Hair Types and Required Specific Ingredients for Conditioning ...
Hair Types and Required Specific Ingredients for Conditioning ... Hair Types and Required Specific Ingredients for Conditioning ...
Dry feel In the sensory hair swatch test, we found best dry feel scoring for VARISOFT ® BT 85 and VARISOFT ® PATC. Gloss/shine For the gloss improvement, again determined by the sensory hair swatch test we found best results for TEGO ® Amid S 18 and ABIL ® Quat 3474. The results for the ABIL ® Quat 3474 were confirmed in a halfhead salon test where this silicone quaternary was judged to be directionally better than CTAC. Figure 12 shows the total result of that half-head test, including further parameters like combability and feel (salon test conducted at an independent test institute). antistatic effect volume build-up distribution capability 5 4 3 2 1 0 rinseability significant wet combability significant significant wet feel ABIL ® Quat 3474 was scored tendenciously better than CTAC. Test formula: rinse 0.5 % Ceteareth-25 2.0 % Cetyl Alcohol 2.0 % active Conditioning agent ad 100.0 % water; pH=4 tendencious gloss drying time elasticity dry combability dry feel ABIL ® Quat 3474 CTAC 5 = excellent 1 = very deficient Figure 12: Results of the half-head-test ABIL ® Quat 3474 against CTAC as Standard 14
Body/Volume Conditioners reduce the volume of the hair by three mechanisms: reducing the fiber to fiber friction to smooth the hair, softening the fibers and by weighing down the hair mass. According to our sensory test, VARISOFT ® W 575 PG was the conditioning additive least likely to impart these effects making it most suited to conditioners developed for the fine hair segment. Because of the good result for the aminofunctional siloxane, we combined this product with some conditioning additives that are known to reduce the body of hair. Figure 13 shows the results. In all cases the negative impact of the organic quats on body/volume could be minimized via the addition of ABIL ® Soft AF 100. The most significant synergy was exhibited by a blend of the ABIL ® Soft AF 100 with the VARISOFT ® BT 85. VARISOFT ® 300 VARISOFT ® BT 85 VARISOFT ® TA 100 VARISOFT ® 432 PPG VARISOFT ® 300 + ABIL ® Soft AF 100 VARISOFT ® BT 85 + ABIL ® Soft AF 100 ABIL ® Soft AF 100 provides better volume score than the quats (as single ingredients). Combinations (1:1) of organic quats with ABIL ® Soft AF 100 compensate the negative impact of organic quats on body/volume. Test formula: rinse 0.5% Ceteareth-25 2.0% Cetyl Alcohol 2.0% active Conditioning agent ad 100,0% water; pH=4 VARISOFT ® TA 100 + ABIL ® Soft AF 100 VARISOFT ® 432 PPG + ABIL ® Soft AF 100 ABIL ® Soft AF 100 0 1 2 3 4 5 Score of sensory assessment (5 = best) Figure 13: Body/Volume results for combinations with ABIL Soft ® AF 100 15
- Page 1 and 2: Hair Types and Required Specific In
- Page 3 and 4: Thin/fine and medium hair Thin/fine
- Page 5 and 6: Hair type Properties Fine Detanglin
- Page 7 and 8: Curl retention [%] = (L - Lt/L - L0
- Page 9 and 10: CH 3 CH 3 CH 3 CH 3 H 3 C Si O Si O
- Page 11 and 12: 6. Results Figure 8 gives an overvi
- Page 13: Comparison against CTAC (VARISOFT
- Page 17 and 18: Curl retention [%] ( = L - L t / L
- Page 19 and 20: Half head test results The new envi
- Page 21 and 22: Summary: Specific properties of con
- Page 23 and 24: Literature [1] Robbins, C.R.: Chemi
Dry feel<br />
In the sensory hair swatch test, we found best dry feel scoring <strong>for</strong> VARISOFT ® BT 85 <strong>and</strong> VARISOFT ® PATC.<br />
Gloss/shine<br />
For the gloss improvement, again determined by the sensory hair swatch test we found best results <strong>for</strong><br />
TEGO ® Amid S 18 <strong>and</strong> ABIL ® Quat 3474. The results <strong>for</strong> the ABIL ® Quat 3474 were confirmed in a halfhead<br />
salon test where this silicone quaternary was judged to be directionally better than CTAC. Figure 12<br />
shows the total result of that half-head test, including further parameters like combability <strong>and</strong> feel (salon test<br />
conducted at an independent test institute).<br />
antistatic effect<br />
volume<br />
build-up<br />
distribution capability<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
rinseability<br />
significant<br />
wet combability<br />
significant<br />
significant<br />
wet feel<br />
ABIL ® Quat 3474 was scored<br />
tendenciously better than<br />
CTAC.<br />
Test <strong>for</strong>mula: rinse<br />
0.5 % Ceteareth-25<br />
2.0 % Cetyl Alcohol<br />
2.0 % active <strong>Conditioning</strong> agent<br />
ad 100.0 % water; pH=4<br />
tendencious<br />
gloss<br />
drying time<br />
elasticity<br />
dry combability<br />
dry feel<br />
ABIL ® Quat 3474<br />
CTAC<br />
5 = excellent<br />
1 = very deficient<br />
Figure 12: Results of the half-head-test ABIL ® Quat 3474 against CTAC as St<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
14
Change language