View PDF - United Kingdom Parliament
View PDF - United Kingdom Parliament
View PDF - United Kingdom Parliament
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
29W<br />
Written Answers<br />
26 OCTOBER 2009<br />
Written Answers<br />
30W<br />
The output of the Territorial Army, University Officer<br />
Training Corps (UOTC) and Cadet Forces is focused on<br />
training and therefore all activity is either directly or<br />
indirectly attributable to planning, organising or conducting<br />
training.<br />
British Forces Post Office<br />
Mr. Dhanda: To ask the Secretary of State for<br />
Defence what his plans are for the future of the British<br />
Forces Post Office; and if he will make a statement.<br />
[295253]<br />
Bill Rammell: The information was published in Defence<br />
Internal Brief, Serial 2009DIB/37 dated 6 October 2009,<br />
copies of which are available in the Library of the<br />
House.<br />
Defence Board<br />
Mr. Arbuthnot: To ask the Secretary of State for<br />
Defence pursuant to the written ministerial statement<br />
of 15 October 2009, Official Report, columns 34-36WS,<br />
on defence acquisition (independent review), who the<br />
members of the new sub-committee of the Defence<br />
Board are; and if he will make a statement. [295775]<br />
Mr. Quentin Davies: As recommended in Bernard<br />
Gray’s recent report on Defence Acquisition, the members<br />
of the new Defence board sub-committee on equipment<br />
are the Permanent Under Secretary, the Chief of the<br />
Defence Staff, the 2nd Permanent Under Secretary, the<br />
Vice-Chief of the Defence Staff and the Director-General<br />
Finance. The sub-committee is charged with determining,<br />
for agreement by the Defence board and Ministers, an<br />
equipment plan that is aligned with strategy, affordable<br />
and realistic.<br />
Defence Medical Services<br />
Nick Harvey: To ask the Secretary of State for<br />
Defence how many compensation claims have been<br />
submitted by armed forces personnel in respect of<br />
malpractice on the part of Defence Medical Services;<br />
how many such claims were upheld; and how much was<br />
paid out against such claims in each year. [295645]<br />
Mr. Kevan Jones: The number of new clinical negligence<br />
compensation claims is not recorded on the Department’s<br />
claims database in a format that differentiates between<br />
service personnel, service dependants and civilian cases.<br />
The number of claims upheld and the amount of<br />
compensation, including legal costs, paid out each year<br />
to service personnel is identifiable. The figures are shown<br />
in the following table. Information relating to clinical<br />
negligence can be found in the Department’s Claims<br />
Annual Report which has been issued each year since<br />
1997-98, a copy of which is held in the Libraries of the<br />
Houses.<br />
All new clinical negligence claims received Service personnel claims upheld Compensation/legal costs (£ million)<br />
1997-98 308 21 0.4<br />
1998-99 255 51 2.3<br />
1999-2000 147 49 2.5<br />
2000-01 128 49 6.1<br />
2001-02 142 39 0.8<br />
2002-03 119 39 3.9<br />
2003-04 92 24 2.6<br />
2004-05 86 17 3.3<br />
2005-06 69 21 3.8<br />
2006-07 67 14 1.5<br />
2007-08 86 10 2.9<br />
2008-09 55 17 5.3<br />
Nick Harvey: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence<br />
what the (a) actual strength, (b) establishment and (c)<br />
percentage difference between establishment and actual<br />
strength is of each speciality of qualified medical personnel<br />
(a) in the Army and (b) tri-service. [295646]<br />
Mr. Kevan Jones: Manning statistics for the Defence<br />
Medical Services are updated twice a year, in April and<br />
October. The October 2009 figures are currently being<br />
collated, and verified figures should be available by the<br />
end of November. I will place these figures in the<br />
Library of the House.<br />
Defence: Procurement<br />
Mr. Arbuthnot: To ask the Secretary of State for<br />
Defence pursuant to the written ministerial statement<br />
of 15 October 2009, Official Report, columns 34-36WS,<br />
on defence acquisition (independent review), what<br />
arrangements he plans to make to provide greater visibility<br />
of project management costs in the Defence Equipment<br />
and Support Organisation to the Capability Sponsor in<br />
head office; and if he will make a statement. [295776]<br />
Mr. Quentin Davies: We are currently reviewing how<br />
best to provide greater visibility of project management<br />
costs, and this will be addressed as part of the Strategy<br />
for Acquisition Reform to be published in the new year.<br />
Mr. Arbuthnot: To ask the Secretary of State for<br />
Defence pursuant to the written ministerial statement<br />
of 15 October 2009, Official Report, columns 34-36WS,<br />
on defence acquisition (independent review), what<br />
steps he plans to take (a) to improve the way in which<br />
projects in the equipment plan are costed, (b) to use<br />
better and more sophisticated techniques applied more<br />
consistently and (c) to ensure that investment<br />
decisions are based on the most reliable forecasts; and<br />
if he will make a statement. [295777]