02.06.2014 Views

Evaluation of the Australian Wage Subsidy Special Youth ...

Evaluation of the Australian Wage Subsidy Special Youth ...

Evaluation of the Australian Wage Subsidy Special Youth ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

37<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> subsidy secondary to <strong>the</strong> quality and suitability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> worker, and<br />

references were made to <strong>the</strong> problems <strong>of</strong> low skills, poor attitudes to work and low<br />

motivation <strong>of</strong> long-term unemployed as perceived by employers (DEETYA (1996): 47).<br />

In October 1995, Jobstart was adjusted to allow shorter placements and extension <strong>of</strong><br />

eligibility to those 6-12 months unemployed.<br />

Table 2.1 Private Sector Jobstart subsidy weekly rates 1985-1987<br />

Age <strong>of</strong> placement Jobstart Basic rate $ Jobstart <strong>Special</strong> rate $<br />

15-17 50 75<br />

18-20 75 110<br />

21-44 100 150<br />

45+ 125 180<br />

Source: Kesteven (1987) p45<br />

A flurry <strong>of</strong> evaluation evidence started to exist for Jobstart from about <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> this<br />

programme’s inception, and through <strong>the</strong> 1990’s. These evaluations were usually by <strong>the</strong><br />

government department responsible for <strong>the</strong> programme. Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> more recent studies<br />

use <strong>the</strong> matched comparison group design, or exact matching methods. 9 The early<br />

evaluation DEET (1989) used data on 1000 participants and non-participants, and found<br />

post-programme continuous full-time employability increased on average by 33<br />

percentage points at 3,5 and 14 months. 10<br />

The next analysis <strong>of</strong> Jobstart was published in 1993. The raw post-programme<br />

employment share, sourced from <strong>the</strong> quarterly Post Program Survey, showed that for<br />

1992 <strong>the</strong>re were 95,600 new placements and 57 per cent <strong>of</strong> Jobstart participants were in<br />

unsubsidised employment over <strong>the</strong> 12 months to September 1992 (DEET (1994) p38<br />

Table 5.3). This was <strong>the</strong> highest employment outcome amongst all programmes, with <strong>the</strong><br />

average for all programmes at 32 per cent. Younger jobseekers were more likely to<br />

receive Jobstart 11 , and men were more likely to get Jobstart placements. 12 SYETP became<br />

Jobstart, and after 10 years in place it seems likely that SYETP had become a generally<br />

9 See earlier in Chapter 1 for <strong>the</strong> introduction to evaluation methods, and Chapter 4.4 for a description <strong>of</strong><br />

matching.<br />

10 DEET (1989) “Jobstart evaluation” DEET Program Review and Income Support Branch, Canberra. Cited<br />

in Webster (1998) Table 1 p194.<br />

11 DEET (1994) p45 and p33 “participation by youth in Jobstart, especially 18-20 years olds was well<br />

above average placement rates.”<br />

12 DEET (1994) p33 “32 places to women per 1000 registrants compared to 44 for men”.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!