here - United Kingdom Parliament

here - United Kingdom Parliament here - United Kingdom Parliament

publications.parliament.uk
from publications.parliament.uk More from this publisher
04.06.2014 Views

335WH [Julian Sturdy] Health Care (North Yorkshire and York) also received representations from concerned health professionals. Only last week, Dr Peter Toomey, a consultant anaesthetist at York hospital wrote to me, stating: “I consider that the PCT have made serious errors of judgement in coming to their decision to restrict access to spinal injections for the relief of pain. The PCT will not reimburse York Hospital for any injection into any part of the spine for any diagnosis unless it has been approved by the PCT’s Funding Request Panel.” We know—my hon. Friend the Member for Selby and Ainsty will back me up on this—that many people are being refused by that request panel. Dr Toomey and a number of his colleagues have fought hard to challenge the PCT’s policy, but—alas—their medical expertise seems to have fallen upon deaf ears. Patients and medical professionals are united in the view that this pain relief service should not have been withdrawn. It has been taken away for the wrong reasons and should be reinstated without delay. The withdrawal of such vital services is causing me great concern, as is the withdrawal of funding for numerous voluntary services. My hon. Friend the Member for Skipton and Ripon touched on that matter earlier. The York Council for Voluntary Service has been informed of a 37% in-year cut, which has been issued by the PCT with just one month’s notice. Angela Harrison, the chief executive of the YCVS, summed up the whole situation quite aptly when she said: “These cuts have already had a disastrous effect on front-line voluntary groups who serve some of the most vulnerable members of society. At the same time, the infrastructure groups who support them have had their funds withdrawn at very short notice, reducing their capacity at a time when it is most needed.” One specific voluntary case vividly highlights the poor management of the way the PCT has handled this situation. On 19 October, Yorkshire MESMAC received a letter from the PCT, informing the organisation that its contracted health care funding was to be withdrawn within one month. Such blunt and definitive notice is absolutely outrageous. Not only has an agreement been broken, but no consultation took place with the organisation, which—knowing the PCT’s overspend— would have been happy to sit down and reach a more amicable agreement. As Tom Doyle, the director of Yorkshire MESMAC, said: “I want to express my deep frustration at how the process has been handled, which was, in my opinion, unlawful, disrespectful and showing an arrogant disregard for the PCT’s own agreements and processes.” It is now feared that Yorkshire MESMAC will be forced to close. On a wider note, the voluntary services budgets are expected to lead to a saving of some £150,000 for the PCT this year. Given that that is a small drop in the £17 million overspend, I would urge the PCT to look internally for structural and efficiency savings, rather than merely reducing the funding of voluntary groups, whose work often plays such as vital role in our health service. If our voluntary health services are forced to close, I predict that far greater numbers of patients will actually require more hospitalised, long-term and expensive treatments through the NHS, thus undermining the PCT’s initial savings. Due to the overspend and service reductions, there now exists a lack of trust in the PCT and a complete absence of confidence over its future intentions, and I 1 DECEMBER 2010 Health Care (North Yorkshire and York) 336WH fear that local people are simply paying too high a price for that. In the long term, I am more optimistic about health care provision in north Yorkshire and York, largely due to the contents of the health White Paper. The localised drive to ensure that PCTs are, at some point, abolished altogether and replaced by GP-led commissioning bodies, which are influenced by local patients, is a measure that I wholeheartedly welcome. At long last, local patients will have a say in their local services, holding the decision makers to account and freeing up our nurses, doctors and health providers from the red-tape that so often binds them and takes them away from the front line. I hope that the Minister can reassure me that the transition from PCTs to GP-led commissioning will be carried out swiftly to ensure that the interim transitional period will not see a lack of leadership or direction for local health care services— especially in our area. I believe that the PCT will continue to operate until 2013, and I plead with the Minister to review to the situation in north Yorkshire and York in the mean time. Our constituents simply cannot afford to wait three years for the situation to be remedied. Most specifically, I would welcome any comments from the Minister on the previous Government’s imposition of a statutory obligation on PCTs to break even by the end of this year. Could that deadline be extended to soften the blow of the cuts over a greater time period? The people of north Yorkshire and York depend upon their health care services, and many are extremely worried at present. I hope that hon. Members from the region—I was going to say “regardless of political allegiances”, but as we only have coalition Members here I will not say that. To give the hon. Member for York Central (Hugh Bayley) credit, he did say that he would try and be at the debate today. We must protect the essential health care services and funding that our region deserves. I ask and urge hon. Members to fight and to campaign for that. We must ensure that, before GP-led commissioning starts, the PCT delivers the best service that it can within its budget. It must focus on service delivery and the outlying services to our communities, rather than cutting. I hope that the Minister will give serious consideration to the issues that I have raised. I am grateful for his time. I know that it has been a hectic day thanks to the Divisions, but I am grateful to him for giving us the time, and I hope that he will give the matter serious consideration. 5.15 pm Andrew Jones (Harrogate and Knaresborough) (Con): I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for York Outer (Julian Sturdy) on securing this important debate, and I add my support to his recognition of the excellent work that the health care professionals do in our area. He has highlighted that our health grant in North Yorkshire is low, which impacts on the services that we receive. When facing the challenge of low funding, the PCT has to look hard at its priorities, particularly with regard to mental health services. I am always concerned about mental health provision, because I think that for far too long in our country it has been a bit of a Cinderella service. In my constituency, the community

