02.06.2014 Views

Evaluation of the Australian Wage Subsidy Special Youth ...

Evaluation of the Australian Wage Subsidy Special Youth ...

Evaluation of the Australian Wage Subsidy Special Youth ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

192<br />

5.8 Model <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> probability <strong>of</strong> attrition<br />

To construct <strong>the</strong> weight for non-response and selection that was provided with <strong>the</strong> data,<br />

administrative data was used to weight back to <strong>the</strong> population. Only survey data is<br />

available to be applied to estimates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sample attrition weight. As <strong>the</strong> attrition only<br />

occurs after <strong>the</strong> 1984 survey, it is likely <strong>the</strong> survey information is <strong>the</strong> most relevant for<br />

describing <strong>the</strong> characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> respondents, as it is ga<strong>the</strong>red at a more recent<br />

juncture while <strong>the</strong> administrative data would be more dated. One useful piece <strong>of</strong> relevant<br />

information that is not available in <strong>the</strong> data would be survey collection information about<br />

movers. This variable had a central role in describing non-response. However,<br />

unavailability means <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> this item to attrition cannot be assessed. The<br />

variables selected for explaining attrition are chosen from amongst those variables<br />

measured in <strong>the</strong> 1984 survey. The model is weighted by <strong>the</strong> initial nonresponse/design/selection<br />

weight in order to represent <strong>the</strong> 1984 data, so that <strong>the</strong> estimates<br />

which will be used for <strong>the</strong> attrition weights will only account for <strong>the</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r non-response<br />

to <strong>the</strong> later surveys to 1986. In this following model, it is assumed that <strong>the</strong> same process<br />

as that <strong>of</strong> attrition to 1986 defines attrition to <strong>the</strong> 1985 survey. 138<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> estimation for <strong>the</strong> probit model <strong>of</strong> attrition are shown in column 1 <strong>of</strong> table<br />

5.9. Those who were interviewed in South Australia and <strong>the</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Territory, Western<br />

Australia and Tasmania, were more likely to also be interviewed in later years to 1986.<br />

Additionally, those in country towns and rural areas, and those with a highest<br />

qualification to year 12, had a higher tendency to be interviewed again in later years.<br />

Those with longer unemployment prior to June 1984 were less likely to be surveyed<br />

again in later years, as were those who were missing <strong>the</strong> unemployment variable, had<br />

held longer jobs in <strong>the</strong> past, and those who were married. Participants in SYETP were<br />

more likely to respond to later surveys.<br />

138 In exploration <strong>of</strong> this, results for which are not shown, separate modelling <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> attrition to each year<br />

was not found to have different estimated models, with <strong>the</strong> same coefficients statistically significant and <strong>of</strong><br />

similar magnitude, and so common modelling <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> attrition was found appropriate.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!