04.06.2014 Views

here - United Kingdom Parliament

here - United Kingdom Parliament

here - United Kingdom Parliament

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1679 Business of the House<br />

6 JUNE 2013<br />

Business of the House<br />

1680<br />

to debate Libya on a substantive motion—that any<br />

decision relating specifically to the arming of the Syrian<br />

National Coalition or others in Syria would be the<br />

subject of debate and an opportunity for a vote in this<br />

House.<br />

Keith Vaz (Leicester East) (Lab): In evidence to the<br />

Home Affairs Committee on Tuesday, Cressida Dick,<br />

the head of counter-terrorism at the Metropolitan police,<br />

told the Committee that, on one hand they were proposing<br />

to assess protection for Anjem Choudary, but on the<br />

other they were considering prosecuting him for racist<br />

and inflammatory statements. He is a former member<br />

of a number of proscribed organisations. May we have<br />

a statement on any guidance that the Home Secretary<br />

has issued about the protection of people who go out of<br />

their way to inflame tensions?<br />

Mr Lansley: The right hon. Gentleman will of course<br />

understand that I am not in a position to make any<br />

comment about any individual case. I am sure that the<br />

Home Secretary—as the right hon. Gentleman knows,<br />

she has done this before and will do so again—will keep<br />

the House fully updated about any actions she is taking<br />

relating to tackling violent extremism and tackling those<br />

who seek to propagate views promoting violent extremism<br />

and terrorism in this country.<br />

Mr John Leech (Manchester, Withington) (LD): In<br />

the light of recent speculation that the London-based<br />

Science Museum Group could axe three regional museums,<br />

including Manchester’s Museum of Science and Industry,<br />

to protect the London Science Museum, may we have a<br />

debate on the future of funding for museums and the<br />

need to protect our regional cultural assets?<br />

Mr Lansley: I am grateful to my hon. Friend. I am<br />

sure that many Members will share with him a sense of<br />

the importance of the Science Museum Group, including,<br />

in particular, the Museum of Science and Industry in<br />

Manchester. The group receives over 5 million visitors a<br />

year, so it is very important. It received a real-terms<br />

reduction in its overall funding in the previous funding<br />

review and, obviously, I am not in a position to talk<br />

about any future spending review. The distribution of<br />

funding within the Science Museum Group is an operational<br />

matter for the group itself, but I will bring the point<br />

raised by my hon. Friend to the attention of my right<br />

hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Culture, Media<br />

and Sport.<br />

Mr John Baron (Basildon and Billericay) (Con): May<br />

I seek absolute clarity on what the Leader of the House<br />

kindly said about a debate on arming the Syrian rebels?<br />

Are the Government committed to having a substantive<br />

debate and vote before any decision is made on whether<br />

to arm the Syrian rebels, even if <strong>Parliament</strong> is in recess<br />

at the time? Will we get that debate before any policy is<br />

implemented?<br />

Mr Lansley: Let me be clear: as the Prime Minister<br />

made perfectly clear yesterday, that question has not<br />

yet arisen because no such decision has been made.<br />

The Prime Minister was clear, as he was in relation to<br />

Libya, that he will seek to secure an opportunity for the<br />

House to debate and express its view through a vote on<br />

these matters. It is, of course, a hypothetical question<br />

at present. The Prime Minister is determined, as is the<br />

Foreign Secretary, that the House should have the<br />

opportunity, as was the case with Libya, to express its<br />

view.<br />

John Cryer (Leyton and Wanstead) (Lab): The Deputy<br />

Prime Minister has been trailing his lobbying Bill all<br />

over the press yet again, and this time his ideas seem to<br />

be staggeringly inco<strong>here</strong>nt even by his standards. It is<br />

three years since the Prime Minister’s original remarks.<br />

When will the Deputy Prime Minister make a statement<br />

to the House or even present a Bill? After all, it is many<br />

months since the consultation exercise closed.<br />

Mr Lansley: The coalition agreement is very clear<br />

that we will introduce legislation. The Prime Minister<br />

said in response to a question yesterday that we will<br />

legislate to tackle the issue of third-party influence in<br />

our political system. We are looking to introduce proposals<br />

before the summer recess.<br />

Alec Shelbrooke (Elmet and Rothwell) (Con): Could<br />

we have a debate on the practices of companies such as<br />

Phyderma and Elisa Jewels, which actively seek to scam<br />

British pensioners by enticing them to purchase catalogue<br />

items with the promise that they will win prizes such as<br />

new cars and luxury holidays? I recently met a distraught<br />

constituent whose father has spent more than £5,000 to<br />

date on these false promises.<br />

Mr Lansley: I am grateful to my hon. Friend. Members<br />

will sympathise with him and his constituents about<br />

these matters, which come up for many of us. Misleading<br />

or false promotional or other advertising material is<br />

covered by the advertising code of practice, which is<br />

policed by the Advertising Standards Authority, with<br />

which my hon. Friend may wish to raise these matters.<br />

Failure to comply with ASA rulings can also result in<br />

referral to the Office of Fair Trading, so that is a further<br />

avenue for him to take if he is not initially successful.<br />

Siobhain McDonagh (Mitcham and Morden) (Lab):<br />

May we have a debate on something that affects a large<br />

number of Members of all parties, namely the rules<br />

used by the NHS to consult on hospital closures? In my<br />

own area the “Better Services, Better Value” scheme<br />

proposes to close the A and E and maternity units at St<br />

Helier hospital after a 12-week consultation over the<br />

school summer holidays at a time when it is difficult to<br />

find venues and get people to volunteer to assist in<br />

gathering the information in order to discuss the schemes.<br />

Could that debate also include a discussion about the<br />

rules on giving notice about venues and dates for important<br />

meetings w<strong>here</strong> members of the public might wish to<br />

see the NHS making decisions on its future?<br />

Mr Lansley: My colleagues from the Health Department<br />

will be <strong>here</strong> to answer questions on Tuesday, if the hon.<br />

Lady would like to raise the issue of the NHS’s internal<br />

guidance on the conduct of consultations, which should<br />

also, of course, reflect the guidance issued by the Cabinet<br />

Office. The hon. Lady will be aware, as I hope all<br />

Members are, that if the overview and scrutiny committees<br />

of local authorities are not satisfied with the procedure,<br />

evidence or outcome of consultations, they can refer

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!