337WH Health Care (North Yorkshire and York) mental service has closed the Hawthorn day unit, which was extremely popular with its service users and well respected across the community. It is claimed that the closure is temporary, but the reasons for its closure run on and on, and it seems endless. While the excuses mount up, some of the most vulnerable people in my constituency—many of whom I have met—have seen their contact time with counsellors, or their time in respite care, decrease from three or four days a week to half an hour a fortnight. I am worried about the impact of the change on some of the most vulnerable members of the community. In some cases, those constituents have severe mental health problems and can periodically be a danger to themselves. I hope that our PCT will consider that and, even at this late stage, find a way to reopen the Hawthorn day unit at the earliest opportunity. 5.16 pm The Minister of State, Department of Health (Paul Burstow): I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for York Outer (Julian Sturdy) on securing this debate, and I note the cross-party support that he has gained, with the arrival of the hon. Member for York Central (Hugh Bayley). I note the presence of my hon. Friends the Members for Skipton and Ripon (Julian Smith), for Selby and Ainsty (Nigel Adams) and for Scarborough and Whitby (Robert Goodwill), and I know that they are all interested in and concerned about the issues that my hon. Friend the Member for York Outer has raised. He has made a powerful case for why we need the radical reforms across the NHS to which the Government are committed. Before I turn to the points that my hon. Friend has raised, I join him in praising the work of NHS staff across Yorkshire. They do an excellent job, often in the most trying circumstances, and he is right that the NHS is a national treasure. Our White Paper reforms are, first and foremost, about freeing those hard-working professionals from the bureaucracy that stands in the way of good patient care. We will be cutting management costs by a third, moving decisions closer to patients through new GP consortia and giving local councils more responsibility for the health of their communities. All those will help to create a more flexible, efficient, interconnected and accountable health service. We are now entering a transition to the new system, which brings its own challenges for all parts of the NHS. The descriptions that my hon. Friend has given of circumstances in his constituency demonstrate the challenge that is exacerbated by the fragile state of the local NHS finances. The Government have inherited that fragility and they will have to address it. I understand from the strategic health authority that the North Yorkshire and York PCT is likely to end the year with a significant deficit unless it takes drastic action of the sort that my hon. Friend has described, and to which others have referred in this debate. That process clearly involves some tough decisions, which will have a distressing impact on his constituents, and I will return to those in a moment. I want to answer his concerns about funding allocations for the NHS in this part of the country. 1 DECEMBER 2010 Health Care (North Yorkshire and York) 338WH At present, as my hon. Friend has described, the NHS uses a funding formula based on objectives set by the previous Government and developed by the independent Advisory Committee on Resource Allocation. I know that one of the big frustrations for North Yorkshire is whether its rural nature is taken fully into account in the funding formula, and my hon. Friend has alluded to that. As a Government, we have asked for that formula to be examined. The Secretary of State has asked ACRA to review how NHS resources are distributed, and has explicitly requested that consideration be given to the issues that face rural communities. Looking ahead, from 2013-14 we will have moved to the new system of the independent NHS commissioning board allocating resources to general practice consortiums. How it does that will be up to the commissioning board itself, but we are clear that it must do it fairly and consistently across the country. For places such as his constituency, my hon. Friend the Member for York Outer is right—real pace and purpose are vital to getting the NHS on to a more stable financial footing. I can assure him that we are keen to make fast progress on GP commissioning consortiums taking on responsibilities. In that regard, shadow allocations for GP consortiums will be published late next year for 2012-13, giving the new organisations the time and space to test financial plans before the full system goes live in 2013-14. My hon. Friend asked whether GP consortiums would have to take on PCT debt. I have heard that anxiety expressed around the country. The NHS operating framework, which we will publish in a few weeks, will set out the rules on legacy debt to ensure that no debts carry forward into the new system. That is challenging, and we are keen to work through it effectively. I shall now come back to the present and say a few words about the current financial position in North Yorkshire and York. The strategic health authority tells me that the local PCT has had a problematic financial history stretching back many years, which may be an understatement. [Interruption.] I can see colleagues nodding. Over the past 12 months, its situation has deteriorated due to a number of factors, including a significant overspend on community services and the fact that its QIPP programme has not delivered the expected savings. As a result, the trust is having to take radical steps to put its finances in order, including temporary reductions to some non-urgent health services. I very much regret that. I regret that the fragility of the organisation has placed my hon. Friend the Member for York Outer’s constituents in a position where they face these service changes. I hope he will understand that it is not for me to give a running commentary on every aspect of what the PCT is doing. On the issues that he highlights— particularly about the QIPP programme implementation, which I have looked at carefully—there are lessons for how we ensure that we get a proper grip on financial management in local NHS organisations. It is striking, for instance, that the neighbouring PCTs with similar populations to North Yorkshire’s and York’s are not facing the same financial challenge, nor are they having to resort to the desperate actions that the trust is taking. My hon. Friend is right to say

