02.06.2014 Views

2010 - Public Relations Society of America

2010 - Public Relations Society of America

2010 - Public Relations Society of America

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

This question did not look at the social media usage from each particular brand as in<br />

research question two, but instead Millennials’ social media usage in general. The significant<br />

correlations support the idea that the more these technological Millennials interact with social<br />

media, the more they tend to favor the top 10 social companies/brands. Based on the results from<br />

research question two, this positive correlation was somewhat expected. The companies/brands<br />

that were selected as the top 10 most social brands were selected because <strong>of</strong> their innate use <strong>of</strong><br />

engaging audiences with social media. Those Millennials who use social media should<br />

seemingly positively correlate with these brands based on the simple fact that they are engaging<br />

with tools that have made these companies/brands rise to the top <strong>of</strong> the list. The more tools with<br />

which Millennials engage, the more opportunity they have to exposure to one or more <strong>of</strong> these<br />

companies. Furthermore, the more social media tools that Millennials use, the more comfortable<br />

they likely are with interacting with each company/brand because <strong>of</strong> the company’s/brand’s<br />

extensive use <strong>of</strong> the social media.<br />

Hypothesis #3. The third hypothesis in the current study states, “Millennial students’<br />

satisfaction with the relationship they have with one <strong>of</strong> the top 10 social brands will be positively<br />

associated with the company/brand through a social media outlet.” A correlation analysis was<br />

run for the number <strong>of</strong> social media tools (e.g., 0 = no tools, 1 = 1 social media tool contact, etc.)<br />

to which participants were exposed by each company/brand and wanting their relationship to<br />

continue for a long time (1 = strongly agree to 7 = strongly disagree) with each respective<br />

company/brand. Results indicated no significant correlations for the number <strong>of</strong> social media<br />

tools that participants were exposed to by each company/brand and wanting their relationship to<br />

continue with that company/brand for a long time. As indicated from the results in Table 6<br />

(Appendix F), the number <strong>of</strong> social media tools Millennials were exposed to by each <strong>of</strong> these<br />

companies did not relate to those same Millennials wanting to maintain a relationship with the<br />

company/brand for a long time.<br />

Although the results for Sony reached significance, none <strong>of</strong> the other companies/brands<br />

indicated a significant correlation between the number <strong>of</strong> social media tools that participants<br />

were exposed to by each company/brand and a desire for their relationship to continue with that<br />

company/brand for a long time. This finding supports the literature (Flanagin and Metzger, 2008:<br />

Lenhart, Madden, Macgill, & Smith, 2007; Mazzarella, 2006) on the Millennials in regard to<br />

finding the fine line between engaging and tuning out completely. Attracting and maintaining<br />

their attention continues to be a challenge for public relations practitioners who are desperately<br />

trying to reach this key market. While Millennial students have a more favorable perception <strong>of</strong><br />

most <strong>of</strong> the top 10 social companies/brands if they have had relationship with them through a<br />

social media tool, as borne out by hypothesis two, as those social media tool interactions<br />

increase, it does not necessarily increase their satisfaction with that particular company/brand.<br />

Data from the current study support the idea that more types <strong>of</strong> social media usage does not<br />

increase user satisfaction with the relationship with a company/brand. These results are<br />

consistent with existing research that encourages public relations practitioners to engage in only<br />

those social media tools that they are willing to devote the time, resources and effort into making<br />

succeed (Gillin, 2007; Li and Bern<strong>of</strong>f, 2008; Scott, 2007). This study further supports the<br />

recommendation <strong>of</strong> engaging in only those social media for which public relations practitioners<br />

are ready because engaging in multiple social media tools does not seem to increase the chances<br />

<strong>of</strong> successfully establishing a mutually beneficial relationship with the Millennial Generation.<br />

Research Question #4. Research question number four asked, “To what extent, if any, is<br />

there a difference between gender and each social media tool?” A chi-square test was run for<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!