Multiple benefits of renovation in buildings - PU Europe
Multiple benefits of renovation in buildings - PU Europe
Multiple benefits of renovation in buildings - PU Europe
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Multiple</strong> <strong>benefits</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> energy<br />
efficient <strong>renovation</strong> <strong>of</strong> build<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
Figure 18 Real <strong>in</strong>terests rates <strong>of</strong> government bonds<br />
per cent<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
-1<br />
-2<br />
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012<br />
Note:<br />
We use the nom<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>terest on a 10-year government bond for most <strong>Europe</strong>an countries. We use the<br />
HICP <strong>in</strong>dex to adjust for <strong>in</strong>flation.<br />
The curve shows a weighted average for all EU countries except countries severely affected by the<br />
economic crisis lead<strong>in</strong>g to extraord<strong>in</strong>arily high <strong>in</strong>terest rates such as: Italy, Spa<strong>in</strong>, Portugal, and Ireland.<br />
The real <strong>in</strong>terest rate has been weighted by the countries’ GDP.<br />
Source: Copenhagen Economics, based on data from Eurostat<br />
MAC and IRR studies typically only <strong>in</strong>clude the energy sav<strong>in</strong>gs that may be derived from<br />
energy efficient <strong>renovation</strong>s <strong>of</strong> build<strong>in</strong>gs. However, as we showed <strong>in</strong> Chapter 1, these <strong>renovation</strong>s<br />
will also give rise to a range <strong>of</strong> co-<strong>benefits</strong>, which makes each <strong>in</strong>dividual project<br />
even more pr<strong>of</strong>itable from a societal po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> view than by just realis<strong>in</strong>g energy sav<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />
The marg<strong>in</strong>al abatement cost curves, and studies on pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> actual energy efficiency<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestments suggest that there is a large unfulfilled potential for otherwise pr<strong>of</strong>itable<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestment projects to be undertaken. This is accentuated by the very low real <strong>in</strong>terest<br />
rates <strong>in</strong> most <strong>Europe</strong>an countries, which by def<strong>in</strong>ition makes more <strong>in</strong>vestment projects<br />
economically pr<strong>of</strong>itable. We argue that there are several barriers hold<strong>in</strong>g these <strong>in</strong>vestments<br />
back. The barriers may be grouped <strong>in</strong>to: 1) Regulatory failures, and 2) Market failures.<br />
We will describe these barriers <strong>in</strong> detail <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g sections.<br />
2.2 Barriers from regulatory failure<br />
In our view, the existence <strong>of</strong> regulatory related barriers is the most conv<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g argument<br />
for the existence <strong>of</strong> unreleased potential for energy efficiency <strong>in</strong>vestments <strong>in</strong> build<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />
Several types <strong>of</strong> regulatory failures are likely to exist:<br />
Rent regulation<br />
Rent regulation is a common feature <strong>of</strong> almost all EU Member States’ hous<strong>in</strong>g policies.<br />
While concrete regulation differs between countries, the most common feature is rent<br />
control, which typically prevents landlords from <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the rent level above some<br />
28