02.06.2014 Views

2010 - Public Relations Society of America

2010 - Public Relations Society of America

2010 - Public Relations Society of America

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Millennials say they have done so. Statistics in this study provide a glimpse <strong>of</strong> the opportunities<br />

that exist for public relations pr<strong>of</strong>essionals to target this engaged audience.<br />

Current Investigation<br />

When research came to a point <strong>of</strong> engagement with studying different practices <strong>of</strong> public<br />

relations, Grunig and Hunt’s four models <strong>of</strong> public relations were developed to help practitioners<br />

become better equipped with the when and how to use their communications skills to solve<br />

public relations problems. The current study is being presented within Grunig and Hunt’s (1984)<br />

four models <strong>of</strong> public relations through the relationship management framework lens. The<br />

question <strong>of</strong> how public relations practitioners are using social media tools to effectively reach<br />

Millennial audiences will be addressed through these guiding foundational blocks.<br />

The following research questions and hypotheses are advanced:<br />

RQ 1 : Do Millennial students interact with one particular social media tool over another?<br />

H 1 :<br />

Millennial students who indicate they interact with company/brand e-mail will generate<br />

the most committed relationship over all other company/brand social media tools.<br />

RQ 2 : What is the relationship between a Millennial student’s commitment to maintaining a<br />

relationship with one <strong>of</strong> the top 10 most social company/brand and the interaction <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Millennial student with a social media tool <strong>of</strong> that company/brand?<br />

H 2 :<br />

Those Millennial students who have had a relationship with the top 10 social brands via<br />

social media tools will be more likely to have a favorable perception <strong>of</strong> that<br />

company/brand.<br />

RQ 3 : To what extent is a Millennial students’ favorable perception <strong>of</strong> the organization<br />

positively associated with his or her active social media behavior?<br />

H 3 : Millennial students’ satisfaction with the relationship they have with one <strong>of</strong> the top 10<br />

social brands will be positively associated with the company/brand through a social<br />

media outlet.<br />

RQ 4 : To what extent, if any, is there a difference between gender and each social media tool?<br />

H 4 :<br />

Millennial males will be more likely to interact with social media tools than Millennial<br />

females.<br />

Methodology<br />

In selecting companies or brands to be investigated in targeting Millennials from a public<br />

relations perspective in this study, no list with this exact criteria emerged. However, one list<br />

dubbed by Advertising Age as the “Most Social Brands <strong>of</strong> 2008,” rose to the top. This list is<br />

intriguing and relevant because it outlines the brand or branded company product that is<br />

mentioned most <strong>of</strong>ten in social media. Brands were chosen based on the conversation volume on<br />

a variety <strong>of</strong> social networking, blogging and microblogging sites according to Klaasen’s (2009)<br />

article. “This survey stuck to a pretty rudimentary metric—it measures mentions, not the<br />

sentiment <strong>of</strong> those mentions or the word parings” (Klaasen, 2009, p. 1). Sheer volume <strong>of</strong><br />

conversations on social media tools is what caused each <strong>of</strong> these top 10 companies/brands rise to<br />

the top <strong>of</strong> the list. The top 10 list includes: iPhone, CNN, Apple, Disney, Xbox, Starbucks, iPod,<br />

MTV, Sony, and Dell.<br />

Participants<br />

Students from two Midwestern universities were selected to complete the survey.<br />

Location, proximity <strong>of</strong> universities, and similar demographics <strong>of</strong> the student body at both<br />

universities provided an opportunity for a larger number <strong>of</strong> Millennial students to be surveyed.<br />

The population <strong>of</strong> this study consisted <strong>of</strong> Millennial students from both Midwest<br />

universities. Participants were selected because most fit the Millennial demographic. Those<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!