04.06.2014 Views

View PDF - United Kingdom Parliament

View PDF - United Kingdom Parliament

View PDF - United Kingdom Parliament

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

177W<br />

Written Answers<br />

26 OCTOBER 2009<br />

Written Answers<br />

178W<br />

(this may be because the person gave different names, or<br />

different versions of their name, on separate arrests, or<br />

because of upgrading of profiles). It is currently estimated<br />

that 13.8 per cent. of profiles held on the NDNAD are<br />

replicates. The replication rate of 13.8 per cent. should<br />

only be applied over the entire database however, as the<br />

replication rate for individual police forces varies<br />

considerably. The presence of these replicate profiles on<br />

the NDNAD does not impact on the effectiveness and<br />

integrity of the database.<br />

Table 1<br />

Force<br />

Number of subject profiles as at<br />

15 October 2009<br />

Number of individuals<br />

(estimated)<br />

Proportion of total subject<br />

profiles held on the NDNAD<br />

(percentage)<br />

Scotland 271,693 — 4.6<br />

England and Wales, inc. BTP 5,532,847 — 93.6<br />

Northern Ireland 74,431 — 1.3<br />

Other 1 31,201 — 0.5<br />

Total 5,910,172 5,094,568 100.0<br />

1<br />

For example, Guernsey police, Ministry of Defence police etc.<br />

Table 2<br />

Force<br />

Number of crime scene profiles as at<br />

15 October 2009<br />

Proportion of crime scene profiles on the<br />

NDNAD (percentage)<br />

Scotland 13,153 3.6<br />

England and Wales, inc. BTP 351,367 95.6<br />

Northern Ireland 1,753 0.5<br />

Other 1 1,262 0.3<br />

Total 367,535 100<br />

1<br />

For example, Guernsey police, Ministry of Defence police etc.<br />

Dogs: Animal Welfare<br />

Mr. Sanders: To ask the Secretary of State for the<br />

Home Department what recent trends he has identified<br />

in the prevalence of dog fighting in the UK; and what<br />

steps his Department is taking to encourage police<br />

forces to allocate adequate resources towards reducing<br />

the incidence of dog fighting. [294918]<br />

Jim Fitzpatrick: I have been asked to reply.<br />

Our regular meetings with the RSPCA include reviewing<br />

dog fighting issues, which has long been an illegal<br />

activity. It is premature to speculate on the basis of the<br />

available evidence whether there have been any significant<br />

trends in the prevalence of dog fighting.<br />

However, the Animal Welfare Act 2006 updated and<br />

strengthened the law on animal fighting. The Act created<br />

separate offences for animal fighting and significantly<br />

increased the maximum financial penalties available to<br />

the courts for such offences. Anyone found guilty of an<br />

offence related to animal fighting is liable to a maximum<br />

fine of £20,000 (previously £5,000), or six months’<br />

imprisonment, or both.<br />

We have also recently published new guidance for the<br />

police on the enforcement of dangerous dogs law as<br />

well as provided the Association of Chief Police Officers<br />

(ACPO) with £20,000 to assist in the training of police<br />

officers in the use of dangerous dogs law. The guidance<br />

and training includes the identification of illegal pit bull<br />

type dogs that are commonly used in dog fighting.<br />

The Home Office are legislating (in the Policing and<br />

Crime Bill) to create a new power to prevent gang-related<br />

violence. This will enable police or local authorities to<br />

ask the courts to prohibit gang members from doing a<br />

number of things, including being in charge of an<br />

animal in a public place.<br />

Drug Interventions Programme<br />

Chris Huhne: To ask the Secretary of State for the<br />

Home Department how many and what proportion of<br />

people arrested and tested under the Drug Interventions<br />

Programme were positive for (a) heroin and (b) crack<br />

cocaine in each police force area in each year since 2003.<br />

[294178]<br />

Alan Johnson: The drug testing of offenders for specified<br />

Class A drugs (heroin and cocaine/crack) in police<br />

custody came into operation from 2003 across 30 Basic<br />

Command Units (BCUs) as part of the Drug Interventions<br />

Programme (DIP). Since that time the programme has<br />

expanded in a phased approach to 66 BCUs in 2004 and<br />

some 107 BCUs in 2005. DIP currently conducts drug<br />

testing in 109 BCUs across England and Wales.<br />

Only offenders arrested or charged with a “trigger<br />

offence”—largely acquisitive crime related offences—are<br />

required to provide a sample to be tested for specified<br />

Class A drugs.<br />

Tables 1, 2 and 3 show the number of positive tests<br />

under the Drug Interventions Programme for heroin<br />

only, cocaine only, and heroin and cocaine combined,<br />

for each financial year since data was available.<br />

Table 1: Heroin only<br />

Force 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09<br />

Avon and Somerset 223 213 408 319 334<br />

Bedfordshire 179 223 328 90 165<br />

Cambridgeshire 164 157 277 196 244<br />

City of London — — 124 84 102<br />

Cleveland 596 516 1,073 988 1,031

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!