04.06.2014 Views

View PDF - United Kingdom Parliament

View PDF - United Kingdom Parliament

View PDF - United Kingdom Parliament

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

29W<br />

Written Answers<br />

26 OCTOBER 2009<br />

Written Answers<br />

30W<br />

The output of the Territorial Army, University Officer<br />

Training Corps (UOTC) and Cadet Forces is focused on<br />

training and therefore all activity is either directly or<br />

indirectly attributable to planning, organising or conducting<br />

training.<br />

British Forces Post Office<br />

Mr. Dhanda: To ask the Secretary of State for<br />

Defence what his plans are for the future of the British<br />

Forces Post Office; and if he will make a statement.<br />

[295253]<br />

Bill Rammell: The information was published in Defence<br />

Internal Brief, Serial 2009DIB/37 dated 6 October 2009,<br />

copies of which are available in the Library of the<br />

House.<br />

Defence Board<br />

Mr. Arbuthnot: To ask the Secretary of State for<br />

Defence pursuant to the written ministerial statement<br />

of 15 October 2009, Official Report, columns 34-36WS,<br />

on defence acquisition (independent review), who the<br />

members of the new sub-committee of the Defence<br />

Board are; and if he will make a statement. [295775]<br />

Mr. Quentin Davies: As recommended in Bernard<br />

Gray’s recent report on Defence Acquisition, the members<br />

of the new Defence board sub-committee on equipment<br />

are the Permanent Under Secretary, the Chief of the<br />

Defence Staff, the 2nd Permanent Under Secretary, the<br />

Vice-Chief of the Defence Staff and the Director-General<br />

Finance. The sub-committee is charged with determining,<br />

for agreement by the Defence board and Ministers, an<br />

equipment plan that is aligned with strategy, affordable<br />

and realistic.<br />

Defence Medical Services<br />

Nick Harvey: To ask the Secretary of State for<br />

Defence how many compensation claims have been<br />

submitted by armed forces personnel in respect of<br />

malpractice on the part of Defence Medical Services;<br />

how many such claims were upheld; and how much was<br />

paid out against such claims in each year. [295645]<br />

Mr. Kevan Jones: The number of new clinical negligence<br />

compensation claims is not recorded on the Department’s<br />

claims database in a format that differentiates between<br />

service personnel, service dependants and civilian cases.<br />

The number of claims upheld and the amount of<br />

compensation, including legal costs, paid out each year<br />

to service personnel is identifiable. The figures are shown<br />

in the following table. Information relating to clinical<br />

negligence can be found in the Department’s Claims<br />

Annual Report which has been issued each year since<br />

1997-98, a copy of which is held in the Libraries of the<br />

Houses.<br />

All new clinical negligence claims received Service personnel claims upheld Compensation/legal costs (£ million)<br />

1997-98 308 21 0.4<br />

1998-99 255 51 2.3<br />

1999-2000 147 49 2.5<br />

2000-01 128 49 6.1<br />

2001-02 142 39 0.8<br />

2002-03 119 39 3.9<br />

2003-04 92 24 2.6<br />

2004-05 86 17 3.3<br />

2005-06 69 21 3.8<br />

2006-07 67 14 1.5<br />

2007-08 86 10 2.9<br />

2008-09 55 17 5.3<br />

Nick Harvey: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence<br />

what the (a) actual strength, (b) establishment and (c)<br />

percentage difference between establishment and actual<br />

strength is of each speciality of qualified medical personnel<br />

(a) in the Army and (b) tri-service. [295646]<br />

Mr. Kevan Jones: Manning statistics for the Defence<br />

Medical Services are updated twice a year, in April and<br />

October. The October 2009 figures are currently being<br />

collated, and verified figures should be available by the<br />

end of November. I will place these figures in the<br />

Library of the House.<br />

Defence: Procurement<br />

Mr. Arbuthnot: To ask the Secretary of State for<br />

Defence pursuant to the written ministerial statement<br />

of 15 October 2009, Official Report, columns 34-36WS,<br />

on defence acquisition (independent review), what<br />

arrangements he plans to make to provide greater visibility<br />

of project management costs in the Defence Equipment<br />

and Support Organisation to the Capability Sponsor in<br />

head office; and if he will make a statement. [295776]<br />

Mr. Quentin Davies: We are currently reviewing how<br />

best to provide greater visibility of project management<br />

costs, and this will be addressed as part of the Strategy<br />

for Acquisition Reform to be published in the new year.<br />

Mr. Arbuthnot: To ask the Secretary of State for<br />

Defence pursuant to the written ministerial statement<br />

of 15 October 2009, Official Report, columns 34-36WS,<br />

on defence acquisition (independent review), what<br />

steps he plans to take (a) to improve the way in which<br />

projects in the equipment plan are costed, (b) to use<br />

better and more sophisticated techniques applied more<br />

consistently and (c) to ensure that investment<br />

decisions are based on the most reliable forecasts; and<br />

if he will make a statement. [295777]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!