here - United Kingdom Parliament

here - United Kingdom Parliament here - United Kingdom Parliament

publications.parliament.uk
from publications.parliament.uk More from this publisher
04.06.2014 Views

1661 Oral Answers 6 JUNE 2013 Oral Answers 1662 Michael Fallon: We are in touch with the Scottish Government. I have ensured that an official from my Department attends meetings of the taskforce set up following the collapse of the Scottish company. We will learn lessons from what has happened in Scotland, and if the British Government can help, of course we will. Andrew Bridgen (North West Leicestershire) (Con): Will my right hon. Friend explain what role he sees the energy efficiency strategy playing in reducing demand for energy? Gregory Barker: My hon. Friend will know that earlier this year the Prime Minister launched our first-ever national energy efficiency mission. We are determined always to pursue the cheapest option, including where the cheapest option is saving energy rather than building new plant, but we will do that in a way that is good for consumers and gives us lower bills as well as cleaner energy. Several hon. Members rose— Mr Speaker: Order. If we are to accommodate the several remaining colleagues, very short answers will be required. Derek Twigg (Halton) (Lab): Will the Secretary of State have another go at answering my earlier question? He said he met the energy companies last month. Let me put the question this way: when he met them, did he raise any concerns about the level of profits they were making, and, if so, what did they say? Mr Davey: I do not think that profits were part of a specific conversation. This issue is about the whole market: how we ensure more competition and more investment and how we protect consumers from rising global prices by ensuring that they help us deal with energy efficiency. Mr Peter Bone (Wellingborough) (Con): In order to save money and improve Government efficiency, would the excellent Secretary of State agree to close his Department and transfer its responsibilities to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills? He, then, could become the Business Secretary, freeing up the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, the right hon. Member for Twickenham (Vince Cable), to concentrate on his campaign to become the next leader of the Liberal Democrats. It would be a win, win situation for everyone. Mr Davey: You will know, Mr Speaker, that the Liberal Democrats always listen to the hon. Gentleman’s advice, because it is always meant as a helpful contribution. I can tell him, however, that my right hon. Friend the Member for Sevenoaks (Michael Fallon) is a fantastic Minister of State and does a brilliant job not only in my Department, but in the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, so we are already very well connected. Diana Johnson (Kingston upon Hull North) (Lab): The Secretary of State told me earlier that he was concerned about all Kingstons in this country. On that basis, would he agree to meet me and a delegation from Kingston upon Hull to discuss what more the coalition Government can do to support Siemens coming to Hull? Mr Davey: Yes. Duncan Hames (Chippenham) (LD): I welcome the Minister’s support for biomass boilers, but the renewable heat incentive was announced in October 2010. Why is it not possible to open up the domestic scheme for payment before spring 2014? Gregory Barker: It has been much more challenging than we anticipated, not least because when we entered government we found that the previous Government had done absolutely no work on this whatsoever. This is the first renewable heat scheme of its type in the world, and heat is much more difficult to quantify and value than exporting electricity, but it is good news. We prioritised industrial heat and are now moving on to domestic heat, and I am looking forward to the scheme’s launch this spring. Julie Hilling (Bolton West) (Lab): The Minister claims that the energy company obligation will help people in fuel poverty, but is it not true that nearly 60% of the funding will go to households that can already afford to pay, not to those people in fuel poverty? Gregory Barker: It is anticipated that more than £500 million of the ECO funding will go directly to the most vulnerable and those who need it most, but the balance of the energy company obligation is intended to support roll-outs street by street. It was the specific nature of previous Government schemes under Labour that made them so bureaucratic and ineffective. Our view is that we ultimately need to focus on properties, not just the individuals who live in them. Miss Anne McIntosh (Thirsk and Malton) (Con): The co-firing of biomass at power stations such as Drax brings enormous opportunities to growers and farmers in Thirsk and Malton, but will the Minister or Secretary of State assure the House that unfair subsidies to imported wood chip are not undermining our home-grown produce? Mr Davey: The hon. Lady will know that our schemes apply to all companies, wherever they are from. We need to ensure that we invest in renewables such as biomass, but in a way that meets our sustainability criteria and creates a proper, fair market.

