here - United Kingdom Parliament

here - United Kingdom Parliament here - United Kingdom Parliament

publications.parliament.uk
from publications.parliament.uk More from this publisher
04.06.2014 Views

1733 Student Visas 6 JUNE 2013 Student Visas 1734 [Jeremy Corbyn] sham. They lost out, and some of them were deported even though they had done nothing wrong. Behind every statistic lies a human story, and we should look at the human story as well as the overall statistics when we deal with these issues. The National Union of Students has pointed out in its advice on this debate that, following a perception study, 40% of respondents to an NUS survey of 909 international students carried out last year said that they would not advise a friend or relative from their home country to come to the UK to study. We cannot afford that perception to be spread abroad. This debate is therefore important, and the Minister’s response to it and the way in which he handles this issue are possibly even more important. It we want to remain a place to which students want to come, we will have to ensure that they are treated properly and that they are allowed to work at the end of their course, particularly if they pursued a semi-vocational or professional qualification. If they cannot complete a period of work at the end of their course, the prospect of studying here will be less attractive and the prospect of studying elsewhere will become more so. The UK loses out as a result. As I said in a couple of interventions, I represent a constituency that includes London Metropolitan university, which has been put through the mill in media treatment and with funding problems like no other university in this country, so I would like to say a few things in its support. As a university, it is an amalgamation of many institutions, as most of them are, and it has given many people the huge opportunity to become the first in their family history to get into higher education. It has an unprecedented record of bringing in students from minority ethic communities and diverse backgrounds, and it should be applauded and complimented for that. Although the name is relatively new, London Metropolitan university is an amalgamation of a number of local institutions in north-east London that started serving the community in 1848. It is not exactly a Johnny-come-lately, although of course the situation has changed a great deal. Two things have happened. First, the Higher Education Funding Council for England decided some years ago to fine the university a great deal of money, but after a lot of representations, that money is now being repaid and the university is coping with that. Secondly, on 29 August last year, it had revoked its tier 4 licence and highly trusted status required to recruit non-European Economic Area students. That placed 2,000 international students at risk, including the current student union president and members of the student union executive. A survey done by the United Kingdom Border Agency claimed that there was a lack of attendance and monitoring, insufficient English language testing and overstaying of student visas. The students concerned were told that they had 60 days to find another institution or they would have to return to their own country. That resulted in a great deal of debate, including an urgent question in this Chamber and statements from the Government. The university sought High Court action against UKBA and was granted a hearing last September, when Mr Justice Irwin granted an order allowing all current international students to stay at the university until the end of the academic year 2013; judicial reviews are still continuing. Since then, there has been a great deal of discussion and negotiation between UKBA and the university, and procedures have been put in place. My concern was that a lot of wholly innocent international students were put under a great deal of stress and pressure. The university was not allowed to recruit international students for the forthcoming academic year, and that obviously has an impact on the local economy and on the university itself. I hope that the Minister can provide us with some hope—if not here today, perhaps by correspondence—that the negotiations will result in the revocation of the original ban on recruitment and that a number of overseas students can be recruited in the forthcoming academic year. I would be grateful if the Minister would answer some brief questions. A number of students who transferred to other institutions last September—nine months ago—still await a decision on their visa applications even though they were submitted in good time. Two additional cases, where students who completed their studies in February 2013 and put in applications for visa extensions, are still pending and have not been answered. That is a very long time to wait. In addition, there are many students who are no longer in contact with the London Met university, yet the Home Office was supposed to establish a casework team in Sheffield to deal with applications from both current and former students of London Met. I would be grateful if the Minister would explain exactly what has happened about that; is the Home Office still in touch with those students? I want London Met to be a successful university. I want it to be able to recruit international students as it did before, and I want those students to benefit from the experience of living in north and east London while they are studying there. I also want to highlight all that they bring to the university and all that they—and, indeed, the local economy—gain from it. The damage done to the international reputation of higher education by the handling of London Met is pretty serious indeed, on top of all the other problems that the Select Committee has rightly pointed out. I hope that the Minister will be able to tell me how many students have actually been removed from the country as a result of the decisions concerning London Met. The Home Office uses the words “probationary licence granted” for the restoration of tier 4 status, but there is nothing in legislation that talks about probationary licences. An institution either has tier 4 status grade A or a most-trusted status, which we obviously hope will be restored. I do not know where the word “probationary” comes from. Is a new point of law being introduced? Finally, will the Minister provide assurances that the 20 London Met students who submitted passports nine months ago and who now wish to leave the country will receive an answer in the next 28 days? In all fairness, those students spent a great deal of money coming to this country, many of them are from poor families who scrimped and saved to send them here, and they had to go through a dreadful experience. We want to move on. We want international students back at the university and the university to be thriving and providing good-quality education. That is the message I want to give. Our local community benefits from that university, and it frequently benefits from the community when community events and many other things are held there. We want it to be a good place of learning. Every colleague who represents

