04.06.2014 Views

here - United Kingdom Parliament

here - United Kingdom Parliament

here - United Kingdom Parliament

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

891 National Policy Statements 1 DECEMBER 2010 National Policy Statements 892<br />

Andrew Percy (Brigg and Goole) (Con): In my<br />

constituency, many properties are not on the gas network,<br />

and t<strong>here</strong> are no plans to expand the network into many<br />

of the small villages t<strong>here</strong>. Will those properties be able<br />

to access alternative sources of heating through the<br />

green deal, perhaps through air source heat pumps and<br />

so on?<br />

Charles Hendry: I am grateful to my hon. Friend for<br />

the work that he has done to highlight issues such as<br />

these. We said in the coalition agreement that prioritising<br />

off-grid customers would be an important part of what<br />

we are seeking to do. However, the help for them will<br />

not come through the measures in the green deal. His<br />

constituents will of course be eligible for support for<br />

energy efficiency measures through the green deal, but<br />

the renewable heat incentive will give them support for<br />

other mechanisms such as air source heat pumps, ground<br />

source heat pumps and solar thermal installations. T<strong>here</strong><br />

will be a different funding mechanism for that, and we<br />

have confirmed that £860 million will be made available<br />

for the renewable heat incentive. We will set out the<br />

precise details of that in the next few weeks, and it will<br />

target precisely the people that he is most concerned<br />

about in that respect.<br />

Albert Owen (Ynys Môn) (Lab): The Minister has<br />

been very effective in campaigning for the extension of<br />

the gas network throughout the <strong>United</strong> <strong>Kingdom</strong>, but<br />

what he has just said will be of little comfort to people<br />

in many areas who simply want a choice. At present,<br />

they have oil or liquefied petroleum gas, but they want<br />

mains gas, which is often located only a few hundred<br />

yards away from their village or hamlet. Do the Government<br />

understand their frustration? Given that the market is<br />

failing them, would it be possible for incentives to be<br />

given in this regard, and for the regulator to ensure that<br />

those gas connections can take place?<br />

Charles Hendry: The hon. Gentleman raises an important<br />

point. Certainly, encouraging people to install renewable<br />

heat sources, particularly in off-grid properties, is part<br />

of the solution. He is absolutely right to say, however,<br />

that for many people, the convenience of being on the<br />

grid will be their primary concern. It must be extremely<br />

frustrating to live in a house close to the grid that is<br />

unable to benefit from it. Ofgem is working to ensure<br />

that the grid is extended, but that is obviously a gradual<br />

process. We are considering different ways of dealing<br />

with the problem. Grid development is mentioned in<br />

the planning policy papers, but we are introducing<br />

other measures such as the renewable heat incentive, to<br />

help people who currently have no alternative to heating<br />

oil or liquefied petroleum gas. I hope that it can be said<br />

that we are dealing with the issue comprehensively.<br />

Sarah Newton (Truro and Falmouth) (Con): Do not<br />

local councils also have an important role to play?<br />

Cornwall council, for example, is undertaking a project<br />

involving feed-in tariffs. It will work with the third<br />

sector in using the money that it earns from installing<br />

solar panels in the county to help those in the greatest<br />

fuel poverty—who, as other Members have pointed out,<br />

are often off grid—not only through energy-efficiency<br />

schemes but by providing heat from more appropriate<br />

sources, such as ground-source heat.<br />

Charles Hendry: My hon. Friend is right to draw that<br />

to the House’s attention. As a result of one of the<br />

changes that we have made, local authorities are now<br />

allowed to sell electricity directly to the grid. Rather<br />

than merely being able to host new facilities, they can<br />

now become involved in these processes as partners.<br />

They can sell the electricity that is generated, and benefit<br />

from the feed-in tariffs or other financial packages that<br />

are available. I hope that, in difficult times, councils<br />

throughout the country will see such measures as an<br />

important potential income-earner and a way of<br />

encouraging their communities to move in a low-carbon<br />

direction. That is a critical part of Government policy.<br />

We have said that t<strong>here</strong> will be special help for the<br />

most vulnerable. The new energy company obligation<br />

will provide additional funds for those who are most in<br />

need and for homes that are hard to treat, which may<br />

need additional support. Our policy also involves the<br />

electricity market reform programme, which is a wholesale<br />

redesign of our electricity market. T<strong>here</strong> is no doubt<br />

that that process, which will begin in a few weeks, is the<br />

most fundamental reform of the market for 30 years. It<br />

involves a new way of encouraging people to invest in<br />

electricity generation, and I cannot over-emphasise the<br />

importance that we attach to it. The power sector needs<br />

to lead the way when it comes to cutting carbon.<br />

Charlie Elphicke (Dover) (Con): Many of my least<br />

well-off and most vulnerable constituents fear that in<br />

five years’ time the lights may go out. What action can<br />

the Government take to deal with the backlog of<br />

infrastructure repairs?<br />

Charles Hendry: I am keen to reassure my hon.<br />

Friend. A couple of years ago, the outlook was a cause<br />

for great concern. The recession reduced demand by 5%<br />

or 6%, and, although it has grown again, it has not<br />

reached its previous level. What appeared to be a serious<br />

pinch point now seems to have been pushed further out,<br />

but that does not give grounds for complacency. We all<br />

know that cold winters and, in particular, cold still days<br />

place immense demand on the system, and we need to<br />

take action to deal with that.<br />

As much as £200 billion of new investment may be<br />

required in our electricity infrastructure. We have to<br />

rebuild it. It would have been much better for the<br />

country if more of that work had been done before<br />

6 May, and it would have been much better had t<strong>here</strong><br />

not been a five-year moratorium on new nuclear and a<br />

delay of some years in new installations. I applaud the<br />

conversion of the last Administration, which began to<br />

put us back on track, but a number of years were lost.<br />

John Woodcock (Barrow and Furness) (Lab/Co-op)<br />

rose—<br />

Huw Irranca-Davies (Ogmore) (Lab) rose—<br />

Charles Hendry: I will give way shortly, but I hope I<br />

shall be forgiven if I do not do so immediately, as I am<br />

in full flight.<br />

We need to establish a structure that will give people<br />

an incentive to invest in new nuclear, clean coal, coal<br />

with carbon capture, renewables—in regard to which<br />

we have great potential—and new gas plant, along with<br />

gas storage. We are alive to all the challenges, and we<br />

are moving forward on all fronts.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!