BPIE: Europe's buildings under the microscope - PU Europe
BPIE: Europe's buildings under the microscope - PU Europe
BPIE: Europe's buildings under the microscope - PU Europe
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
IV. Separation of expenditure and benefit<br />
This is probably <strong>the</strong> most complex and long-standing barrier relating to existing <strong>buildings</strong>, particularly in<br />
countries where <strong>the</strong>re is a high share of rental accommodation in <strong>the</strong> residential sector, but also because<br />
of <strong>the</strong> structure of occupancy in <strong>the</strong> non-residential sector. This barrier has been known <strong>under</strong> various<br />
names throughout <strong>the</strong> years. Most recently it is known as <strong>the</strong> ‘split incentives barrier’ or <strong>the</strong> ‘landlord/<br />
tenant barrier’, <strong>the</strong> ‘investor/user barrier’ and <strong>the</strong> ‘principal/agent barrier’, to name <strong>the</strong> main ones.<br />
This barrier was identified as <strong>the</strong> fourth most important barrier in <strong>the</strong> <strong>BPIE</strong> survey, although <strong>the</strong>re were no<br />
first place positions amongst <strong>the</strong> countries. This barrier is sometimes considered a financial barrier and,<br />
<strong>under</strong>standably, <strong>the</strong>re are financial implications. It is also sometimes considered to be an institutional<br />
barrier. This is presented separately herein due to its importance in retrofit strategies.<br />
The problem originates from <strong>the</strong> fact that one person or organisation owns a building and someone else<br />
uses it. For <strong>the</strong> owner, any investment has to bring a benefit which is not necessarily through energy<br />
savings, unless it is a situation where <strong>the</strong> landlord pays <strong>the</strong> energy bills (this may sometimes be <strong>the</strong> case).<br />
Since <strong>the</strong> tenant does not own <strong>the</strong> facility, any investment in lowering energy bills has to be seen as<br />
financially advantageous for both actors. This often leads to a stalemate with nothing happening.<br />
There are many examples where <strong>the</strong> party investing in a building may not be <strong>the</strong> party reaping <strong>the</strong><br />
financial returns (in full or in part). Examples include:<br />
• Landlords investing in a property where tenants pay <strong>the</strong> energy bill;<br />
• Landlords’ inability (through legislative restrictions or o<strong>the</strong>r reasons) to raise rents after a building<br />
renovation; and<br />
• Developers constructing a new building or renovating an existing one, where market prices do not<br />
reflect <strong>the</strong> energy performance of <strong>the</strong> building.<br />
As evidence from Germany 26 has shown, this is one of <strong>the</strong> most relevant barriers needing increased<br />
attention, particularly since many leases include heating charges and so <strong>the</strong> actual consumer has a lack of<br />
<strong>under</strong>standing of actual energy consumption. A comprehensive analysis on split incentives <strong>under</strong>taken<br />
by <strong>the</strong> International Energy Agency in 2007 showed that this barrier accounts for about 30% of sectorial<br />
energy use, which is highly significant. It stated, however, that no single policy instrument can address<br />
it. The IEA stated 27 :<br />
“Nei<strong>the</strong>r regulatory mechanisms, (e.g. minimum energy performance standards, or regulated contract<br />
design), nor information-based instruments (i.e. awareness campaigns) alone will resolve <strong>the</strong>m. Instead,<br />
governments should help design well-targeted policy packages to address PA problems in <strong>the</strong>ir specific<br />
national contexts, and within <strong>the</strong> particular constraints of a given sector. These packages should include<br />
measures to: a) address contract design to ensure end-users face energy prices, b) regulate <strong>the</strong> level of<br />
energy efficiency in appliances and <strong>buildings</strong>, c) improve access to information about energy efficiency<br />
performance.”<br />
This is an important point to remember in designing renovation policy pages, as will be seen in Part 3.<br />
26<br />
<strong>BPIE</strong> database<br />
27<br />
IEA, Mind <strong>the</strong> Gap, IEA/OECD, Paris, 2007, p. 12.<br />
60 | <strong>Europe</strong>’s <strong>buildings</strong> <strong>under</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>microscope</strong>