1735 Student Visas 6 JUNE 2013 Student Visas 1736 a constituency with a university or a higher education institution in it wants that for those institutions. It is up to the Minister to ensure that we continue to recruit overseas students and that they benefit from their learning experience in this country. 2.36 pm Chris Bryant (Rhondda) (Lab): Let me first pay tribute to my hon. Friend the Member for West Bromwich West (Mr Bailey) and all other Members who signed up to ensure that we had this afternoon’s debate. It is perhaps a sort of irony that the quality of the debate has been high, with an enormous degree of unanimity on the issues. I suspect that if the Chamber had been fuller, the debate might have been more partisan and there might have been less unanimity, but the debate we have had is a tribute to the way in which the argument has been advanced in several Select Committees and through the Select Committee process itself. Sometimes if we just look rationally at the facts, it is easier to reach a cross-party position. I studied abroad. I did part of my primary education in Spain; I studied theology at the Instituto Superior Evangélico de Estudios Teológicos in Argentina; so I understand the complications and difficulties of studying in other countries. I note that the hon. Member for Stratford-on-Avon (Nadhim Zahawi), of whom I am particularly fond, referred to Erasmus, talking about what has happened since Erasmus came here in the 16th century. It is interesting because when Erasmus first came here to study at Cambridge university in 1506, he did not complete a whole year so I do not think he would have been included in the net migration target. When he came again, in 1511, staying until 1515, he taught as the Lady Margaret Professor of Divinity at Cambridge university. In that case, he would have come here under the tier 2 visa, which would have been completely different and not the subject of this afternoon’s debate. Mr Andrew Smith: Does my hon. Friend think that the Home Office still has Erasmus’s passport? Chris Bryant: That is a point well made. Another hon. Member—I cannot remember who it was—referred to the fact that many Heads of State from around the world have studied in the United Kingdom. [Interruption.] It was the hon. Member for Croydon Central (Gavin Barwell), who speaks sanely and sensibly on many of these issues. As he said, some studied at Sandhurst, as many have been military leaders as well. It must surely be good, in terms of our soft power, that the Heads of State of Denmark, Portugal, Iceland, Norway, Turkey and many other countries have studied in the United Kingdom. I would also point to those who have had a more courageous political career, such as Aung San Suu Kyi, and, for that matter, to the large number of people who have come to the United Kingdom, studied here, stayed on and ended up teaching here, gaining Nobel prizes in classic instances such as Sydney Brenner, César Milstein and Aaron Klug. Perhaps most interesting of all, T S Eliot, now thought of as the quintessentially British poet of the 20th century, was originally born in the United States of America, came to study here at the beginning of the first world war and ended up staying here for the rest of his life. Perhaps it was because he had the experience of being a migrant student that he ended up writing so much about travelling and the difficulty of living in other cultures. Jason McCartney (Colne Valley) (Con): The hon. Gentleman just mentioned Sandhurst, and I ask him not to forget the royal naval training college at Darmouth and the RAF training college at Cranwell, which I attended. During my flight officer training we often thought it was the Omani officer, with the overseas costs, who actually funded the training costs of the British RAF officer cadets. Chris Bryant: Indeed, that is an important point. If we look at the number of people from Latin American militaries—air force, navy or army—who have historically had the Prussian tradition of military and then come to the UK to train in a British environment and completely changed their attitude towards democracy and the way in which the military operate in a democratic society, we see another positive aspect of people coming from other parts of the world to study here. Many hon. Members have rightly referred to the economic benefit of international students coming to study in this country. The Government estimate in 2009, produced by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, was that this country’s higher education exports came to a value of some £8 billion and could rise to £16.9 billion by 2025. That is one of the most significant areas of growth potential in the economy. As my hon. Friend the Member for Sheffield Central (Paul Blomfield) said, the University of Sheffield has produced an important report on the economic benefits that can arise from international students coming here. My hon. Friend the Member for Washington and Sunderland West (Mrs Hodgson) referred to the importance to the north-east of not only people studying and paying for their courses—many British people do not understand that international students pay fully for their course and, indeed, pay over the odds compared with British people, doing so in advance—but all the other benefits that come to the local economy. According to the University of Sheffield’s study, the relevant figure for Sheffield is £120 million a year. In addition, we need to consider the wide range of subjects studied. Some people want to say, “It is just about the brightest and the best coming to the United Kingdom.” I wholly agree with those who have said that it was absolutely right for the Government to deal with issue of bogus colleges, but it is not just university degrees at Oxford and Cambridge that we should be concerned with; this is also about postgraduate studies at many different universities and the English language. I would prefer people who are learning English around the world to learn about taps, not faucets, and about pavements, not sidewalks, because I would prefer them to have a British understanding of the English language and get it from the horse’s mouth. Many schools and universities have valued enormously exchange students coming to the United Kingdom, and they are important in relation to the shorter-term student visitor visa. There is not only an economic advantage to consider, but a social advantage, in terms of, the quality of the education students are able to get. If they are studying international politics or history and people

