04.06.2014 Views

View PDF - United Kingdom Parliament

View PDF - United Kingdom Parliament

View PDF - United Kingdom Parliament

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

159W<br />

Written Answers<br />

26 OCTOBER 2009<br />

Written Answers<br />

160W<br />

The questionnaire that most customers will fill in<br />

when they claim employment and support allowance<br />

(the ESA50) has been redesigned to make it more<br />

customer-friendly. We have improved the wording, lay-out<br />

and design of the form. The questionnaire used for the<br />

previous assessment did not fully take into account the<br />

cognitive functions of people with learning disabilities<br />

and other conditions such as brain damage, that are not<br />

mental health problems. The new questionnaire also<br />

includes the opportunity for individuals to detail fluctuations<br />

in the nature of their condition. Where customers suffer<br />

from mental health conditions, the claim will be progressed<br />

even if the questionnaire is not completed.<br />

Every month a customer satisfaction survey is sent at<br />

random to a large number of customers. This ensures<br />

an ongoing assessment of the customer experience and<br />

highlights any areas in need of review and improvement.<br />

In addition, to protect our most vulnerable customers,<br />

Jobcentre Plus has ensured that safeguards are embedded<br />

into the design and delivery of employment and support<br />

allowance. These safeguards ensure that where a customer<br />

has a mental health condition, and fails to comply with<br />

the Work Capability Assessment processes, benefit will<br />

not be withdrawn until their responsibilities have been<br />

explained to them either by telephone contact or a<br />

home visit.<br />

Industrial Injuries Scheme: Knees<br />

John Mann: To ask the Secretary of State for Work<br />

and Pensions what account her Department takes of<br />

the participation of miners in industrial action in 1984<br />

and 1985 when reckoning service in order to determine<br />

the compensation payable for (a) miners’ beat knee<br />

and (b) osteoarthritis of the knee. [292955]<br />

Jonathan Shaw [holding answer 14 October 2009]:<br />

Periods of industrial action in 1984 and 1985 are not<br />

relevant in considering entitlement to PD A6 (Beat<br />

Knee).<br />

For Osteoarthritis of the Knee, periods of industrial<br />

action exceeding three months in 1984 and 1985 do not<br />

qualify as time spent underground and therefore do not<br />

count towards the 10 year qualifying period.<br />

Jobcentre Plus: Telephone Services<br />

Jeff Ennis: To ask the Secretary of State for Work<br />

and Pensions what estimate she has made of the<br />

revenue guaranteed by the Jobseekers Direct telephone<br />

line in 2009-10. [291734]<br />

Jim Knight: The Department for Work and Pensions<br />

does not receive any revenue from the Jobseekers Direct<br />

telephone line.<br />

Jobseeker’s Allowance: Employment Schemes<br />

Steve Webb: To ask the Secretary of State for Work<br />

and Pensions what the average length of a work trial<br />

undertaken by a jobseeker’s allowance claimant was in<br />

each of the last 24 months. [293588]<br />

Jim Knight: The information requested is not available<br />

in the format requested. Such information that is available<br />

is in the following table:<br />

Duration of completed work trials by jobseeker’s allowance customers<br />

April 2009 to September 2009<br />

0-7 days<br />

duration<br />

8-21 days<br />

duration<br />

22+ days<br />

duration<br />

April 587 350 52<br />

May 974 471 74<br />

June 847 390 61<br />

July 1,234 515 94<br />

August 867 364 89<br />

September 995 444 99<br />

Note:<br />

The totals of the in-month figures are lower than the cumulative<br />

number of Work Trials completed. This is because the in-month<br />

figures are a snapshot taken on a particular date in the month,<br />

whereas the cumulative total figure reflects subsequent Work Trials<br />

that took place.<br />

Source:<br />

BOXI Management Information<br />

Steve Webb: To ask the Secretary of State for Work<br />

and Pensions how many jobseeker’s allowance claimants<br />

aged (a) 18 to 24 and (b) 25 to 59 years old in each<br />

region have completed a work trial in each of the last 24<br />

months; and if she will make a statement. [293594]<br />

Jim Knight: 11,239 work trials have been completed<br />

by jobseeker’s allowance customers from April 2009 to<br />

September 2009. The totals of the in-month figures are<br />

considerably lower than the total number of work trials<br />

completed. This is because the in-month figures are a<br />

snapshot taken on a particular date in the month,<br />

whereas the total figure reflects subsequent work trials<br />

that took place.<br />

The information requested is not available in the<br />

format requested. Such information that is available is<br />

in the following table:<br />

Work trial: jobseeker’s allowance completers April 2009 to September 2009<br />

Region April May June July August September<br />

East Midlands 81 82 92 120 117 84<br />

East of England 18 53 31 41 31 49<br />

London 144 238 144 259 194 272<br />

North East 86 151 93 125 73 111<br />

North West 132 195 158 239 162 170<br />

Office for Scotland 170 231 215 210 126 189<br />

Office for Wales 46 53 54 81 58 66<br />

South East 49 76 120 238 145 182<br />

South West 26 56 87 117 59 67<br />

West Midlands 93 99 122 156 156 150

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!