04.06.2014 Views

PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament

PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament

PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES - United Kingdom Parliament

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1467 Oral Answers<br />

26 MARCH 2013<br />

Oral Answers<br />

1468<br />

The Attorney-General: The Home Office is responsible<br />

for producing official statistics on casework outcomes<br />

in terrorism. The latest published Home Office data for<br />

the year ending September 2012 indicate that 24 out of<br />

29 defendants were convicted, at a conviction rate of 82.8%.<br />

At that time, 134 prisoners classified as terrorists or domestic<br />

extremists were convicted and remanded. On fraud,<br />

the number of prosecutions has increased by 25% since<br />

2010 and the conviction rate remains at 86.2%. On tax<br />

evasion, in the financial year to date 86% of cases<br />

originating with Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs<br />

have resulted in conviction. I should like to write to my<br />

hon. Friend about the overall figures on this.<br />

Catherine McKinnell (Newcastle upon Tyne North)<br />

(Lab): Does the Attorney-General share my concern<br />

about the memo leaked by the CPS that showed there<br />

was a risk of CPS prosecutors deliberately choosing<br />

cases that were likely to crack because of lack of evidence,<br />

in order to save costs?<br />

The Attorney-General: I think that the conviction<br />

rates speak for the efficiency of the CPS. I have seen<br />

nothing to suggest that cases are not being pursued<br />

outside the ordinary tests of public interest and the<br />

reasonable prospect of getting a conviction. Obviously,<br />

if those do not apply then there should not be a prosecution<br />

at all. I am certainly not aware of there being any<br />

fiddling and of decisions being made not to prosecute<br />

certain cases that should be prosecuted.<br />

Confiscation Orders<br />

5. Chris Williamson (Derby North) (Lab): What steps<br />

he is taking to increase the effectiveness of the pursuit<br />

by the Crown Prosecution Service of high-value<br />

confiscation orders. [149749]<br />

The Attorney-General (Mr Dominic Grieve): The Crown<br />

Prosecution Service is generally very effective in the pursuit<br />

of high-value confiscation orders. My office and the<br />

CPS are represented on the Home Office-led criminal<br />

finances board, at which asset recovery performance is<br />

discussed. Asset recovery is a long process. Assets are<br />

often hidden. Third-party litigation, appeals against<br />

conviction and confiscation orders all mean that the<br />

enforcement of such orders may take a significant amount<br />

of time. Due to the way in which the value of a<br />

confiscation order is calculated, in many cases it is not<br />

possible to recover the full amount that has been ordered.<br />

Chris Williamson: Four out of five of the largest<br />

confiscation orders sought by the CPS in the past three<br />

years have concerned VAT fraud. Will the Attorney-General<br />

ensure that prosecuting these high-value and highly<br />

complex fraud cases is prioritised by the CPS?<br />

The Attorney-General: I assure the hon. Gentleman<br />

that I will raise the matter with the CPS, but I have no<br />

reason to think that it is not doing that. The evidence<br />

suggests overall—I cannot break it down for VAT fraud—<br />

that year on year the amount being confiscated is rising<br />

from what was a very low and rather unsuccessful level<br />

after the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 first came into<br />

force. In the past year, £107 million was realised through<br />

confiscation. I will write to him about his specific point<br />

on VAT.<br />

Minimum Wage: Evasion<br />

6. Diana Johnson (Kingston upon Hull North) (Lab):<br />

What recent assessment he has made of the effectiveness<br />

of the Crown Prosecution Service as a prosecutor of<br />

employers who evade the minimum wage. [149750]<br />

The Solicitor-General (Oliver Heald): The Crown<br />

Prosecution Service decides whether to prosecute national<br />

minimum wage cases, but the cases are investigated by<br />

Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs. Since 2010, three<br />

cases have been referred to the CPS by HMRC, two of<br />

which resulted in convictions, most recently in February<br />

2013, where the defendant was fined £1,000.<br />

Diana Johnson: Shockingly, there were no prosecutions<br />

for minimum wage evasion in 2011 or 2012. If the<br />

Government are really serious about dealing with low-skilled<br />

immigration and its causes, why have they not been<br />

enforcing the minimum wage legislation properly?<br />

The Solicitor-General: It is important to bear in mind<br />

that HMRC has two sorts of powers that it can use:<br />

criminal investigation, which we have already discussed,<br />

and the civil powers that enable it to look at the books and<br />

then to impose penalties and recover arrears. It is for<br />

HMRC to decide on the best way forward. The hon.<br />

Lady is right that these are important matters.<br />

John Cryer (Leyton and Wanstead) (Lab): Is the<br />

Solicitor-General aware that the number of relevant<br />

inspections by HMRC has been falling for the past two<br />

or three years? Does that not make the sort of convictions<br />

that he is talking about less likely in the future?<br />

The Solicitor-General: These are important matters<br />

and I will pass the hon. Gentleman’s comments on to<br />

Treasury Ministers. It is important that this matter is<br />

taken seriously and that there is proper enforcement.<br />

The Government certainly consider it to be an important<br />

matter.<br />

Rape<br />

7. Stephen Doughty (Cardiff South and Penarth)<br />

(Lab/Co-op): What recent assessment he has made of<br />

the effectiveness of the Crown Prosecution Service in<br />

rape prosecutions. [149751]<br />

The Solicitor-General (Oliver Heald): The conviction<br />

rate for rape cases has increased from 59.4% in 2009-10<br />

to 63.4% in the current year.<br />

Stephen Doughty: I thank the Solicitor-General for<br />

his answer. However, in 2011-12, the CPS took no<br />

further action in nearly half the cases that involved a<br />

rape allegation that were referred to it by the police.<br />

What reasons have the Law Officers identified for that?<br />

The Solicitor-General: It is difficult to prosecute some<br />

cases. Often, it is the word of one person against the<br />

word of another. It is important in those circumstances<br />

to ensure that the victim who is the witness is properly<br />

supported. In addition, it is vital to have corroborative<br />

evidence and to use it effectively. It is sometimes said

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!