03.06.2014 Views

Multiple benefits of renovation in buildings - PU Europe

Multiple benefits of renovation in buildings - PU Europe

Multiple benefits of renovation in buildings - PU Europe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Multiple</strong> <strong>benefits</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> energy<br />

efficient <strong>renovation</strong> <strong>of</strong> build<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

less research. One <strong>of</strong> the estimates was made by the <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission (2012), Annex<br />

I, where it is found that annualised <strong>in</strong>vestments <strong>of</strong> €60 billion per year is needed from<br />

2012-2020 to reach the potential correspond<strong>in</strong>g to our low EE scenario <strong>in</strong> both the exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

build<strong>in</strong>g stock, and <strong>in</strong> new build<strong>in</strong>gs. We use the same method applied by the Commission,<br />

but only considers the potential <strong>in</strong> the exist<strong>in</strong>g build<strong>in</strong>g stock. We beg<strong>in</strong> by tak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the MAC-curves presented <strong>in</strong> ECF (2010), page 54 and read <strong>of</strong>f the net <strong>in</strong>vestment<br />

cost (or sav<strong>in</strong>g) per <strong>in</strong>vestment type per GJ.<br />

By comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the net cost <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestment per GJ with the energy sav<strong>in</strong>g potential for each<br />

measure, we can transpose the net cost <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong>to a total cost <strong>in</strong> EUR. The net<br />

cost <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestment is by def<strong>in</strong>ition equal to the gross cost <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestment m<strong>in</strong>us the annualised<br />

achievable sav<strong>in</strong>gs from reduced energy consumption. S<strong>in</strong>ce we know both the energy<br />

sav<strong>in</strong>g potential, and the price <strong>of</strong> energy used <strong>in</strong> the ECF (2010) study (both for electricity<br />

and heat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>puts), we can deduce the gross cost <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestment.<br />

We f<strong>in</strong>d that for EU27 the annualised gross <strong>in</strong>vestment costs needed to achieve the <strong>renovation</strong><br />

measures <strong>in</strong> the low EE scenario from 2012-2020 to be €41 billion, and €78 billion<br />

<strong>in</strong> the high EE scenario, cf. Table A.5. A similar annual amount is needed to reach the<br />

potential go<strong>in</strong>g from 2020-2030.<br />

Table A.5 Gross annualised <strong>in</strong>vestment cost <strong>of</strong> energy sav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>vestments,<br />

2012-2020<br />

Renovation source<br />

Gross <strong>in</strong>vestment<br />

cost - low EE<br />

scenario (bn EUR)<br />

Households – heat<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>sulation 20.8 40.5<br />

Households - water heat<strong>in</strong>g 2.8 5.5<br />

Service sector – heat<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>sulation 8.6 16.1<br />

Service sector appliances (air condition<strong>in</strong>g & ventilation) 0.7 0.7<br />

Industry – heat<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>sulation 7.0 12.7<br />

Households – light<strong>in</strong>g 0.2 1.0<br />

Service sector – light<strong>in</strong>g 1.1 1.1<br />

Total gross <strong>in</strong>vestment costs 41 78<br />

Note:<br />

Gross <strong>in</strong>vestment<br />

cost - high EE<br />

scenario(bn EUR)<br />

In order to calculate <strong>in</strong>vestment cost, we have assumed that all water heat<strong>in</strong>g is generated by use <strong>of</strong><br />

electricity, and all that all heat<strong>in</strong>g is generated by use <strong>of</strong> heat<strong>in</strong>g oil.<br />

Source: Copenhagen Economics, based on ECF (2010) and methodology <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission (2012)<br />

It should be noted that these estimates are calculated on the basis <strong>of</strong> MAC-curves. MACcurves<br />

typically only <strong>in</strong>clude the costs related to the actual <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the operation<br />

and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance costs. Other costs, such as transaction costs related to e.g. the use<br />

<strong>of</strong> scarce management time are not <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the analyses. This means that the net sav<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

we derive overestimate the true <strong>benefits</strong> <strong>of</strong> the measures, when tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account <strong>of</strong><br />

all relevant costs. Consequently, we may underestimate the actual annualised <strong>in</strong>vestment<br />

costs.<br />

52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!