04.06.2014 Views

here - United Kingdom Parliament

here - United Kingdom Parliament

here - United Kingdom Parliament

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

903 National Policy Statements 1 DECEMBER 2010 National Policy Statements 904<br />

Tessa Munt: Thank you. Will that investigation examine<br />

the cost of under-sea infrastructure as well? I understand<br />

that the project will look at networks not just underground,<br />

but under-sea. Is that correct?<br />

Charles Hendry: That is my understanding of the<br />

report. We are all keen to have a fact-based scientific<br />

assessment of the relative costs. I know that in the hon.<br />

Lady’s constituency and many others t<strong>here</strong> has been<br />

great concern and a need to know the costs of different<br />

ways of dealing with the issues, so I hope the report will<br />

examine the under-sea aspects as well.<br />

Tessa Munt rose—<br />

Dr Thérèse Coffey (Suffolk Coastal) (Con) rose—<br />

Charles Hendry: I will give way to my hon. Friend,<br />

who has some issues in Suffolk.<br />

Dr Coffey: Thank you. We do indeed have issues in<br />

East Anglia, and in Suffolk in particular. We have an<br />

enormous number of offshore wind farms, yet the green<br />

impact of pylons across our countryside is hardly palatable.<br />

I welcome the changes being made, and hope that we<br />

will have more detailed calculations of the costs and the<br />

impact of the benefits.<br />

Charles Hendry: I shall give way again to the hon.<br />

Member for Wells and deal with both issues together.<br />

Tessa Munt: How can I and my constituents be<br />

assured that the study is wholly independent and is not<br />

in any way informed or directed by National Grid?<br />

Charles Hendry: I would hope that the nature of the<br />

Institute of Engineering and Technology, and its track<br />

record for independence and fact-based assessment,<br />

would be sufficient to assure everyone that a thorough<br />

approach will be taken. T<strong>here</strong> is no doubt in any of our<br />

minds that if anybody tried to steer its conclusions one<br />

way or the other it would publicly require them to go<br />

away. I am absolutely satisfied that the process will be<br />

independent and robust, but in due course the institute<br />

will publish the full report so that it can be peer-reviewed.<br />

Dr Alan Whitehead (Southampton, Test) (Lab): Before<br />

the hon. Gentleman leaves EN-5, will he reflect on the<br />

question that he raised previously about investment in<br />

new infrastructure through the electricity markets as<br />

they stood, and the extent to which that investment<br />

stayed in existing equipment to shore up the electricity<br />

market? In the new circumstances, w<strong>here</strong> investment in<br />

infrastructure will increasingly be required before the<br />

replacement of plant, will EN-5 reflect that change<br />

fully? If not, could the energy market reforms that he<br />

will undertake shortly inform a revision of EN-5 to take<br />

those new circumstances into account?<br />

Charles Hendry: We have to see the national policy<br />

statements as part of the process. They are an integral<br />

part of an improved planning process, but they are not<br />

the full package. Electricity market reform will also be a<br />

key element in incentivising people to invest. Let me<br />

give an example of how things are changing. I was<br />

recently with Ofgem launching the second round of<br />

offshore grid transmission infrastructure bids. More<br />

than 100 different organisations, most of which were<br />

new players in this area, were keen to take part in that<br />

process, which was started by the previous Administration.<br />

A number of new organisations—new financial<br />

institutions—want to invest in our energy infrastructure,<br />

which is extremely encouraging, but to see the full<br />

package of these measures it will be necessary to ensure<br />

that they see the planning changes and the funding<br />

mechanisms that will drive it forward.<br />

Andrew Percy rose—<br />

Charlie Elphicke rose—<br />

Charles Hendry: I shall take a couple of interventions<br />

and then seek to conclude my remarks.<br />

Andrew Percy: While we are on the subject of new<br />

players coming into our energy industry, I invite the<br />

Minister to visit north Lincolnshire and the site of the<br />

South Humber Gateway project, w<strong>here</strong> we hope to<br />

cluster a number of offshore wind farm manufacturers<br />

with the potential to create 5,000 jobs initially, possibly<br />

rising to 20,000. It will be incredibly important to our<br />

region, so I invite the Minister to join me and my hon.<br />

Friend the Member for Cleethorpes (Martin Vickers)<br />

on a visit some time soon.<br />

Charles Hendry: I know that both my hon. Friends<br />

have done sterling work in pushing the case for the<br />

South Humber Gateway. I would be delighted to see<br />

the planned work to get a clearer understanding of the<br />

ambition. It is typical of many of the ambitions of<br />

people who see a fantastic new opportunity emerging in<br />

the energy sector, and we are keen to encourage that. I<br />

imagine that my hon. Friend the Member for Dover<br />

(Charlie Elphicke) will make a similar plea for a visit.<br />

Charlie Elphicke: I do not wish to trouble the Minister<br />

to come down to east Kent, but for the benefit of the<br />

House will he say how many power stations were brought<br />

into operation during the last <strong>Parliament</strong>? The only one<br />

that we in Kent can recall is the dirty Kingsnorth power<br />

station. On the need for more funding and the need to<br />

build infrastructure and green infrastructure, I recall<br />

that during the last <strong>Parliament</strong> not many power stations<br />

were brought on line.<br />

Charles Hendry: A number of gas powered plants<br />

were brought on stream. The last nuclear power station<br />

was Sizewell in the 1990s. T<strong>here</strong> has not been a new<br />

clean coal plant yet because people need to know how<br />

the carbon abatement technology will move forward.<br />

Gas has been the fuel of choice: 60% of the consented<br />

plant—12 out of 20 GW—is gas. What people want to<br />

build remains to be seen, but t<strong>here</strong> is significant interest.<br />

We now need the policies to drive this forward.<br />

I want rapidly to conclude my remarks with a few<br />

additional points—<br />

Christopher Pincher (Tamworth) (Con) rose—<br />

Charles Hendry: An enormous number of colleagues<br />

are keen to speak in the debate, but with your forbearance,<br />

Mr. Deputy Speaker, I will allow my hon. Friend to<br />

intervene as he is a member of the Select Committee.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!