03.06.2014 Views

Multiple benefits of renovation in buildings - PU Europe

Multiple benefits of renovation in buildings - PU Europe

Multiple benefits of renovation in buildings - PU Europe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Multiple</strong> <strong>benefits</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> energy<br />

efficient <strong>renovation</strong> <strong>of</strong> build<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

<strong>in</strong>cludes the health <strong>benefits</strong> from improved <strong>renovation</strong> on e.g. respiratory diseases, asthma<br />

etc, where the estimates are quite uncerta<strong>in</strong>. If <strong>in</strong>vestments cont<strong>in</strong>ue towards 2030,<br />

these annual <strong>benefits</strong> will be approximately doubled <strong>in</strong> 2030.<br />

Table A.31 Annual improvement <strong>of</strong> public f<strong>in</strong>ances, 2020<br />

Improvement <strong>of</strong> public f<strong>in</strong>ances (<strong>in</strong>cl. rebound)<br />

Direct annual <strong>benefits</strong><br />

Value - low EE scenario<br />

(bn EUR)<br />

Energy sav<strong>in</strong>gs 9.1 12.4<br />

Lost tax revenue from energy taxation<br />

-4 -6<br />

Reduced outlay on subsidies 2.2 – 8.7 2.5 – 9.0<br />

Indirect annual <strong>benefits</strong><br />

Reduced air pollution 0 0<br />

Health <strong>benefits</strong> (uncerta<strong>in</strong>) 10.0 – 28.2 19.0 – 35.4<br />

Total 17.1 – 42.0 28.1 – 51.0<br />

Total (pct. <strong>of</strong> GDP) 0.1 – 0.3 0.2 – 0.4<br />

Value - high EE scenario<br />

(bn EUR)<br />

Note:<br />

Rebound effect has been <strong>in</strong>cluded<br />

Annual improvements <strong>of</strong> public f<strong>in</strong>ances are a subset <strong>of</strong> overall <strong>benefits</strong> to society.<br />

Source: Copenhagen Economics<br />

In addition to these annual <strong>benefits</strong>, there will be a one-<strong>of</strong>f <strong>benefits</strong> to GDP and public<br />

budgets from <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g economic activity. This corresponds to €153 billion impact on<br />

GDP and €67 billion <strong>in</strong>creased revenue to public budgets <strong>in</strong> the low EE scenario, cf. Figure<br />

A.10. If the high EE scenario is followed, the <strong>benefits</strong> will be €291 billion impact on<br />

GDP and an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> public revenue <strong>of</strong> €128 billion.<br />

Figure A.10 Benefit from <strong>in</strong>creased economic activity<br />

€ billion<br />

350<br />

300<br />

291<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

153<br />

128<br />

100<br />

67<br />

50<br />

0<br />

Low EE scenario<br />

Impact on GDP<br />

High EE scenario<br />

Impact on public f<strong>in</strong>ances<br />

Source: Copenhagen Economics based on the stated sources <strong>in</strong> the above calculation steps.<br />

78

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!