here - United Kingdom Parliament
here - United Kingdom Parliament
here - United Kingdom Parliament
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1707 6 JUNE 2013 Student Visas<br />
1708<br />
Student Visas<br />
[Relevant documents: Fourth Report of the Business,<br />
Innovation and Skills Committee, Session 2012-13, Overseas<br />
Students and Net Migration, HC 425, and the Government<br />
response, Cm 8557, Seventh Report of the Business,<br />
Innovation and Skills Committee, Session 2012-13, Too<br />
little, Too late: Committee’s observations on the Government<br />
Response to the Report on Overseas Students and Net<br />
Migration, HC 1015, and the Government response, Cm 8622,<br />
Fifth Report of the Home Affairs Committee, Session<br />
2012-13, The work of the UK Border Agency (December<br />
2011-March 2012), HC 71, Sixth Special Report of the<br />
Home Affairs Committee, Session 2012-13, The work of<br />
the UK Border Agency (December 2011-March 2012):<br />
Government response to the Committee’s Fifth Report of<br />
Session 2012-13, HC 825, Eighth Report of the Home<br />
Affairs Committee, Session 2012-13, The work of the UK<br />
Border Agency (April-June 2012), HC 603, and the<br />
Government response, Cm 8591, Seventh Report of the<br />
Committee of Public Accounts, Session 2012-13,<br />
Immigration: The Points Based System–Student Route,<br />
HC 101, and the Treasury minute, Cm 8467]<br />
12.50 pm<br />
Mr Adrian Bailey (West Bromwich West) (Lab/Co-op):<br />
I beg to move,<br />
That this House notes the recommendations of the House of<br />
Commons Business, Innovation and Skills Committee, the Home<br />
Affairs Select Committee, and the Committee of Public Accounts,<br />
together with the House of Lords Science and Technology Committee<br />
and the EU Sub-Committee on Home Affairs, Health and Education,<br />
for the removal of students from net migration targets; and<br />
invites the Home Office to further consider the conclusions of<br />
these Committees in developing its immigration policy.<br />
I thank the Back-Bench Business Committee for<br />
allocating time for this important debate. I am grateful<br />
to those Members who helped me get this Back-Bench<br />
business debate: my hon. Friend the Member for Sheffield<br />
Central (Paul Blomfield), who is not only a fellow Select<br />
Committee member, but secretary of the all-party higher<br />
education group, whom I thank for the work that he has<br />
done, and the hon. Member for Stratford-on-Avon (Nadhim<br />
Zahawi), whom I thank for the assiduous way in which<br />
he has backed the Select Committee recommendations<br />
and worked to ensure that they get wider recognition.<br />
The motion demonstrates that t<strong>here</strong> have been five<br />
Select Committee reports on this subject. All have examined<br />
the student visas issue, all have come to similar conclusions<br />
and all have been consistently rejected by the Home<br />
Office, even though a considerable number of Government<br />
Members on the relevant Select Committees have backed<br />
those reports. However, the wording of the motion is<br />
deliberately designed not to pursue a confrontational<br />
approach with the Home Office, and I will not seek to<br />
divide the House on the motion. Rather, the motion has<br />
been tabled in order to give the House an opportunity<br />
to present a case for removing students from the net<br />
migration figures in a way that will be evidence-led and<br />
lead to further consideration in the evolution and, I<br />
hope, refinement of the Government’s immigration policies.<br />
Keith Vaz (Leicester East) (Lab): Will my hon. Friend<br />
give way?<br />
Mr Bailey: Yes, I could not resist the Chair of the<br />
Home Affairs Committee.<br />
Keith Vaz: I am grateful to my hon. Friend. I congratulate<br />
him on securing the debate and accurately reflecting the<br />
views of the Home Affairs Committee.<br />
Does my hon. Friend agree that the way we conduct<br />
this debate—the language that we use—is extremely<br />
important? Over the past year, in the case of India, for<br />
example, t<strong>here</strong> has been a 30% decline in the number of<br />
students coming to this country because the message<br />
has got out that they are not welcome <strong>here</strong>. Our message<br />
is that they are welcome <strong>here</strong>, and we need to reflect this<br />
in the debate that we have and in Government policy.<br />
Mr Bailey: My right hon. Friend makes an important<br />
point. It is not just the regulatory regime, but the<br />
language surrounding the introduction and implementation<br />
of that regulatory regime, which define international<br />
perception of our policy. I will touch on that in the<br />
course of my remarks.<br />
Dr Julian Huppert (Cambridge) (LD): I congratulate<br />
the hon. Gentleman and his Committee on securing this<br />
debate on a very important issue. International students<br />
make a huge difference. Apologies from me and, I am<br />
sure, from the Chair of the Home Affairs Committee, as<br />
we have a Home Affairs Committee debate in another<br />
place which starts shortly.<br />
Further to the question from the Select Committee<br />
Chair, does the hon. Gentleman agree that t<strong>here</strong> are<br />
three things that we have to get right—the rhetoric, the<br />
policy and the administration? If we fall foul of any of<br />
those, we will not get the outcomes that we need.<br />
Mr Bailey: I agree. In varying degrees, none of those<br />
is right at present.<br />
Before I go on to the substance of the issues, let me<br />
make it clear that no MP in any party can be unaware of<br />
public concerns about immigration or can fail to recognise<br />
the legitimacy of the Government’s intentions to address<br />
that. Similarly, I do not think that any MP in any party<br />
can object to actions being taken against bogus colleges<br />
and the use of education as a route to illegal immigration.<br />
I am sure all MPs of all parties would stand behind the<br />
Government and the education system as a whole in<br />
seeking to block that.<br />
Mr Barry Sheerman (Huddersfield) (Lab/Co-op): I<br />
congratulate the Chairman of the Select Committee on<br />
this very good report. It meshes well with the Higher<br />
Education Commission report on post-graduate education,<br />
which he will know of. What is good about his report<br />
is that it flags up in a sensible way the problems of<br />
migration and bogus colleges, but points out strongly<br />
that, within this international market and this great<br />
employment and wealth creator, the universities of this<br />
country and post-graduate education in particular are<br />
sensitive to the possible reaction of legitimate students—<br />
highly qualified people—who come <strong>here</strong>.<br />
Mr Bailey: The hon. Gentleman addresses an important<br />
point. Skills and higher education is now a global<br />
market. Those with the best brains are increasingly<br />
footloose and go to the places w<strong>here</strong> they think they<br />
will get the best opportunity to develop their expertise<br />
and w<strong>here</strong> they feel they will get the warmest welcome.<br />
It is in that international context that we must look at<br />
our policies on student visas.