03.06.2014 Views

BPIE: Europe's buildings under the microscope - PU Europe

BPIE: Europe's buildings under the microscope - PU Europe

BPIE: Europe's buildings under the microscope - PU Europe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Number of countries with penalties<br />

for EPC’s non compliance<br />

Figure 2B5 – Number of countries with penalties foreseen for EPC non-compliance<br />

Source: <strong>BPIE</strong> survey<br />

19 10<br />

Penalties foreseen<br />

No penalties<br />

While residential EPCs typically cost between €100 and €300 in most Member States, <strong>the</strong> full cost range is<br />

from <strong>under</strong> €50 to as much as €2,000. Information on costs for non-residential <strong>buildings</strong> was much more<br />

limited. Where quoted, <strong>the</strong> values range from €0.5 to 3/m 2 . Where available, <strong>the</strong>se registers have proven to<br />

be extremely useful in monitoring and analysing <strong>the</strong> opportunities for energy performance improvement.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> longer term, <strong>the</strong>y will also prove invaluable in assessing trends in energy performance. A total of<br />

18 countries out of 29 foresee penalties in <strong>the</strong> event of non-compliance with <strong>the</strong> certification process.<br />

Inspections<br />

Although most of <strong>the</strong> countries have already inspection schemes for boilers and/or air conditioning<br />

systems, data collection on <strong>the</strong> number of inspections done by each Member State is still at a very low<br />

level. Insufficient data makes it difficult to formulate an appropriate evaluation.<br />

Italy and <strong>the</strong> Brussels Region of Belgium have experienced delays in implementing <strong>the</strong> requirements for<br />

<strong>the</strong> certification of air conditioning systems.<br />

As can be seen on Figure 2B6 countries have chosen to implement Article 8 of <strong>the</strong> initial EPBD (on <strong>the</strong><br />

inspection of boilers) by taking steps to ensure <strong>the</strong> provision of advice to <strong>the</strong> users on boilers and heating<br />

systems (option b) instead of implementing an inspection and assessment regime (option a).<br />

Figure 2B6 - Share and number of countries having implemented Article 8 of <strong>the</strong> EPBD (on <strong>the</strong><br />

inspection of boilers) by <strong>the</strong> method chosen<br />

Source: <strong>BPIE</strong> survey<br />

7 b)<br />

Unknown 1<br />

21 a)<br />

Finland, France, Ireland, The Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands, Slovenia, Sweden and <strong>the</strong> UK have chosen option b (advice<br />

to <strong>the</strong> users) regarding <strong>the</strong> EPBD requirement for inspection of boilers, while for Switzerland it was not<br />

reported. All <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r Member States have implemented inspection and assessment systems, mainly<br />

because many of <strong>the</strong> countries already had a boiler inspection system in place prior to <strong>the</strong> EPBD.<br />

Impact reported by countries in 2011<br />

Some of <strong>the</strong> main contributions of <strong>the</strong> EPBD have been bringing energy efficiency in <strong>buildings</strong> onto <strong>the</strong><br />

political agenda, integrating energy performance requirements and bringing it to <strong>the</strong> attention of citizens.<br />

On Table 2B3, <strong>the</strong> main impacts and benefits of <strong>the</strong> EPBD implementation reported by each country are<br />

presented.<br />

<strong>Europe</strong>’s <strong>buildings</strong> <strong>under</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>microscope</strong> | 69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!