BPIE: Europe's buildings under the microscope - PU Europe
BPIE: Europe's buildings under the microscope - PU Europe
BPIE: Europe's buildings under the microscope - PU Europe
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
In terms of cost-effectiveness to consumers, scenarios 1-3 are broadly similar in terms of <strong>the</strong> Internal Rate<br />
of Return when considered over <strong>the</strong> period to 2050, all falling into <strong>the</strong> range 11.5-12.5%. This is slightly<br />
better than <strong>the</strong> baseline scenario of 10%, though not as good as scenario 4, which achieves 13.4%<br />
The following set of graphs present and compare <strong>the</strong> overall results of <strong>the</strong> scenarios to 2050.<br />
Figures 3C1 and 3C2 below compare <strong>the</strong> net savings to consumers and to society from <strong>the</strong> six scenario<br />
options. It can be seen that <strong>the</strong> more ambitious <strong>the</strong> scenario, <strong>the</strong> higher <strong>the</strong> net savings are.<br />
Figure 3C1 – Lifetime net savings to consumers (present value)<br />
Source: <strong>BPIE</strong> model<br />
500<br />
450<br />
400<br />
350<br />
300<br />
€bn<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
Baseline Slow & shallow Fast & shallow Central Deep Two-stage<br />
€bn<br />
Figure 3C2 – Lifetime net savings to society (present value)<br />
Source: <strong>BPIE</strong> model<br />
12.000<br />
10.000<br />
8.000<br />
6.000<br />
4.000<br />
2.000<br />
0<br />
Baseline Slow & shallow Fast & shallow Central Deep Two-stage<br />
120 | <strong>Europe</strong>’s <strong>buildings</strong> <strong>under</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>microscope</strong>