02.06.2014 Views

Evaluation of the Australian Wage Subsidy Special Youth ...

Evaluation of the Australian Wage Subsidy Special Youth ...

Evaluation of the Australian Wage Subsidy Special Youth ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

51<br />

2.2.3 SYETP operation<br />

Earlier references to SYETP explained it in various ways. SYETP was initially described<br />

as a training programme that was part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> National Employment and Training System<br />

(NEAT 25 ), in a 1980 information pamphlet for CES services and Manpower Programmes<br />

(DEYA (1980)). In 1982 SYETP was listed amongst manpower programmes as a work<br />

experience programme, which was part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Youth</strong> Training Programmes, with <strong>the</strong><br />

following remit:<br />

“The work experience programme helps employers (both private and<br />

Commonwealth) take on young people who have found it difficult to get<br />

stable employment because <strong>the</strong>y lack <strong>the</strong> required experience and<br />

qualifications by providing a subsidy for <strong>the</strong>ir employment.” (Paterson (1982)<br />

Appendix 1, p3).<br />

However, research documenting <strong>the</strong> programmes pointed out that <strong>the</strong> SYETP was<br />

essentially a wage subsidy to employers to take on unemployed young people (BLMR<br />

(1983): 2). In this same research, SYETP was also defined as a ‘work experience<br />

programme’. Yet <strong>the</strong> real emphasis was never on training. In 1984 programme conditions<br />

for employers included <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> a training plan for <strong>the</strong> new employee,<br />

however this seems <strong>the</strong> greatest extent <strong>of</strong> training under SYETP. Smith (1983) pointed<br />

out that this training plan could cover normal orientation for new employees. Thus it was<br />

a fairly straightforward employment subsidy programme with no real training provisions<br />

attached.<br />

In a submission to <strong>the</strong> OECD, <strong>the</strong> department in charge <strong>of</strong> administering manpower<br />

programmes described SYETP as “…one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> major programmes designed to improve<br />

access to and equity in <strong>the</strong> labour market”, one <strong>of</strong> two toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> job creation<br />

programme CEP (Community Employment Programme). It was fur<strong>the</strong>r described as<br />

“…aimed at improving <strong>the</strong> employability <strong>of</strong> longer-term unemployed young people aged<br />

25 An active labour market ‘umbrella’ program, NEAT consisted <strong>of</strong> a mixture <strong>of</strong> separate training and wage<br />

subsidy programs.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!