BPIE: Europe's buildings under the microscope - PU Europe
BPIE: Europe's buildings under the microscope - PU Europe
BPIE: Europe's buildings under the microscope - PU Europe
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Number of countries with penalties<br />
for EPC’s non compliance<br />
Figure 2B5 – Number of countries with penalties foreseen for EPC non-compliance<br />
Source: <strong>BPIE</strong> survey<br />
19 10<br />
Penalties foreseen<br />
No penalties<br />
While residential EPCs typically cost between €100 and €300 in most Member States, <strong>the</strong> full cost range is<br />
from <strong>under</strong> €50 to as much as €2,000. Information on costs for non-residential <strong>buildings</strong> was much more<br />
limited. Where quoted, <strong>the</strong> values range from €0.5 to 3/m 2 . Where available, <strong>the</strong>se registers have proven to<br />
be extremely useful in monitoring and analysing <strong>the</strong> opportunities for energy performance improvement.<br />
In <strong>the</strong> longer term, <strong>the</strong>y will also prove invaluable in assessing trends in energy performance. A total of<br />
18 countries out of 29 foresee penalties in <strong>the</strong> event of non-compliance with <strong>the</strong> certification process.<br />
Inspections<br />
Although most of <strong>the</strong> countries have already inspection schemes for boilers and/or air conditioning<br />
systems, data collection on <strong>the</strong> number of inspections done by each Member State is still at a very low<br />
level. Insufficient data makes it difficult to formulate an appropriate evaluation.<br />
Italy and <strong>the</strong> Brussels Region of Belgium have experienced delays in implementing <strong>the</strong> requirements for<br />
<strong>the</strong> certification of air conditioning systems.<br />
As can be seen on Figure 2B6 countries have chosen to implement Article 8 of <strong>the</strong> initial EPBD (on <strong>the</strong><br />
inspection of boilers) by taking steps to ensure <strong>the</strong> provision of advice to <strong>the</strong> users on boilers and heating<br />
systems (option b) instead of implementing an inspection and assessment regime (option a).<br />
Figure 2B6 - Share and number of countries having implemented Article 8 of <strong>the</strong> EPBD (on <strong>the</strong><br />
inspection of boilers) by <strong>the</strong> method chosen<br />
Source: <strong>BPIE</strong> survey<br />
7 b)<br />
Unknown 1<br />
21 a)<br />
Finland, France, Ireland, The Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands, Slovenia, Sweden and <strong>the</strong> UK have chosen option b (advice<br />
to <strong>the</strong> users) regarding <strong>the</strong> EPBD requirement for inspection of boilers, while for Switzerland it was not<br />
reported. All <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r Member States have implemented inspection and assessment systems, mainly<br />
because many of <strong>the</strong> countries already had a boiler inspection system in place prior to <strong>the</strong> EPBD.<br />
Impact reported by countries in 2011<br />
Some of <strong>the</strong> main contributions of <strong>the</strong> EPBD have been bringing energy efficiency in <strong>buildings</strong> onto <strong>the</strong><br />
political agenda, integrating energy performance requirements and bringing it to <strong>the</strong> attention of citizens.<br />
On Table 2B3, <strong>the</strong> main impacts and benefits of <strong>the</strong> EPBD implementation reported by each country are<br />
presented.<br />
<strong>Europe</strong>’s <strong>buildings</strong> <strong>under</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>microscope</strong> | 69