04.06.2014 Views

View PDF - United Kingdom Parliament

View PDF - United Kingdom Parliament

View PDF - United Kingdom Parliament

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

55W<br />

Written Answers<br />

26 OCTOBER 2009<br />

Written Answers<br />

56W<br />

Authority<br />

Percentage of waste sent to<br />

landfill in 2006-07<br />

Percentage of waste sent to<br />

landfill in 2007-08<br />

Difference between 2006-07 and<br />

2007-08<br />

Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames 69.45 73.42 3.97<br />

Sheffield City Council 14.55 16.38 1.83<br />

Southampton City Council 17.72 22.29 4.57<br />

Southwark LB 48.81 53.16 4.35<br />

Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council 10.54 13.96 3.41<br />

Torbay Council 67.97 71.19 3.22<br />

Tower Hamlets LB 83.08 88.66 5.58<br />

Wiltshire County Council 60.16 61.24 1.09<br />

Wolverhampton MBC 17.30 22.13 4.84<br />

Source:<br />

WasteDataFlow<br />

Litter: Rural Areas<br />

Mr. Marsden: To ask the Secretary of State for<br />

Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what steps he<br />

plans to take to reduce the incidence of littering in<br />

rural areas. [294995]<br />

Jim Fitzpatrick: The Government’s policy on tackling<br />

litter applies to all communities. There is no excuse for<br />

littering and local authorities have been given powers to<br />

deal with litterers, most recently through the Clean<br />

Neighbourhoods and Environment Act 2005. Littering<br />

is an offence and if convicted in a magistrates court an<br />

offender may receive a fine of up to £2,500 and a<br />

criminal record. As an alternative, local authorities<br />

have powers to issue on the spot fines of up to £80. The<br />

2005 Act includes a power for parish councils to issue<br />

on the spot fines for littering the first time.<br />

Through its annual grant to the charity Keep Britain<br />

Tidy, the Government campaign for behaviour change<br />

on litter. Campaigns like The Big Tidy Up and the<br />

Eco-Schools programme raise awareness of the issue,<br />

and get communities and individuals actively involved<br />

in clean-ups, in understanding the impact of littering<br />

and taking greater responsibility for their neighbourhoods.<br />

Local Government Association<br />

Mr. Stewart Jackson: To ask the Secretary of State<br />

for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs pursuant to<br />

the Answer to the hon. Member for Meriden of 15 July<br />

2009, Official Report, column 443W, on the Local<br />

Government Association, what guidance his Department<br />

has provided on the status of the Local Government<br />

Association in respect of the Environmental Information<br />

Regulations 2004. [294779]<br />

Dan Norris: My Department has not provided any<br />

guidance on the status of the Local Government<br />

Association in respect of the Environmental Information<br />

Regulations 2004 (EIRs).<br />

Guidance on which bodies may be public authorities<br />

under the EIRs is publicly available on the DEFRA<br />

website at:<br />

http://www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/policy/opengov/eir/<br />

guidance/full-guidance/pdf/guidance-2.pdf<br />

Pigs<br />

Lynne Jones: To ask the Secretary of State for<br />

Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what recent<br />

assessment he has made of the (a) costs and (b)<br />

benefits of maintaining the ban on raising pigs on swill.<br />

[295475]<br />

Jim Fitzpatrick: No formal assessment has been made.<br />

However, at the time when the ban was introduced in<br />

2001, around 70 swill processors lost trade and around<br />

90 swill feeders had to find alternative sources of feed.<br />

Restaurants, kitchens and factories producing food also<br />

had to find alternative disposal routes. These bodies<br />

have subsequently adapted to the new rules and so a<br />

cost comparison between then and now would be difficult<br />

to make.<br />

The benefits of maintaining the ban remain primarily<br />

the prevention of disease spread. As the 2001 Foot and<br />

Mouth Disease (FMD) outbreak demonstrated, the<br />

financial and practical consequences of one mistake in<br />

swill feeding can be enormous and potentially far outweigh<br />

the costs above. This FMD outbreak, the cause of<br />

which was thought to be the feeding of unprocessed<br />

swill to pigs, is estimated to have cost in the region of £8<br />

billion (including indirect costs) and the potential for<br />

re-introducing the disease by livestock being illegally<br />

fed on infected meat is a constant and on-going concern.<br />

For this reason, the Government support a maintenance<br />

of the EU wide ban which is now in place.<br />

Recycling<br />

Mr. Illsley: To ask the Secretary of State for<br />

Environment, Food and Rural Affairs whether he plans<br />

to introduce quotas on the minimum amount of<br />

recycled material to be used in (a) motor vehicle<br />

manufacture and (b) manufactured goods; and if he<br />

will make a statement. [295590]<br />

Dan Norris: There are no such plans.<br />

Ms Buck: To ask the Secretary of State for<br />

Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what proportion<br />

of waste was (a) recycled and (b) composted in<br />

2007-08 in each local authority area. [295798]<br />

Dan Norris: I have asked for the list of local authorities<br />

ranked by waste recycled and composted in 2007-08 to<br />

be placed in the Library of the House.<br />

Ms Buck: To ask the Secretary of State for<br />

Environment, Food and Rural Affairs which local<br />

authorities recycled or composted a smaller proportion<br />

of their total waste in 2007-08 than in 2006-07.<br />

[295847]<br />

Dan Norris: The following table shows the English<br />

local authorities that composted a smaller proportion<br />

of their total household waste in 2007-08 than in 2006-07.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!