1735 Student Visas<br />

6 JUNE 2013<br />

Student Visas<br />

1736<br />

a constituency with a university or a higher education<br />

institution in it wants that for those institutions. It is up<br />

to the Minister to ensure that we continue to recruit<br />

overseas students and that they benefit from their learning<br />

experience in this country.<br />

2.36 pm<br />

Chris Bryant (Rhondda) (Lab): Let me first pay tribute<br />

to my hon. Friend the Member for West Bromwich<br />

West (Mr Bailey) and all other Members who signed up<br />

to ensure that we had this afternoon’s debate. It is<br />

perhaps a sort of irony that the quality of the debate<br />

has been high, with an enormous degree of unanimity<br />

on the issues. I suspect that if the Chamber had been<br />

fuller, the debate might have been more partisan and<br />

t<strong>here</strong> might have been less unanimity, but the debate we<br />

have had is a tribute to the way in which the argument<br />

has been advanced in several Select Committees and<br />

through the Select Committee process itself. Sometimes<br />

if we just look rationally at the facts, it is easier to reach<br />

a cross-party position.<br />

I studied abroad. I did part of my primary education<br />

in Spain; I studied theology at the Instituto Superior<br />

Evangélico de Estudios Teológicos in Argentina; so I<br />

understand the complications and difficulties of studying<br />

in other countries. I note that the hon. Member for<br />

Stratford-on-Avon (Nadhim Zahawi), of whom I am<br />

particularly fond, referred to Erasmus, talking about<br />

what has happened since Erasmus came <strong>here</strong> in the 16th<br />

century. It is interesting because when Erasmus first<br />

came <strong>here</strong> to study at Cambridge university in 1506, he<br />

did not complete a whole year so I do not think he<br />

would have been included in the net migration target.<br />

When he came again, in 1511, staying until 1515, he<br />

taught as the Lady Margaret Professor of Divinity at<br />

Cambridge university. In that case, he would have come<br />

<strong>here</strong> under the tier 2 visa, which would have been<br />

completely different and not the subject of this afternoon’s<br />

debate.<br />

Mr Andrew Smith: Does my hon. Friend think that<br />

the Home Office still has Erasmus’s passport?<br />

Chris Bryant: That is a point well made.<br />

Another hon. Member—I cannot remember who it<br />

was—referred to the fact that many Heads of State<br />

from around the world have studied in the <strong>United</strong><br />

<strong>Kingdom</strong>. [Interruption.] It was the hon. Member for<br />

Croydon Central (Gavin Barwell), who speaks sanely<br />

and sensibly on many of these issues. As he said, some<br />

studied at Sandhurst, as many have been military leaders<br />

as well. It must surely be good, in terms of our soft<br />

power, that the Heads of State of Denmark, Portugal,<br />

Iceland, Norway, Turkey and many other countries<br />

have studied in the <strong>United</strong> <strong>Kingdom</strong>.<br />

I would also point to those who have had a more<br />

courageous political career, such as Aung San Suu Kyi,<br />

and, for that matter, to the large number of people who<br />

have come to the <strong>United</strong> <strong>Kingdom</strong>, studied <strong>here</strong>, stayed<br />

