02.06.2014 Views

2010 - Public Relations Society of America

2010 - Public Relations Society of America

2010 - Public Relations Society of America

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

viewed to some degree as a valuable public relations practice by practitioners and business<br />

people because <strong>of</strong> perceived multiplier effects.<br />

The commonly held belief in implied third-party endorsement effect <strong>of</strong> news media may<br />

well be merited despite mixed results <strong>of</strong> academic experiments and surveys. Perhaps the<br />

definition <strong>of</strong> “media” needs to be reconsidered beyond “news media” when analyzing<br />

endorsement effects. In today’s communication landscape, more media formats and forums exist<br />

– many <strong>of</strong> them online – and many may <strong>of</strong>fer an implied an endorsement effect to different<br />

audiences. The “a-ha” realization may be that the endorsement effect actually comes from<br />

multiple media types, not just the news media. Consequently, a multifaceted approach to<br />

communication may, ultimately, produce the most successful and effective results for public<br />

relations pr<strong>of</strong>essionals and their clients. Rather than limiting or diminishing the role and value <strong>of</strong><br />

public relations, this expanded idea <strong>of</strong> third-party endorsement may require practitioners to<br />

develop new, more sophisticated communication strategies using a variety <strong>of</strong> media channels.<br />

Certainly these notions warrant future research.<br />

In conclusion, the long-time role <strong>of</strong> public relations to pitch and secure story placements<br />

in independent media channels such as newspapers, magazines and trade journals, is likely to<br />

continue based on the perceived value <strong>of</strong> these stories by PR practitioners, their clients and<br />

business people.<br />

References<br />

Baran, S.J. & Davis, D.K. (2006). Mass communication theory: Foundations,<br />

ferment, and future. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.<br />

Berkowitz, S. (1997). Analyzing qualitative data. In J. Frechtling and L. Sharp (Eds.), User-<br />

Friendly Handbook for Mixed Method Evaluations. Arlington, VA: Division <strong>of</strong> Research,<br />

Evaluation and Communication, National Science Foundation.<br />

Bogdan, R.C., & Biklin, S.K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to<br />

theory and methods. 3 rd ed.. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.<br />

Cameron, G.T. (1994). Does publicity outperform advertising? An experimental test <strong>of</strong> third<br />

-party endorsement. Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> Research. 6(3), 185-207.<br />

Cameron, G.T., Wilcox, D.L., Reber, B.H., & Shin, J.A. (2008). <strong>Public</strong> relations<br />

today: managing competition and conflict. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.<br />

Geary, D.L. (2005). The decline <strong>of</strong> media credibility and its impact on public relations. <strong>Public</strong><br />

<strong>Relations</strong> Quarterly, 50, 3, 8-12.<br />

Grunig, J.E., & Grunig, L.A. (2000). When conventional wisdom meets research: The myth<br />

<strong>of</strong> implied third-party endorsement. Research: A supplement <strong>of</strong> pr reporter, 8, 1-4.<br />

Guth, D.W., & Marsh, C.M. (2007). <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Relations</strong>: A values-driven approach. Boston:<br />

Pearson Education, Inc.<br />

Hallahan, K. (1999 a). Content class as a contextual cue in the cognitive processing <strong>of</strong> publicity<br />

versus advertising. Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> Research, 11(4), 293-320.<br />

Hallahan, K. (1999 b). No Virginia, it’s not true what they say about publicity’s<br />

“Implied Third-Party Endorsement” effect. <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> Review, 25, 331-350.<br />

Jo, S. (2004). Effect <strong>of</strong> content type on impact: Editorial vs. advertising. <strong>Public</strong><br />

<strong>Relations</strong> Review, 30, 503-512.<br />

Michaelson, D., & Stacks, D.W. (2007). Exploring the comparative communications<br />

effectiveness <strong>of</strong> advertising and public relations: An experimental study <strong>of</strong> initial<br />

branding advantage. Institute for <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Relations</strong>. www.instituteforpr.org<br />

Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. (2009, September 13). Press Accuracy Rating<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!