View PDF - United Kingdom Parliament
View PDF - United Kingdom Parliament
View PDF - United Kingdom Parliament
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1WS<br />
Written Ministerial Statements<br />
26 OCTOBER 2009<br />
Written Ministerial Statements<br />
2WS<br />
Written Ministerial<br />
Statements<br />
Monday 26 October 2009<br />
BUSINESS, ENTERPRISE AND REGULATORY<br />
REFORM<br />
EU Informal Competitiveness Council<br />
The <strong>Parliament</strong>ary Under-Secretary of State for Business,<br />
Innovation and Skills (Ian Lucas): The following statement<br />
provides information on the EU Informal Competitiveness<br />
Council that took place in Umeå, Sweden on 14 and<br />
16 October. My officials Andrew van der Lem, head of<br />
EU strategy (at the industry and internal market sessions<br />
on 14 and 15 October) and Professor Adrian Smith,<br />
director general of Science and Research (at the Research<br />
Council sessions on 15 and 16 October) represented<br />
the UK.<br />
At the internal market session on 14 October, priorities<br />
for future EU single market policy were discussed. The<br />
Commission is planning to make proposals by 2012 on<br />
a new single market package. In discussion, member<br />
states prioritised recovery from the economic crisis and<br />
financial stability, focusing on external (i.e. outside EU)<br />
competitiveness, improving the business environment<br />
and boosting consumer confidence. The importance of<br />
implementation of the EU services directive was also<br />
stressed. The UK emphasised the need for a joined up<br />
approach to EU single market, industry and research<br />
policy, with a focus on outcomes, the evidence base and<br />
external competitiveness. The UK also stressed the need<br />
to make the EU single market more accessible. The<br />
presidency concluded there was broad support for a<br />
new Commission package on the single market.<br />
At the industry session on 15 October, the presidency<br />
hosted a discussion on eco-efficiency from a competitiveness<br />
perspective, which included presentations by two businesses<br />
and a policy think-tank. The EU presidency suggested<br />
that EU member states should take a global lead in<br />
promoting growth and jobs through an eco-efficient<br />
economy. There was general support among member<br />
states that economic growth and environmental protection<br />
can be mutually reinforcing, not conflicting. However<br />
member states also stressed the need for a global “level<br />
playing field” and the importance of agreeing a global<br />
deal at the <strong>United</strong> Nations climate change conference at<br />
Copenhagen in December. In the informal breakout<br />
sessions, the UK stressed the need for the EU to be a<br />
good place to do business, for EU companies to have<br />
access to global markets, for a global carbon price to be<br />
agreed and for targeted EU funding and EU public<br />
procurement to help develop a low carbon economy.<br />
At the research Council sessions on 15 and 16 October,<br />
on the afternoon of the first day research ministers held<br />
discussions in break out groups on the future governance<br />
structures of the European Research Area (ERA); the<br />
outcome of these discussions was considered in a plenary<br />
session in the morning of the second day. While there<br />
was little support for the idea of establishing regular<br />
“ERA Ministerial” meetings, there was agreement that<br />
links between research, innovation and education policies<br />
needed to be strengthened and that the mandate of the<br />
Centre for Renewable Energy Systems Technology<br />
(CREST) advisory committee needed to give that body<br />
a more strategic role. Ministers also discussed expected<br />
cost overruns on the international ITER (International<br />
Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor) nuclear fusion<br />
facility. The UK stressed the need to find an acceptable<br />
solution to the funding issue.<br />
Correction to Response to <strong>Parliament</strong>ary Question<br />
The <strong>Parliament</strong>ary Under-Secretary of State for Business,<br />
Innovation and Skills (Ian Lucas): I would like to inform<br />
the House that a written answer I gave on 6 July 2009,<br />
Official Report, column 597W, to the hon. Member for<br />
Mid-Dorset and Poole North (Annette Brooke) was<br />
incorrect. To the question<br />
Annette Brooke: To ask the Minister of State, Department<br />
for Business, Innovation and Skills if he will make provision<br />
for the vehicle scrappage scheme to be open to persons<br />
who have taken on the registration of a vehicle over<br />
10-years-old which was initially registered in the name of<br />
their deceased spouse. [281255]<br />
The correct answer was:<br />
We have reviewed this issue carefully given that we consider the<br />
case of a recently bereaved spouse or civil partner to be particularly<br />
compelling and we would want to be as helpful as possible to<br />
those in this situation, while still ensuring that the scheme and<br />
compliance with the rules can be administered simply and abuse<br />
can be minimised. We therefore propose, subject to the agreement<br />
of vehicle manufacturers, that where a bereaved spouse or civil<br />
partner shares the same address as the person who was the former<br />
keeper of the car, that the requirement that the old vehicle must<br />
have been registered to the keeper continuously for 12 months<br />
before the order date of the new vehicle should be cut to six<br />
months (on a rolling basis).<br />
In addition to complying with other rules of the scheme, the<br />
bereaved would need to produce an original or certified copy of<br />
their marriage certificate or certificate of civil partnership and of<br />
their spouse/civil partner’s death certificate for the dealer to verify<br />
and copy.<br />
We have written to the manufacturers to seek their agreement<br />
to this change and will put revised guidance on the Department’s<br />
website at: http://www.berr.gov.uk/whatwedo/sectors/automotive/<br />
scrappage/page51068.html as soon as we are clear which manufacturers<br />
have agreed to this change to the scheme.<br />
I have written to the hon. Member for Mid-Dorset<br />
and Poole North to apologise for the administrative<br />
error, and provide the correct answer. I would also like<br />
to apologise to the House. The Department’s procedures<br />
for dealing with the answering of parliamentary questions<br />
have been revised to avoid any future occurrence of this<br />
error.<br />
CHILDREN, SCHOOLS AND FAMILIES<br />
Young People’s Information, Advice and Guidance<br />
The Secretary of State for Children, Schools and<br />
Families (Ed Balls): Today I will be launching a new<br />
strategy to transform information, advice and guidance<br />
(IAG) for young people.