on and ended up teaching <strong>here</strong>, gaining Nobel prizes in<br />

classic instances such as Sydney Brenner, César Milstein<br />

and Aaron Klug. Perhaps most interesting of all,<br />

T S Eliot, now thought of as the quintessentially British<br />

poet of the 20th century, was originally born in the<br />

<strong>United</strong> States of America, came to study <strong>here</strong> at the<br />

beginning of the first world war and ended up staying<br />

<strong>here</strong> for the rest of his life. Perhaps it was because he<br />

had the experience of being a migrant student that he<br />

ended up writing so much about travelling and the<br />

difficulty of living in other cultures.<br />

Jason McCartney (Colne Valley) (Con): The hon.<br />

Gentleman just mentioned Sandhurst, and I ask him<br />

not to forget the royal naval training college at Darmouth<br />

and the RAF training college at Cranwell, which I<br />

attended. During my flight officer training we often<br />

thought it was the Omani officer, with the overseas<br />

costs, who actually funded the training costs of the<br />

British RAF officer cadets.<br />

Chris Bryant: Indeed, that is an important point. If<br />

we look at the number of people from Latin American<br />

militaries—air force, navy or army—who have historically<br />

had the Prussian tradition of military and then come to<br />

the UK to train in a British environment and completely<br />

changed their attitude towards democracy and the way<br />

in which the military operate in a democratic society, we<br />

see another positive aspect of people coming from<br />

other parts of the world to study <strong>here</strong>.<br />

Many hon. Members have rightly referred to the<br />

economic benefit of international students coming to<br />

study in this country. The Government estimate in<br />

2009, produced by the Department for Business, Innovation<br />

and Skills, was that this country’s higher education<br />

exports came to a value of some £8 billion and could<br />

rise to £16.9 billion by 2025. That is one of the most<br />

significant areas of growth potential in the economy. As<br />

my hon. Friend the Member for Sheffield Central (Paul<br />

Blomfield) said, the University of Sheffield has produced<br />

an important report on the economic benefits that can<br />

arise from international students coming <strong>here</strong>. My hon.<br />

Friend the Member for Washington and Sunderland<br />

West (Mrs Hodgson) referred to the importance to the<br />

north-east of not only people studying and paying for<br />

their courses—many British people do not understand<br />

that international students pay fully for their course<br />

and, indeed, pay over the odds compared with British<br />

people, doing so in advance—but all the other benefits<br />

that come to the local economy. According to the<br />

University of Sheffield’s study, the relevant figure for<br />

Sheffield is £120 million a year.<br />

In addition, we need to consider the wide range of<br />

subjects studied. Some people want to say, “It is just<br />

about the brightest and the best coming to the <strong>United</strong><br />

<strong>Kingdom</strong>.” I wholly agree with those who have said that<br />

it was absolutely right for the Government to deal with<br />

issue of bogus colleges, but it is not just university<br />

degrees at Oxford and Cambridge that we should be<br />

concerned with; this is also about postgraduate studies<br />

at many different universities and the English language.<br />

I would prefer people who are learning English around<br />

the world to learn about taps, not faucets, and about<br />

pavements, not sidewalks, because I would prefer them<br />

to have a British understanding of the English language<br />

and get it from the horse’s mouth.<br />

Many schools and universities have valued enormously<br />

exchange students coming to the <strong>United</strong> <strong>Kingdom</strong>, and<br />

they are important in relation to the shorter-term student<br />

visitor visa. T<strong>here</strong> is not only an economic advantage to<br />

consider, but a social advantage, in terms of, the quality<br />

of the education students are able to get. If they are<br />

studying international politics or history and people

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!