HOUSE OF LORDS - United Kingdom Parliament

HOUSE OF LORDS - United Kingdom Parliament HOUSE OF LORDS - United Kingdom Parliament

publications.parliament.uk
from publications.parliament.uk More from this publisher
04.06.2014 Views

to any Member to table a free-standing motion for resolution, containing a short, self-contained “reasoned opinion”, as required by the Protocol. 10.66 The Government have made a commitment that they will not support a proposal in the Council of Ministers which has been the subject of a reasoned opinion from either House without first communicating to Parliament their reasons for doing so. “Passerelle” clauses 10.67 A “passerelle” clause is a European treaty provision which allows the Members States of the European Union to decide, by unanimity, to change the way in which decisions are taken within a specified policy area—for instance, to move from a requirement for unanimity to qualified majority voting. 10.68 Under section 6 of the European Union (Amendment) Act 2008, the approval of both Houses is required before the Government may support the use of one of the passerelle clauses. Under the Act, approval is only given if “each House agrees to the motion without amendment”. 10.69 If any Member intends to oppose a Government motion seeking such approval, he should give notice by tabling an amendment in the following form: “Lord [name] to move, as an amendment to the above motion, to leave out ‘approve’ and insert ‘declines to approve’”. No other type of amendment is admissible. Scrutiny of United Kingdom “opt-ins” 10.70 During passage of the European Union (Amendment) Act 2008, the Government gave an undertaking 1 that they would take account of the views of the EU Committees of the two Houses before exercising their right, under the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, to notify the Council of Ministers of their decision to take part in the adoption and application of proposals within that area. Without the exercise of such an “opt-in” such proposals are not binding upon the United Kingdom. 10.71 The Government’s undertaking applies only if the views of the EU Committee are forthcoming within eight weeks of publication of the proposal. If, within this time-limit, the EU Committee makes a report to 1 9 June 2008. See European Union Committee 2nd Report 2008–09, appendix 1. 208

the House on the proposal, recommending the report for debate, the Government will seek to arrange a debate through the Usual Channels. The debate takes place on a motion, tabled in the name of either the Chairman or a Member of the Committee, that the House agrees the recommendation of the Committee that the Government should or, as the case may be, should not exercise their right to opt in to the proposal. The motion is amendable and may be divided upon. NATIONAL POLICY STATEMENTS 10.72 National policy statements (NPSs) set out national policy on particular types of development. Under Section 9(2) of the Planning Act 2008, each proposal for a NPS must be laid before Parliament. In so doing, the Secretary of State specifies a relevant period for parliamentary scrutiny. If, during this scrutiny period, either House passes a resolution with regard to the proposal, or a committee of either House makes recommendations regarding the proposal, the Secretary of State must lay before Parliament a statement setting out his response to the resolution or recommendations. Following completion of parliamentary scrutiny, the Secretary of State may formally designate the proposal as a NPS. The final NPS is also laid before Parliament. 1 10.73 In the House of Lords, NPSs are normally debated in Grand Committee, for up to four hours. However, this does not restrict the freedom of committees of the House or of individual Members to make use of the statutory procedures outlined above. In the event of a motion for resolution being tabled, the Usual Channels have undertaken to provide time for a debate in the Chamber within the scrutiny period. 2 SCRUTINY OF TREATIES 3 10.74 No treaty 4 may be ratified unless the minister responsible has: 1 Planning Act 2008 s. 9 and s. 5. 2 Procedure 2nd Rpt 2008–09. 3 See Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010, ss 20–25. 4 This procedure does not apply to (i) treaties covered by the European Parliamentary Elections Act 2002 and European Union (Amendment) Act 2008; (ii) double taxation conventions and arrangements and international tax enforcement arrangements; and (iii) treaties concluded under authority given by the UK Government by any of the Channel Islands, the Isle of Man or any of the Overseas Territories. 209

to any Member to table a free-standing motion for resolution, containing<br />

a short, self-contained “reasoned opinion”, as required by the Protocol.<br />

10.66 The Government have made a commitment that they will not<br />

support a proposal in the Council of Ministers which has been the subject<br />

of a reasoned opinion from either House without first communicating to<br />

<strong>Parliament</strong> their reasons for doing so.<br />

“Passerelle” clauses<br />

10.67 A “passerelle” clause is a European treaty provision which allows<br />

the Members States of the European Union to decide, by unanimity, to<br />

change the way in which decisions are taken within a specified policy<br />

area—for instance, to move from a requirement for unanimity to<br />

qualified majority voting.<br />

10.68 Under section 6 of the European Union (Amendment) Act 2008,<br />

the approval of both Houses is required before the Government may<br />

support the use of one of the passerelle clauses. Under the Act, approval<br />

is only given if “each House agrees to the motion without amendment”.<br />

10.69 If any Member intends to oppose a Government motion seeking<br />

such approval, he should give notice by tabling an amendment in the<br />

following form: “Lord [name] to move, as an amendment to the above<br />

motion, to leave out ‘approve’ and insert ‘declines to approve’”. No other<br />

type of amendment is admissible.<br />

Scrutiny of <strong>United</strong> <strong>Kingdom</strong> “opt-ins”<br />

10.70 During passage of the European Union (Amendment) Act 2008, the<br />

Government gave an undertaking 1 that they would take account of the views<br />

of the EU Committees of the two Houses before exercising their right, under<br />

the Protocol on the position of the <strong>United</strong> <strong>Kingdom</strong> and Ireland in respect of<br />

the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, to notify the Council of Ministers<br />

of their decision to take part in the adoption and application of proposals<br />

within that area. Without the exercise of such an “opt-in” such proposals are<br />

not binding upon the <strong>United</strong> <strong>Kingdom</strong>.<br />

10.71 The Government’s undertaking applies only if the views of the EU<br />

Committee are forthcoming within eight weeks of publication of the<br />

proposal. If, within this time-limit, the EU Committee makes a report to<br />

1 9 June 2008. See European Union Committee 2nd Report 2008–09, appendix 1.<br />

208

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!