BPIE: Europe's buildings under the microscope - PU Europe
BPIE: Europe's buildings under the microscope - PU Europe
BPIE: Europe's buildings under the microscope - PU Europe
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Figure 2A3 – An illustration of <strong>the</strong> main risks which need to be addressed for market uptake<br />
CHALLENGES<br />
Supply chain<br />
Quality of<br />
workmanship<br />
Technical failure<br />
Disturbance<br />
I. Supply chain<br />
Market and supply chains will certainly develop over time but short term we are facing risks. For example,<br />
a significant shortage of material, components and suitably skilled labour could lead to renovation<br />
work not including low energy measures. Opportunities will be missed that may not reappear for many<br />
decades (‘lock-in effect’). Alternatively, low energy renovation projects may be abandoned because <strong>the</strong>y<br />
cannot be delivered within a specific window of opportunity.<br />
II. Quality of workmanship<br />
Ano<strong>the</strong>r side-effect of a significant increase in demand could be <strong>the</strong> rapid growth of contractors offering<br />
to <strong>under</strong>take low energy renovation work, which if not appropriately regulated or managed, could<br />
give rise to poor workmanship and even some serious short term failures. Both <strong>the</strong>se outcomes would<br />
generate negative feedback which in turn could stem <strong>the</strong> demand for renovation projects (in England in<br />
<strong>the</strong> 1970s <strong>the</strong> World in Action TV programme exposed shoddy working practices in timber frame house<br />
building that virtually stopped <strong>the</strong>m being built and <strong>the</strong> industry took decades to recover).<br />
III. Technical failure<br />
A similar and potentially more troubling concern that has been voiced by many in <strong>the</strong> industry is <strong>the</strong><br />
risk of building-in long term failure risks that may not emerge for a decade or more. Whilst not a barrier<br />
in <strong>the</strong> short term, if such failures began to occur on a large scale in several years <strong>the</strong>y could result in a<br />
massive loss of confidence and a halt in major renovation programmes; to say nothing of major costs<br />
to building owners and insurers. Most new construction materials and more importantly construction<br />
techniques and processes go through a long period of testing and development before <strong>the</strong>y gain<br />
approval for widespread application in new <strong>buildings</strong>. This would also be true of <strong>the</strong> materials being<br />
used in low energy renovations but not necessarily <strong>the</strong> construction techniques and processes. Many of<br />
<strong>the</strong>se have had little testing and development. A major concern is <strong>the</strong> potential for building-in interstitial<br />
condensation risk when installing internal wall insulation.<br />
IV. Disturbance<br />
Ano<strong>the</strong>r barrier that has yet to emerge is <strong>the</strong> practical issue of what happens to <strong>the</strong> building occupier<br />
when a major renovation is being <strong>under</strong>taken. It is probably seen a barrier at <strong>the</strong> moment given that<br />
occupants may not want to entertain <strong>the</strong> disruption involved in a major building renovation. In most<br />
cases deep renovation can only be implemented in a vacant building which will involve practical and<br />
financial barriers associated with re-locating <strong>the</strong> occupant for <strong>the</strong> period of <strong>the</strong> retrofit (4-10 weeks).<br />
62 | <strong>Europe</strong>’s <strong>buildings</strong> <strong>under</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>microscope</strong>