fair Playing Field Review The Secretary of State for Health (Mr Jeremy Hunt): The Fair Playing Field Review has been laid in Parliament today, in line with the requirement set out in section 1G of the National Health Service Act 2006. The aim of the review is to ensure that patients are able to access NHS services delivered by the best possible providers. In June 2012, Monitor—the independent health care regulator—was asked to look into any matters that might undermine this aim, and to report back with options for addressing such matters. The Department would like to thank Monitor for its work, the results of which have been published as part of the review. Revised NHS Constitution The Minister of State, Department of Health (Norman Lamb): The NHS constitution sets out the principles, values, rights and responsibilities that underpin the NHS. It sets out the enduring character of the NHS as a comprehensive and equitable health service. It is intended to empower the public, patients and staff to know and exercise their rights to help drive improvements throughout the NHS. The constitution sets out rights to which patients, public and staff are entitled, and pledges which the NHS is committed to achieve, together with responsibilities which we all owe to one another to ensure that the NHS operates fairly and effectively. Between November 2012 and January 2013, the Department ran a full public consultation on a package of amendments to strengthen the NHS constitution. This consultation followed advice from a NHS Future Forum working group, which advised on options for strengthening the NHS constitution to support the fair and effective operation of the NHS.

91WS<br />

Written Ministerial Statements<br />

26 MARCH 2013<br />

Written Ministerial Statements<br />

92WS<br />

being collected by local authority enforcement officers<br />

across the UK. Public analysts are testing these products<br />

for both horse and pig DNA. While the majority of<br />

testing has been completed, results of some analysis are<br />

still awaited.<br />

A total of 364 samples have been taken in the first<br />

two phases of this survey, including beef burgers, beef<br />

meatballs, minced beef, beef ready meals and tinned<br />

beef products. Two products have been identified which<br />

did not meet the sampling and analytical criteria, giving<br />

362 samples on which the Food Standards Agency will<br />

be reporting. Results for five samples are in dispute.<br />

Where results are disputed, a retained portion of the<br />

food sample may be sent for further, independent analysis.<br />

Of the 357 samples for which analysis has been<br />

completed, all but five were clear of both horse and pig<br />

DNA at the 1% reporting limit. Two samples contained<br />

over 1% horse DNA and three samples contained over<br />

1% pig DNA. All these products have been withdrawn<br />

from sale and named on the Food Standards Agency<br />

website.<br />

There have been no positive tests to date for the<br />

presence of bute in any of the UK food samples found<br />

to contain horse DNA.<br />

The Food Standards Agency met representatives of<br />

the food industry on 14 March to discuss future<br />

collaboration and reporting of test results. There was<br />

general agreement on four areas of future collaboration,<br />

for each of which the Food Standards Agency will now<br />

draw-up implementation plans. These areas are describing<br />

good practice for food businesses in assuring their food<br />

chains, with a particular focus on supporting small and<br />

medium-sized food businesses; an improved framework<br />

for securing and sharing intelligence; developing shared<br />

priorities for future food authenticity work; and creating<br />

a repository for sharing data and information.<br />

Food industry representatives also agreed to continue<br />

to provide data on their ongoing tests for horse DNA in<br />

processed beef products, with identification of individual<br />

products testing positive above the 1% reporting limit.<br />

The Food Standards Agency will next publish a summary<br />

of this information in early June, and will continue to<br />

report individual products testing positive above the 1%<br />

reporting limit as soon as they are confirmed by the<br />

food industry.<br />

Although in the short-term our priority has been to<br />

focus on the deliberate substitution of beef with horse,<br />

this does not mean that we have ignored the possibility<br />

of beef products containing undeclared pork or pig<br />

DNA. Consumers have a right to expect that all the<br />

food they are eating is correctly described.<br />

I recognise that even trace levels of pork contamination,<br />

below the 1% threshold, are unacceptable to some faith<br />

communities. Where a product is labelled as Halal and<br />

is found to contain traces of horse or pig DNA, the<br />

relevant local authority will investigate each case and<br />

take steps to ensure that consumers are informed.<br />

It remains the responsibility of all food businesses<br />

(including processors, catering suppliers and retailers)<br />

to ensure that the food they sell is what it says it is on<br />

the label, and Kosher and Halal certification bodies<br />

have a part to play in this. Any claims on a product<br />

certified by a certification body must be accurate. It is<br />

for the certification body to set out the standards which<br />

a certified product must meet, and for that body to<br />

work with food businesses to ensure those standards are<br />

adhered to.<br />

On 14 March senior officials from DEFRA, Food<br />

Standards Agency, DCLG and the Laboratory for the<br />

Government Chemist met with certifying organisations<br />

to discuss the Government’s testing programme. The<br />

main focus was the testing programme for detecting<br />

horse and pig DNA in beef products. They also discussed<br />

research being undertaken on detection levels and crosscontamination<br />

thresholds.<br />

Investigations continue at a number of sites across<br />

the UK. City of London police is the co-ordinating<br />

Police Authority for these investigations. At a European-level<br />

the Food Standards Agency continues to work closely<br />

with the Commission and other member states, sharing<br />

information via the rapid alert system for food and<br />

feed.<br />

We will be reporting the UK’s contribution to the<br />

Europe-wide programme of testing to the European<br />

Commission in advance of the deadline of 15 April.<br />

I will continue to keep the House informed.<br />

HEALTH<br />

Fair Playing Field Review<br />

The Secretary of State for Health (Mr Jeremy Hunt):<br />

The Fair Playing Field Review has been laid in <strong>Parliament</strong><br />

today, in line with the requirement set out in section 1G<br />

of the National Health Service Act 2006.<br />

The aim of the review is to ensure that patients are<br />

able to access NHS services delivered by the best possible<br />

providers. In June 2012, Monitor—the independent<br />

health care regulator—was asked to look into any matters<br />

that might undermine this aim, and to report back with<br />

options for addressing such matters. The Department<br />

would like to thank Monitor for its work, the results of<br />

which have been published as part of the review.<br />

Revised NHS Constitution<br />

The Minister of State, Department of Health (Norman<br />

Lamb): The NHS constitution sets out the principles,<br />

values, rights and responsibilities that underpin the<br />

NHS. It sets out the enduring character of the NHS as a<br />

comprehensive and equitable health service. It is intended<br />

to empower the public, patients and staff to know and<br />

exercise their rights to help drive improvements throughout<br />

the NHS. The constitution sets out rights to which<br />

patients, public and staff are entitled, and pledges which<br />

the NHS is committed to achieve, together with<br />

responsibilities which we all owe to one another to<br />

ensure that the NHS operates fairly and effectively.<br />

Between November 2012 and January 2013, the<br />

Department ran a full public consultation on a package<br />

of amendments to strengthen the NHS constitution.<br />

This consultation followed advice from a NHS Future<br />

Forum working group, which advised on options for<br />

strengthening the NHS constitution to support the fair<br />

and effective operation of the NHS.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!