335WH<br />

[Julian Sturdy]<br />

Health Care (North Yorkshire and<br />

York)<br />

also received representations from concerned health<br />

professionals. Only last week, Dr Peter Toomey, a consultant<br />

anaesthetist at York hospital wrote to me, stating:<br />

“I consider that the PCT have made serious errors of judgement<br />

in coming to their decision to restrict access to spinal injections<br />

for the relief of pain. The PCT will not reimburse York Hospital<br />

for any injection into any part of the spine for any diagnosis<br />

unless it has been approved by the PCT’s Funding Request<br />

Panel.”<br />

We know—my hon. Friend the Member for Selby and<br />

Ainsty will back me up on this—that many people are<br />

being refused by that request panel. Dr Toomey and a<br />

number of his colleagues have fought hard to challenge<br />

the PCT’s policy, but—alas—their medical expertise<br />

seems to have fallen upon deaf ears.<br />

Patients and medical professionals are united in the<br />

view that this pain relief service should not have been<br />

withdrawn. It has been taken away for the wrong reasons<br />

and should be reinstated without delay. The withdrawal<br />

of such vital services is causing me great concern, as is<br />

the withdrawal of funding for numerous voluntary services.<br />

My hon. Friend the Member for Skipton and Ripon<br />

touched on that matter earlier. The York Council for<br />

Voluntary Service has been informed of a 37% in-year<br />

cut, which has been issued by the PCT with just one<br />

month’s notice. Angela Harrison, the chief executive of<br />

the YCVS, summed up the whole situation quite aptly<br />

when she said:<br />

“These cuts have already had a disastrous effect on front-line<br />

voluntary groups who serve some of the most vulnerable members<br />

of society. At the same time, the infrastructure groups who<br />

support them have had their funds withdrawn at very short<br />

notice, reducing their capacity at a time when it is most needed.”<br />

One specific voluntary case vividly highlights the<br />

poor management of the way the PCT has handled this<br />

situation. On 19 October, Yorkshire MESMAC received<br />

a letter from the PCT, informing the organisation that<br />

its contracted health care funding was to be withdrawn<br />

within one month. Such blunt and definitive notice is<br />

absolutely outrageous. Not only has an agreement been<br />

broken, but no consultation took place with the<br />

organisation, which—knowing the PCT’s overspend—<br />

would have been happy to sit down and reach a more<br />

amicable agreement. As Tom Doyle, the director of<br />

Yorkshire MESMAC, said:<br />

“I want to express my deep frustration at how the process has<br />

been handled, which was, in my opinion, unlawful, disrespectful<br />

and showing an arrogant disregard for the PCT’s own agreements<br />

and processes.”<br />

It is now feared that Yorkshire MESMAC will be forced<br />

to close.<br />

On a wider note, the voluntary services budgets are<br />

expected to lead to a saving of some £150,000 for the<br />

PCT this year. Given that that is a small drop in the<br />

£17 million overspend, I would urge the PCT to look<br />

internally for structural and efficiency savings, rather<br />

than merely reducing the funding of voluntary groups,<br />

whose work often plays such as vital role in our health<br />

service. If our voluntary health services are forced to<br />

close, I predict that far greater numbers of patients will<br />

actually require more hospitalised, long-term and expensive<br />

treatments through the NHS, thus undermining the<br />

PCT’s initial savings.<br />

Due to the overspend and service reductions, t<strong>here</strong><br />

now exists a lack of trust in the PCT and a complete<br />

