Long term Cost analysis Yea r Capital cost $ Annual Recurrent cost $ Additional Education cost (EETC) $ Cumulative cost $ Cumulative Education Savings $ Cost (-spending/ +saving) $ 1 1,228,500 5,440,758 2,581,508 9,250,766 / -9,250,766 2 / 5,440,758 7,744,523 22,436,047 / -22,436,047 3 / 5,440,758 7,744,523 35,621,328 / -35,621,328 4 / 5,440,758 7,744,523 48,806,609 / -48,806,609 5 / 5,440,758 7,744,523 61,991,890 / -61,991,890 6 / 5,440,758 7,744,523 75,177,171 8,199,565 -66,977,606 7 / 5,440,758 7,744,523 88,362,452 24,598,695 -63,763,757 8 / 5,440,758 7,744,523 101,547,733 49,197,390 -52,350,343 9 / 5,440,758 7,744,523 114,733,014 81,995,650 -32,737,364 10 / 5,440,758 7,744,523 127,918,295 122,993,475 -4,924,820 11 / 5,440,758 7,744,523 141,103,576 172,190,865 +31,087,289
Cost Effectiveness • Long term cost analysis showed that the cost of UNHS could be offset by savings from reduced burden on special education • Positive gain at 10-11 years after implementation.