02.06.2014 Views

Evaluation of the Australian Wage Subsidy Special Youth ...

Evaluation of the Australian Wage Subsidy Special Youth ...

Evaluation of the Australian Wage Subsidy Special Youth ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

73<br />

provisions for SYETP and extended SYETP had a small amount <strong>of</strong> age variation with<br />

extended SYETP excluding 15-17 year olds. They concluded that a smaller share <strong>of</strong><br />

commencements for older ages in <strong>the</strong> target groups was likely due to <strong>the</strong> flat age payment<br />

<strong>of</strong> SYETP subsidy whereas employers paid wages within an age related award structure.<br />

Table 2.14 shows <strong>the</strong> age breakdown <strong>of</strong> SYETP commencements in 1980/81, while Table<br />

2.15 gives <strong>the</strong> age/sex breakdown. Total wage reimbursement to Commonwealth<br />

employers and <strong>the</strong> ability to avoid ‘staff ceiling constraints’ led to older target ages being<br />

more common in this sort <strong>of</strong> placement. The Extended SYETP was not in operation until<br />

<strong>the</strong> ‘March 1981’ quarter.<br />

In Table 2.15, <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> commencements gives an idea <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> scale <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

programmes in terms <strong>of</strong> total treated ‘flow’ cases in <strong>the</strong> period, and <strong>the</strong> proportion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

total each programme represents is also shown. It is clear <strong>the</strong>re was a heavy reliance on<br />

<strong>the</strong> private SYETP, amongst all SYETP, and also <strong>the</strong>re was more widespread use <strong>of</strong><br />

SYETP amongst <strong>the</strong> range all programmes.<br />

Table 2.14 Distribution <strong>of</strong> SYETP commencements, by age 1980-81<br />

Quarter Sept 1980 Dec 1980 Mar 1981 Jun1981<br />

Age 15-19<br />

years<br />

20-24<br />

years<br />

25 47<br />

years<br />

15-19<br />

years<br />

20-24<br />

years<br />

25<br />

years<br />

15-19<br />

years<br />

20-24<br />

years<br />

25<br />

years<br />

15-19<br />

years<br />

20-24<br />

years<br />

25<br />

years<br />

SYETP<br />

58.6 41.4 0.0 52.3 47.5 0.2 52.2 46.6 1.2 62.7 36.5 0.8<br />

Commonwealth<br />

2nd SYETP 52.8 47.2 0.0 42.9 57.1 0.0 46.9 53.1 0.0 46.9 50.0 3.1<br />

Commonwealth<br />

SYETP private 86.8 13.1 0.1 84.8 15.0 0.2 84.1 15.7 0.2 90.1 9.8 0.1<br />

2nd SYETP 86.2 13.8 0.0 82.5 17.1 0.3 81.4 18.5 0.1 85.8 14.2 0.0<br />

private<br />

Extended SYETP 58.0 41.7 0.3 53.5 46.0 0.5<br />

Source: BLMR (1983) p42 Appendix Table B1. Data is Department <strong>of</strong> Employment and Industrial<br />

Relations administrative records for commencements to <strong>the</strong> programme in 1980-81, which thus only refer<br />

to ‘flow’ into <strong>the</strong> programme and not <strong>the</strong> total number or ‘stock’ being treated at any one time. Table shows<br />

proportions in <strong>the</strong> three age groups that sum to 100 per cent <strong>of</strong> commencements for each quarter and<br />

programme. ‘2 nd SYETP’ placements refer to commencements where this was <strong>the</strong> 2 nd eligible period <strong>of</strong><br />

SYETP assistance – i.e. multiple placements. The Extended SYETP was not in operation until <strong>the</strong> ‘March<br />

1981’ quarter.<br />

47 The 25 year olds were not eligible but <strong>the</strong>se commencements are explained by ‘Birth dates falling just<br />

prior to or after commencement dates, coding errors’ (BLMR (1983) p42 Appendix Table B1footnote (b)).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!