02.06.2014 Views

Evaluation of the Australian Wage Subsidy Special Youth ...

Evaluation of the Australian Wage Subsidy Special Youth ...

Evaluation of the Australian Wage Subsidy Special Youth ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

39<br />

differences in characteristics that affect <strong>the</strong> employment outcome can remain. As a result<br />

it is likely that <strong>the</strong> matching performed does not fully diminish potential bias arising from<br />

<strong>the</strong>se o<strong>the</strong>r sources.<br />

Some raw statistics suggesting <strong>the</strong> positive effect <strong>of</strong> Jobstart upon employment were<br />

presented in <strong>the</strong> Working Nation policy document, however no more systematic<br />

evaluation evidence was presented. The raw post-programme employment share, derived<br />

from <strong>the</strong> quarterly Post Programme Survey [PPM], showed that for 1996 <strong>the</strong>re were 41.1<br />

per cent <strong>of</strong> Jobstart participants in unsubsidised employment over <strong>the</strong> 12 months to<br />

September 1992 (DEETYA (1996) p53 Table 4.5). This was higher than <strong>the</strong> employment<br />

share for <strong>the</strong> training programmes Jobskills and NWO 13 . The employment effect was not<br />

evaluated fur<strong>the</strong>r with any modelling.<br />

A fur<strong>the</strong>r evaluation <strong>of</strong> Jobstart in 1997 14 also used <strong>the</strong> matching design. Again age, sex<br />

and unemployment duration were used for matching with o<strong>the</strong>r factors such as education<br />

and location not accounted for, as <strong>the</strong>se were not deemed as important to describing<br />

employment outcomes. 15 Using administrative data, participants were matched to a<br />

comparison group <strong>of</strong> non-participants. Jobstart participants had post-programme<br />

employment 3 months after <strong>the</strong> programme <strong>of</strong> 50 per cent while <strong>the</strong> matched<br />

comparisons had 22 per cent, a net impact <strong>of</strong> 28 percentage points. At 12 months postprogramme,<br />

<strong>the</strong> net employment impact had fallen to 15 percentage points.<br />

Stromback and Dockery (2000) used <strong>the</strong> panel data 1994-1997 Survey <strong>of</strong> Employment<br />

and Unemployment Patterns (SEUP) to examine employment outcomes for programme<br />

participants, including <strong>the</strong> Jobstart. The survey collected 3 interviews between September<br />

1994 and 1997, for a panel <strong>of</strong> persons aged 15-59 years. Labour market history for each<br />

month <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> past year was collected at each interview by recall, recorded as periods <strong>of</strong><br />

13 New Work Opportunities (NWO). NWO provided direct job creation in projects where placements had<br />

work with some training typically in environmental, age care and community sectors [OECD (2001): 199].<br />

14 DEETYA (1997) “The net impact <strong>of</strong> labour market programs: improvements in <strong>the</strong> prospects <strong>of</strong> those<br />

assisted” DEETYA <strong>Evaluation</strong> and Monitoring Branch report 2/97, Economic and Policy Division,<br />

Canberra. Cited Table 1 p194 Webster (1998) and Richardson (1998) p3.<br />

15 DEETYA (1997) Appendix B cited Webster (1998) p200 footnote 5.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!