BPIE: Europe's buildings under the microscope - PU Europe
BPIE: Europe's buildings under the microscope - PU Europe
BPIE: Europe's buildings under the microscope - PU Europe
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
In addition to <strong>the</strong> lack of sufficient <strong>the</strong>rmal insulation, gaps at connection points between<br />
different elements of a building envelope (e.g. window frame and surrounding wall) can lead to<br />
considerable energy wastage. This highlights <strong>the</strong> importance of appropriate air tightness levels in<br />
a building. A building with high air tightness levels (that is, high air leakage levels and high n 50<br />
values 18 )<br />
typically suffers from high energy consumption levels while a building with very high air tightness levels<br />
can cause unhealthy conditions for its occupants, especially if <strong>the</strong>re is inadequate ventilation. The latter<br />
is typically linked to poor indoor air quality and <strong>the</strong> so-called sick building syndrome. Establishing <strong>the</strong><br />
appropriate level of air tightness in <strong>buildings</strong> is, <strong>the</strong>refore, a key aspect from <strong>the</strong> viewpoints of energy<br />
usage and comfortable occupant conditions. Poor detailing in past construction techniques means that<br />
older <strong>buildings</strong> encounter high leakage levels.<br />
This is illustrated by Figure 1C8 which shows typical values of air tightness levels (measured at 50 Pa in h -1 ) of<br />
single family houses for a number of countries across <strong>Europe</strong>. It is evident that in countries with long traditions<br />
in energy regulations (such as Germany and Denmark), <strong>the</strong> older stock demonstrates far lower air leakage<br />
levels compared to <strong>the</strong> old stock in Central & Eastern regions (such as Czech Republic, Latvia and Bulgaria).<br />
However, even with today’s levels of air tightness levels, studies have shown that envelope leakage can<br />
increase <strong>the</strong> heating needs by 5 to 20 kWh/m²/a in a moderate climate (2500 to 3000 degree-days) 19 .<br />
Non-residential <strong>buildings</strong><br />
Understanding energy use in <strong>the</strong> non-residential sector is complex as end-uses such as lighting,<br />
ventilation, heating, cooling, refrigeration, IT equipment and appliances vary greatly from one building<br />
category to ano<strong>the</strong>r within this sector.<br />
Over <strong>the</strong> last 20 years in <strong>Europe</strong> electricity consumption in <strong>Europe</strong>an non-residential <strong>buildings</strong> has<br />
increased by a remarkable 74%, as depicted in Figure 1C9. This is compatible with technological advances<br />
over <strong>the</strong> decades where an increasing penetration of IT equipment, air conditioning systems etc. means<br />
that electricity demand within this sector is on a continuously increasing trajectory.<br />
(c.f. absolute difference in electricity use between 1990-2009).<br />
Mtoe<br />
Figure 1C9 – Historical final energy use in <strong>the</strong> non-residential sector in <strong>the</strong> EU27, Norway and<br />
Switzerland<br />
Source: Eurostat database<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
1990<br />
1991<br />
All fuels<br />
1992<br />
1993<br />
1994<br />
1995<br />
Electricity<br />
18<br />
n 50<br />
represents <strong>the</strong> total air change rate in a building caused by pressure difference of 50 Pa<br />
19<br />
As quoted in <strong>the</strong> ASIEPI project (www.asiepi.eu)<br />
1996<br />
1997<br />
1998<br />
1999<br />
2000<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
2007<br />
2008<br />
2009<br />
<strong>Europe</strong>’s <strong>buildings</strong> <strong>under</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>microscope</strong> | 51