BPIE: Europe's buildings under the microscope - PU Europe
BPIE: Europe's buildings under the microscope - PU Europe
BPIE: Europe's buildings under the microscope - PU Europe
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
With respect to <strong>the</strong> demand side, Latvia highlighted <strong>the</strong> complex estate administration of privatised<br />
apartment <strong>buildings</strong>. It noted that <strong>the</strong>re was an unequal ability of owners to pay for renovations and<br />
some groups (e.g. pensioners) showed no interest in investment. Latvia also noted that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
standards for building energy efficiency have been adopted more slowly than planned and that those<br />
standards were not adapted to national needs. Because of <strong>the</strong> delays, no common software for building<br />
energy efficiency calculations for designers and engineers was available. Slovenia pointed out that<br />
scattered ownership in apartment <strong>buildings</strong> (with privatisation only taking place in <strong>the</strong> 1990s) raised<br />
many organisational barriers where <strong>the</strong>re must be a 75% consensus in multi-owned <strong>buildings</strong> for<br />
<strong>under</strong>taking technical improvements. This leads to complex protocols and <strong>the</strong> lack of consensus. There<br />
can also be institutional barriers in <strong>the</strong> public sector using energy service companies. This was raised by<br />
Slovenia but is a problem in several o<strong>the</strong>r countries.<br />
Structural<br />
Evidence from Belgium illustrates a dilemma that is probably found in several o<strong>the</strong>r Member States. The<br />
main barrier identified by our analysis of <strong>the</strong> Belgian responses is <strong>the</strong> age of <strong>the</strong> building stock because<br />
of a low demolition rate. As <strong>the</strong> average age of Belgium’s building stock is forecast to increase fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />
than that of <strong>Europe</strong>an counterparts in <strong>the</strong> next 25 years, <strong>the</strong> relative energy efficiency of <strong>the</strong> building<br />
stock is also likely to decrease. The analysis goes on to state that <strong>the</strong> high upfront cost and <strong>the</strong> annual cap<br />
on most incentives have <strong>the</strong> consequence that <strong>the</strong> refurbishments are spread over a long time period,<br />
which is a barrier to improving energy efficiency. Because of <strong>the</strong> age of <strong>buildings</strong>, <strong>the</strong> landlord-tenant<br />
dilemma makes it difficult to ameliorate <strong>the</strong> existing building stock. Many of <strong>the</strong> new Member States<br />
from Eastern <strong>Europe</strong> have a legacy of poor quality “panel” <strong>buildings</strong> from <strong>the</strong> 1960s and 1970s that need<br />
serious upgrading.<br />
Multi-stakeholder issues<br />
Various barriers exist where <strong>the</strong>re are multiple owners and/or occupiers of <strong>buildings</strong>. Ownership and<br />
responsibility can be opaque, while it can be very difficult to agree on energy saving investments in<br />
multi-family residential <strong>buildings</strong> if many different property owners have to ei<strong>the</strong>r approve a decision or<br />
make a financial contribution.<br />
III. Awareness, advice and skills barriers<br />
There are many barriers relating to awareness, information and technical expertise. This was <strong>the</strong> second<br />
most identified barrier category, with 15 of 26 countries giving this a high priority (amongst <strong>the</strong> top three).<br />
Undoubtedly, for <strong>the</strong> market to work well, correct and appropriate information is essential. Ambitious<br />
renovations comprise a major decision which can only work if <strong>the</strong> right energy advice to take action is<br />
available and that <strong>the</strong> energy efficiency service industries are capable of delivering those measures and<br />
ultimately that sufficient satisfaction levels can be guaranteed for <strong>the</strong> consumer. Current ESCO companies<br />
are not designed to deliver deep renovations where <strong>the</strong> complex process, small project size and multistakeholder<br />
involvement discourage ESCOs from having a real interest in deep renovation projects.<br />
Without <strong>the</strong> right combination of necessary conditions, <strong>the</strong> consumer may only choose to <strong>under</strong>take<br />
renovation measures when it is absolutely necessary, as is <strong>the</strong> case for <strong>the</strong> replacement of equipment<br />
when it breaks down. There were many observations in <strong>the</strong> survey about consumers not taking action<br />
and not being interested. Not being interested is a complex issue and generally takes more investigation<br />
to fully <strong>under</strong>stand <strong>the</strong> consumer’s motivation (or lack of motivation).<br />
58 | <strong>Europe</strong>’s <strong>buildings</strong> <strong>under</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>microscope</strong>