02.06.2014 Views

Evaluation of the Australian Wage Subsidy Special Youth ...

Evaluation of the Australian Wage Subsidy Special Youth ...

Evaluation of the Australian Wage Subsidy Special Youth ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

79<br />

2.3.1 Stretton (1982, 1984) 53<br />

Stretton (1984) used survey data <strong>of</strong> participants in 5 programmes collected in November<br />

1981, where <strong>the</strong> 5 programmes were EPUY, GTA on-<strong>the</strong> job and 3 types <strong>of</strong> SYETP-<br />

Commonwealth, private, and second serve. The survey took place about 6 months after<br />

programme participation, was <strong>of</strong> a sample <strong>of</strong> 1500 participants who completed,<br />

terminated or withdrew from <strong>the</strong> placement in April/May 1981 and had a response rate <strong>of</strong><br />

63 per cent with 945 cases for analysis. Stretton (1984) himself pointed out that he did<br />

not have a comparison group, and that <strong>the</strong> possibility <strong>of</strong> selection bias existed with regard<br />

to modelling employment, and non-response bias might be present. An analysis <strong>of</strong> nonresponse<br />

was made using <strong>the</strong> administrative data for <strong>the</strong> sample. It was found that<br />

younger persons, females and programme completers were more likely to respond.<br />

Participation in one programme was compared to participation in ano<strong>the</strong>r programme, by<br />

including a set <strong>of</strong> programme dummies. Employment (two-types: full or part-time job at<br />

interview, or any job since programme) was modelled using a logit <strong>of</strong> labour market<br />

status. The regressions were run with age, continuous age, education (dummy with 1 for<br />

school leaver at 16 years or younger), duration <strong>of</strong> unemployment prior to programme<br />

entry, programme (EPUY was <strong>the</strong> base), and state (Tasmania was <strong>the</strong> base). Positive<br />

coefficients, statistically significant at <strong>the</strong> one and five per cent level, were present for all<br />

programme dummies, and for SYETP this was true in both employment at interview and<br />

any employment since <strong>the</strong> programme.<br />

To investigate retention, <strong>the</strong> same model was run on just <strong>the</strong> sample <strong>of</strong> those who were<br />

not retained by <strong>the</strong>ir placement employer. No programme dummies were significant. It<br />

was concluded completers not retained in <strong>the</strong>ir placement job did no better than those<br />

who did not complete. It was noted that <strong>the</strong> observed retention rates differed for <strong>the</strong><br />

various programmes, with only 60 per cent <strong>of</strong> GTA retained, 70 per cent <strong>of</strong> SYETP<br />

private, 70 per cent or SYETP second serve, and 80 per cent <strong>of</strong> SYETP Commonwealth<br />

(Stretton (1984): 86). Also, less than 5 per cent <strong>of</strong> SYETP or GTA programme<br />

participants left early (Stretton (1984): 87). Then <strong>the</strong> employment model was adjusted to<br />

include dummies about completion, <strong>the</strong> resulting model interpreted as comparing those<br />

53 As <strong>the</strong> first <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se is early findings, only <strong>the</strong> second is discussed here.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!