absence of confidence over its future intentions, and I<br />

1 DECEMBER 2010<br />

Health Care (North Yorkshire and<br />

York)<br />

336WH<br />

fear that local people are simply paying too high a price<br />

for that. In the long term, I am more optimistic about<br />

health care provision in north Yorkshire and York,<br />

largely due to the contents of the health White Paper.<br />

The localised drive to ensure that PCTs are, at some<br />

point, abolished altogether and replaced by GP-led<br />

commissioning bodies, which are influenced by local<br />

patients, is a measure that I wholeheartedly welcome.<br />

At long last, local patients will have a say in their<br />

local services, holding the decision makers to account<br />

and freeing up our nurses, doctors and health providers<br />

from the red-tape that so often binds them and takes<br />

them away from the front line. I hope that the Minister<br />

can reassure me that the transition from PCTs to GP-led<br />

commissioning will be carried out swiftly to ensure that<br />

the interim transitional period will not see a lack of<br />

leadership or direction for local health care services—<br />

especially in our area.<br />

I believe that the PCT will continue to operate until<br />

2013, and I plead with the Minister to review to the<br />

situation in north Yorkshire and York in the mean time.<br />

Our constituents simply cannot afford to wait three<br />

years for the situation to be remedied. Most specifically,<br />

I would welcome any comments from the Minister on<br />

the previous Government’s imposition of a statutory<br />

obligation on PCTs to break even by the end of this<br />

year. Could that deadline be extended to soften the<br />

blow of the cuts over a greater time period?<br />

The people of north Yorkshire and York depend<br />

upon their health care services, and many are extremely<br />

worried at present. I hope that hon. Members from the<br />

region—I was going to say “regardless of political<br />

allegiances”, but as we only have coalition Members<br />

<strong>here</strong> I will not say that. To give the hon. Member for<br />

York Central (Hugh Bayley) credit, he did say that he<br />

would try and be at the debate today.<br />

We must protect the essential health care services and<br />

funding that our region deserves. I ask and urge hon.<br />

Members to fight and to campaign for that. We must<br />

ensure that, before GP-led commissioning starts, the<br />

PCT delivers the best service that it can within its<br />

budget. It must focus on service delivery and the outlying<br />

services to our communities, rather than cutting.<br />

I hope that the Minister will give serious consideration<br />

to the issues that I have raised. I am grateful for his time.<br />

I know that it has been a hectic day thanks to the<br />

Divisions, but I am grateful to him for giving us the<br />

time, and I hope that he will give the matter serious<br />

consideration.<br />

5.15 pm<br />

Andrew Jones (Harrogate and Knaresborough) (Con):<br />

I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for York<br />

Outer (Julian Sturdy) on securing this important debate,<br />

and I add my support to his recognition of the excellent<br />

work that the health care professionals do in our area.<br />

He has highlighted that our health grant in North<br />

Yorkshire is low, which impacts on the services that we<br />

receive.<br />

When facing the challenge of low funding, the PCT<br />

has to look hard at its priorities, particularly with<br />

regard to mental health services. I am always concerned<br />

about mental health provision, because I think that<br />

for far too long in our country it has been a bit of a<br />

Cinderella service. In my constituency, the community

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!