1663 6 JUNE 2013 Onshore Wind (Planning Policy) 1664 Onshore Wind (Planning Policy) 10.30 am Chris Heaton-Harris (Daventry) (Con) (Urgent Question): To ask the Minister for Housing if he will make a statement on planning policy in relation to onshore wind. The Minister for Housing (Mr Mark Prisk): The coalition agreement pledged to decentralise power to local people. We are committed to giving local people far more ability to shape the places in which they live. Through a series of reforms, this coalition Government are making the planning process more accessible to local communities. Planning works best when communities themselves have the opportunity to influence the decisions that affect their lives. However, current planning decisions on onshore wind do not always reflect a locally led planning system. Following a wide range of representations, including the letter of 30 January 2012 to the Prime Minister from 100 hon. Members, and in light of the Department of Energy and Climate Change’s call for evidence, it has become clear that action is needed to deliver the balance expected by the national planning policy framework. We need to ensure that protecting the local environment is properly considered alongside the broader issues of protecting the global environment. Today my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change has published the response to his call for evidence on onshore wind and my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government is publishing a written ministerial statement that will set out a number of key changes that I know the House will wish to consider. Let me set out the key elements for the benefit of the House and my hon. Friend the Member for Daventry (Chris Heaton-Harris). First, we want to strengthen the voice of local people. The submissions to the call for evidence have highlighted the benefits of good quality pre-application discussions for onshore wind development and the improved outcomes they can have for local communities. We will amend secondary legislation to make pre-application consultation with local communities compulsory for the more significant onshore wind applications. This will ensure that community engagement takes place at an earlier stage and may assist in improving the quality of proposed onshore wind development. It will also complement the community benefits proposals announced by the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change. Secondly, on better planning guidance, the national planning policy framework we published last year includes strong protections for the natural and historic environment. However, I know that local communities have genuine concerns that insufficient weight is being given to environmental considerations such as landscape, amenity or heritage. We need to ensure that decisions get the environmental balance right, in line with the framework, and that any adverse impact from a wind farm development is addressed satisfactorily. We have been equally clear that this means facilitating sustainable development in suitable locations. Put simply, meeting our energy goals should not be used to justify the wrong development in the wrong location. We are looking to local councils to include in their local plans policies that ensure that adverse impacts from wind farm developments, including cumulative landscape and visual impact, are addressed satisfactorily. Where councils have identified areas suitable for onshore wind, they should not feel they have to give permission for speculative applications outside those areas when they judge the impact to be unacceptable. To help to ensure that planning decisions reflect the balance in the framework, my Department will shortly issue new planning practice guidance to assist local councils and planning inspectors in their consideration of local plans and individual applications. Briefly, the guidance will set out, first, that the need for renewable energy does not automatically override environmental protections and the planning concerns of local communities. Secondly, decisions should take into account the cumulative impact of wind turbines and properly reflect the increasing impact on the landscape and local amenity. Thirdly, local topography should be a factor in assessing whether wind turbines have a damaging impact on the landscape. Fourthly, great care should be taken to ensure that heritage assets are conserved in a manner appropriate to their significance, including the impact of proposals on views important to their setting. We will be writing to the Planning Inspectorate and to all councils to flag up the new guidance and its operation. This Government firmly believe that renewables have an important role to play in a balanced energy policy. However, as a localist Government, we also firmly believe that planning works best when local people are able to shape their local environment. Chris Heaton-Harris: Thank you for granting this urgent question, Mr Speaker. I should like to draw the House’s attention to my entry in the Register of Members’ Financial Interests. I thank the Minister for his reply, but it is a shame that this was not announced to the House first. Should the Department of Energy and Climate Change have been briefing the media on this announcement 24 hours before it was announced in this place, especially when its planning element comes from the Department for Communities and Local Government and is time-sensitive and commercially significant? What will be the impact of the policy change on proposed developments that are currently in the planning process, particularly those that are in the planning appeals system and whose appeal has been concluded but the result is not yet known? Will the proposed change be retrospective for schemes that have been granted planning permission against the wishes of the local communities or councils, but whose construction has not yet started? For too long, developers have ridden roughshod over the views of local communities and local councils on inappropriately sited wind turbines. Can the Minister elaborate on how the new policy will be communicated to the Planning Inspectorate and local planning authorities, and on the timeline that will be involved? There might have been some confusion within Government Departments about these matters, but I wholeheartedly welcome the planning changes. I really believe that this could be the beginning of the end of unwanted onshore wind farm development in England, and I welcome the Minister’s statement. Several hon. Members rose—

