02.06.2014 Views

a complete copy of the 2012 CAFR Report! - PSERs

a complete copy of the 2012 CAFR Report! - PSERs

a complete copy of the 2012 CAFR Report! - PSERs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FINANCIAL SECTION<br />

Management’s Discussion and Analysis (continued)<br />

Investment Income<br />

Net investment income decreased from $9.2 billion in<br />

FY 2011 to $1.1 billion in FY <strong>2012</strong>, which is consistent<br />

with <strong>the</strong> decrease in <strong>the</strong> investment rate <strong>of</strong> return from<br />

20.37% for FY 2011 to 3.43% for FY <strong>2012</strong>. Net investment<br />

income changed by $3.1 billion from $6.1 billion in FY<br />

2010 to $9.2 billion in FY 2011, which is consistent with<br />

<strong>the</strong> increase in <strong>the</strong> investment rate <strong>of</strong> return from 14.59%<br />

for FY 2010 to 20.37% for FY 2011. As depicted in <strong>the</strong><br />

following chart, investment earnings provided 71% <strong>of</strong><br />

PSERS’ funding over <strong>the</strong> past 20 years. Net investment<br />

income also includes investment expenses as a deduction.<br />

The “Total PSERS’ Benefits and Expenses” section that<br />

follows includes an analysis <strong>of</strong> investment expenses.<br />

PSERS' Sources <strong>of</strong> Funding<br />

Twenty Year History (1993-<strong>2012</strong>)<br />

Investment<br />

Earnings<br />

71%<br />

Member<br />

Contributions<br />

15%<br />

Investment expenses decreased by $33.4 million from<br />

$514.7 million in FY 2011 to $481.3 million in FY <strong>2012</strong><br />

mainly due to a decline in management fees in <strong>the</strong> real estate<br />

and alternative investment asset classes. This reduction is<br />

widely attributable to changes in fee structure brought on<br />

by partnerships maturing. Also contributing to this change<br />

was a decrease in performance fees in <strong>the</strong> public market<br />

sector from FY 2011 to FY <strong>2012</strong>. Investment expenses<br />

decreased by $7.6 million from $522.3 million in FY 2010<br />

to $514.7 million in FY 2011 mainly due to a decline in<br />

management fees in <strong>the</strong> alternative investment asset class.<br />

This reduction is widely attributable to changes in fee<br />

structure brought on by partnerships maturing.<br />

Administrative expenses decreased by $1.2 million from<br />

$57.7 million during FY 2011 compared to $56.5 million<br />

during FY <strong>2012</strong> as PSERS continued to diligently control<br />

administrative expenses. FY <strong>2012</strong> and FY 2011 are more<br />

consistent with historical values. FY 2010 administrative<br />

expenses <strong>of</strong> $30.5 million were significantly lower due<br />

to a $23.8 million reduction from <strong>the</strong> capitalization<br />

<strong>of</strong> previously expensed GASB 51 qualifying costs for<br />

computer systems development.<br />

Employer<br />

Contributions<br />

14%<br />

Total PSERS' Benefits and Expenses<br />

Fiscal Year Ended June 30, <strong>2012</strong><br />

Total PSERS’ Benefits and Expenses<br />

The primary source <strong>of</strong> expense during FY <strong>2012</strong> was for<br />

<strong>the</strong> payment <strong>of</strong> benefits approximating $6.0 billion. The<br />

breakdown consisted <strong>of</strong> $5.7 billion for Pension, $97.0<br />

million for <strong>the</strong> PA program, and $213.0 million for HOP<br />

benefits. The chart at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> this page illustrates <strong>the</strong><br />

significant portion <strong>of</strong> expenses attributable to benefit<br />

payments.<br />

Total PSERS’ benefit expense increased from $5.6 billion<br />

in FY 2011 to $6.0 billion in FY <strong>2012</strong>. The increase is<br />

attributable to higher lump sum payments as well as an<br />

ongoing increase to <strong>the</strong> average monthly benefit and an<br />

increase in <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> members receiving benefits.<br />

There was a decrease in fourth quarter retirements, in<br />

FY <strong>2012</strong> versus <strong>the</strong> same period in FY 2011, resultng in<br />

a lower pension benefits payable figure at June 30, <strong>2012</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> $495.0 million compared to $646.4 million at June<br />

30, 2011. New retirements during FY <strong>2012</strong> outpaced <strong>the</strong><br />

number from FY 2011 by approximately 6%. Benefit<br />

expense increased from $5.3 billion in FY 2010 to $5.6<br />

billion in FY 2011. This increase is attributable to <strong>the</strong><br />

number <strong>of</strong> new retirements for <strong>the</strong> year, higher lump sum<br />

payments, as well as an ongoing increase to <strong>the</strong> average<br />

monthly benefit.<br />

PAGE 33<br />

Benefits<br />

91.7%<br />

Administrative<br />

expenses<br />

0.9%<br />

Investment<br />

expenses<br />

7.4%

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!