BPIE: Europe's buildings under the microscope - PU Europe

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Figure 2B2 - Number of countries with an operational EPC database Source: BPIE survey EPC register/database 11 7 10 1 EPC register at national level Under development or existing only at regional/local level No Register Unknown With the reported data from the operational registers/databases and other EPC calculation systems, the number of registered residential EPCs as a share of the total number of dwellings can be seen in Figure 2B3. Figure 2B3 – Share of dwellings with a registered EPC Source: BPIE survey AT LT SK SI EE CY PT IT SE NO FR DK IE UK NL 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% NOTES AT: Accounted certificates only from the ZEUS EPC database CY: Data from 1/1/2010 to 6/5/2011 CZ: Value for 2009 and 2010 (number is about) DK: Data refers to the current EPC scheme (certificates issued between 1997 and 2006 are not included) FR: Some figures are from CEREN data, some others are from the country consultant personal expertise GR: Registered EPC’s till July 2011 HU: Estimation for completed energy certificates IT: Values are based on collected data from 2 regions (Piemonte and Lombardia) and extrapolated to national level (by ENEA). SK: Data refer to certificates issued only after 1st January 2010 (certificates issued before that date were not registered) UK: For domestic certificates values are as of May 2011 66 | Europe’s buildings under the microscope
Although the certification schemes have been working for only a couple of years, the proportion of dwellings not yet certified remain above 90% for all countries with the exception of The Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Note that The Netherlands has had a certification scheme for new buildings in operation since 1995. As for the issued and registered EPCs of non-residential buildings, Figure 2B4 provides an overview of the relative share of certified buildings against the population in each country. Figure 2B4 – Non-residential registered certificates per capita Source: BPIE survey AT BG SK EE CY SI NL LT NO IE PT FR SE UK DK NOTES 0 0,002 0,004 0,006 0,008 AT: Accounting only certificates from the ZEUS EPC database CY: Data from 1/1/2010 to 6/5/2011 DK: Data refers to the current EPC scheme (certificates issued between 1997 and 2006 are not included) FR: Some figures are from CEREN data, some others are from the country consultant personal expertise SK: Data refers to certificates issued only after 1st January 2010 (certificates issued before that date were not registered) Denmark has without doubt the largest proportion of certified non-residential buildings, followed by the UK, Sweden and France, while the other countries still have a low share of certified buildings. Belgium has reported having issued 302,570 EPCs in total, the Czech Republic 4,000 (approximate value for 2009 and 2010), Greece 32,420 (registered EPCs up to July 2011), and Hungary 1,400 (estimation for completed energy certificates). Table 2B2 summarises the costs, where available, of acquiring an energy performance certificate across Europe, as well as whether penalties are foreseen for EPC non-compliance. Europe’s buildings under the microscope | 67
Page 1 and 2:
Europe’s buildings under the micr
Page 3 and 4:
Foreword Buildings are at the pivot
Page 5 and 6:
ContentS FOREWORD Acknowledgements
Page 7 and 8:
ExEcutivE summAry From the emotiona
Page 9 and 10:
Space standards (expressed through
Page 11 and 12:
Buildings vary remarkably in terms
Page 13 and 14:
The absence of previous requirement
Page 15 and 16: It is, however, not sufficient to o
Page 17 and 18: In all the scenarios, the estimated
Page 19 and 20: Introduction A vital picture of the
Page 21 and 22: The Challenge Many experts agree th
Page 23 and 24: Europe’s buildings under the micr
Page 25 and 26: areas. These factors were defined f
Page 27 and 28: A. building typology From large com
Page 29 and 30: The floor space breakdown per count
Page 31 and 32: IE UK GR NO NL MT SI DK IT SK FR FI
Page 33 and 34: Figure 1A8 - The non-residential se
Page 35 and 36: While the dataset of residential bu
Page 37 and 38: Size Information on the size of non
Page 39 and 40: Ownership and tenure The ownership
Page 41 and 42: Data availability on the ownership
Page 43 and 44: C. Energy Performance It is widely
Page 45 and 46: Mtoe Figure 1C3 - Historical final
Page 47 and 48: The performance of households depen
Page 49 and 50: Within the existing European stock,
Page 51 and 52: In addition to the lack of sufficie
Page 53 and 54: Specific energy use (kWh/m 2 a) in
Page 55 and 56: A. Barriers & Challenges Improving
Page 57 and 58: years, while many businesses will n
Page 59 and 60: Lack of advice/information Even wit
Page 61 and 62: Figure 2A2 - Building owner’s dec
Page 63 and 64: B. Regulatory and legislative frame
Page 65: At the moment all countries have im
Page 69 and 70: Number of countries with penalties
Page 71 and 72: IE IT LU LV MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK
Page 73 and 74: Table 2B4 - Calculated impacts and
Page 75 and 76: LV NL NO PL PT SI SK SE UK The Mini
Page 77 and 78: Table 2B6 - Summary of building ene
Page 79 and 80: egulated energy and total energy re
Page 81 and 82: LT LV MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK Mi
Page 83 and 84: Prescriptive-based requirements for
Page 85 and 86: iii. Other requirements A number of
Page 87 and 88: Building code requirements for exis
Page 89 and 90: Enforcement and Compliance Building
Page 91 and 92: Financial programmes fall into the
Page 93 and 94: Table 2C2 - A summary of selected f
Page 95 and 96: D. Other Programmes The BPIE 2011 s
Page 97 and 98: Europe’s buildings under the micr
Page 99 and 100: The previous chapters so far have g
Page 101 and 102: Even when viewed purely in economic
Page 103 and 104: At the other end of the scale, reno
Page 105 and 106: New Member States from Central and
Page 107 and 108: Determining the practical limit for
Page 109 and 110: Figure 3B1 - Cost reductions for di
Page 111 and 112: projects to assess the viability of
Page 113 and 114: C. Setting the scene This section e
Page 115 and 116: An initially slow growth in the ann
Page 117 and 118:
Scenario 4 - Two-stage renovation T
Page 119 and 120:
Table 3C7 - Overall results to 2050
Page 121 and 122:
Figure 3C3 below compares the prese
Page 123 and 124:
Final remarks and policy recommenda
Page 125 and 126:
• Finally, the EU should support
Page 127 and 128:
• A reliable and continuous data
Page 129 and 130:
DEFINITIONS Air-conditioning system
Page 131 and 132:
U-Value: is the measure of the rate
show all

BPIE: Europe's buildings under the microscope - PU Europe

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?