04.06.2014 Views

here - United Kingdom Parliament

here - United Kingdom Parliament

here - United Kingdom Parliament

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

873W<br />

Written Answers<br />

1 DECEMBER 2010<br />

Written Answers<br />

874W<br />

Maria Miller: Statutory adoption pay enables adopters<br />

to take a period of leave from work when a new child<br />

joins the family. It is paid by employers to employees<br />

who satisfy qualifying conditions based on length of<br />

employment and a minimum level of earnings. Casual<br />

employees may receive statutory adoption pay if they<br />

can satisfy the qualifying conditions.<br />

Income support is available in certain circumstances.<br />

Single people who have a child placed with them prior<br />

to an adoption have access to income support. Once the<br />

adoption has taken place an adoptive parent can continue<br />

to receive income support if they fall within another<br />

prescribed group, for example if they are a lone parent<br />

or a carer. A parent may also be entitled to income<br />

support if they are taking leave from their employment<br />

under the parental leave provisions.<br />

Social Security Benefits: Fraud<br />

Priti Patel: To ask the Secretary of State for Work<br />

and Pensions pursuant to the answer of 10 November<br />

2010, Official Report, column 350W, on social security<br />

benefits: fraud, what the (a) monetary value was of the<br />

suspected fraud in the 550 warrant cases, (b) average<br />

monetary value per case was of suspected fraud and<br />

(c) monetary value was of the suspected fraud in each<br />

of the 10 cases w<strong>here</strong> that value is highest; and what the<br />

dates of issue were of the 10 longest standing arrest<br />

warrants. [24549]<br />

Chris Grayling: Of the 550 warrants held by the<br />

Department on 14 October 2010, information was held<br />

centrally on 188 cases. This number has now been<br />

reduced to 156 following the execution of 32 warrants.<br />

Information on the remaining 362 warrants not held<br />

centrally can be provided only at disproportionate cost.<br />

(a) The total monetary value of fraud in the 156 cases is<br />

£1,273,314.26.<br />

(b) The average monetary value of fraud in the 156 cases is<br />

£8,162.27<br />

(c) The monetary value in each of the 10 cases w<strong>here</strong> that<br />

value is highest is shown in the following table.<br />

10 highest value warrant cases<br />

£<br />

1. 58,550.01<br />

2. 55,494.13<br />

3. 54,864.22<br />

4. 53,319.36<br />

5. 46,406.20<br />

6. 39,906.59<br />

7. 37,465.39<br />

8. 33,735.64<br />

9. 32,121.02<br />

10. 28,253.76<br />

Total 440,116.32<br />

Source:<br />

FRAIMS<br />

Information on the dates of issue of the 10 longest<br />

standing arrest warrants is not available centrally and<br />

can be provided only at disproportionate cost.<br />

Priti Patel: To ask the Secretary of State for Work<br />

and Pensions pursuant to the answer of 10 November<br />

2010, Official Report, column 350W, on social security<br />

benefits: fraud, what benefits were involved in the<br />

suspected frauds; how many cases involved each type<br />

of benefit; and how many cases involved suspected acts<br />

of fraud relating to more than one type of benefit.<br />

[24550]<br />

Chris Grayling: Information on the following is held<br />

but would incur disproportionate cost to collate:<br />

(a) what benefits were involved in the suspected frauds,<br />

(b) how many cases involved each type of benefit, and<br />

(c) how many cases involved suspected acts of fraud relating to<br />

more than one type of benefit..<br />

Priti Patel: To ask the Secretary of State for Work<br />

and Pensions pursuant to the answer of 10 November<br />

2010, Official Report, column 350W, on social security<br />

benefits: fraud, how many of the defendants have<br />

convictions or police cautions for other offences.<br />

[24551]<br />

Chris Grayling: The information on how many of the<br />

defendants have convictions or police cautions for other<br />

offences is held but can be provided only at disproportionate<br />

cost.<br />

Priti Patel: To ask the Secretary of State for Work<br />

and Pensions pursuant to the answer of 10 November<br />

2010, Official Report, column 350W, on social security<br />

benefits: fraud, what were the (a) names of the persons<br />

issued with arrest warrants, (b) their last known<br />

addresses or w<strong>here</strong>abouts and (c) the monetary value<br />

of the suspected fraud in each case. [24719]<br />

Chris Grayling: The Data Protection Act 1998 and<br />

Article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights<br />

provide no legal gateway to release information containing:<br />

(a) names of the persons issued with arrest warrants<br />

(b) their last known addresses or w<strong>here</strong>abouts.<br />

Of the 550 warrants held by the Department on<br />

14 October 2010, information is held centrally on 188<br />

cases. Information on the remaining 362 cases is not<br />

held centrally, warrants having been issued prior to roll<br />

out of an IT case management system in November<br />

2009.<br />

The monetary value of the 362 cases is held but can<br />

be provided only at disproportionate cost.<br />

Of the 188 arrest warrants mentioned above, 32 have<br />

been executed since 14 October 2010, reducing the<br />

number to156, on which information is held centrally.<br />

(c)The monetary value of the 156 cases can be found<br />

in the following table.<br />

Number and monetary value of 156 warrant cases<br />

Number Amount of overpaid benefit (£)<br />

1-13 0<br />

14 77.95<br />

15 259.28<br />

16 328.29<br />

17 409.50<br />

18 429.66<br />

19 517.07<br />

20 587.88<br />

21 776.81<br />

22 841.44<br />

23 854.62<br />

24 862.30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!