02.06.2014 Views

Evaluation of the Australian Wage Subsidy Special Youth ...

Evaluation of the Australian Wage Subsidy Special Youth ...

Evaluation of the Australian Wage Subsidy Special Youth ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

253<br />

8: Summary and Conclusions<br />

The underlying motivation for this work is <strong>the</strong> desire for a closer examination <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Australian</strong> wage subsidy SYETP. The main <strong>the</strong>oretical rationale for wage subsidies is<br />

that <strong>the</strong>y stimulate a gain in employment. However <strong>the</strong> review <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>oretical models<br />

<strong>of</strong> wage subsidies shows <strong>the</strong>y cannot provide unambiguous pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> an increase in<br />

employment. The importance <strong>of</strong> empirical evaluation <strong>of</strong> wage subsidies in part stems<br />

from this uncertainty. The central question remains: do wage subsidies improve<br />

employment prospects for <strong>the</strong> individual?<br />

Microeconomic evaluation evidence can demonstrate whe<strong>the</strong>r SYETP has led to a gain in<br />

employment for participants. While <strong>the</strong> main evaluation interest is <strong>the</strong> programme<br />

influence on job entry, <strong>the</strong> processes <strong>of</strong> participation and job entry can involve both<br />

observable and unobservable components that can introduce selection bias. An evaluation<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> program effect needs to account for this selection. Two evaluation methods are<br />

explored here – <strong>the</strong> Heckman selection bivariate probit model, and matching methods, in<br />

particular propensity score matching. Both identify a parameter corresponding to <strong>the</strong><br />

mean effect <strong>of</strong> treatment on <strong>the</strong> treated, which can be used to decide whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong><br />

programme leads to employment gains. However each method uses different assumptions<br />

to achieve this. Selection on unobservables is assumed by <strong>the</strong> Heckman bivariate probit,<br />

while selection on observables is assumed by matching methods.<br />

The review <strong>of</strong> recent overseas evidence for wage subsidies shows a variety <strong>of</strong> positive<br />

and negative impacts. Two key <strong>the</strong>mes are identified. The empirical ambiguity as to<br />

employment gains from wage subsidies remains unresolved. Contributing to this, in many<br />

studies <strong>the</strong> non-experimental evaluation methods insufficiently test <strong>the</strong> assumptions,<br />

alternative methods, and data issues. It was noted that meta-analysis might be more<br />

satisfactory in accounting for <strong>the</strong> deviations in evaluation evidence, since it was hard to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!