1663 6 JUNE 2013 Onshore Wind (Planning Policy) 1664<br />

Onshore Wind (Planning Policy)<br />

10.30 am<br />

Chris Heaton-Harris (Daventry) (Con) (Urgent<br />

Question): To ask the Minister for Housing if he will<br />

make a statement on planning policy in relation to<br />

onshore wind.<br />

The Minister for Housing (Mr Mark Prisk): The<br />

coalition agreement pledged to decentralise power to<br />

local people. We are committed to giving local people<br />

far more ability to shape the places in which they live.<br />

Through a series of reforms, this coalition Government<br />

are making the planning process more accessible to<br />

local communities. Planning works best when communities<br />

themselves have the opportunity to influence the decisions<br />

that affect their lives. However, current planning decisions<br />

on onshore wind do not always reflect a locally led<br />

planning system.<br />

Following a wide range of representations, including<br />

the letter of 30 January 2012 to the Prime Minister from<br />

100 hon. Members, and in light of the Department of<br />

Energy and Climate Change’s call for evidence, it has<br />

become clear that action is needed to deliver the balance<br />

expected by the national planning policy framework.<br />

We need to ensure that protecting the local environment<br />

is properly considered alongside the broader issues of<br />

protecting the global environment. Today my right hon.<br />

Friend the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate<br />

Change has published the response to his call for evidence<br />

on onshore wind and my right hon. Friend the Secretary<br />

of State for Communities and Local Government is<br />

publishing a written ministerial statement that will set<br />

out a number of key changes that I know the House will<br />

wish to consider. Let me set out the key elements for the<br />

benefit of the House and my hon. Friend the Member<br />

for Daventry (Chris Heaton-Harris).<br />

First, we want to strengthen the voice of local people.<br />

The submissions to the call for evidence have highlighted<br />

the benefits of good quality pre-application discussions<br />

for onshore wind development and the improved outcomes<br />

they can have for local communities. We will amend<br />

secondary legislation to make pre-application consultation<br />

with local communities compulsory for the more significant<br />

onshore wind applications. This will ensure that community<br />

engagement takes place at an earlier stage and may<br />

assist in improving the quality of proposed onshore<br />

wind development. It will also complement the community<br />

benefits proposals announced by the Secretary of State<br />

for Energy and Climate Change.<br />

Secondly, on better planning guidance, the national<br />

planning policy framework we published last year includes<br />

strong protections for the natural and historic environment.<br />

However, I know that local communities have genuine<br />

concerns that insufficient weight is being given to<br />

environmental considerations such as landscape, amenity<br />

or heritage. We need to ensure that decisions get the<br />

environmental balance right, in line with the framework,<br />

and that any adverse impact from a wind farm development<br />

is addressed satisfactorily.<br />

We have been equally clear that this means facilitating<br />

sustainable development in suitable locations. Put simply,<br />

meeting our energy goals should not be used to justify<br />

the wrong development in the wrong location. We are<br />

looking to local councils to include in their local plans<br />

policies that ensure that adverse impacts from wind<br />

farm developments, including cumulative landscape and<br />

visual impact, are addressed satisfactorily. W<strong>here</strong> councils<br />

have identified areas suitable for onshore wind, they<br />

should not feel they have to give permission for speculative<br />

applications outside those areas when they judge the<br />

impact to be unacceptable.<br />

To help to ensure that planning decisions reflect the<br />

balance in the framework, my Department will shortly<br />

issue new planning practice guidance to assist local<br />

councils and planning inspectors in their consideration<br />

of local plans and individual applications. Briefly, the<br />

guidance will set out, first, that the need for renewable<br />

energy does not automatically override environmental<br />

protections and the planning concerns of local communities.<br />

Secondly, decisions should take into account the cumulative<br />

impact of wind turbines and properly reflect the increasing<br />

impact on the landscape and local amenity. Thirdly,<br />

local topography should be a factor in assessing whether<br />

wind turbines have a damaging impact on the landscape.<br />

Fourthly, great care should be taken to ensure that<br />

heritage assets are conserved in a manner appropriate<br />

to their significance, including the impact of proposals<br />

on views important to their setting.<br />

We will be writing to the Planning Inspectorate and<br />

to all councils to flag up the new guidance and its<br />

operation. This Government firmly believe that renewables<br />

have an important role to play in a balanced energy<br />

policy. However, as a localist Government, we also firmly<br />

believe that planning works best when local people are<br />

able to shape their local environment.<br />

Chris Heaton-Harris: Thank you for granting this<br />

urgent question, Mr Speaker. I should like to draw the<br />

House’s attention to my entry in the Register of Members’<br />

Financial Interests.<br />

I thank the Minister for his reply, but it is a shame<br />

that this was not announced to the House first. Should<br />

the Department of Energy and Climate Change have<br />

been briefing the media on this announcement 24 hours<br />

before it was announced in this place, especially when<br />

its planning element comes from the Department for<br />

Communities and Local Government and is time-sensitive<br />

and commercially significant? What will be the impact<br />

of the policy change on proposed developments that<br />

are currently in the planning process, particularly those<br />

that are in the planning appeals system and whose<br />

appeal has been concluded but the result is not yet<br />

known? Will the proposed change be retrospective for<br />

schemes that have been granted planning permission<br />

against the wishes of the local communities or councils,<br />

but whose construction has not yet started?<br />

For too long, developers have ridden roughshod over<br />

the views of local communities and local councils on<br />

inappropriately sited wind turbines. Can the Minister<br />

elaborate on how the new policy will be communicated<br />

to the Planning Inspectorate and local planning authorities,<br />

and on the timeline that will be involved?<br />

T<strong>here</strong> might have been some confusion within<br />

Government Departments about these matters, but I<br />

wholeheartedly welcome the planning changes. I really<br />

believe that this could be the beginning of the end of<br />

unwanted onshore wind farm development in England,<br />

and I welcome the Minister’s statement.<br />

Several hon. Members rose—

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!