02.06.2014 Views

Evaluation of the Australian Wage Subsidy Special Youth ...

Evaluation of the Australian Wage Subsidy Special Youth ...

Evaluation of the Australian Wage Subsidy Special Youth ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

35<br />

term unemployed for over 12 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> last 15 months, or <strong>the</strong> disadvantaged groups listed.<br />

The designated disadvantaged groups were “...disabled, sole supporting parents, migrants<br />

with English language difficulties, Aborigines” (Kesteven (1987): 45). The positions<br />

were required to be full-time, but with exceptions possible for <strong>the</strong> disadvantaged groups,<br />

and available for 26 weeks continuous employment. Job vacancies had to be notified with<br />

<strong>the</strong> CES, and at least <strong>the</strong> Award wage 7 was paid to placements. There was a special<br />

Jobstart self-service board with all wage subsidy jobs displayed on it, and <strong>the</strong> CES could<br />

also give a card called, a ‘self-canvassing card’, that could be shown to employers at <strong>the</strong><br />

job interview (Victorian State Office (1985) p7 and DEET (1994) p38).<br />

Jobstart was described as a general wage subsidy scheme, where employers received<br />

subsidy for placements where <strong>the</strong> rate varied with age. Private Sector Jobstart subsidy<br />

rates for 1985-87 are shown below in Table 2.1. The Jobstart <strong>Special</strong> rate was higher than<br />

<strong>the</strong> basic rate, and rates increased with age. In 1985/86 35,098 placements were approved<br />

in private sector Jobstart, with expenditure for <strong>the</strong> year at $18,787 million (Kesteven<br />

(1987): 46).<br />

Jobstart was expanded considerably during <strong>the</strong> <strong>Australian</strong> recession, but was more<br />

commonly referred to within <strong>the</strong> Job Compact package. After 1989, it was part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Job<br />

Compact along with <strong>the</strong> National Training <strong>Wage</strong> [NTW]. The NTW was a training wage<br />

but was “...to be supplemented by subsidies to entice employers to provide training”<br />

(OECD (2001): 198). The Job Compact was part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Working Nation package <strong>of</strong><br />

initiatives, and centred on an <strong>of</strong>fer <strong>of</strong> 6-12 months job placement in <strong>the</strong> private sector, but<br />

usually 9 months, to all who had been in receipt <strong>of</strong> benefits for more than 18 months<br />

(OECD (2001): 198). This eligibility required a longer period <strong>of</strong> unemployment than in<br />

1987, and so <strong>the</strong> targeting <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> programme was tightened in this new form, however<br />

against this, <strong>the</strong> subsidy length was extended to 12 months. This had strong effects on <strong>the</strong><br />

programme. There were issues <strong>of</strong> low take-up. Sheen and Tre<strong>the</strong>wey (1991) p38 point<br />

7 Australia has extensive union wage agreements, which specify a complex system <strong>of</strong> minimum wages.<br />

These are termed Award <strong>Wage</strong>s.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!